Does NKJV remove Lord, God, heaven, repent, blood, hell, JEHOVAH, New Testament, damnation & devils? 

I can understand how some of it is not understandable with some of the outdated words of the old KJV but there's one word in 2 Timothy1:15 that got me wondering why they needed to update the first word Maybe I'm Wrong but it made sense to me and I wonder if you've checked out the difference between (the mark) going (in) vs going (on)

​@@kaseycooper7141This is one of Mark Wards "false flag" findings. The word, IN, back in 1600s, meant , ON. Example, I punched him IN the face or I put the wagon IN the meadow. Obviously, my fist didnt go inside his face or the wagon wasnt put into hole, both were put upon the surface.

To bad people arnt trying to follow GODS word instead of disputing the true word of GOD and honoring GODS word just like the true word of GOD says not like the defiled modern counterfeit bibles that defile the word of God and change the meaning of the word its like THE LORD JESUS CHRIST said in these words John 12:48-50 (KJV) He that rejecteth me, and receiveth not my words, hath one that judgeth him: the word that I have spoken, the same shall judge him in the last day. For I have not spoken of myself; but the Father which sent me, he gave me a commandment, what I should say, and what I should speak. And I know that his commandment is life everlasting: whatsoever I speak therefore, even as the Father said unto me, so I speak.John 14:8-26 (KJV) Philip saith unto him, Lord, shew us the Father, and it sufficeth us. Jesus saith unto him, Have I been so long time with you, and yet hast thou not known me, Philip? he that hath seen me hath seen the Father; and how sayest thou then, Shew us the Father? Believest thou not that I am in the Father, and the Father in me? the words that I speak unto you I speak not of myself: but the Father that dwelleth in me, he doeth the works. Believe me that I am in the Father, and the Father in me: or else believe me for the very works' sake. Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that believeth on me, the works that I do shall he do also; and greater works than these shall he do; because I go unto my Father. And whatsoever ye shall ask in my name, that will I do, that the Father may be glorified in the Son. If ye shall ask any thing in my name, I will do it. If ye love me, keep my commandments. And I will pray the Father, and he shall give you another Comforter, that he may abide with you for ever; Even the Spirit of truth; whom the world cannot receive, because it seeth him not, neither knoweth him: but ye know him; for he dwelleth with you, and shall be in you. I will not leave you comfortless: I will come to you. Yet a little while, and the world seeth me no more; but ye see me: because I live, ye shall live also. At that day ye shall know that I am in my Father, and ye in me, and I in you. He that hath my commandments, and keepeth them, he it is that loveth me: and he that loveth me shall be loved of my Father, and I will love him, and will manifest myself to him. Judas saith unto him, not Iscariot, Lord, how is it that thou wilt manifest thyself unto us, and not unto the world? Jesus answered and said unto him, If a man love me, he will keep my words: and my Father will love him, and we will come unto him, and make our abode with him. He that loveth me not keepeth not my sayings: and the word which ye hear is not mine, but the Father's which sent me. These things have I spoken unto you, being yet present with you. But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you.Galatians 1:7-12 (KJV) Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ. But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed. As we said before, so say I now again, If any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed. For do I now persuade men, or God? or do I seek to please men? for if I yet pleased men, I should not be the servant of Christ. But I certify you, brethren, that the gospel which was preached of me is not after man. For I neither received it of man, neither was I taught it, but by the revelation of Jesus Christ.((( GOD’S WORD IS A LAW TO BE OBEYED ))) Luke 8:21 kjv And he answered and said unto them, My mother and my brethren are these which hear the word of God, and do it. Luke 11:28 kjv But he said, Yea rather, blessed are they that hear the word of God, and keep it. James 1:22-25 kjv (22) But be ye doers of the word, and not hearers only, deceiving your own selves. (23) For if any be a hearer of the word, and not a doer, he is like unto a man beholding his natural face in a glass: (24) For he beholdeth himself, and goeth his way, and straightway forgetteth what manner of man he was. (25) But whoso looketh into the perfect law of liberty, and continueth therein, he being not a forgetful hearer, but a doer of the work, this man shall be blessed in his deed.

Thats how I found out they were currrtp by reading them evidently somthing u have not done that u really should if u honor GODS WORD

there's an easy way to find out who set alight the bible changes in 1840 the westcott and hort duo ttwo men in the anglican church. they changed the greek koinaniia to a corrupt greek out of alexandria egypt their intention was get rid of the kj bible that hort said he hated. changing Gods preserved inerrant word shows no fear of our heavenly family. both the diety and the blood are frequently removed from new age books calling themselves bibles but are another Jesus. there surely can only be one pure preserved word preserved of God errant in english. it's the majority text the textus receptus

I am very glad this was a blessing and a help for you!

Thanks! I am glad it was a blessing!

Thanks! I’m glad it was a blessing!

So what do you say? Is NKJV on par with KJV? Did it really omit all these words?

​@jesusislord-ce1or did you even watch the video?

There is nothing beneficial about a new age Bible version ushering many into the eventual religion of Anti-Christ.

@@jesusislordoflordsamen hi, I wouldn’t say it’s on par, the KJV is superior in every way however I use the NKJV if there’s a word or passage that I don’t fully understand to see how it has translated it and sometimes it may help. That’s why I said I use both. Out of all the so called ‘modern’ versions it’s the only one worth using. As for the words being omitted, they’ve just been translated differently rather than fully removed, but this doesn’t bother me because the NKJV isn’t the authoritative version for me and use it as a reference. I think it would bother me if it was the only version I was using though.

Thanks and Amen brother!

I’m glad this was a blessing. I feel a burden to get truth to God’s people on this topic.

Thanks! I am glad it was a blessing!

I’m glad it was a blessing! The NKJV has been attacked almost as much as the KJV if not more. We need the truth to get out there.

Ralph, that’s been a struggle for me, being in the Philippines. I’ve tried to read KJV with my wife, but it takes extra explaining. She speaks English, but it’s still a second language. I was concerned about using the NKJV after hearing Riplinger and others demonize it over the years, even though I’m sure my wife would understand it better. Pastor Scott sure helped me out with this video.

28 In the end of the sabbath, as it began to dawn toward the first day of the week, came Mary Magdalene and the other Mary to see the sepulchre. (KJV) 28 Now after the Sabbath, as the first day of the week began to dawn, Mary Magdalene and the other Mary came to see the tomb. (NKJV) The Greek is ὀψέ opse. Both versions are saying the same thing, though the NKJV makes it clearer. One thing to keep in mind is the hours of the sabbath in the Bible (and as currently observed by Jews), ends at nightfall. So, the dawn (which both versions say) is clearly "after the sabbath."

I have several as well. I would get rid of the Kanye Bible though if i was given one. lol

I’m glad it was a blessing and a help!

Thanks for your kind words! I appreciate them

Masoretes deliberately made changes against Christianity. Why would you trust the enemies of Christ lol?

The reason we have so many modern Bibles is money, plain and simple.

Thanks! God bless you my friend!

I really like the Geneva Bible. I prefer Geneva and KJV and NKJV.

It's from the devil because it says the spirit "came down" instead of "descended!" - some kjvo sheep, probably.

There are differences between the words and multiple definitions of each word too. In the dictionary it states: Condemnation: noun con·​dem·​na·​tion ˌkän-ˌdem-ˈnā-shən -dəm- Synonyms of condemnation 1 : CENSURE, BLAME … the Quakers, in their uncompromising condemnation of war … -William Ralph Inge 2 : the act of judicially condemning 3 : the state of being condemned … in the hopeless hour of condemnation … -Washington Irving 4 : a reason for condemning His conduct was sufficient condemnation. Judgment: noun judg·​ment ˈjəj-mənt variants or judgement Synonyms of judgment 1 a : the process of forming an opinion or evaluation by discerning and comparing careful judgment of the odds b : an opinion or estimate so formed is not worth doing in my judgment 2 a : the capacity for judging : DISCERNMENT be guided by your own judgment showing poor judgment b : the exercise of this capacity a situation requiring careful judgment 3 a : a formal utterance of an authoritative opinion b : an opinion so pronounced 4 a : a formal decision given by a court b (1) : an obligation (such as a debt) created by the decree of a court (2) : a certificate evidencing such a decree 5 a capitalized : the final judging of humankind by God sinners awaiting Judgment b : a divine sentence or decision specifically : a calamity held to be sent by God believed their bad luck to be a judgment upon them 6 : a proposition stating something believed or asserted

I am glad this was helpful for you. I am considering doing a study on Hell soon, but I have spoken deeper on this subject here as well: “A History of Heavenly Things (John 3:12-16)” ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-_6VXjFLbsKs.html

@@PastorScottIngram Thank you for the link. I will check it out.

My congregation has moved toward a 50/50 in its usage of KJV and the NKJV. I have used the KJV from the pulpit and have been using the NKJV more now. I feel I need to use it at times to help people grasp the meaning better. So, I have been referencing both to help us see the original languages better than have been passed down to every generation.

It is truly amazing how if you are looking for the truth and asking God which is the truth of his word he will reveal his( perfectly purified preserved words) like it tells us in Psalms12:6-7 and things that are different are not the same. you're right you should check out the difference between the mark going (in) vs going (on) and I know most people love to talk about the outdated arcade words of the KJV which there are some that we do not use anymore and are definitely outdated because of our modern language but you should check out 2 Timothy 2:15 it uses the word study in the old KJV but apparently that word is outdated to the ones that make the more modern versions

Thanks for sharing your story. I discussed the differences in the KJV and NIV here: What is the Difference in the KJV and NIV? ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-KC50Ilop9X0.html

Do you think you are somehow more "saved" now or better doing the commands of Yahweh which Jesus told you to keep? How have the "differences" between the two made you "more holy," if you will. That's what nobody can ever explain to me.

@@whoavadis1984 I will try to explain. but I don't know where you got these questions from. The differences between the Bible's to me is about the purity and preservation of the words of God not about being "more holy" because I'm not sure if I'm holy at all and if you are saved you should know that no one is "more saved" than anyone else. There is only saved or lost.

@@kaseycooper7141 then you are confessing that the obsession with the particular translation committee, team, method, etc. is secondary to the message, and that your only source for the decision as to which books even belong, was given to the Catholic Church at the council of Trent in 300 something a.d., and includes the apocrypha. Furthermore you confess that God, for some reason, then allowed His message (or, more specifically, His complete and true and canonical word,) to abide in those Roman hands for over a thousand years until inspiring Luther that the canonized word was actually wrong, and some books were actually not inspired, others were to be relegated to the back as unimportant and "Catholic." Then God waited two hundred years until inspiring a British monarch to translate just those NEW holy canonical words of God into English and then that would be the REAL, real true canonical word of God forever in English. Gotcha. What a weird God! My God Yahweh is omnipotent, omnipresent, omniscient, and omnibenevolent, and can just put His word in our hearts and lead us to truth by His grace and mercy and love for His creation which He called "very good," regardless of the efforts of your human masters to try to put stumbling blocks in front of His Children seeking His Christ, by humans selling the "word of God" for a profit, twisting its simple message to suit their own lusts for power, money, fame, and the other things of this world.

Where have you seen changes?

Just happened on your post here, and I am moved to say a little something. I am nearly 64 years old, and I have intensively studied and taught English for almost 40 of those years. I seem to have a natural ear for what is right and what is wrong in any English text - a love of words, their feeling, their texture...even the "taste" of them on my tongue. I'ts weird, I know, but it is...let me just say it's a talent I have. I've had, as a sinner, much experience with Psalm 51, and especially with v.2: "wash me throughly from my iniquity." I even remember reading an article that discussed why "throughly" was a better word than "thoroughly ." Yet now, when I go there, in my KJV, it's "thoroughly" (although a 100 or so year old KJV bible I own still has "throughly"). But it's this next one that is really "messing with my head." I remember, solid as a rock, learning the Lord's Prayer with "and forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those that trespass against us. "as WE forgive THOSE, that TRESSPASS against US." My developing young future English teacher mind could never forget the cadence - the rhythm - the rise and fall of the stressed and unstressed syllables - the glorious music of them (my mother used to reminisce about how, when I was around 2-3 years old, I somehow heard the term "corrugated cardboard," and I said nothing but that for two months, so fascinated was I with the sound and feel of those words). But now, I find, even in the 100-year-old KJV, "Forgive us our debts, as we forgive our debtors." It's heavy. It's clunky. No rhythm or music at all. I can explain easily about how you are wrong about any other so-called "Mandela Effect," but not this one. It seriously disturbs me. Thanks for listening.

Translations aren’t inspired. “For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost.” 2 Peter 1:21 holy men did not translate. They spoke.

Thanks! I do not trust the modern critical text due to the much omission and have made several videos on the differences. I hope you will have opportunity to check some of them out. God bless!

After seeing your graven images on the wall I don't believe I will trust your conclusion . There are several time the nkjv removes the diety of Jesus

I discussed these issues in these three videos if you’re interested: What is the Difference in the KJV 1611 and 1769? ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-pIPy6hlYImQ.html Is It Okay to Read A Bible OTHER Than the KJV? ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-DPEfBat8txI.html Why Use the New King James Version? ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-3N3Y22QdvLQ.html

Not sure what you are trying to say there.

I have taken the time to provide a video to answer this concern. You can find it here: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-onzwxbu1Qyw.html

Maybe

What part of this do u not understand Deuteronomy 4:2 (KJV) Ye shall not add unto the word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish ought from it, that ye may keep the commandments of the LORD your God which I command you.Revelation 22:18-19 (KJV) For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book: And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.Proverbs 30:5-6 (KJV) Every word of God is pure: he is a shield unto them that put their trust in him. Add thou not unto his words, lest he reprove thee, and thou be found a liar.Psalms 12:6-7 (KJV) The words of the LORD are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times. Thou shalt keep them, O LORD, thou shalt preserve them from this generation for ever.Revelation 19:13 (KJV) And he was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and his name is called The Word of God.John 1:1 (KJV) In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

I use the KJV and understand it just fine and that is what I will continue to preach and teach from. We need to explain scripture and rightly divide to ensure truth

I understand every bit of it. God has surely preserved his words in the TR. No debate here. @@rogerferrell861

@@dylansimmons7164 well u see the word of GOD say u need no man to teach u the holy GHOST will guide u and we sure don't teach them by changing the word of GOD around when the holy GHOST has already inspired it to the maxx if I don't understand somthing I pray about it and the holy GHOST reviles it to me lets leave the Bible writing to the LORD JESUS CHRIST and not man thats what I'm saying nothing more have a blessed day friend

@@dylansimmons7164 me too. I recommend the KJV firmly. But I don’t think we should make up lies about other translations to justify our position.

This was a rather short presentation compared with some other resources on this topic.... take your add meds and relax focus...

I hope you can. I know it was longer than some of my videos but felt it needed to be all in one video to properly answer this common assertion.

Do you believe the English of the 1769 KJV is the inspired words of God or is it in the original words of the Hebrew and Greek?

Using that logic, it should have never been translated into English.

@@TheRebeccaLivermore Not my logic...in God's word in Revelation. You might want read it and/or want to take that with Him on judgement day.

@@donnaguyton153 The Word of God is true. Hallelujah!

I have always used the KJV and NKJV in my preaching and Bible studies. I have always said that the KJV is more exact to the traditional text (which doesn’t remove the equivalent of 1 and 2 Peter from the Greek and Hebrew) while the NKJV is more instantly understandable. Both use the same traditional text passed down to every generation. Some English words translated in the KJV have changed meanings but are still exact from the 1769 understanding of those words. There are those who lie about this and this is why I am sharing this truth as every Christian should. We should all be people of the truth. The truth shall set you free is what the Lord said.

Let's look at the oldest versions that we have and see what they say. 18 Μαρτυρῶ ἐγὼ παντὶ τῷ ἀκούοντι τοὺς λόγους τῆς προφητείας τοῦ βιβλίου τούτου· ἐάν τις ἐπιθῇ ἐπ’ αὐτά, [o]ἐπιθήσει ὁ θεὸς ἐπ’ αὐτὸν τὰς πληγὰς τὰς γεγραμμένας ἐν τῷ βιβλίῳ τούτῳ· 19 καὶ ἐάν τις ἀφέλῃ ἀπὸ τῶν λόγων τοῦ βιβλίου τῆς προφητείας ταύτης, [p]ἀφελεῖ ὁ θεὸς τὸ μέρος αὐτοῦ ἀπὸ τοῦ ξύλου τῆς ζωῆς καὶ ἐκ τῆς πόλεως τῆς ἁγίας, τῶν γεγραμμένων ἐν τῷ βιβλίῳ τούτῳ. Obviously to have a translation a word is substituted for a different word, my question is, does that mean that we all need to learn Greek to truly follow what is written? And if so are all versions not in the original language an abomination? Does God and the Holy Spirit speak to us in the languages of the original Bible?

@@adrenalizd bahahahahaha give me a break man lol 😂

@@adrenalizd Psalms 12:6-7 (KJV) The words of the LORD are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times. Thou shalt keep them, O LORD, thou shalt preserve them from this generation for ever. This means 7 different languages do u understand this or does it need to be in Greek lol

God bless you all, I love the King James Version too and shall refrain from arguing as it is written, I only ask you brothers and sisters, did the King James Version not come from the original Hebrew,Aramaic and Greek, thus the same verses and commandments there were written? Are the arguments you use to say your version is the only version, the same words in the original language? If so do you really think that God only wanted us to read them as such? Are we not told to go out and teach, and how is it we can teach if the tongue is not known to the listeners? I love you all and may God bless you each one. Edited to add Hebrew and Aramaic to include the Old Testament.

@@adrenalizd the Bible is sacred its not just a book it is HOLY GHOST inspired it is genuine and has no need to be altered or revised or anything at all for that matter and in Hebrew and Greek It say the same thing the old king James 1611 say Deuteronomy 4:2 (KJV) Ye shall not add unto the word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish ought from it, that ye may keep the commandments of the LORD your God which I command you.Revelation 22:18-19 (KJV) For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book: And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.Proverbs 30:5-6 (KJV) Every word of God is pure: he is a shield unto them that put their trust in him. Add thou not unto his words, lest he reprove thee, and thou be found a liar.Psalms 12:6-7 (KJV) The words of the LORD are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times. Thou shalt keep them, O LORD, thou shalt preserve them from this generation for ever.Revelation 19:13 (KJV) And he was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and his name is called The Word of God.John 1:1 (KJV) In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.its about being biblical I love everyone also but principle over personality keep it biblical from the beginning old king James 1611 is just that I yield back lol

The KJV is more exact to the original words especially if you can understand the 1611 words as they were defined back then. The NKJV is more instantly understandable for today even though it some places it will not be as exact.

Simple. Accuracy of translation in our modern tongue. You missed literally half of the video.

@CC-iu7sq I missed nothing. You missed the point of the comment. KJB is more precise, pastor says nkjv is instantly understood, which is entirely different than being accurate.

@CC-iu7sq Is the word "waifs" more instantly understood more than "fatherless" used in KJB?? You can't have it both ways... the claim is that nkjv is easier because it's more modern language but there are many examples where this is simply not true at all.

@@Holy-Joe7 You literally point out a handful of verses that may have an entire story to explain why they were translated the way they were. I can give you thousands of verses that are instantly more understandable to a lost person and saved person alike. Example: The entire New Testament.

@@CC-iu7sq Oh, ok. 👏

I guess that is Sam Gimp’s opinion.

You should check out your study Bible with one of those old outdated KJV side by side on 2 Timothy 2:15 and ask yourself which one makes more sense then maybe go for the difference between the mark going (in) vs going (on) but maybe I don't know what I'm talking about just check for yourself and pray asking God where is his word perfectly purified and preserved from this generation forever like in Psalms12:6-7

@@kaseycooper7141 Not sure I understand the point. In 2 Tim. 2:15, the only question I might have would be "Study" (KJV) versus "Be diligent" (NKJV, NASB). Did you, perhaps, mean a different verse?

It just seemed odd to me that the first verses I ever read told me to study sounded like something I might have heard before like in school or something I know what study means but if I would have read be diligent instead of study first I probably would not be studying the word of God I have many books that say holy Bible across the front but none of the other has spoken to me in such a powerful way as the one that told me to study when I first opened it up after trying to give it away because I did not want to read it I just wanted to listen to the preacher without reading for myself but maybe it's just me

@kaseycooper7141 on February 21 at 12:15 PM (EST) I will be discussing that difference here on the channel . I hope you will be able to check it out.

My understanding is that "be diligent" is a bit closer to the Greek technically, but "be diligent" and "study" are saying the same thing, especially when you consider the rest of 2 Tim. 2:15.

Which KJV do you use then? The 1611? Or the 1769?

The KJV has 8 mistrannslations which are very easy to prove. All the verse in the NT which say first day of the week, should say first of the sabbaths. You can go to the Textus Receptus compare acts 20:7 using the original Greek texts used to produce the 1611 and most modern day bibles. It clearly shows it should say first of the sabbaths. Or one of the Sabbaths if you study letvicus 23. You will learn what the counti g of the sabbaths means.

@@davidc2361 - Only eight? I know of many more than eight, but maybe not as easy to show folks who can't read Hebrew or Greek. Aside from that, the greatest abomination is substituting "Yahweh," the Name above all names, almost 8000 times!

@@CC-iu7sq 1769 the only thing changed is spelling punctuation and things like that. It doesn't change doctrine or veer from the majority text.

@@markrobertsministries That’s objectively false and reiterated talking points given out by the Gipp and Ruckman crowds. There are dozens of verses where words were taken out and words added and rearranged that changed the meaning of said verses. Not the mention the thousands of updated word and grammar changes to be more relevant to 18th century English. You’ve never actually read the 1611 KJV. The 1769 is what you read. And it’s a revision with updated English and grammar.

Yes, most do not share the name of God consistently. I have been told the ASV does consistently use the word Jehovah to refer God though. Thanks for the catch on the commandment. We all make mistakes sometimes.

@@PastorScottIngram - To me, it's really blasphemous considering all the Texts and I don't know why more believers don't realize this. My biggest problem is when I keep mistyping Scripture references, so yeah, no condemnation there, sir. :)

The NKJV used the same texts. The differences did not weaken doctrines, in my opinion, as I have shown here. My point is that we should not use this meme because it's only desire is to deceive and that is not of God. I have been studying Riplinger lately and she didn't have any theological training whatsoever, but she did go to school for advertising and she knows how to get a rise out of people by putting an idea in their heads. Just watch one of her presentations! If one wants to make a point about the accuracy of the KJV, I don't believe she is a good person to get behind. It is better to simply show people the facts of the removal of large portions of scripture in modern translations and then let them decide and I personally believe they will see that the KJV is more exact and the NKJV is simply more instantly understandable to the traditional text as I have said beforehand. Either way, thanks for watching and commenting.

The KJV used texts other than the TR and masoretic as well. Have you not read on what texts were used for the revisions to the KJV and who performed them? It’s okay to update language. The English language changes, brother. Beowulf, which is not understandable in modern English, is written in English. Language changes over time. The NKJV is a terrific translation that God has used and worked though to bring people to him.

⁠God bless you pastor my question concerning the NKJV is that it removes the second person plural pronouns which leads to and accuracy and misinterpretation which makes the NKJV irrelevant? What would be the purpose of having a Bible that that can lead to inaccuracy and misinterpretation?

@terrellking4174 I think the removal of the second person pronouns does make the NKJV less exact, but I don’t think it disqualifies it as a usable translation though because of that fact. There was actually a big discussion when they were making the NKJV about including the second person pronouns but the choice to do it without them was decided.

Thanks pastor for the response correct me if I’m wrong but we as Christian’s believe the God the father threw the Holy Spirit Author of book

“Hell” is technically okay, as long as one realizes it just means “hole” or “place where something is hidden or unseen,” and has no inherent meaning of “inescapable torture chamber” as most now mistakenly assume it means.

@@DrewCosten Amen

​@@DrewCostenwell thats what jesus said it was many times and thats what everyone else said it was. you cant read the word hell to mean "hole" to prove there isnt an afterlife. what? do we not go to heaven either? and im not saying this from a kjv only perspective or anything.

@@swamprat22 I didn’t say anything about an afterlife. That said, I don’t believe in one, no. Only a resurrection. Too big a topic for a RU-vid comment, but search for “What the Bible really says about heaven, hell, judgement, death, sin, and salvation” on the True Biblical Freedom page with my name and you’ll find a detailed explanation, using only the KJV.

That's nonsense. Keep telling yourself that to feel better.