Euro NCAP Crash & Safety Tests of Mercedes-EQ EQS 2021-Best in Class 2021-Executive-Pure Electric

Подписаться 287 тыс.

Просмотров 222 тыс.

50% 1

Update January 2022: Euro NCAP awarded the 2021 Best in Class Executive - Pure Electric to Mercedes-EQ EQS.
Learn more about the Best in Class cars: www.euroncap.com/en/ratings-r...
Euro NCAP January 2022 Press release www.euroncap.com/en/press-med...
Euro NCAP performs a series of crash and safety tests on car models:
- a frontal impact test, 50% of the width of the car is striking an oncoming deformable barrier, also travelling at 50 km/h
- a frontal impact test, the car impacts a rigid full width barrier
- a side impact test, a mobile deformable barrier impacts the driver's door
- a pole test, the tested car is propelled sideways into a rigid pole and the robustness of the centre airbag is evaluated.
A series of pedestrian tests are conducted with different impactors, adult and child head form, lower and upper leg form and whiplash tests are performed on a sled as well as AEB pedestrian and cyclist tests.
Active safety is tested based on the car’s equipment: autonomous emergency braking car-to-car scenarios, occupant status monitoring (including seatbelt reminders), lane support and speed assistance technologies.
All details on the Euro NCAP Website:
Mercedes-EQ EQS 2021 test information www.euroncap.com/en/results/m...
Euro NCAP December 2021 Press release www.euroncap.com/en/press-med...

Авто/Мото

Опубликовано:

7 дек 2021

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 227

@redriver15262 2 года назад

1:11 cool to see the middle airbag deploy! to prevent passenger and driver from hitting eachother and/or potentially snapping their necks 😳

@zkdd23 2 года назад

Didn't know it was a thing, until you pointed it out. Great to have it, for sure!

@Giulietta1750tbi 2 года назад

Really impressive at the side pole test.

@peterbess9243 2 года назад

It should be for 102 000 $ (base model)

@valentin7006 2 года назад

Good point. In my opinion that result is based on the battery pack underneath which is reinforcing the body edges

@Rev0lution88 2 года назад

All electric cars have almost the same result at the pole test due to the battery pack :)

@Alif1089 2 года назад

The windshield, yess

@GrandHuevotes 2 года назад

@@Rev0lution88 sorta not really. The Tesla windshield cracks in the same test. This one doesn’t at all.

@Wised1000 2 года назад

Extraordinary performance. The "fail" on the pedestrian test is another good reminder why "self driving" cars are still a pipe dream. I'm glad that NCAP keeps pushing the boundaries. One thing to keep in mind, it would be advisable to test the dual engine model and see if it makes a significant difference.

@NOSPowerxxxl 2 года назад

Mhh very hard to compare. Because this test was made with the „basic“ configuration EQS. But if you want to have the max performance you have to order the „driver assistance package“

@HeloiamCmP 2 года назад

@@NOSPowerxxxl No thats wrong. AEB is basic standard for all models. It performed ok, but not well.

@NickFindsNick 2 года назад

I wouldn’t say “pipe dream” as it’s a technology that is reasonably successful and, in fact, not a pipe dream but is widely implemented in vehicles today.

@alperevcil 2 года назад

Tesla 😃👍

@simonm1447 2 года назад

Waymo already uses a fleet of Level 5 vehicles in different US cities, as robotaxis, without a human safety driver. The system is not perfect yet, but still impressive. However, the system Waymo currently uses is probably more expensive than the whole EQS, so it's not comparable to a car built in masses for consumers

@Timico1000 2 года назад

I have to say that the EQS grows on me...i like it!

@JP-xd6fm 2 года назад

And on me too! , a shame my wallet doesn't grow at all, is actually shrinking...

@Timico1000 2 года назад

@@JP-xd6fm Same over here. ;)

@kB-tt7tr 2 года назад

A famous mercedes disgner say if you see the first time a new car and you doubts than is that a timeless disgne, every time you see it again you like it more and more and more.

@Timico1000 2 года назад

@@kB-tt7tr That are probably the words of Bruno Sacco, father of the W201 (190), W124 (80s E-Class) and the R129 (SL from `89). All of them were critizised when they came out, but became instant bestsellers and today they are sought after classics.

@KunalDMehta 2 года назад

It's good, but the E-tron GT is epic!

@derbigpr500 2 года назад

I like how most cars bend in half on the pole test and the pole go half way through the car, and here it's like "oh there's a dent on your door, better have that checked out".

@Foersom_ 2 года назад

0:30 finally we get a view of the tech under the hood, that can otherwise only be opened by mechanics.

@thomasbenski599 2 года назад

Or with a simple screwdriver at home.

@dr-ok3sn 2 года назад

actually everyone can open it, there is a handle underneath the dashboard like on every other car

@Foersom_ 2 года назад

@@dr-ok3sn No, you can NOT. That is one of the special points of this car. EQS has the lowest Cd coefficient of any current car, to achieve this the hood can NOT be opened by the user. See any review and they will talk about this and the washer fluid inlet.

@Enzoxvx 2 года назад

@@Foersom_ I can assure you that you can open the hood like any other car. I was impressed too but it works. There's pretty much just an extra plastic shield for the hood opener and you'll need someone to hold the hood open for you.

@Spyker8921 2 года назад

@@Foersom_ There's no frunk, then? That sucks

@User.Joshua 2 года назад

This is more of a tank than the S-Class. Those crash tests looked amazing.

@Neojhun 2 года назад

Not a fair comparison. S Class does not have a wide solid heavy mass in the middle. It's physically structurally different.

@User.Joshua 2 года назад

@@Neojhun for someone cross-shopping the two models, a comparison is inevitable. It’s totally fair given their similar price and dimensions.

@Neojhun 2 года назад

@@User.Joshua Sure they compete in the same category and use case. But functionally in terms of Safety it's no competition win to the BEV. Especially a Big Engine S-Class which is more problematic than small engine cars.

@joni8755 2 года назад

I'm amazed by the side crash. The chassis is 💪🏻

@thomasalbrecht5914 2 года назад

Legend has it the pole had to be changed after the test due to structural damage. Look at all the annihilated honeycomb on the mobile barrier. Part of the impressive performance is simply due to the fact that it’s nearly 2.7 tons of car. That’s not the way EVs are going to save the planet...

@LeoMkII 2 года назад

yeah, they're nonsense, we need to get rid of cars not only of ICEs, no electric car will ever be as efficient as good public transport

@thomasalbrecht5914 2 года назад

@@LeoMkII public transport is all fine for people living in big cities, and at reasonably short distance from the centre. Unfortunately, that’s not everybody’s case.

@MaticTheProto Год назад

These 2.7 ton cars still are more efficient than ice cars

@thomasalbrecht5914 Год назад

@@MaticTheProto But it takes 2.7 tons of stuff to make them, and making 2.7 tons of stuff uses an awful lot of energy and raw materials. Since we change the complete driving technology, we might as well redesign the cars and accept a more ecological design that needs fewer resources than these behemoths that ape the old ice cars.

@MaticTheProto Год назад

@@thomasalbrecht5914 these cars do exist, and there will be more when electric cars become the norm

@Endorion_YTC 2 года назад

No big surprise, Mercedes excels in safety.

@KrsnGmer Год назад

AHHHH NOPE

@tristanrabier8608 Год назад

Arguments ?

@Endorion_YTC Год назад

@@tristanrabier8608 He doesn’t have any, anything he says is brain dead. NCAP and IIHS ratings prove otherwise.

@plvt0n1vm 2 года назад

I'm sorry,but I died laughing at the first test because the sled basically bounced off this behemoth 🤣🤣🤣🤣

@LeoMkII 2 года назад

daaaaamn, that pole impact totally sold it to me, it didn't even notice, freaking tank

@LeoMkII 2 года назад

tho it better be like that, I don't want to die in a fireball

@marvinm.7634 2 года назад

The EQS was practically made for the first test. 2.5 tonnes of weight, super sturdy frame due to battery...That cart didn't stand a chance, that EQS barely slowed down haha. To make it fair, they should make the moving cart the same weight as the cars they test. Otherwise its the equivalent of a tank hitting a 600 kg 90s city car.

@Zeus-kz1zq 2 года назад

Absolutely fair enough bro

@LeoMkII 2 года назад

yeah, they should update their test just like the IIHS did, with s bigger car-rig tp represent the ever increasing suvs

@kB-tt7tr 2 года назад

Wow that side pole test never see that before, so strong

@markmd9 2 года назад

This car is so heavy, almost didn't meet resistance at 50% test

@Wasmachineman 2 года назад

I love how the MPDB gets completely overran by the EQS. Isn't this basically a electric S-Class?

@xXMonster26Xx 2 года назад

No its not. Its build on a new electric plattform.( EVA)

@AIRDRAC 2 года назад

@@xXMonster26Xx True, but it is built specifically to be an all-electric alternative to the S-class, though (excluding the Maybach versions, which are significantly roomier and more luxurious than the EQS)

@tarkanbashllari1627 2 года назад

@@AIRDRAC Maybach EQS is a significantly different segment as well

@AIRDRAC 2 года назад

@@tarkanbashllari1627 that's what I just said?

@martinsv9183 2 года назад

Yes, its supposed to be an electric S. That's why its named EQ S. You have EQC, EQE and EQS.

@Darx97 2 года назад

Such a tank

@actuallydaleruzbekov 9 месяцев назад

Idk why but it’s so fun to look at these tests 😂

@goncalodomingues7273 2 года назад

Don’t unterstand why crash tests to Mercedes S class are not avaliable…

@erebostd 2 года назад

The side impact! Wow 😳😁👍

@melsyoutube 2 года назад

the side airbags are great!!

@jonask.9879 2 года назад

Masterpiece of techic

@patrickgillespie9423 2 года назад

I do hope to see that as EV cars are getting heavier, they increase the weight of the moving barrel.

@matusk3308 2 года назад

love the new safety tech!

@serefturk6517 2 года назад

Why don't they show the roof from upside when the side pole crash happens? I own a glass roof car and want to see the damage on the roof.

@christianmoris1651 2 года назад

Expensive crash test 😏

@paullacey2999 2 года назад

That is not a car,its a tank!Impressive!

@kelvin79uk Год назад

Birds Eye camera view is missing in the side pole test?

@Reversentry 11 месяцев назад

How is technology and safety going on! Impressive

@droopy-R 2 года назад

Good job Mercedes

@adambbbbbbbbbbbbb 2 года назад

what does the percentage on the bottom left indicate

@chrisak49 2 года назад

Wow windshield didn’t break or crack during side pole test

@narita._.harajuku 2 года назад

0:39 how come the side curtain didn't deploy?

@federigodelazion6738 2 года назад

very nice! only one pedestrian died

@MaslAlek 2 года назад

Ok what happenes with the wasted battery after the crash?

@Spyker8921 2 года назад

I'm impatient to see the crash test for the Lucid Air

@ambergris5705 2 года назад

Why does the head impact test look actually... Comfortable?

@reputationtaylorsversion 2 года назад

How is 3:31 a fail? The dummy car drove into the Mercedes. The EQS stopped.

@KunalDMehta 2 года назад

I don't think they counted that as a fail.

@emirhankesim57 2 года назад

Why is the glass roof open?

@Petroljunky17 2 года назад

The bag swing of the driver seat was a little bit wired to me 🤔 but the rest was good. The pole test have to be this good by a electric car. Otherwise the battery get damaged

@adrianromero92 2 года назад

Lo que me parece increíble es que el el choque frontal el retrovisor y el plástico que recubre los sensores salen disparados.

@BigHumz155 2 года назад

This car is a tank wow!

@konwix.a8556 5 месяцев назад

My Honda Stepwgn Mk4 (Japan) From 2009

@AlexanderA80 2 года назад

Why not 64 km/h front hit?

@ValentinGucci-eu4ij 11 месяцев назад

amazing!!!

@MaticTheProto 2 года назад

This is the kind of stuff people usually don’t give Mercedes credit for. Their safety systems are the best you can get. I know several people who said that they’d be dead if they had driven any other brands vehicle.

@eminsahan9368 2 года назад

I would vouch for the side crash test. As long as you give me that car instead of crashing it. :)

@Raptorel 2 года назад

Solid performance but it bothers me how much forward the seats move at 0:43. Doesn't seem good at all.

@rorr4753 2 года назад

the speed in less on sides nobody drives that slow

@Nichkid 2 года назад

This channel needs to comment

@pouryy7362 2 года назад

it's amazing

@nikosserenault4407 2 года назад

Ils sont trés forts chez Mercedes ;)

@heeheeriah 2 года назад

I'd love to see these tests done on a common older car, like a Ford KA

@akacicaa 2 года назад

Arent they kinda similar? ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-qtd9n-7IYfE.html

@PaulieMD5 2 года назад

The first frontal test shows why more heavy cars are safer

@pikoliii 2 года назад

On the expense of smaller, cheaper cars, sadly.

@LeoMkII 2 года назад

@@pikoliii yeah, cars are still not made to keep both parts safe, its an every man for himself situation

@MaticTheProto Год назад

At least unlike with pick ups the impact areas align

@ys_a1659 2 года назад

Ok, I am convinced. So I need a new Mercedes-Benz. Oh if I ordered one I would have to wait 12 or more months. So I have to think about it once more.

@joaomiguelgarcia8717 2 года назад

Porque de fazer testes a 50 k h? O normal e andar a 80 90 kh o por isso de a ver tantas mortes nao se fazem testes com o que se vive

@herrlich7671 2 года назад

great car

@polardabear 2 года назад

My first choice of EV's wouldn be this one, the EQS (or EQE) And when Cadillac releases their new Lyriq, gotta test drive it! It looks amazing.

@UTVH21 2 года назад

Caddilac 🤣

@pentrudreptate3342 2 года назад

But if the accident will be with an heavy car like van ho will have more then 3000 kg the test its not real.

@philippbretzler7687 2 года назад

Small overlap? From this you can see whether the safety is only sewn on the edge.

@AverageAviationist12 2 года назад

0:11 bounce bang bouce

@starlite-sw5wr 2 года назад

‘Uploaded 14 hours ago’

@jonathanluttner9832 2 года назад

Ah thats how you open the Hood 😅

@randomguy-rom 2 года назад

1:50 i just saw kids moving satifesing

@nikolakirs5350 2 года назад

2,5 tons OMG. its getting heavier så all small and medium small cars wen they get hitt by this typ of cars its going to by nasty.

@krystiankrychu2507 2 года назад

over 2.5t

@LeoMkII 2 года назад

yes, just ridiculous

@cornelhansen-juhas1971 2 года назад

4* Max

@kamleshberwa2637 2 года назад

The Mercedes souls 👻

@toninocars 2 года назад

Safe car but the auto detection systems not up to the job 3:31 Toyota Yaris for example passes eqs failed 🤔

@NOSPowerxxxl 2 года назад

That is because in the EQS the advanced driver assistance systems with more performance are optional, and the NCAP test were made with the „basic“ config

@HeloiamCmP 2 года назад

@@NOSPowerxxxl Thats wrong. Here we talk about AEB Features which are and should be standard and EQS failed to perform well.

@NOSPowerxxxl 2 года назад

@@HeloiamCmP As already said, there is a set of AEB features standard in the EQS and if you order the driver assistance package you get the extended features with even more performance and use cases

@HeloiamCmP 2 года назад

@@NOSPowerxxxl no what you tell here is simly wrong: -Check euroncap eqs result page 2. The vehicle was equipped with ALL safery features. -Check the EQS Configurator on mercedes-benz. The advanced Package is baic Configuration. You can order an advanced Plus package with additional features, but this does NOT have any impact on AEB, Assistent features etc. what was tested. Turns out other vehicles as Ioniq 5 simpy performed better than the EQS.

@JP-xd6fm 2 года назад

@@NOSPowerxxxl You're all wrong. Is a new system to get rid of poor people by Mercedes.

@zakzwijn8410 2 года назад

These are the levels of safety you pay for but don't see. Take this in mind when you consider purchasing something which is a lot cheaper but 'looks almost as nice'.

@focus678 2 года назад

1.30 now I can crash to the pole with no worry.

@nomiS.27 2 года назад

Best car ever.

@UTVH21 2 года назад

The BEST or NOTHING 👍

@idontknowwhattoputhere. 2 года назад

im surprised it did well in the pole test, but the aeb systems on this car are trash.

@jianqiangxie1525 2 года назад

Finally.... they failed a test at 3:30

@LeoMkII 2 года назад

ngl kinda disappointing considering how many sensors that thing probably has

@LeoMkII 2 года назад

especially the one when it hits the person, just as simple as a wider range of view for the camera would have sufficed

@taylorsmunich5360 2 года назад

the side view of EQS looks like a Honda Civic

@LucasXAeroTrayhan 25 дней назад

The crystalline gamerz crash test 2024 Brookhaven - E

@Ryan-mg7pd 2 года назад

50kmh is a bit too slow

@krystiankrychu2507 2 года назад

lane keeping assist looks like is bouncing between lines,no keep it in middle

@Max_Dev 2 года назад

they are only testing the passive lane departure assist. Lane keeping assist has to be enabled manually.

@MichaelMengo 2 года назад

That chassis is stiff. Almost zero flexing

@ram64man 2 года назад

Mercedes fix the turning emergency stop between radar and camera data it should easily see a traveling vehicle in the opposite direction before turning this would never been allowed in a normal s class

@user-ek1cx5ws1n 2 года назад

👍👍👍🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦

@snuggles03 2 года назад

They destroy three or four beautiful EQS cars for this?

@seddam 2 года назад

Sad :( I mean if Mercedes released this car for sale, then it's safe to drive.

@konwix.a8556 5 месяцев назад

Mercedes Benz Since 1886

@konwix.a8556 5 месяцев назад

Carl Benz

@victorgrasscourt3382 Год назад

I hope these cars can be repaired.

@jasonleon1976 2 года назад

As a former firefighter, this is something I definitely consider when buying a family car👍

@BrianYYH 2 года назад

I hope you know it’s a 6 figure car…

@jamoin4588 2 года назад

Impressive, looks like a swedish brick 😏 Volvo

@freddyhollingsworth5945 2 года назад

0:14 not even close to a real world crash, make the "fake car" about 5,500 lbs and raise it up 2.5 feet and then use it to better represent the real world.

@sweetbon76 2 года назад

Only 100-200 thousand euros...

@minkeuk549 2 года назад

Mercedes. What else?

@SiiliViin 2 года назад

You should occasionally perform a real life(90 km/h) crash tests also, to see and show how much that differs from test speed results for everyone.

@birakosilahievlattr3972 2 года назад

i really want to see a 80kmh small overlap crash test, and i think iihs is going to start doing it in the next few years

@SiiliViin 2 года назад

@@birakosilahievlattr3972 I think, side pole test at 80 km/h, most of cars will split in two halves.

@birakosilahievlattr3972 2 года назад

@@SiiliViini tihnk so, even at 32kmh side pole crash test the car's 1/4 of the side (except EVs) get crumpled and this is creates a risk of leg injury i cant think 80kmh side pole test it would be a definite death in my country its night time now i have to sleep, have a good night

@martinsv9183 2 года назад

@@birakosilahievlattr3972 Has nothing to do with if its an EV or not. All new cars should manage the side pole test without injuries.

@birakosilahievlattr3972 2 года назад

@@martinsv9183 yes, ur right

@arrowsplit 2 года назад

Middle airbag? No more headbutting the driver? Disappointed..

@florianjacquin6310 2 года назад

Mercedes at the top !

@user-wl6lv6zm9g 9 месяцев назад

💯💥

@iloveataturk6444 2 года назад

2:49 mercedes killing some one MURDERER

@Unknown-1407 2 года назад

Sad to see a 100.000 € car get crashed over and over again

@bobby4500 2 года назад

the safest car or nothing for my family

@MetoFulcurm 2 года назад

Too heavy of a car. Without the lightweight cars the environmental concerns are just empty words. Cheap cars are light and consume less energy to build and operate but the heavy ones make it unfeasible for them to be in a crash.

@brandon_nope 2 года назад

It's inevitable if it's an EV

@yasemineryigit2846 2 года назад

Passat

@ryantomei 2 года назад

Euro NCAP should really be taking notes from IIHS and challenging auto makers to improve safety. I can almost guarantee that automakers are making safer cars for the US market because of IIHS testing, but they know there is no EU testing like that, so their factories for EU sold cars are built more structurally basic. Shame on EU for failing to progress and challenge like IIHS is always doing.