Efficient & Good-Looking Industrial Atmospheric Mining Ship / Space Engineers Tutorial 

You can get the blueprint and look at it as much as you need, it's linked in the description Pausing is also an option

@@DanSher Watching someone else's videos is also an option. Don't be an ass.

@@dimesio find me that someone else who can provide niche tips like I can, barely any competition means I can be as huge of an ass ass I want! :P

@@dimesio God forbid somebody have an opinion. Don't be an ass.

@@DanSher the shaking of the camera makes it an absolute pain to watch your videos. bad forbuisiness.

Separately recording video and audio would be a bit annoying, I'll just try to move less so the cuts aren't as jumpy and get better at speaking so there are less cuts that need to be made

@@DanSher Fair enough. I appreciate you taking it into consideration, however you hope to improve.

I moved too much and did too many cuts, I'll try to move less and speak in larger chunks that require less cuts in the future videos

@@DanSher Do what you enjoy. I'm just some YT asshole.

The ores are distributed horizontally in the deposit, you can easily dig out a vertical hole while you're empty, but you need to mine the deposit horizontally, unless your miner is large enough to mine it in a single vertical hole

Horizontal miner can also save some components and power. Most vertical miners need enough thrusters to lift full load on 2 directions (upwards and backwards). More thrusters = more weight = even more thrusters = more power consumption = more batteries = more bulk (+ lots of drills and "ugliness"). Also, vertical miners needs to drill through a lot of dirt and stone just to mine a thin layer of ore. And if you want to mine more, you need another hole through that junk again. It's better to drill one hole to the right depth and then mine the vein horizontally. You can absolutely make wonderful vertical miner with two cockpits or remote control to achieve same thrust:cargo ratio, but horizontal miners are more convenient.

@@themoss7115 yeah, generally you want to have a single main thrust direction (upwards in pretty much all cases) and have only enough thrust in other directions for smaller velocity adjustments while performing larger maneuvers by rotating the ship

@@themoss7115 I think I understand. If I am to stay only on the planet it is better to have a horizantal miner because of the way the veins are. Thin but large diameter cylinder vs the asteroids where they are Cylindrical in shape smaller diameter but longer in length. And when in Space the vertical and horizantal really means nothing :) This is quite a different approach from how I play and its exciting... This is exactly why I love Space Engineers so much. Change just variable and its a whole new game...

I'm always saying this

Huh, weird, will check the blueprint next time I play, maybe it got saved with damage states, though the question then is how did it get damaged in the first place

Same reason as why not small ejectors, small inventory makes them eject at a slower rate

It has plenty of backwards thrust and if you need even more, you can always just pitch up and use the spare upward thrust, more efficient and fun that way

So true bestie

I will try to move less and speak in a way that requires less cuts in the future videos, got it