2/3. County picks up the rest. Item # 18 of the contract is damning...contractors acting in their private capacity with no ties to the state or state agencies. Blam
Good job, interesting way of handling them. In the (federal territory) State of California, an administrative law judge (ALJ) can not hear or see any IV-D matters, only a commissioner (Coram non judica) with the consent of the parties. An the private tribunal is not a court of record either.
@@imsooooffended no the case was closed because he aged out I guess but I’m still in arrears but they violated my due process so many ways it seem like … I been doing my own work as well the little I do know . I received my documents from when it started and all
then unfortunately you have no rights to your offspring until you become the legal father. however if you can settle these things out of court with baby momma thats always best.
I have a court zoom hearing coming up on 12-22-22! It's a hearing for non payment and the court is seeking to suspend my Drivers License. Any information to help?
436 U.S. 84 (1978) KULKO v. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO (HORN, REAL PARTY IN INTEREST) No. 77-293. Supreme Court of the United States. Argued March 29, 1978. Decided May 15, 1978. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA. 86*86 Lawrence H. Stotter argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Edward Schaeffer. Suzie S. Thorn argued the cause for appellee. With her on the brief was James E. Sutherland. MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL delivered the opinion of the Court. The issue before us is whether, in this action for child support, the California state courts may exercise in personam jurisdiction over a nonresident, nondomiciliary parent of minor children domiciled within the State. For reasons set forth below, we hold that the exercise of such jurisdiction would violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
If the child support magistrate deletes any part of the court record so it doesn't show up on the transcript, does that taint the case? In the final hearing in 2008 I tried to present evidence of receipts of money paid directly to the mother, the magistrate said she could not legally look at my receipts. First of all, that is a lie, secondly, she deleted that segment from the transcript.
Great explanations on all three videos! I have a couple questions everybody could benefit from. 1. So when you file facts for the record, is it before the first hearing only or are you filling additional paperwork before each review meeting? 2. Each time the de facto judge refuses to accept your motions, or states a lie, shouldn't you object? As in order to repeal, you must object in a timely manner. Just some thoughts Great stuff!
1. In the beginning, after the hearing, after the next hearing, and after the last hearing. 2. I did object, in my paperwork. I had nothing left to say to them.
propia persona. its being pro per instead of pro se. most courts see them as the same, but it is not. Propia persona is proper person, pro se is acting as your own attorney.
10:16 all I can say is when you take away the face to face. In there court. They become scared. Life is Amazing. I been watching and listening. Great Job. I respect your work. We should meet and talk. You sir are a Man and not a wuss. Have an amazing NYE and into the New Year 2022
@@imsooooffended I have a court date at the end of the month it's for traffic but my child support for a suspension popped up in another state that I used to live in. And it's been over 7 years since I've lived there. But I do go visit for my mom. Anyways long story short I just wanted to go away because when I left everything was fine. Now I come back I have all this problem. What paperwork do I need to submit or at least to start cuz I want to go there first and not wait for my court date.
A person like yu will always let the government run you unfortunately your not a true American if you dnt stand up for your rights a man can take care of his kids without child support taking the money and the extra money they receive
Hey brother I'm trying to get a hold of you i sent an email to you and like to set up a call but i dont seem to get a email back, i dont know if its something on my end or yours can you let me know something, i need help i have court for child support coming up next month.
Good job and congratulations on your success however I feel you had some luck during this and one of them is timing and the other is you never consented. I don't know how old your daughter is but that could factor in how old the case is.
Long story short are you financially taking care of your child. If you are that's fine if your not or your not seeing your child well I suspect this will come back on you.
not married, petitioner of record when i filed for legal rights to my daughter. i was not the plaintiff in an action that child support brought against me although i was the petitioner of record as far as the case number is concerned. whomever brings a case brings the jurisdiction.
I also noticed in another contempt hearing that they had the guy stand up and swear in and he did. He also answered all their questions then he was handcuffed and taken to jail. The court gave him an attorney and the attorney shook hands with the prosecuting attorney and said "good seeing you again." It was brought to my attention that they appoint the accused an attorney because they need 3 signatures to make the incarceration legal, they need your attorney to sign, they need the judge to sign and the prosecuting attorney to sign off or it is a mistrial. That is why the appointed attorney stays silent, he is only there to sign your freedom away.
@@robertdiminuco689 sounds like the trust relationship at that point has come full circle. One option at that phase in my opinion would be to dissect the order they are enforcing and find the defects, return for correction and take it from there. Many ways to handle it I’m sure but man we are blessed to be able to so readily have these scenarios and information out here to review and study. It’s been awhile since I checked in on this channel I’ll have to catch up if they have some new content. Peace. Edit: thought I was responding to the content creator; corrected.
@@tmacc1529 I can tell you that in my personal case, the court never had Sufficiency of Pleadings. My attorney lied to me and told me that the woman behind the bench was a judge, she isn't a judge, she is a child support magistrate, but she is the one to sign a stipulated order. The magistrate admitted to me in another hearing that she has no authority to make anyone pay through the child support agency, she also said she is not a judge and has no oath on file. I have challenged their jurisdiction, at this time, they won't allow for a hearing to put facts on the record. But child support agency keeps harassing me. I stopped paying them 18 months ago. The child also moved away from his mother 18 months ago. Family court failed to prove jurisdiction on the record when I challenged it, they gave a nonsensical answer that doesn't address the specific Petition that challenged their jurisdiction.
They simply drop the contempt because they have a wage garnishment in place on your unemployment so you cannot be held in contempt if payment is being received. Continue to stand firm in your fight...
That is exactly right sir. Oh and I have filed a lawsuit against the director of Department of Economic Security and Division of Child Support Services for fraudulently stealing the unemployment payments.
@@imsooooffended Title 26 doesn't apply to child support and 45 cfr 302.65 gives authorization to garnish unemployment benefits so I don't see where you actually have a case to sue. Can you explain on what grounds your suit have standing in which relief can be granted?
@@Yahismagnified you are quite knowledgeable sir, but I have to ask if you read it? “Enforce unmet support obligations by arranging for the withholding of unemployment compensation based on a voluntary agreement with the individual who owes the support,”
This man is avoiding $317 a month towards his own kid. All the time he spends on this he could have come to an agreement with the mother and moved forward with his life. Despicable regardless of the mother's character. No point in sanctioning someone who is currently paying duh, voluntarily or involuntarily. This dude needs to grow up, supporting your kid financially is not a trick.
Why are you here? The fact that you think that child support has to do with the kids means you know nothing about the law. No one is mad about your opinion, you just have no idea what your talking about. Have a nice day 🙂
@@imsooooffended why am I here? Why don't you think your daughter has $317+ of expenses is the question. The mother of your child wouldn't need to use a questionable system if you consistently financially supported your kid. Grow up
@@WhichTheChickenOrTheEgg you have no idea what your talking about. You know nothing about the law. It has nothing to do with kids. I can’t explain it to you any more clear than that.
You are fooled to think child support has anything to do with your child. Is not about the child. Is about the federal funds that the agency gets for collecting money . They collect this money by using scary tactics which they violate your human and constitutional rights... You just do not have the education to understand how this corruption works and trust me we all want to take care of our kids but not by force. Not by extortion!.... We are not mad at you but please be opened minded to learn and see outside the box. It is easy to just wanting to judge others when you have no idea everything that we suffer. We will continue fighting .
@@jvaldez1947 you're reply is compassionate and I follow, my only point being if a child is being financially supported voluntarily there'd be no need to force or otherwise extort.
