Emergency Landing RAF Typhoon takes Arrestor cable 

dramatic depth in puppetry ! I loved that too ...

FAB - No def the unsung heroes, as this was happening, everything was done in a calm controled fashion. Well done to all

Agree

No not brake failure. As soon as he took off he got alarms re under carriage. So decided on emergency landing

They would check both, if it leaked fluid esp hydraulic, it could cause issues or possible debris. Def would check both. Airplane first, safe it. Extract pilot etc

I use to watch the Vulcan’s when i was a child, you knew when they were taking off. What a noise

What's going on with the new fire trucks? They look like bread vans!

@@keithhunt4959 Vulcans operated from RAF Coningsby in the mid 60s.

Thanks 👍

I been to Donna once, and really enjoyed it

Also good for those you missed the streams

This is the 2nd time i seen a Typhoon take the cable, but first time i have filmed it. But no sparks on either like the F15. Which is strange.

The American RHAG System is different plus the F-15 is a lot heavier. I was in Saudi working on Tornado for BAe Systems when one of the US Aircraft Carriers had an Emergency one evening and due to it being Dark and serious they decided to land all airborne aircraft on Dharan's airbase we had the luxury of 3 runways so they were landing on both the Military and Civil runways during the recovery an F14 declared a hydraulic emergency and wanted to take the RHAG so the Saudi Airforce Air Traffic controller decided to land it on the Civil runway which had a French Air Force mobile RHAG system rigged for Mirages on it well when the F14 landed it ripped the whole system out of the desert and towed it down the runway causing a lot of damage to the surface and lights and totalling the French RHAG completely it was designed for an aircraft half weight of the F14 Whooops!!!!

Lol

We do 90% military, and some civil. I am a fast jet man lol welcome aboard

Sssssh

Hi, all Jets have arrester hooks, F15s, Typhoons, Tornados etc, all for Emergency landings. For the Typhoon to be able to operate from an Aircraft carrier, the landing gear and hook would need strengthen, which would mean more weight etc, plus our carriers would need massive changes. Sadly we are completely stuck with the F35B

He did burn off as much fuel as he could, esp as they had to recover the training guys. Not sure they allowed to drop the tanks over land. Not sure

@@coningsbylive i see - so this was the flight leader's ship...?

@@doce7606 no, it was the 4th that took off, when he was airborne he immediately throttled down. He had the issue straight away. If you listen to the 4th, the engine is throttle down as soon as he was airborne

@@coningsbylive ah ok i got that his was the 4th - so the leader always gets airborne first...

@@doce7606 yes flight lead is always the first jet also if you have a scanner it is always the flight lead you hear, hear

could be gyppos with contacts at the air-ministry

lol

There was a phantom in the 80s the crashed threw the fence. Scary stuff

@@coningsbylive i love the F-4... proper thunderbirds aircraft... dihedral and anhedral surfaces...

@@doce7606 The Phantom just looks the business

Not sure they are allowed to, esp over land. Not really sure if they can drop them tbh

@@coningsbylive The tanks can be jettisoned if required, but provide good support if the main undercarriage fails.

@phillipbanes5484 i knew the Senior Civil Servant responsible for the air ops side of the Carriers. He wanted the Catabar system so the carriers could chuck Typhoons and almost anything else required off the flight deck. Sadly, Cameron, the Eton Mess phony Tory penny pinched the project and cut the budget to "keep costs down." So we end up with carriers that can only fly less capable VSTOL aircraft... My friend resigned over that matter. You cut costs on one component and then have to pay the price by buying more expensive and less effective aircraft.

@johnhudghton3535 answered this very well

@@coningsbylive ex RAF Padre who met my friend through a church organisation.

@@johnhudghton3535 Sigh. Yes. I read 'arrestor cable' and thought what might have been. While being the last person to defend the typical bungling you mentioned, I was under the impression that one reason they went for the current design was because the EMALS system wasn't ready in time, and a conventional steam catapult wouldn't have been suitable for the powerplant chosen. I also thought that one reason the French pulled out of the Eurofighter project was because it wasn't being made suitable for carriers in the first place. Not pretending I have much expertise in this area, but I do know that you can't just stick an arrestor hook on an aircraft, the airframe needs to be designed to take the stress from scratch ideally. Post hoc modification was deemed too costly and troublesome. I've heard that our carriers can be converted to some degree, they do have a big beam to length ratio, so an angled deck modification at the bow looks possible. Not heard it confirmed whether this is true, nor if it's not possible at all.

Sadly not, there would need to be a lot of work for a navy Typhoon, undercarriage would need strengthing and modified for cat launches. Would love to see these for carriers

yep@@FunnyVideoCollector

Er, no.

Yeah, for some reason the RAF Typhoons are smokey. Not sure if other countries are so smokey

@@coningsbylive In order to comply with soon to be announced green legislation all RAF jets will be modified to utilize to run on recycled chip fat frying oil. Newer aircraft such as the Tempest, currently being developed will also be offered with a hybrid variant, including lithium Ion batteries and hydrogen tanks. Plug-in variants have been abandoned because the length of the cable limited combat radius.

@@christopherrobinson7541 lol

As soon as he took off, he got a alarm for the front undercarriage. He tried resetting and troubleshooting but alarm wouldn't clear. Then when he came into land, he lowered the hook, but the system didn't confirm it was lowered. They were very unsure about the state of the undercarriage

Thanks for the info @@coningsbylive

your Welcome@@kennesaw101

@@coningsbylive At least the nose leg was down. Early in the production program a rare two seater landed without the nose leg and the only way to get it into a high drag configuration was to extend the air-to-air refueling probe. The air intake feed runway into the engines and produce some very pretty pictures.