Apart from the excellent content (as usual), I must compliment you on the stellar video editing. Best irony: you were providing tips on how to excel in writing without emulating other media BUT you more than delivered on the visual pizzazz. I salute you. 😃
Great video man! I started to adapt my screenplays into books, and the challenge has been trying to leverage the book form. This stuff is super useful!
You are right on the mark with your section on internals. I feel like there are such an abundance of writing advice videos that stress the "show don't tell" philosophy so much that as a writer I feel guilty if I try to go into what my character is thinking. "You can't SAY how and why he's frustrated, you have to show him rubbing the bridge of his nose and looking down shaking his head and let the reader surmise the reason!" Not only does this showing get very tiring and repetitive, but whenever I break away from it I feel like I'm doing something wrong. Glad to hear (for once, really) that it is okay to spend some time exploring the character's thoughts in a few sentences or even a paragraph. One video I saw basically forbid any telling and said if I want to be a good writer that "99%" of my text should be showing, which, when I tried it, resulted in a very dry script, like it was just stage play directions.
But comic books are just as much of a visual medium as TV and movies. I kind of expect them to be this way...at least the mainstream comics. Independent and international (i.e., mangas) are probably a different story.
Got it! Don't depend on sight so much, consider other senses * Pace & progression. Light in the shade it's been called, where there's a fluctuation between speed and action & slow sensation. It's not always hard pounding heavy metal, or calm classical strumming. Use, all the tools in the toolbox. I can watch you all day! Thank You! I've learned so much already from your channel I stumbled on last week! Thank You! 👍💥
Timing is weird. I was reading back through one of my stories out loud and thought that I had a background character teleport. Turns out, I just hadn't made a scene FEEL like time had passed. A fairly significant amount of time. Enough that the background character could, feasibly, shower, go back downstairs, and start his reading exercises. So I went back and added a dream sequence that made it feel like the main character took longer than a two-second nap (which she did). Writing through this right now I think I could have just inserted what amounts to an establishing shot of the background character waking up the napping main character by stomping down the hall. Eh. Conveying the modulated flow of time is difficult, and takes a lot of practice. Immersion is such a delicate flower, and if you crank the blower handle too hard, the petals might fly right off instead of burning at a steady, satisfying pace. I agree with all of this video (and, as another commenter noted, very neat, clean video editing). To the overall advice to Read More Books I would add that sometimes I am really intimidated by well-written books. It isn't particularly often that I feel like I have a lot to add to them, as it were (and usually I just focus on my inadequacies). I have found that reading poorly-written books engages the more analytical side of my brain, and I sometimes think more positively about fixing those areas that are lacking in my own stories. Lois McMaster Bujold's Sharing Knife universe is half-finished. The main character is stagnant, there's a supreme race that is justifiably racist somehow, and the magic system feels made up on the fly. With the bones exposed, we have such thought-provoking ideas as: How might this scene be better written? How could this world be better presented so it doesn't feel like I went to a national park and it was literally just some rich guy's huge lawn with a pond or two thrown in? How can I integrate accents and idioms without it feeling hecka corny? Why is the main character painted as a strong female lead, but she's literally wrong about everything? And weak? Seriously, what is up with this book? Patrick Rothfuss describes music so I can feel the same reading a book as I do listening to an aria, and I have no idea how he does it, nor can I hope to achieve that level of prose. It's hard to get past this mindset. Also, I have to say I was more able to recognize the Better Version of some things after reading the Inferior Version. It pays to mix and match. Anyway. Long comment. Hopefully you get more Engagement, because I do think movies can have a detrimental effect, and it is refreshing to hear it articulated so well.
Question: What's the difference between (internals) and filler words, telling, flashbacks, and info dumping. I'd like to show, my reader's what's going on inside, however, I'd feel like I'd be committing a big, no-no. ☝️💥☝️
