Everything Wrong With The Dark Knight In 27 Minutes or Less - 10th Anniversary Re-Sin 

Jack Nicholson, Heath and Caesar Romero.

Not that big of a deal. He's dead, so it's pretty pointless to mope around about it while you are alive.

@what about the situation The fuck do you mean "even in a videogame"? Dude it's like one of the top 5 best joker depictions ever.

Don't do drugs.

@what about the situation As a person who loves film noir, I loved Jack Nicholsons depiction of the Joker.

If anyone can do it, it's the writers at CinemaSins

Don't you ever talk about volcano activities ever ever ever again!

I know 2 things wrong with this movie, it isn't longer and Joker isn't in it more!!!!!!!

C'mon man everyone knows ice is just a myth

Interesting quip.

You are gorgeous

I know I was thinking that also

Same. I wanted to add text to a still of Joker with the knife to Rachel saying "I fucked your brother!" :P

​@@MrJimmyTideI'd go with "Ride 'em cowboy!"

literally the only good joke dffjksfhsjkhfkdjshfk

Agreed! The logo thing makes so much more sense now.

I'm positive he's said before the whole reason he does it is something like he shouldn't have to sit through their logos if he's paying to see their movies? But then now he's realised he does the exact same thing because how else would you know who made the movie if their isn't an intro with the companies logo

Yeah, although we still don't know who "Chris" is.

Not take it seriously in what way tho? Yeah, a big portion of these sins might be nonsensical and have dumb oversights in them, but a lot of them are also correct and make good points, and they are legit logical flaws and overlooked plot holes of the movie that the writers/creators allowed to be (either intentionally or not). Yes, most people are probably watching these sin videos for pure silly entertainment, but it doesn't mean you can watch it only for that. These videos also have some educational value to them.

@@king__iopa6841 "These videos also have some educational value to them." Very, very little. 80% of the sins on this channel are questioning insignificant details, continuity errors, pop culture references, personal opinions, and jokes. and the rest 20% can mostly be explained "away" with movie nerd jargon, like: rule of cool, not giving out all the details, having the finished product have better pacing this way, conveying an abstract concept better through picture that way, or simply being mostly unimportant to the plot/character arc/moral of the story, etc. etc. etc. Cinemasins is practically just entertainment. Just food for thought: Do you think that Christopher Nolan would really get something substantial out of this, education wise?

I always figured the joker was so messed up that the detonator would blow up the ones that triggered it not the other way around.

Whatever was supposed to happen when they hit the denotators, it didn't, it just goes to show Joker was wrong about people. Hell, him keeping a detonator as a failsafe shows that even he accounted for this show of empathy getting in the way of his message, making it inherently hypocritical

@@Igorcastrochucre always have a backup plan

Until we really see moments like this shine in the real world, though, the Joker will be right.

See I think this was jokers one mistake, if he'd given someone both detonators and told them to choose or he'd kill them then both boats (basically making it a suped up trolly dilemma) I think that person kills the boat full of criminals every time.

Abso-fucking-lutely. I also like to live by “I’ll take on any job… for the right price.” - Cad Bane.

thats why i became a hooker

*does not always apply to sex

@@b1bbscraz3y Nah, pretty much always applies to sex. You also need a strong will and good character judgement though, in order to avoid the drug culture that comes with that entertainment industry. Unless you were talking about prostitutes, in which case yeah, I agree, but primarily because it's almost entirely unregulated instead of being a licensed practice like, say, massage therapy.

@@CoralCopperHead that's the point lol, who said anything about the industry or sex work. you can be good at sex and just a regular person. plenty regular people are. and just have sex with their partner or partners in life, not getting paid for intercourse. you could maybe say they pay for it through relationship benefits but that's more paying for the comfort of the person than the sex itself since regular people who aren't good at sex get those same relationship benefits

Lego Batman?)))

Idk if leaving out Leto was intentional or not but either way, good 😂

phoenix was the first one i've seen and that movie hit me so hard that i got him tattood

Jesus, I'm still learning new shit about this movie lol

I've missed that too many times for me to believe that it was intentional lol. 😀

This was from that "Did you know that in The Dark Knight" guy.

coincidences =/= foreshadowing

@@eternyti Maybe it's subconscious.

Batman's voice every time he speaks. Ding ding ding ding

@@InsanityPlea100 Let's hear you do a better job

@@ASK-iz1pm ok. 'IIIII'MMMM BAATTMMMAANNNNN, WHHEEREEE IISSS HHHEEEE???!!!' How'ed I do?

the batmobile crashing through the garage on x floor above the first or second and the witness getting a gun in court should be worth 50 sins

The acting of Christian Bale (in both roles, especially Bats) deserves a 101 mediocre sins.

I'm so glad I'm not the only one. It always makes me wonder how people believe a word he says to anybody. Especially the "agent of chaos" seems so off, I wonder how anybody believes it judging Jokes actions even if he would otherwise tell the truth. And we know really well that he lies even to people he's going to kill, like we saw with the scars stories. He always lies and misguides and always has a plan.

No offense to Eckhart, as it has nothing to do with his acting, but I feel he was more interesting as Harvey Dent before he went completely loony. Taking a suspect hostage, making them think they might die off a coin toss. Really sketchy stuff. Once he became Two-Face he became pretty one-note. He shows up to people who wronged him, flips a coin, and kills. It's just not that interesting compared to everything the Joker is up to, like blowing up the hospital, doing the hostage swap, and the ferry test.

100%. Man gets overlooked hard because of Heath, plus all the other major stars in this film, but he had a LOT of screentime and he nailed this role the whole way.

@@kyuubinaruto17 I think the issue is we didn't see ENOUGH of him as two face.

@@tinyky2598 I mean if they gave him more to do than just vengeance killing then sure. As I said the issue isn't with Aaron acting but the script that made him one dimensional. He kinda just felt THERE for the sake of breaking up the pace for the joker and because any movie with dent is eventually gonna have a two face.

@@kyuubinaruto17 I also feel like they didn't really know what to do with him in the end, his pretty quick death made me scratch my head saying "is that it?"

@TwinTurbo Ray His interns did a really good job.

Did you just forget about James Newton Howard?

Best movie composer

Elfmans batman score >>>

@@Roysin Howard co-composed the Batman themes, as far as I know. The first two movies were very collaborative except for the Joker & Two-Face themes. But the scores are way more than just a few character themes.

I don't get that reference. Help?

They should have just pulled up the casing from the floor unless the brass party went in after the shooting and cleaned up for them. Sorry I haven't seen the movie in a while so don't remember where the bullet was fired from (probably a gun).

Why is that even a problem in something such as the DC Universe? It's clearly possible since the movie said it was possible.

True, even if he unshelled the round, he'd still have to have some tiny thumbs to make that work

@@rickstaism not sure if you do or don’t know how guns work but the brass is ejected out of the top of the gun (unless it’s a revolver in which it stays chambered which is possible). So for them to recreate a full bullet is nonsense unless they were able to retrieve the shell In which case they wouldn’t need to reconstruct any part of the bullet.

@@versecontro4898 *gasp* Actually more likely the brass is ejected out of the side or the bottom of the weapon (the latter typically reserved for larger automatic weapons mounted on tripods) to lessen the incidence of jamming. My 'brass party' comment was intended to highlight the name attributed to the cleanup crew on a firing range - surely gangsters employ brass parties so they don't leave behind evidence that can be traced back to them ;-)

Kevin Conroy just died yesterday. Batman and Joker are together in Heaven now.

@@robjef622 awwww ….

@what about the situation That's not very nice.

He wasn't really Taken though. He left voluntarily 🤷🏼‍♂️😅

@@robjef622 Well, kinda yeah but not Conroy's Joker

Yup, was looking for this comment

Yeah but i dont think any movie has been taken that many sins off

Problem with this is that many of the things Jeremy say isn’t even sins or stuffs that is wrong with the movie. 🤷‍♂️

​@@123RADIOactive you can only speak for yourself

@@123RADIOactive This is great actually, because we get to now watch th3birdman call him out on this and point out how unfunny his cash grab non-sins are

@@arjunholmie the birdman videos suck

Or Michael Keaton?? Yeah?

He will never be replaced

@@AmberAmber he's good, but there can only be one. RIP Kevin Conroy

The TRUE voice of the Batman/Bruce Wayne. The DCAU's consistent standard of excellence was built on Batman:TAS and set the bar so high that everything else seems like a disorganized reenactment by comparison. Idk why either, Conroy didn't alter his voice too drastically between the two(Batman and Bruce). Just enough to where you knew they were in completely different headspaces. Bruce's voice was more relaxed, almost leisurely, with an ever-present "open" quality. Whereas Batman's voice was much more concise, consistently deeper(but not drastically so). The kicker is that you could tell they were two sides of the same voice, to match the personalities in the same head. To me, that would seem easier and MUCH more effective.

How does an Animated show still whole up more than the DC movies?

Like William Wallace being 7 feet tall, kills men by the hundreds, and would consume the English with fireballs from his eyes and bolts of lightning from his ass?

They kinda played around with that a bit in Batman Begins.

It was only when everyone thought that Bruce was dead and Dick Grayson briefly assumed his identity that the mythos was broken. Dick allowed himself to be caught on a security camera to let everyone know that Batman was still alive.

By retellings, you mean outside of comics? 'Cause I haven't found much on Man-Bat aside from certain volumes of comics and the random jumpscares in Arkham Knight.

@@genkureshima9834 No, I mean regardless of where its retold or if Man-bat is a thing: early descriptions of Batman are often that of a Bat monster rather than a man in a bat-themed cape & cowl. As for finding Man-bat, try the animated stuff, he's much easier to animate than to impose on a irl environment with CG. He was in *the* Animated Series & * capital The Batman, among others.

I looked into it an carbon fiber would not fool a (modern) metal detector. Apprarently, stainless steel is tricky to spot because it has low electrical conductivity.

@@turbo8628 I understand detectors have 'levels', or tolerance which need to be set. Either Gotham is far behind on tech or set the bar very low... which would be irresponsible considering all of the gang activity. Makes me wonder though in real life what kind of weapons of various metals (e.g, copper or aluminum) could be passed undetected. Wands used by guards and TSA have a much higher detection compared to the ones we step through. You'd think it'd be the other way around.

@@DareToBeDeviant i did think it was the other way around! I assume plastics and ceramics would be the way to go but i could be wrong. I figures all metals were detectable, so i learned something new today

Or the plastic gun used by John Malkovich's "Booth" character gun he used to shoot at the president in "In The Line of Fire."

Ew. The Nolan Batverse really is a horrific police state.

Who

That's WILD!

Reeeeeaaaaaddddding

ding!

Because it's dated and corny.

@@user-qn1zp5bi2h Maybe now, fuckin 15 YEARS after the movie lol

@@Flash4ML Yeah, meaning the movie doesn't hold up.

@@user-qn1zp5bi2h Meaning that the scene is so exceptionally iconic, ingrained into popular culture through the influence of memes and the internet in general, that kids 15 years afterwards think it's cool to claim it's a "dated and corny" scene. Lol how exactly does it fit those parameters, in your opinion?

Look at me... LOOK! AT! ME!

I hated when The Batman tried copying it with Riddler. It just didn’t hit the same

It’s still a masterpiece of cinema.

@@chasehedges6775 most definitely

I’m glad everyone can agree on this. This film is a marvel!

But it's impossible to sin something that epic!

also sins for not including the scene where not all bombs at the hospital going off unscripted and heath amazingly going with it and killing that part (choice of words deliberate)

Bruh. If you act like Jeremy you must be dense asf.

Exactly. He needed Harvey to become insane murderer to prove his point that anyone can be corrupted, that's the whole reason he was even there. What makes anyone think that what he said to Harvey in that scene wasnt tailored to push Harvey over the edge. Especially since he's lied about himself multiple times and we know he's good at predicting people's reactions. Like why wouldn't he lie to manipulate him.

he already did in Batman Begins

I found both Bale and Caine to be ONE-DIMENSIONAL cardboard cutouts in all three films. UNBEARABLE. Ditto Morgan Freeman and Gary Oldman's LAME appearances.

@@hawkweedofficial2925 Shittiest takes I've ever seen

EVERYYYYONE!

Agreed. Several missed opportunities in the outtakes.

Yes. And not using "They used to call me Crazy Joe... Now they call me Batman"

Yep. The prisoners knew they deserved to die, and that the guards would want to save their own skins.

Because he is the d a r k knight

I've been working in the printing industry for 20 years now and I agree

That baffled me, too, since that's one of the best scenes in the movie.

I was fully expecting a break down

Metal detectors would pick up carbon fiber. Strangely, having just done a bit of research, metal detectors struggle to spot stainless steel (because it has low electrical conductivity).

@@turbo8628 really?

@@trevorjoneill707 yeah, according to my research on google. The stainless steel ome i have no explanation for because electricity isn't my thing (i teach mechanical).

fair enough. But it would have made airports even less protected than one would have thought

That's what makes us true fans. We can accept the flaws in our favorites as well as the ones we hate.

If my guess is correct, I think the five are the cop Joker shot at the hospital, Wuertz, Maroni, Maroni's driver and Dent himself.

I always assumed he was referring to Joker’s victims, when he said he’d kill people every day until Batman turned himself in

Honestly I boo'd him for skipping it

That movie is garbage

Best animated Batman show ever. EVER! 😢😢

Just like Blake and Kyle are never referred as Robin and Catwoman

@@leonpaelinck Yep, because only crazy people use costumes and codenames in the Nolanverse.

@@leonpaelinck Also how Reese collaborated with Joker just to have Joker turn on him 😆 very Riddler

And I call bullshit people need to stop being retarded on how 3d printed guns work you still need a steel barrel, breech, pin and springs. And its even more triple bullshit cause that's a Glock or something similar and nothing in that design allows non metal parts to function without massive changes to a brick of unrecognizable plastic.

Yes

Except 2 major plotholes. One, Batman doesn't need to sacrifice himself at the end, since there is no evidence Dent killed anyone. Second, the scene with the boats doesn't make sense. People on boats don't know that Batman (or anyone) is coming to their rescue. Therefore, logical and moral thing to do is to destroy other ship. If they destroy other ship, their own ship and everyone on it is saved. If they don't destroy other ship, then Joker will destroy both ships. In Joker's game, there is no way you can save other ship. Either you destroy it or Joker will destroy it. So why not destroy other ship? 500 dead people is better than 1000 dead people. Their decision to not destroy other ship doesn't save anyone (since they don't know Batman is coming).

@@goranmilic442 You missed the point of the boat scene. It's not just about getting saved or not, it's about seeing the good in other people, in humanity. It's a reminder that not everything is straight logic, black and white, that people aren't just thinking about themselves. Some do, but we can band together and not fall for that trap, just like the people on the boats beat Joker's game by refusing to play. The boats scene is about people making the choice to say, 'it doesn't matter what could happen to me, I'm not going to tear down someone else, murder someone else, just to save myself.' No, they didn't know anyone was coming to save them or what would happen, but they choose to have faith and to forgo violence despite that.

@@dragonsailorzero179 That doesn't make sense. "Good in people" is about "saving others". What's the point of "being good", if you don't actually help anyone? I'm sure you agree about that. And it's not about saving yourself. It's not about pure logic. It's about saving others. Did you read my comment properly? There is no way to save other ship. There just isn't. Either you destroy it or Joker does. You agree? So, if you destroy other ship, which is doomed anyway, you save not just yourself, but anyone on your ship. By destroying other ship, you save 500 lives. By not destroying other ship, you don't save nobody. Why would you let 500 people die? Why would you choose destruction of both ships? Why?

@@goranmilic442 I think you are missing, or negating the choice that was made. Both groups of people made a choice to save someone but choose to save someone else (the other boat). I say you are missing the point about what the scene says about humanity because both parties were selfless and chose not to blow up the other just to save themselves. They chose for the other to live. And that completely baffled the Joker. He thought he knew humanity, or at least Gotham. He thought for sure that people would throw anyone under the bus when it came time to save themselves. But both parties chose grace. They chose to trust the other; they saw the value of the lives on the other boat. By taking the risk not to denotate the other, they chose to save the other boat. It's easy to say that the prisoner boat should obviously be blown up at the expense of the other, but the question really is more complex and morally gray, even without bring in real world realities. (I do not recall if it's said in the movie, but in real life, not everyone on that prisoner boat would be convicted. Some might be innocent, either wrongly convicted or just still awaiting trail; some might be there because they can't post bail, etc.) There are also boat crew and prisoner guards on the boat. You could argue the guards are more valuable to society, as they do dangerous, important work. Now, maybe for you, it's just a numbers game, but me, again, I think it's more complex. Who is really to say that one life is worth more that another's? That one person's family member is worth saving over someone else's? And who knows what the future holds? How do you know that one of the people on either boat don't have some great future destiny/importance that you are cutting short? Even a convicted prisoner might turn their life around and end up doing good work, helping more people. Finally, if people on the boats think the way you do, that they might as well blow up the other so that some of them can live, then neither party ends up standing a chance, and they end up killing each other. Remember they can't communicate with each other. They don't know what the other boat will do and yes, they are taking a risk that they could all die, but by doing nothing, they are gambling that they could all survive. No, they don't know when or even if anyone is coming to save them, but they are taking the gamble. And maybe for some, it's not about saving the most amount of lives, what you call being good. For them, being good could mean doing the least amount of active harm and so for them it's better to nothing than to actively take a role in killing someone else, no matter what the reason. (Because again, who is to say one person's life is worth more than another's?). So I hope you understand now that the issue is a lot more complex than you make it; otherwise we'll just have to agree to disagree. I see where you are coming from, but for me, I would make that choice to do nothing. You don't know what you don't know. No, they don't know someone is coming to save them, but they don't know someone is not. They don't know how sincere the Joker is, if both boats won't get blown up anyway. They just knew that they weren't okay with risking harm to the other boat. I wouldn't be either.

@@dragonsailorzero179 I never said people on one ship deserve to live more than others. All I said was very obvious truth - it's better than one ship is destroyed than two ships are destroyed. Ultimately, someone on ship will have to save 500 lives. I read your arguments carefully. Most of your arguments are valid when you have an hour to go (someone can rescue both ships, we are letting other ship to live). When you have one minute to go, your aren't valid no more. Chance of being rescued is now extremly low. If both ships decide not to detonate, one minute to go, like in the scene, then both ships are destroyed unnecesarilly. Their sacrifice is unnecesary, because what's the point of sacrifice, if you don't save anyone that way.

Batman has duel identies.

@@HappyCynic But the Joker knows Batman's other identity is fake, merely a mask, so he disregards it.