Тёмный

Episode 355 - Comparison: Ford Ranger Wildtrack vs VW Amarok Ultimate 

RPM TV Online
Подписаться 28 тыс.
Просмотров 121 тыс.
50% 1

Date of broadcast: 08 June 2016
Ford Ranger Wildtrack:
Engine: In-line four-cylinder, 3 198 cc turbodiesel
Power : 147 kW @ 3 000 rpm
Torque: 470 Nm @ 1 500 - 2 750 rpm
Power/weight ratio: 67,52 kW/ton
Gearbox: Six-speed auto, AWD, low range
Wheels/tyres: 18-inch alloy, 265/60 R18 tyres
0-100 km/h:11 sec (est)
Top speed: 185 km/h (est)
Fuel tank capacity: 80 litres
Fuel consumption (claimed): 8,9 litres/100 km
Operating range (claimed): 900 km
CO2 emissions: 236 g/km
Cargo bay size: 1 549 x 1 560 mm
Sill height/width: 511 / 1 139 mm
Payload: 938 kg
Ground clearance: 237 mm
Turning circle: 12,7 m
Approach/departure: 25,5/21,8 deg
Pros: Trendy. Low-range 4x4. Full-house equipped
Cons: Engine lacks refinement.
VW Amarok Ultimate:
Engine: In-line four-cylinder, 1 968 cc,
bi-turbodiesel
Power: 132 kW @ 4 000 rpm
Torque: 420 Nm @ 1 750 rpm
Power/weight ratio: 66,57 kW/ton
Gearbox: Eight-speed auto, AWD
Wheels/tyres: 19-inch alloy, 255/55 R19 tyres
0-100 km/h: 11,0
Top speed: 180 km/h
Fuel tank capacity: 80 litres
Fuel consumtion: 8,3 litres/100 km
Operating range: 960 km
CO2 emissions: 219 g/km
Cargo bay size: 1 555 x 1620 mm
Sill height/width: 508 / 1 222 mm
Payload: 837 kg
Ground clearance: 244 mm
Turning circle: 12,95 m
Approach/departure: 28,0/23,6 deg
Pros: Smart and sophisticated. Car-like in most respects.
Cons: No low range. Expensive.
Retail price:
VW Amarok 2.0 BiTDi Ultimate: R616 700
Ford Ranger 3.2 Wildtrak 4x4 : R597 900
Prices correct on date of broadcast.

Авто/Мото

Опубликовано:

 

1 ноя 2016

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 37   
@AdamAus85
@AdamAus85 7 лет назад
Nice work stopping at the STOP sign.
@rayred74
@rayred74 7 лет назад
Took my Amarok off road through the French and Italian Alps and it went exactly where the Land Cruiser 70 and 80 series went, along with built up Jeep Wrangler and Landrover Defender. The only thing is, the Amarok did it with more style, composure and half the fuel
@bikerman6907
@bikerman6907 7 лет назад
in the description box, it says the ford 3.2 has an in line four cylinder diesel, which is wrong as most of you know:-):-) in line five is more correct! cheers:-)
@bulldog100able
@bulldog100able 7 лет назад
clearly these guys didn't test these two properly in a tough 4x4 course... They would be amazed.
@kingprettie01
@kingprettie01 7 лет назад
Should have tested the v6 model amarok against the ranger
@user-tw9tk1vb6d
@user-tw9tk1vb6d 4 года назад
Unfair. Its a V6 :)
@KinanAl-akhras
@KinanAl-akhras 3 месяца назад
Make the music louder I can still hear them talking
@alancoates140
@alancoates140 5 лет назад
Did these guys actually test the off road performance of these two vehicles? Many reports claim that the missing low range of the Amarok “should” reduce its off road performance. Actual physical trials have not been able to confirm this theory!
@rayred74
@rayred74 6 лет назад
I think the Voetspore team have proven that the Amarok is more than capable offroad
@JackFN_VR64
@JackFN_VR64 6 лет назад
I recall one of the bakkie's engine blew in the middle of nowhere.
@janhendrikloots598
@janhendrikloots598 7 лет назад
Gentleman, Bring it on and put in a place where you can proof the lack of a low-rang and stop the Bullshit
@lungaswazi9194
@lungaswazi9194 7 лет назад
This has to be, by far, the worst head to head review I've seen. Just a pair of guys telling us what's in the brochures.
@robwelsh5070
@robwelsh5070 5 лет назад
Can't hear a word you are saying because of the music
@muaazmth2696
@muaazmth2696 7 лет назад
ranger is the better buy here as non of the other bakkies come with all those standard features!
@johnyoung4467
@johnyoung4467 6 лет назад
No mention the Amarok has no rear curtain air bag?
@janhendrikloots598
@janhendrikloots598 7 лет назад
tough stuff, tough stuff, man take nit on and seeeee
@endzmeetmusic9053
@endzmeetmusic9053 4 года назад
Amarok rules these cars
@RowanEngineering
@RowanEngineering 7 лет назад
Stupid and annoying soundtrack drowns out the commentary.
@imwolfmaster8399
@imwolfmaster8399 7 лет назад
The vw looks nasty but the ranger looks sexy as fuck
@gregobrien6912
@gregobrien6912 7 лет назад
19" wheels and 6" brake disks lol
@gmf62v84
@gmf62v84 5 лет назад
The ranger is a five cylinder not four cylinder
@Wolfie387
@Wolfie387 2 года назад
Half baked comparison. Get your trailers hooked and get it off road..Ranger Wildtrack anytime.
@elbarto9900
@elbarto9900 4 года назад
Where is the sense to compare a 3.2 liter with a 3.0 liter? Do you know the Amarok has also a 3.0 liter with 224 hp or 258 hp? Why didn't you compare with that? Probably because you just wanted Ford to look better than VW.
@timurselcuk1556
@timurselcuk1556 7 лет назад
Amarok
@mikestuart5119
@mikestuart5119 4 года назад
The amarok is better by miles
@CARLOS37400
@CARLOS37400 7 лет назад
Hallo.WV+AUDI+PORSCHE+SEAT+ROLLS ROYCE= Volkswagen Group jajja...
@muaazmth2696
@muaazmth2696 7 лет назад
most expensive bakkies ??? the ford isnt even in the top 10 most expensive!! in s.a!
@lakemphato9296
@lakemphato9296 3 года назад
Hey.. Wake up research more.. Some amarok do have 4x4 low range.. You failed boy
@paolouchicentofanti8494
@paolouchicentofanti8494 7 лет назад
Kiwi accents don't work, sorry
@noworriesimfijian
@noworriesimfijian 6 лет назад
I think they're South African....
@conradvermaak3278
@conradvermaak3278 5 лет назад
My goodness guys, you are such a bad reporters, your facts are so absurd!
@sirkeloinaragas4702
@sirkeloinaragas4702 6 лет назад
Ford is best car in the world
@Morphinos
@Morphinos 5 лет назад
how old are you, like 9 years old?
@jeffwerkman3918
@jeffwerkman3918 6 лет назад
volkswagen sophisticated? whaaa? looks like crap.
Далее
Редакция. News: 125-я неделя
48:25
Просмотров 1,2 млн
VW AMAROK 2 YEARS ON
9:24
Просмотров 29 тыс.
Living with a… Volkswagen Amarok
7:54
Просмотров 236 тыс.
Ford Ranger BUYERS GUIDE | Reliable OR Rust Bucket?
10:24