EU4 A to Z - Doing THIS As England SHOULD BE BANNED 

Make Hungary your vassal as Australian (form as horde gov).

I challenge u to play as Lebanon b

Form australia and own a province of austrian culture

Maybe a little to long for A to Z campaign but it will be fun to form Eire (Irland) starting with Eora!

Reform and leave Australia :) It's more difficult than it sounds, it takes forever reforming your government as an tribe there.

As France I managed to form GB. This was before I formed GB as england

This is not this hard

if he surrender france he can gave them all the provinces

@@ysff0710 not really, u take the english province in ireland in the first war and from there you eat the isles up.

Big blue blob is a better idea.

I thought Sikhism appeared around the XVII century

This would be a very funny idea

@@ZaRodinu1945 in eu4 Sikh can spawn in 62 months (~5 years) from year 1480 in Doaba, in 13 years in other Punjabi provinces and in 260 months in other indian provinces with Hindu religion bordering a muslim one or vice versa

Eora Sikh mann

What would be better would be "sikh man of Europe" ottoman sikhs

i do not think you need to form england to form great britain. also arent you forbidden from forming tags which you already were in the past?

@@majdavlk649 not in single player i don’t think, maybe a mp rule

Huh, didn’t the chancery standard standardized the usage of English in the English government or was it only for the governments documents

I think it was Ed boy V who first used English predominantly in his government laying the foundation for English nationalism. And yes there worst thing to happen to the English language was the French.

The angevin kings didnt have a personal union over the kingdom of france they only held the duchies of normandy and aquitaine which technically made them a vassal of the french kings

@@williamkline7922 English wouldn't exist without French.

France and Uk never was in pu

Lol you mean Pro-s tip, right. Real pro are selling the province to Britanny for 40-50 coins

ingerland

@Immortal Science of Hauntology Yeah, this makes more sense given the historical example of on and off unions between the crowns of Bohemia, Poland and Hungary or the kalmar union. However, given that at the time the french crown was the more prestigious one, it's also not unlikely that initially, just like the Habsburgs domains were initially just referred to as the Austrian Empire, the Angevin domain would probably just be colloquially named the French Empire. Although the English, just like the Hungarians in real life, would've strove to become independent from such an arrangement if it had happened, or at the very least for a dual monarchy type of deal.

@Immortal Science of Hauntology Now I just had the image appear in my mind of a Irish Gavrilo Princip killing the Dauphin of the Franco-English Empire and starting WW1.

@@greenrocket23 the austrian Habsburgs were not the austrian empire or even just austria untill 1700 (and they started long before that) and it was not official until 1804. the actual contemporary names before and during this are: 1) Danubian Monarchy (the domains of the viennese habsburgs, to differentiate them from the spainish habsburgs, appearing in 1515) 2) the Habsburg domains 3) the Habsburg monarchy 4) the Habsburg empire 5) the imperial and royal domains (or just imperial-royal domains) [kuk/k-k], the latter became only the austrian half during the austria-hungary period. 2-4 also refer to the spainish habsurgs domains, which is why i put the Danubian monarchy first. there was no official name, but austria wasn't even an unofficial name for the whole lot untill 1700. this is because they were just theoretically equal PUs* untill 1804 (when the emperor believed that centralizing under 1 culture was the way to defeat napoleon, but it only inflamed nationalists). so no the Habsburg domains were not "initially just referred to as the austrian empire" that came hundreds of years after the PUs with hungary, croatia and bohemia (let alone the PUs of Austria. there was the "arch dutchy of austria", which was a separate PU with "Inner Austria", aswell as the "county of Tyrol", "Further Austria" [western german austrian lands, including Alsace]) or the fact Bohemia was a bunch of PUs (bohemia, moravia, lusatia and silesia)

can you explain that straight, briefly?

@@PriestOfFilm all you do is exploit manpower after the usual releasing French vassals

Enjoy!

And the English would have likely been islander French as a posed to English

@@imspudus technically they are islander french because kings of england are an offshoot of french nobility since 1066

@@sadettinarslan5324 well yes but at the nobility was very French but the peasants were different from French peasants