Ever hear of Saint Peter? Knowles takes pro-abortion Christians to (Sunday) school 

That’s a great comment and something not normally thought about. The ones pro choice had the privilege of being born so how can they understand the ones who have problems.

Whoa! And here I was thinking I am the first person to ever think of that.

Oh snap! Unbelievable. Me too!

@@darryllesunderland7368 Why should the innocent child get the death penalty?

Them babies being killed by abortion are all from liberal women. They line up to do it - one dead baby after another. Repeat the process as often as pleases them.

liquidnature13 amen my man amen

liquidnature13 that verse right there destroys abortion. Any Christian who denies that is not a Christian.

AMEN.

Thankyou😊

Amen

Many will say "Lord, Lord, ... Then I will tell them plainly, "I never knew you, away from me you evil doers" Mathew 7:21-23

Nathan Adrian In the Greek it actually says you who don’t keep the Law or you who work Lawlessness. He actually starts by saying not everyone who says Lord Lord will enter the kingdom but those who do the will of my Father. The will of the Father is and always has been for us to keep the commandments in the Law. Makes me wonder why so many Christians think the Law was done away with.

If you actually believe in God - then why do you think "he" allows abortion, and then who are you to question the wisdom?

@@jenspetersen5865 He doesn't allow it. Its one of the big 10. Thou shalt not murder. You mean why doesn't he just supernaturally perform a miracle and force the abortionist to not be able to perform the act of aborting babies. He has never done that throughout the Bible. He gave us free will. We must choose to obey His commandments. If he forces us to keep commandments then what good would that be on judgement day? We'd all stand before God and say I kept all the commandments. He'd say yeah because I made you by force.

@@fivebooks8498 “Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor.” You might look up what murder is! - oh here - I am sure you are not capable "the unlawful premeditated killing of one human being by another" Now what is a HUMAN a bipedal primate mammal (Homo sapiens) Sorry an embryo is not a human, irrespective of how much you want to distrespect the 8th commandment

Jay- I'm SO thankful that He knows me!

YES!!! YES!!! YES!!! YES!!!

Well then, the soul does not not need to take on a body. Right?

All well and good. Now prove god exists.

@@dominicpardo4783 I can try to, but what's the point when you pose a contentious question you seemingly don't really want an answer for? I could ask you to prove he doesn't exist, but won't. There's no need for this quibble. When both camps begin the discussion entrenched. The opposition to God, tends to attack him and his believers. Lots of hate and time is being wasted on our imaginary friend. When you could simply ignore him if he doesn't exist.

This, right here!

although I agree with you, what should the options be of a person who has been raped and has gotten pregnant?

If you ban abortion, you are taking away a very significant personal choice for all women, regardless of circumstance, about what they can and can't do with their reproductive organs. And men are really in no place to decide such a thing. But unfortunately, misogyny is everywhere, and especially in religion...

But abortion takes away an innocent person's life. Even in a case of rape, what wrong did the child do? Why kill them for the crime of the father? I can understand and accept abortion in a case where continuing the pregnancy would harm the mother - then it becomes a medical issue. But the fact is only about 1% of abortions are as a result of rape. Less than that as result of incest. So 98+% women are choosing to kill babies for what? To get rid of their oopsies? In this day and age, that's not a good excuse. And don't get me started on "it's just a clump of cells". I've been pregnant. I've seen the little heart beating at 5 weeks when the whole baby was no bigger than a sesame seed. How can someone say it's just a clump of cells?

In my opinion, abortion is not about women's choices. Because we do have a choice of who we sleep with, and how we do that as far as preventing a pregnancy. What it is about is the business side of abortion. Because even if these abortion clinics claim to provide free abortions, guess what, someone's gonna have to pay for them. If not the woman getting them, then it's a private fund or a government grant. Whatever it is, it's a bunch of people making money off of feeding women an illusion how they are concerned about our choice.

Anti-consequence summarizes the left’s entire worldview. They can’t buy good health insurance? They want others to pay for it. They can’t pay off their college debts? They want others to pay for it. They won’t get married and develop a steady family income? They want others to give them money. They commit crimes and get punished? They want to reduce the punishments. They act stupidly around police and that ends badly? They want to defund the police. They failed to grow a thick skin and learn to debate? They want universities and companies to create a safe space where only their opinions exist. They can’t figure out if they’re male or female? They want everyone else to validate their insanity. They aren’t willing to defend themselves against violent criminals and won’t let police do their job? They want to take away everyone else’s right to self-defense. (And that still doesn’t stop violent crime) They get pregnant but don’t want to be? They murder the baby. On and on it goes.

Thank you!

@@QualityPen Boom! Nailed it!

Yes! Yes! Yes!

Yes, pro-choice is pro-suicide. Suicide is a choice, if you believe that all choices need to be protected then you need to take this choice into account as well. I like my choices but i’m not pro-choice. Choices need to be made with a well-informed mind. Let’s say a woman will die if she gives birth to a baby, is there not a better choice maybe with more risks than abortion? I’d say trying to save both lives are worth the risks rather than the alternative of giving up on one life to save the other. There are better options for those who can’t afford to bring a baby up in the world. Obviously, it is hard for a woman who was taken advantage of to bring a baby into the world, but why would you not let the baby have the life it deserves to have?

Freedom First. That's what I'm talking about!

I'd like to hear some ideas to fix the problem. Can we come up with a better solution? Because to think that banning abortion without other options available will work, is astoundingly naive. I believe in limited abortion rights. I'm a republican/conservative, but I'm also a realist. As opposed to being religious I'm a realist, I should say. If we as a society can come up with better solutions I'm all for it. I've heard no real solutions thus far. Its just allot of talk about "I'm against it", or, "I'm for it". Followed by a bunch of vitriol, which solves absolutely nothing.

@@sarahlane4241 , I've known a few girls, that use abortion as birth control, having three or more abortions. I am not totally against abortion, but it is out of control. There has to be a legitimate reason, not just because you can. You can always use contraceptives or not have sex, but there are some cases where those are not options, such as rape or molestation and a few other situations.

Exactly. I always say I am both pro life and pro choice. Why shoukd they be mutually exclusive? That is a great way to expose that the other guy is not just pro choice, but anti life. Men and women have 4 choices for this issue. Abstinence, contraception, adoption, and parenthood.

@@randomkid7390 It is a disconnect between morality and legality. A lot of people believe the law should be moral (thus used to enforce their morals), but the law (in the US) is designed to be JUST. A lot of times justice and moral are parallel, but there are times when they are not. When you actually take an in-depth look at the pro-life arguments that is where it ultimately falls apart and is why abortions are legal. The pro-life ideology wants to promote an argument of the sanctity of life being the ultimate right when that is not a foundational belief of most conservatives, most Americans, and not inherent in American Law. The ultimate right is Liberty and is what every other life is balanced against. This inconsistency is attempted to be amended by the assertion of responsibility, but the pro-lifers want to enforce a narrow view of what being "responsible" is while denying the rights of women to control their body. Once you get past the rhetoric, the pro-life agenda seeks to stripe women of their right to discontinue a physical relationship based upon the fact that they committed a legal act of having sex. They want to take the right to chose what happens to their own body to prolong the life of another person, which is unilaterally unconstitutional. It would set a legal precedence where anyone could be forced to give their non-vital organs, fluids, DNA ect. to prolong the life of anyone. If abortions were made illegal, a women, would literally have less right to decide what happens to her body then dead people.

Greate Quote 👍.

Baffling, isn’t it. 🤔

That's a false dichotomy. Bacteria _is_ life. A fetus is _not_ a fully developed _human_ life. There are significant differences in these two things, which is why killing a virus, or a snail, or a flower, does not result in a death sentence for anyone, ever.

@@thepubliusproject when does human life become fully developed?

@@MARKTH3COBRA now that is an interesting philosophical question, and one that there are many different, sincere, evidence-based answers for. Some say it's conception, but outside of their own personal religious beliefs, supporters of that idea have little compelling evidence to show for it. There's a strong argument to be made that the age of viability is a good line to choose. There's also a strong argument to be made that birth is when life begins, and for all of human history (until recently) this was more or less the consensus choice. It's an interesting conversation, and one that should be had. It's an interesting set of arguments, and arguments that should be had with earnest sincerity. I hope those who claim they care about such things try doing so some day.

Are your hands clean, oh Pharisee? Is your conscience truly clear? You know, if Christians spent more of their time being role-models of the Christian way of life, more time in the Word of God, & more time witnessing to lost souls, I imagine the abortion issue would take care of itself.

The truth should be prioritized over everything. Something very foreign to religious people.

No man may call himself clean. Let he who is without sin cast the first stone.

They didn’t say they without sin, they said they were clean. Those aren’t the same things.

Yet you encourage many innocent lives to be destroyed. Breathing, eating, and medicine all kill billions of innocents, yet you stand by and do nothing. Suicide is the least damaging, yet you, incorrectly, consider that wrong.

Omg is that what they were doing? That's so messed up.

@K C ?

Well the word Democrat is a dirty word to me I'm glad I didn't have to listen to it

2:43 Whyyyyy? Censorship?

Yes, they absolutely did🤨! I slowed down the audio, and, whoever "they" are, they did it!

Agree.

I'm Christian and I'm pro-choice: Pro-adoption and pro-fostering. Those are choices. Not pro-murder. Murder of any person... Inside the womb or outside. And Jesus said hating someone is the same as murder. So I need to check my heart, We all should, and not hate these pro abortionists. Hate the sin. Anyway. That's my sermon for today, have a super day if you are reading this. Jesus loves you. And may you be successful in all you do.

Cloud B. You can not be a Christian and pro-choice. You deceive your self if you think so. Jesus came to destroy sin and death. Abortion is sin and death.

@@stevensonrf hey friend. I just meant that adoption and fostering is a choice but not murder. I don't agree with abortion, just check my post again. Perhaps it's my punctuation but just so it's clear: adoption and fostering IS a choice💜 There is an abundance of choices why do people run to death as though it is a choice. It's not. But choices such as loving a baby even if it's not yours is so beautiful and precious. God adopted us. Please reread my post. Stay safe. I assume you are American, I'm thinking of your country a lot. My heart breaks for you guys during this time of the spread of the virus. I plead the blood of Jesus over you and your family and declare psalm 91 over you.

Cloud B. Yes. You are right. After my response, I noticed the colon. Very sorry. Have a blessed Sunday.

Yeah. I noticed that "Do unto others as you would have done unto you." didn't have an asterisk and a side note saying "unless it's inconvenient to you".

More like red, zince thats the only color they'll see when they get to hell.

Morality in general is absolute, God is the standard of good.

Nope, it is a grey area. Think about it. If G-d was 100% against abortion He would not have built into women a natural abortive process. Women miscarry all the time and for different reasons. What the early Church opposed was abortion as birth control. Now since we live in the modern world we can see from the Third World and our own not-too-distant past that population growth without a "check" leads to great suffering. If abortion suddenly became illegal in the USA this country will become a Third World shithole in less than 1 generation, social services would not be able to cope with all the abnormal children being born and tou would see legions of abnormal children begging on the streets for food or being eaten by rats and dogs. Do you really want that future??

@@christianfreedom-seeker934 keep telling yourself that, I'm just glad you are not in a position of power.

Abd we;'re gonna have one for our new President. Goody.

@@colleen4ever ? Do you mean Trump or Biden?

@@billybayaraa BIDEN OF COURSE!!! TRUMP IS PRO-LIFE!!

I was going to say the same thing..

I am pro life but I do not wish to judge another's salvation on pro life or not. Too many people close to me with those views. I will say there are liberal "Christians" out there saying moral majority types are going to Hell and this is also judgmental and shameful. Pray for your enemies. And I am not saying this to sound holy. Sometimes I think nothing is going to work except prayer, leaning on Jesus, and repentance. God help our country.

That’s right, there’s only confused Christians.

@Brucey Gersty sounds exactly like what a confused christian would say😅

There’s also no such thing as god, but I’m sure that’s not stopping you from believing

@@scottwilson2812 - There is also no such thing as a unicorn. That fact also has nothing to do with this conversation.

Yes

So kool.

Yes. Also Jeremiah 1:5 ""Before I formed thee in the womb, I knew thee . . ."(KJV)

““When men strive together and hit a pregnant woman, so that her children come out, but there is no harm, the one who hit her shall surely be fined, as the woman’s husband shall impose on him, and he shall pay as the judges determine. But if there is harm, then you shall pay life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, burn for burn, wound for wound, stripe for stripe.” ‭‭Exodus‬ ‭21:22-25‬ ‭ESV‬‬ Notice, “when the baby comes out”, “life for life, eye for eye” etc. If harm comes to the baby, whoever inflicted the harm is going to suffer in the same measure. If the baby dies, they die. Why doesn’t anyone quote this? It’s obvious.

And Jesus flipped tables due to His passionate zeal for the House of God, yet the right-wing always tells its followers to not be passionate or display emotion....think about why your pundits are telling you to act the opposite way from Christ. Telemachus also was emotional over the loss of life in the coliseum. Both Christ and Telemachus ultimately lost their lives because of their being sincerely passionate, but in losing their lives they both saved countless lives. So if we want to save these babies lives, it may require that the culture says we are crazy or invalid, it may require our lives, but being emotional is the only way.

No but in review, there was a CHOP!

"Democratic" is muted out

@@tradcatholic Nope, not a chop. It was muted.

Missed it. Wow! Big Brother at work for sure. Scary. All foretold.

@@keithlauderjr1691 I'm really hoping for a reply from @YAFTV.

The Roman emperor Antoninus agrees with you (see the discussions between Antoninus & Rabbi Judah the Prince in Tractate Sanhedrin.)

I am a Catholic. I believe that abortion is wrong not only because that is the Catholic Church's position, but because the unborn baby is a separate human being who just needs time to grow and develop in the mother's womb. The Catholic Church is the ONLY mainstream faith tradition that has not given in to the pressure as other religions have done. The fact that there are atheists who believe that abortion is wrong just goes to show that abortion is not a moral or religious issue--it's a life-or-death issue. Irrel Avant, keep on fighting for the rights of the unborn. They need all of us to protect them.

I'm religious but abortion is still wrong with or without my God. The beauty if scientific facts.

@@jeanneplymette411 Mennonites are pro life, and so are all the evangelical churches that I know, you do not stand alone. We must continue to stand up and fight for the unborn, the vulnerable and the aged.

DNA is the most complex code in the Universe and couldn't possibly be the result of a fictional explosion of Nothing in Nowhere and Nowhen exploding for No reason. But you're an atheist?

AMEN!!!!

Cute baby on the picture! Glad that baby was yours and not to other pro choice people, i am not judging, but it really is disgusting, no other way to call it.

Easy on the eyes too!

Which human wrote that? One who must have physically seen and spoken to god right? Or one who knows how to manipulate gullible people

@@mooselord2838 Your choice dude. Enjoy your fate.

@@yournightmareracing1754 ah yes the old "god will send you to spend eternity in agony for not believing in him even if your the nicest person in the world" thing. he seems like a nice guy 😂😂. Why do you have faith in such a sadistic being? I'll also point out that hell is not actually mentioned in the original Bible. It only appears in the king James version of the Bible which was written in the 15th century. I would like to say that I can't wait for you to be disappointed and realise that you've wasted your life when you find that there is no god after you die. But that won't happen because nothing happens after you die! It's exactly the same as before you were born. Life is full of disappointment I guess lol.

I caught that too can’t block what everyone already knows

Well, in their defense, that word these days is a profanity.

Really odd. Don't know if the censors is saying that Democrat is a naughty word or if the censors committee has decided that no one should know it was a Democrat governor. Either way it gives me the willies and it seems nefarious

Ytube did not mute it LOL...the channel muted it for the reason that this will be viewed for years and years to come...and the position may change..but its actually "Liberal Governor of Virginia"

that's not really weird, the youtube overlords are all leftists

Odin, Mohammed and the other 800+ gods disagree.

@@GinoNL How does Mohammad disagree lol

@@diacriticsrue260 He claims that he is the one who did all of this

@@GinoNL No... Muhammad never claimed he was God.

Our President -Elect (barf!) a.k.a The Thief In Chief might disagree with you.

@@colleen4ever keep in mind. Just because you say you are Christian doesn’t make you one. Just like me saying I’m a woman doesn’t make me a woman.

And you are the judge of that?

@@MrWhite00001 ah, here we have the good Christian who in earlier times would slaughter others for not being "Christian" enough or without the correct interpretation (meaning his interpretation. Thousands upon thousands were killed for your view.

@@hamster4618 (read this statement with an earnest tone) Jesus taught that in Matthew 7:21. People who are only Christian by mouth...and you’ll know them by their fruits. So yes, just because you say you are a Christian doesn’t make you one...according to Jesus. I used to be a fake Christian too, only claiming Jesus with my mouth, until I actually read the Gospels for myself. So if my statement upsets you, it’s not me you are upset at, but the teachings of Christ. So I’m just going to ignore your statement about killing, I can tell Jesus statement offended you so you begin attacking me on the internet claiming I’d be a murderer like the fake Christians of the past. Anyways, God bless friend.

@John Paul Even then, it isn’t.

@John Paul Jehovah’s meting out of his judgment can be horrific & undesirable to witness.

@John PaulOne can extrapolate through creation & imagine the being of the Creator.

@@10thMorales can you explain what you meant by the 'jehovoh' comment please?

@John Paul maybe study the Bible a bit more before you spout some basic level reddit atheist arguments about God. But I doubt you’ll do that.

That's how I feel. I'm sure all those people advocating for abortion are pretty happy they didn't get killed in the womb.

@@tara34952 Picture this.... A child is killed in the womb; the child is taken to heaven; the mother finally dies of old age; to greet the mother at heavens gate is the child she killed and says... "WHY MOMMY, WHY". What should the mother say in reply?

@@strikemaster1 Where does the Bible say that the products of conception will be (1) in Heaven, & (2) meet ANYONE "at heavens gate"? So glad churches are teaching sound doctrine in today's churches. No wonder socialism/communism has taken a large foothold in our country....As go the believers, so goes the nation....just ask any of the prophets sent by God to the Israelites to fish them out of one dilemma, one catastrophe, & one idol worship after another....they never learned their lessons & still aren't.

@@MsJudi54 The bible is not the only truth... there is more truth outside of it. I could babble on forever, but the truth is I am not qualified, and I also suspect niether are you. So I copy the following from a person at least more qualified than the both of us. She is a Scientist and from what I gather also a Christian.... From the Bible Psalms 139:16 "Your eyes saw my unformed substance; in your book were written, every one of them, the days that were formed for me, when as yet there were none of them." (Please read all for a better understanding.) I (Heather Zeiger scientist) was particularly struck by the “unformed substance” in this verse because you said your babies died when one was a gestational sac and the other when there was just an endometrial lining. And according to this verse, God seems to treat this unformed substance as though it has a soul. I cannot conclude when a fetus receives a soul, but from scripture, it seems that God’s actual mechanism on this is not our concern. The point is that this unformed substance will have/does have/has always had a soul, and we treat it as such. I also think it is reasonable to conclude from general and special revelation (that would be from what we know from observation and from the Bible) that from the time of conception the new clump of cells is a new individual. Your doctor is defining personhood as something that has the full genetic make-up of a person. Before 8 days, the cells have not formed its entire genetic structure, it’s still in the process of doing that, however, those cells are also not composed of only your genetics or only your wife’s genetics. In fact, there is no other genetic match to those cells, so it is a new genetic entity, and in that sense is a unique, new being." Now... back to me talking. The bible also tells us the God knows us BEFORE we were formed in the womb... look it up. And when you consider that the spirit of John the Baptist was well alive in the womb before he was born, shows this important truth, that the soul is not given at birth, but closer to conception. Besides, all pregnant women know the baby is alive when it is moving within. Why? Because it feels like it... meaning it is reacting to feelings. Mam, we can argue till the cows come home, but let the destroyer of the unborn know... it is God who they deal with in the end... not carnal man. Edit: IMHO only, the main pro abortionists women, are those who might have already had an abortion. In this case it is understandable that this woman is justifying her actions. If it were me, I would be asking forgiviness from The Lord and repenting.

@@strikemaster1 If you're going to accuse someone of MURDER, you better have it right; otherwise, God will most DEFINITELY care. If you notice, the Bible spends no time at all on abortion. Why is that if millions of abortions would occur throughout history? Just a thought. Btw, I'm not arguing with you. I hope you didn't not consider this an "argument". Disagreement, perhaps, but there is no angst on my part. I'm anti-abortion either way we look at it. I just don't like the idea that people, mainly the "religious" are emphatically accusing others of MURDER when for there to be MURDER, from a legal standpoint, there must be proof of "human life", not just "life". Thanks for the discussion. Bye.

😂😂

Love your name.

@@fernandaabreu5625 thank you 🙏

I went to god's house the other day and he definitely says that 🤣🤣🤣🤦🤦🤦. The Bible was written by a human who has seen god as many times as you have.....so never, because there is no god! Thor would kick gods ass anyway.

@@mooselord2838 it’s a Bible verse. Jeremiah 1:5 quick question though.. what about my comment has you upset enough or makes you react 6 months later on a comment I wrote with your own edited comment?

Simple

The Bible doesn’t. Leviticus 20:13 "If a man practices homosexuality, having sex with another man as with a woman, both men have committed a detestable act. They must both be put to death, for they are guilty of a capital offense." (NLT)

@nick m. At least they're alive to talk about it and now it's the pro choice party that's doing it.

Well the problem with nutcases like the sheep here is that you/they define for yourselves when that human life begins, which is contrary to say, science.

@@Tom-le3yy Science DOES confirm when human life begins. Check your current science book on Embryology.

@@theowolf1057 Fits his lip movements, indeed. Most people here think that RU-vid muted it because he said "democrat". Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought RU-vid can only bring a video down, right?

@@ConsumeristScroffa Giving that this comment section is the first I've heard of it, and that a simple google search does not confirm it, I'd have to say we're in the clear. I just don't know why so many people in this comment section were convinced of it?

@@theowolf1057 Literally more than half the comments talk about that. I guess it's easy to assume "democrat" because it fits what comes next. But I am really not sure whether RU-vid can mute parts or not. I think the uploader did it themselves.

@@ConsumeristScroffa Yeah, it fits with what else I've seen from the YAF. They always bleep out curse words.

@@theowolf1057 I am looking at this moment repeatedly now. I become more skeptical each time I watch over that piece. It looks like there are more than two syllables in the edited out word. I also don't see his mouth open enough to expose his front teeth. You literally can not say words with "sh" without exposing the majority of your top front teeth (unless you are a skilled ventriloquist). If you have access to an unedited raw version of this speech, I would greatly appreciate the link. My curiosity is now piqued!

Very true, but unfortunately there are lot of Christians or what I like to call them “scholars of the Bible” that aren’t saved. You can read the Bible but still not be saved and unfortunately lots of people don’t know it.

@@lunagrace2872 Preach!

It's just another sign of the end times. Self proclaimed Christians arguing for abortion. Goes right along with gay Christians or the idea of gay marriage. God specifically speaks about homosexuality in His Word, yet there are tens of thousands of 'Christians' who claim it's not sinful. The Bible predicted all of this long ago.

@John Paul human rights...if it's a zygote, embryo, fetus, baby, toddler, teen, adult or the elderly...they are all in the different stages of the human lifecycle and being human they are all deserving of human rights.

As a rational being, I don't understand how you put any validity in the imaginary, bumbling, foolish dictator mentioned in the Bible.

You'll laughing on the other side of your face on the day of reckoning!

@@marie-floreddy667 huh?

@@marie-floreddy667 Im pretty sure he just found that funny. He's on our side lol

LMFAO 😂 😂 😂 😂

@@marie-floreddy667 deep breath. I'm sure Jesus has a sense of humor.

Amén.

May God get is through these next 4 years and make Trump run again like Grover Cleveland so people will be begging him back!

how am I getting so many likes? Wow Pogu. Thanks everyone!

Your moral compass was written on your heart/conscious by God's hand, Sir.

@@JoeandAngie That should be your proof that God exists.

May God bless you and your family. I note that it’s been a year since you posted this. How are you guys doing?

Should not a girl/woman who was raped be able to abort?

@@rexxo4246 Did the unborn baby commit that horrible act? Should the child be punished for its fathers sins? Murder a baby, because the father is a deviant? Rape is a disgusting, violent act. Murder is much worse.

@@rexxo4246 foster care, incubators, delivery those are just some of the solutions

@@SWILL612 No, the baby didn't commint those acts. But, here's the thing, if the woman goes immediately... IT'S NOT A BABY! It doesn't even have organs. By most standards, people don't say anything to family or friends before 16 weeks, because the chance of a miscarriage is so high. So, if you're so against abortion. Are you against miscarriage? That woman just killed her baby. It wasn't conscious. Should she be charged with murder?

@@michaelmirecki3114 You're really reaching, aren't you? Miscarriage is a natural occurrence. The mother does not decide to abort the pregnancy, when she has a miscarriage. I find it seriously troubling that people fight so hard to justify the termination of life. It's actually quite sick. Best of luck Michael

True, but biologically speaking a few stem cells doesn't classify as a person. It's exactly like saying frogspawn are frogs, they aren't.

@@bradleywoods3742 Your knowledge if biology is pretty slim...at conception a unique human DNA is created. The progression from that point on is remarkably quick. Drawing a line anywhere after conception is strictly arbitrary.

@@adamsmith3413 I know that the line is arbitrary but having unique DNA is not the sole factor in determining whether or not something or someone is a person. For example identical twins have the same DNA but they are two different people. There is no logical sense that a microscopic bundle of undifferentiated cells constitutes as a person with equal rights to a baby. What person do you know has no brain or body and can be cryogenically frozen? The answer is nobody. If someone was to get an abortion less than a week after conception there is absolutely no evidence to suggest they "murdered" a person. On the other hand a late term abortion IS murder.

@@bradleywoods3742 Ok. Now I would like to know, in your opinion at what point does an embryo / fetus / baby become a 'person'? Please answer.

​@@tara34952 The point that I was making is that there is a line, however it IS arbitrary. I am in no way medically qualified to suggest exactly where that line is, however clearly there is a huge difference between a microscopic group of cells and a baby. I disagree with late term abortions, so the line in my opinion would be before that. Beyond that I cannot say without researching the biology of foetal development, and I cannot be bothered, sorry.

Oh yer I remember going to god's house and he definitely said that. I saw him say it 😂😂.

@John Paul So you think a mother who decides to kill her unborn child because it's convenient for her, is comparable to the moral arbiter and creator of the universe exercising divine justice and punishment? Human beings don't have ultimate authority over who deserves life or death. God does. You don't need to believe in God to understand that if he did exist, what I've just argued would make sense.

Caption says liberal

They literally won’t allow you to say “suicide”, “covid”, “anxiety” and stuff like that. Give me a break.

It's not RU-vid blanking it out. YAF is a tax-exempt organization, under the "educational" exemption of the IRS tax code. That exemption requires them to be "non-partisan," so if they mention a party, their tax-exempt status could be challenged as them being political, not non-partisan educational. Look up 501(c)(3). You can check their status by looking up Young America's Foundation on charitynavigator, for example. (I used to run an educational 501(c)(3). Lawyers made us do the same.)

@@Dudemon-1 That is pretty crazy. How is calling a Democrat a Democrat now a partisan/political move? I mean he is a registered Democrat and ran on a Democrat platform.

Kudos for you, Steven for remembering this verse. I... actually just read this, since I am behind on my Bible reading plan, stopped at Exodus 31 now. Agree that Exodus 21:22-25 should be mentioned more when defending babies’ lives!

Here's why: at least one thousand years of rabbinical scholarship say the fine is for causing a miscarriage and the death penalty is for causing the death of the pregnant woman. If anti-abortion exegetes are only now finding in this rather obscure passage evidence for an absolute biblical ban on abortion, you have to wonder why no one read it that way before. The Talmud permits abortion under certain circumstances, in fact requires it if the woman’s life is at stake.

@@dulpurp There has never been agreement among rabbis over these verses. There was always debate over if the harm was to both the woman and infant, or just the woman. Another thing that has to be clear is the Rabbis also debated the literalness of an eye for an eye. Bava Kamma 83b “one who injures another” is liable to pay five kinds of penalties: “for damage, for pain, for medical costs, for loss of livelihood, and for humiliation.” In other words, the mishna starts from the assumption that the penalty for injury is the payment of money. Now for Exodus 21: Read Bava Kamma 48b “Rabbi Eliezer ben Ya’akov says that one who injures a woman is never liable to pay compensation for miscarried offspring unless he strikes her opposite the womb, i.e., on the abdomen. Rav Pappa said: Do not say that it must be literally opposite the womb. Rather, he is liable if she was struck anywhere that the wound’s impact could reach the offspring, i.e., any part of the torso, to exclude a wound to her hand or foot, for which he is not liable, since it could be argued that it was not the wound to the hand or foot that caused the miscarriage.” They uphold here that payment for an eye for an eye is upheld even for the miscarried offspring and only upheld if it is clear they were responsible for the miscarriage.

@@stevenvelez1717 ok, thank you. I was just quoting a biblical scholar. My bad.

He reminds me a lot of Dinesh D'souza. Both are brilliant speakers.

@@jimboslice3358 I agree! Spot on!

That's a close enough translation from the original Hebrew.

Woe to everyone that voted for Harris! (not Biden, Harris!)

Context ..Context ! Jesus is speaking to the Pharisees in that verse

@@brianmccauley339 you've missed the point of the Bible.

Cause abortion isn’t mandatory and those people just choose to do so. So there’s nothing racial about it

I know. Like we don't know what he's saying!

Clearly done for political reasons, could be see as political interference

Its Editorial. They are editorializing, contrary to their legal mandate.

You'd think that Democrat would be highlighted by RU-vid!

Coz THEY don't wanna be reminded of their prejudices!

The Talmud (Jewish religious law) states that there are three 'partners' involved with the creation of a child: the father, the mother, and Hashem (God). This means that the creation of every child is the direct will of God himself and there are no "accidental" children. I always thought this was a very beautiful thing.

@@daniellemeyer8568 Just because the parents didn’t plan the child doesn’t mean God didn’t. No child is a mistake to God. We are all special to him.

And they're baffled by their own ignorance, too. Sad.

Excellent point

Not trying to support abortion but I believe the reason the eggs are protected is because they belong to an endangered species, not out of the sanctity of life. There are people who get paid in Florida to kill pythons because they are an invasive species, egg or otherwise.

The commandment is thou shall not murder.... and it means Hebrews are not to murder other Hebrews.

@@cnault3244 Nope. Biblically you can't kill non hebrew slave for example, for any reason. Another hebrew was supposed to be killed for certain crimes. So it always means innocent, people have their rights you know. Original hebrew word doesn't help, if you don't read the content properly.

@@petrikoivukangas "Biblically you can't kill non hebrew slave for example, for any reason. " When a man strikes his male or female slave with a rod so hard that the slave dies under his hand, he shall be punished. If, however, the slave survives for a day or two, he is not to be punished, since the slave is his own property. (Exodus 21:20-21)

@@petrikoivukangas "So it always means innocent, people have their rights you know." According to the Bible, god says the following people ( this is a partial list) are NOT innocent & are to be killed: - adulterers - homosexuals - disobedient children - women who were not virgins on their wedding night - people who worship a different god - people who worship no god - people who work on the Sabbath

C Nault Biblically those are not innocent. Unborn babies are. Basic example of not killing innocent exists. We have to apply to state laws that exist, but that should be less killing these days. Abortion should be illegal, and that phenomena didn't exist in biblical times. So we have to use brains also, when thinking God's will.

@Kadyrbek Nurlybekov You need to calm down, you're being too loud (and conflating two unrelated topics)

@J Mireles Damn son. That was one of the most concise and irrefutable statements of fact, logic and reason as to the morally repugnant concept of abortion that I have read from just about any source. Well done.

@aKa Donut There couldn't be another Jesus, but good point.

He said Democratic, while the Closed Caption says "liberal"

I found this comment down below. "They do it themselves so as to bypass a few filters."

I'm stealing that

@@gideone9802 it's all yers. Enjoy.

According to the CDC, there are between 13,000 and 30,000 late-term abortions each year. Less than 1% of abortions are due to rape. Less than 0.5% of abortions are due to incest. Less than 10% of late-term abortions are for fetal or maternal health. Pretty messed up when you realize the vast majority have nothing to do with any of the usual excuses given by abortion supporters.

Doesn't means those "excuses" aren't valid. Taking these numbers, that would roughly means there's 130 abortion due to rape, 65 due to incest and 1.300 due to health issues each year. Do you see yourself sayin to 4 different women each and every day that their reason to abort is not valid ? The problem comes from those considering abortion as a late birth control measure when there's multiple ways to avoid getting pregnant in the first place. People just need to enjoy their sexual life in a responsible manner, and that should start with proper education on the subject.

He meant to say "demonic"

Now you know how people with more than one brain cell feel about people who believe in god

It's not RU-vid blanking it out. YAF is a tax-exempt organization, under the "educational" exemption of the IRS tax code. That exemption requires them to be "non-partisan," so if they mention a party, their tax-exempt status could be challenged as them being political, not non-partisan educational. Look up 501(c)(3). You can check their status by looking up Young America's Foundation on charitynavigator, for example. (I used to run an educational 501(c)(3). Lawyers made us do the same.)

So what do you call the crusades then? Politely shoving your religious beliefs down someone's throat and if they dont swallow you kill them? Sounds legit

Then what is it?

@@jamesdungan4426 another human being with a different DNA and, if there's blood, different blood (that's why there's a placenta)... That wasn't difficult to answer

And it isnt a human till further growth in the womb so removing it at an early stage isn’t killing.

@@allpowerful555 that's scientifically wrong buddy. It isn't a person for sure... But it is a human being. Learn some biology

Leftists should stop breeding

He was saying that in a "tongue in cheek" sort of manner to emphasize Jesus Himself will harshly judge those who harm children.

yes.. for His followers, the way this kid spoke of the Lord is very offensive. If apostle Peter heard this he would have been tempted to slap him a few times.

@@TommyNitro there are some people (all human beings) you can do that with and One Being that you don't do that with.

Well, it is a rude word 😂😂

It's not RU-vid blanking it out; it's YAF (the spospor/uploader). YAF is a tax-exempt organization, under the "educational" exemption of the IRS tax code. That exemption requires them to be "non-partisan," so if they mention a party, their tax-exempt status could be challenged as them being political, not non-partisan educational. Look up 501(c)(3). You can check their status by looking up Young America's Foundation on charitynavigator, for example. (I used to run an educational 501(c)(3). Lawyers made us do the same.)

They probably worship Margaret Sanger and pray to her at her church of Planned Parenthood.

Odin and the other 800+ gods disagree.

@@GinoNL 800+ false gods, the God im talking about is the only One. 👍🏻 Alpha and Omega, the beginning and end

Awesome