Тёмный

Federal Judge Humiliates ATF Over Pistol Brace Ban 

The VSO Gun Channel
Подписаться 400 тыс.
Просмотров 52 тыс.
50% 1

Federal District Court Judge Steven Grasz Eviscerated the ATF in the FRAC V Garland Case. In stunning support for the Constitution, Separation of Powers and the Second Amendment the Judge
further admonished the already vacated ATF rule on pistol braces. I expect the ATF will double down and appeal this case. Which, I hope they do, so they can further solidify this decision at a higher level of court. This video covers the court's opinion applying the Cargill decision.
ALL LINKS, Join the Email List, and get discounts from the affiliates page: linktr.ee/vso_...
Armed and Nerded Podcast:
/ @armedandnerded
#vsogunchannel
The VSO Gun Channel is an educational resource of VSO Media LLC, a media production company, and VSOrdnance LLC, a research and development/ Testing Evaluation "contract lab". VSO is not in the business of selling or promoting the sale of firearms. Nothing VSO publishes should be misconstrued to support the sale of Firearms, components, or accessories. The VSO Gun Channel serves as a common sense, educational resource promoting responsible gun ownership and safety particularly for young minds otherwise negatively influenced by a fundamental breakdown of our society.
Unless otherwise stated, the subject matter of this video was provided by the manufacturer or another third party at no cost to us. In doing so, VSO reserves all creative rights, including the right to publish negative aspects it deems relevant to the representation of the product and its continuous improvement. VSO Gun Channel only publishes objective content related directly to tests performed by its personnel. While in-depth test results may be shared directly with manufacturers prior to official release, they must agree NOT to: impede VSO's work, attempt to undermine or alter our results, impugn or undermine our integrity, and must forfeit any expectation of being involved in the process. To be clear to our viewers, VSOrdnance LLC provides testing, evaluation, research, and product development consulting services to clients, for which it is compensated. It is solely at VSO's discretion whether or not to turn footage over to VSO Gun Channel for the publishing video derived from such tests and experience with these products. These are separate-No party may buy our opinion & No party may buy access to our audience even if it is their ulterior motive to do so by contracting the testing.
If you are interested in VSO's services you may submit an official inquiry via email to the contact email listed on channel the "about" page

Опубликовано:

 

10 сен 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 276   
@Username18981
@Username18981 26 дней назад
If the ATF calls everything a SBR, when does the NFA get challenged under common use?
@sinisterthoughts2896
@sinisterthoughts2896 26 дней назад
Solid point
@matthewd.1805
@matthewd.1805 26 дней назад
Damn dude... you nailed it
@thediddy8117
@thediddy8117 26 дней назад
It will now
@roflchopter11
@roflchopter11 25 дней назад
Unfortunately, common use isn't a real test.
@arconomach
@arconomach 25 дней назад
That's the hope for all of us buying suppressors too.
@bm5298
@bm5298 26 дней назад
$50 says not a single lawyer will ask for the word infringed to be defined
@PrayingPanda
@PrayingPanda 26 дней назад
They shouldn't. They should *TELL* the court the definition is "hinder, obstruct, or destroy" which is what the word meant in 1791 and in 2024.
@annelarrybrunelle3570
@annelarrybrunelle3570 26 дней назад
@@PrayingPanda Mark W. Smith has WELL explained this on his channel. SCOTUS has read his stuff.
@RyshusMojo1
@RyshusMojo1 26 дней назад
Ain't taking that bet. Nope.
@anthonywilliams9334
@anthonywilliams9334 26 дней назад
@@RyshusMojo1 Agreed. That’s a suckers bet.
@DDGVET4
@DDGVET4 26 дней назад
Even if they did they would say they didn't. They're lawyers.
@user-el2ek2ow3r
@user-el2ek2ow3r 26 дней назад
Governments almost always appeal a ruling against them. Why wouldn't they? They have unlimited funds called tax dollars to use.
@roflchopter11
@roflchopter11 25 дней назад
They wouldn't if they know SCOTUS will side with their opponent and nationalize their loss. If they didn't appeal and whatever rule wasnt vacated nationwide, the ruling only governmens the circuit where they lost.
@H.R.6688
@H.R.6688 26 дней назад
If braces are stocks now doesn't that prove how stupid and pointless the sbr laws are considering the millions out there and nothing has happened even though nobody has paid that magical tax that somehow makes them less dangerous?
@Jason_556
@Jason_556 26 дней назад
Exactly! I’ve always thought that and it should get SBRs thrown out of the NFA.
@BagelWithaG
@BagelWithaG 26 дней назад
@@H.R.6688 i agree friend but those who rule don't want tounderstand or be literate 😡
@PSUQDPICHQIEIWC
@PSUQDPICHQIEIWC 26 дней назад
This was _never_ about public safety or anything bound by honest reasoning -- neither today, nor in 1934.
@sinisterthoughts2896
@sinisterthoughts2896 26 дней назад
The same is true about Suppressors. It was never about safety, it was about control.
@H.R.6688
@H.R.6688 26 дней назад
@@sinisterthoughts2896 yep. Several countries have laws requiring a suppressor. I was hoping the hearing protection act would have went somewhere, especially since government got in bed with the Healthcare industry.
@me2ontube
@me2ontube 26 дней назад
That whole 16 inch rule makes about as much sense as the 6 foot rule some genius came up with concerning health not so long ago
@othernamesweretaken1871
@othernamesweretaken1871 26 дней назад
It leaked that he arbitrarily made it up. There was no data at any point to indicate that number lead to a significant increase in safety.
@seenochasm7101
@seenochasm7101 26 дней назад
@@othernamesweretaken1871he stated in his own hearing that the number “just kind of stuck”
@me2ontube
@me2ontube 26 дней назад
@@seenochasm7101 nor does 1 or 2 inches increase safety in any way
@me2ontube
@me2ontube 26 дней назад
@@seenochasm7101 and if atf were honest ... guess what
@sinisterthoughts2896
@sinisterthoughts2896 26 дней назад
​​@@othernamesweretaken1871ergo arbitrary, just as the lengths were chosen in the NFA.
@joemccarthy4270
@joemccarthy4270 26 дней назад
It isn't funny because the targets are people and what the judge is indicating is that the ATF means to accuse people of crimes and then write new laws for the crimes that they want to destroy people with. That makes the ATF a racketeering crime syndicate not a law agency.
@BadRickey
@BadRickey 26 дней назад
Well, they can't write new laws. They don't have the authority. They can write rules. screw them Damn Rules.
@kickblake
@kickblake 26 дней назад
Here's the way this works out: The ATF doesn't want to give exact details on how to make a braced pistol BECAUSE...........the industry will make that, to a T, and sell it. So they just want to use the old "just trust us, we know what one looks like up close" to accomplish this. And even if this wasn't the ATF..........no agency should have that kind of completely black-box, subjective, authority.
@sinisterthoughts2896
@sinisterthoughts2896 26 дней назад
Bingo. Add to that the chilling effect of them having the implied threat they draw that circle around you or your product if you displease them.
@KiraSlith
@KiraSlith 26 дней назад
That's what happened with the design and production of the first American pistol braces around 2012. It was heavily publicized that they were designed with DIRECT assistance and approval of the ATF to produce a legal option, both in the arm wrap and flat "blade" styles, and now 12 years later they're trying to claim those same braces are illegal. There is definitely an entrapment case to be had, but that would require surviving a direct encounter with the ATF without "voluntarily" turning over the brace.
@kickblake
@kickblake 25 дней назад
@@KiraSlith It's even more sinister than that: they're not trying to claim those *braces* are illegal...they're trying to claim that everything else about the gun except the brace makes it an SBR/"illegal".
@greggbutkewicz5892
@greggbutkewicz5892 25 дней назад
You dare to qvestion Der Fuhrer?!!
@UnfiItered
@UnfiItered 26 дней назад
If brace are stock then the ATF had violated their own rules and that rule should be over turned. They knowingly told false information to get millions of people to violate their rule just so they can prosecute. Im pretty sure thats considered a entrapment.
@ecobasetech4558
@ecobasetech4558 26 дней назад
I think you have to have "standing" to use that argument which would require someone to actually be prosecuted.
@kirkboswell2575
@kirkboswell2575 26 дней назад
If the ATF has enough money in its budget to fight these rulings through dozens of courts over years and years, then the ATF has WAY TOO MUCH money at its disposal. Way past time to cut the ATF budget.
@jeffgoodrich7628
@jeffgoodrich7628 26 дней назад
BAN THE ATF!’
@RyshusMojo1
@RyshusMojo1 26 дней назад
BAN THEM HARDER DADDY!
@g1942transient
@g1942transient 26 дней назад
I don't like that my tax money goes to taking away my human rights.
@Zulu55far
@Zulu55far 26 дней назад
For a consecutive 10 years AFT said pistol braces were legal. SBR needs to be removed from NFA, as millions of braces sold proves they are not inherently dangerous at all.
@JJ-vc2nk
@JJ-vc2nk 26 дней назад
"Arbitrary and capricious" is a feature not a bug. Glad the judges noticed.
@victorpfendler3230
@victorpfendler3230 26 дней назад
A feature inspired by the Chinese Communist Party.
@sinisterthoughts2896
@sinisterthoughts2896 26 дней назад
​@victorpfendler3230 it goes far further back than that. Tyranny has been around since before the 20th century.
@Silvercrypto-xk4zy
@Silvercrypto-xk4zy 26 дней назад
it should be illegal for any agency to use tax money to fight against our God given constitutional right to bear arms, or any other right for that matter
@jongriffin2125
@jongriffin2125 26 дней назад
The right to bear arms is not a God given right.
@Omnonymous
@Omnonymous 26 дней назад
@jongriffin2125 All of our rights are God given. The constitution is comprised of words. Words only work if you read all of them.
@othernamesweretaken1871
@othernamesweretaken1871 26 дней назад
@@jongriffin2125okay dude
@sinisterthoughts2896
@sinisterthoughts2896 26 дней назад
​@@jongriffin2125 you should work on your reading comprehension. If you want to claim you don't believe in a God so be it, a rose by any other name. The constitution acknowledges that right derive from a higher authority than any government or society of man. The phrasing they used referred to God. So even if you don't have any God you venerate, the wording still says as much, therefore, "God given" is an accurate term when referring to the constitutions acknowledgement of rights, even if it be by semantics alone.
@sinisterthoughts2896
@sinisterthoughts2896 26 дней назад
I like the sentiment, but they don't have profit margins,nand are only funded by taxes. And that argument could easily lead to many government functions to go defunct, which sounds fun, but really means something closer to a societal collapse. Maybe a limit on funds thst can be used, and a limit to appeals as well. Personally I'm not sure the government should be allowed appeals, since the courts are meant as a check to overreach, and what good is a check than can just be spammed until it breaks down somewhere?
@LordVader407
@LordVader407 26 дней назад
The only reason why this keeps happening is because we're going about it the wrong way. The only thing the government needs to be told is four words long.. Come and take it. Full stop.
@np4057
@np4057 26 дней назад
They will come and take it though. There is power in numbers sure, but when they show up with 20 people and you are alone in your house you aren’t winning that fight. That’s how they’ll go about it. The government has done a tremendous job dividing the population through misinformation and we are now next to incapable of uniting against them as a formidable force
@TheRange7
@TheRange7 26 дней назад
That's brilliant keyboard warrior. I'll pass on the internet tacticool tough guy sh*t and just comply. Who cares about a friggen bump stock? You mess with the ATF, you lose 100% of the time. Not rocket science.
@PSUQDPICHQIEIWC
@PSUQDPICHQIEIWC 26 дней назад
Nah. They've been warned enough times.
@sinisterthoughts2896
@sinisterthoughts2896 26 дней назад
I prefer "shall not be infringed" since that one has been there from out governments genesis and is written into the constitution. Meaning if anything has any weight, it's that.
@LordVader407
@LordVader407 26 дней назад
@@sinisterthoughts2896 it's abundantly clear at this point that your rights have no meaning to the federal government. Think about it. If you don't pay taxes they will send a goon squad to your house to murder you even though they print billions of dollars every year. I don't know how you believe that type of tyranny can be swayed.
@PrayingPanda
@PrayingPanda 26 дней назад
"Shouldering by the barrel" 😂😂😂😂😂
@brianclassen5221
@brianclassen5221 26 дней назад
Tea out the nose. 🤣😂✌ Happy Feet!
@z0phi3l
@z0phi3l 26 дней назад
I liked that one too
@user-fi5wz5si6o
@user-fi5wz5si6o 26 дней назад
FREE MATT HOOVER 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
@davestahl572
@davestahl572 26 дней назад
These ATF court cases are like being stuck at a rail road crossing with ATF being the train. The train stops and sits there blocking your passage for 30 minutes, moves forwards a few cars, stops for 10 minutes, backs up a few cars, stops again and keeps doing this for an hour, all the while still blocking your passage to the other side. It is like a torture tactic. The worst part is that it is wasting a lot of taxpayer dollars for absolutely no good reason over unconstitutional bullshit that shouldn't be in existence, including everything surrounding the ATF and their senseless rules.
@cd0130
@cd0130 26 дней назад
Yep.
@mikeh3084
@mikeh3084 26 дней назад
Shouldn't all judges be pro 2a? They swore to it didn't they?
@sinisterthoughts2896
@sinisterthoughts2896 26 дней назад
Yeah, funny how people have grown accustomed to that not being standard practice. Boiling a frog, I suppose.
@davidjernigan8161
@davidjernigan8161 26 дней назад
It seems like the DOJ and ATF like getting kicked in the nuts.
@PBVader
@PBVader 26 дней назад
Considering making an additional unscheduled donation in hopes of capturing a photo of their balzac casts.
@cas2985
@cas2985 26 дней назад
@@davidjernigan8161 They are not particularly smart but they are devious as hell.
@chrish1585
@chrish1585 26 дней назад
The hope is that Trump is reelected and can appoint a ton of other federal judges into the deep liberal circuit courts and lower to flip the balance back to the constitution. The other thing that MUST happen is that corrupt activist judges be removed, disbarred, and prosecuted for any criminal activity!! If the courts are corrupt, the only other option for we the people is the cartridge box...
@sinisterthoughts2896
@sinisterthoughts2896 26 дней назад
Agreed on rogue judges, there is some appalling behavior from the bench on some accounts.
@p99guy
@p99guy 26 дней назад
I sure wish we could overturn the 1986 Hughes amendment, and open up the NFA registry again. ( Gee thanks NRA…you chucked us under the bus)
@redacted_redacted_redacted
@redacted_redacted_redacted 26 дней назад
They didn't get the moniker of Negotiating Rights Away for nothing
@imperfectlump6070
@imperfectlump6070 26 дней назад
Get rid of the NFA altogether.
@p99guy
@p99guy 26 дней назад
@@imperfectlump6070 I agree, but kicking the register back open to new tranferables is a step in the right direction.
@imperfectlump6070
@imperfectlump6070 26 дней назад
@@p99guy I am unwilling to pay taxes on a right nor get on a list. Not that they don't have an illegal registry already.
@jamesvatter5729
@jamesvatter5729 26 дней назад
Curtis adding "humiliates" to that caption makes it worth the wait! 😂
@raymarchetta7551
@raymarchetta7551 25 дней назад
ATF: but why can’t we do this now and tell you why we did it later? 😅
@RustyShacklefardd
@RustyShacklefardd 26 дней назад
Literally what difference does it make if my barrel is 2" or 20"? SBR laws are gay
@dreknows
@dreknows 26 дней назад
Funny pistol is defined by atf as be Intended or designed be shot one handed but everyone use support hands when e shoot unless we're gangsters in juice 😂😂
@sinisterthoughts2896
@sinisterthoughts2896 26 дней назад
A support hand is not necessary for the function of a hand gun, which is true. Funny enough though, there are rifles that can be used one handed pretty easily, but they aren't designed solely to operable via one hand. Now as you mentioned, the use of a support hand is common, and how is just using a second hand, or a cheek any different than using a shoulder? Which demonstrates that is indeed arbitrary and basically a load of BS.
@mysteriousoklahoma777
@mysteriousoklahoma777 26 дней назад
ATF needs to accept SC ruling and stop
@NoOne-kp2gz
@NoOne-kp2gz 26 дней назад
Even worse if you think about it, they're using our tax dollars to argue in court why they need to get more tax money and try and revoke rights that they don't have the authority to revoke.
@silencedOak
@silencedOak 26 дней назад
He clearly sees Exactly how they tried to circumvent the law.
@deankirkpatrick7658
@deankirkpatrick7658 26 дней назад
does it really matter? how long and how many lawsuits and this is still an issue? they will just create 10 more illegal rules - or even laws and then how many years and how much $ is spent to get our rights back - just to have 20 more passed that have to be fought. there needs to be criminal prosecutions for depravation of rights under the color of law. until that starts happening there is no repercussions for depravation of rights to just continue - losing rights for decades, losing millions in fines, fees and or lawsuits.
@sinisterthoughts2896
@sinisterthoughts2896 26 дней назад
Agreed.
@PumpkinKingXXIII
@PumpkinKingXXIII 26 дней назад
It’s like that old saying is it porn or is it art thing. I know it when I see it. Is it a pistol or a sbr? ATF “I know it when I see it!”
@sinisterthoughts2896
@sinisterthoughts2896 26 дней назад
Exactly
@Qingeaton
@Qingeaton 26 дней назад
I like to look at the "vintage" photos channels. They show a lot of things and people I haven't seen. I go look up some of them. One glamour photo of a beautiful young woman, who looks very much like my daughter in law. I said "look at her, honey, doesn't she look like your daughter Rae?" Then I google who she was and up come nude photos, because she was actually a stripper back in the day. So, she was both art and porn, I guess.
@EndjdjDhjeje
@EndjdjDhjeje 26 дней назад
What if a state passes a law saying pistol braces are legal on pistols. Like the dea cant raid dispensarys in legal states and the atf cant take a pistol from a 18 Year old in states its legal.
@richardhansen342
@richardhansen342 26 дней назад
This is truly ridiculous any judge should be able to stop an executive agency from violating the peoples Rights, and it automatically goes Nation wide, Plus once they are slapped down the Government can not appeal.
@FreedomsLife1776
@FreedomsLife1776 26 дней назад
First off: love the channel guidelines pop up hahah second: we already had a moment like this where a massive amount of “non registered SBRs” went out to the public via the influx of M1 Carbines. They did the appropriate action and changed the NFA to make them legal. That’s the correct answer now: completely remove SBRs from the NFA. It’s a ridiculous law made toothless since pistols exist and are the truly concealable firearm.
@spikymikie
@spikymikie 26 дней назад
That is an EPIC response. Another brick in the wall to protect the 2nd.
@Puma1Sunfire1
@Puma1Sunfire1 26 дней назад
ATF thinking it can win here is LITERALLY making my head play the John Johan Jameson laughing at Peter Parker meme
@user-hr7im6fn7j
@user-hr7im6fn7j 26 дней назад
ATF is reloading they're going to change the language in the law, you watch and see
@sinisterthoughts2896
@sinisterthoughts2896 26 дней назад
The government always does. Animal farm all over again.
@Car-Ramrod69
@Car-Ramrod69 23 дня назад
How’s many humiliations is this now? Can’t a judge force some kind of cease and desist order against these clowns?
@cliffmontagnoli1886
@cliffmontagnoli1886 26 дней назад
thanks for the information. Keep it coming. We’re are grateful.
@AncientGloom
@AncientGloom 26 дней назад
I'm not saying anyone should just put stocks on their shorties, but if you did, I didn't see anything, I didn't hear anything, and I'm not going to say anything.
@grantroper2511
@grantroper2511 День назад
I love it! A thorough judgement with well explained, humorous examples. We need more humor in the court system, in my humble opinion. The whole thing is way too uptight.
@OFallons
@OFallons 26 дней назад
Once the Supreme Court rules it’s done, and done.
@gunsfugitivessecurity8357
@gunsfugitivessecurity8357 26 дней назад
Tell that to those behind enemy lines in California post Bruen, doesn’t change shit until there’s an enforcing/punishing act
@TimothySmith-yh4fu
@TimothySmith-yh4fu 26 дней назад
Federal Agencies (ATF, FBI, FDA, NSA, IRS, etc.) are part of the executive branch not the legislative branch. They enforce laws, they can not legally/constitutionally make them. This shortcut just like legislation by gavel has not served us well. It took 2 constitutional amendments to make alcohol illegal then legal again but none for marijuana and other drugs.
@2024MakeAmericaGreatAgain
@2024MakeAmericaGreatAgain 26 дней назад
It should be criminal for the ATF to continuously infringe upon the God given rights reconfirmed by the constitution.
@charleswismiller3271
@charleswismiller3271 26 дней назад
Waste more of the taxpayers money
@robertosantinni9656
@robertosantinni9656 26 дней назад
I thought the Supreme Court said pistol braces WERE legal?
@adamturnbull6157
@adamturnbull6157 26 дней назад
Now it looks like your walls are tilting slightly to your right my left. I hope it was worth it to make the desk level. 😂
@scubasleeve3497
@scubasleeve3497 26 дней назад
So they didn't call out the rule as unconstitutional on it's face, they just ruled against the AFT "on a technicality". Basically if the AFT explains things better it's all good.
@Tripsolo65
@Tripsolo65 26 дней назад
If everyone can’t see why the ATF needs to be done away with completely after seeing how they are operating, then get used to this because it’s never going to change.
@sedevri864
@sedevri864 26 дней назад
Really glad there are some good honest judges out there willong to go to bat forour rights.
@Qingeaton
@Qingeaton 26 дней назад
As in so many other areas of the law, we need adjustments to err on the side of freedom. If the agency seeks to restrict rights, and loses a case, no appeal. If they seek to restrict rights and win, the people still get to appeal. The people have the benefit of the presumption of having the right and freedom, and taking it should be extremely burdensome to the government.
@ferebeefamily
@ferebeefamily 26 дней назад
Thank you for the video.
@tacticalrabbit308
@tacticalrabbit308 26 дней назад
I didn't know the atf could hit the broad side of a barn at 50 feet!
@f22cap2s2k
@f22cap2s2k 26 дней назад
It's time to completely repeal the NFA
@user-lx2sh7gx5l
@user-lx2sh7gx5l 23 дня назад
The fact that the braces were atf legal since their inception is a bit of an issue.
@MF-hz6xx
@MF-hz6xx 26 дней назад
ATF did a pretty good job on their own after a decade of self inflicted confusion
@joelatkinson2080
@joelatkinson2080 26 дней назад
Another great video!!!
@armani_5.565
@armani_5.565 26 дней назад
Outstanding
@zer0tzer0
@zer0tzer0 26 дней назад
They have to do all these legal gymnastics because they're wrong. If their position wasn't fundamentally flawed from the beginning it would not be necessary. All gun laws are infringements.
@jjacksonjr2
@jjacksonjr2 26 дней назад
MAN I LOVE your opening statement!!! LoL
@richb.4374
@richb.4374 26 дней назад
The ATF can play legal ping pong all they want....we still will not give them up and we still refuse to give up rights to appease their puppet masters...end of story.
@steveninaz9576
@steveninaz9576 26 дней назад
Thank you Sir
@RyshusMojo1
@RyshusMojo1 26 дней назад
I no longer comply with tyrants. I have chosen my hill.
@jda79
@jda79 26 дней назад
He has appointed tons of pro 2a judges
@sinisterthoughts2896
@sinisterthoughts2896 26 дней назад
Did he? Or did he approve tons of actual conservative judges, which means they are pro constitution in general? As in do they only focus on 2a, or is apart of their greater philosophy.
@rabidsbr
@rabidsbr 22 дня назад
​@sinisterthoughts2896 Does this distinction matter? Conservative judges are originalists. That's a good thing.
@ayougo
@ayougo 26 дней назад
Santa’s making a list and he is checking it twice. ATF has been naughty not nice. Santa’s coming for you.
@lmbear
@lmbear 26 дней назад
The atf can return all the pistol braces that they confiscated too!!!!! Or pay for it.
@pgtmr2713
@pgtmr2713 26 дней назад
The atf like picking on the handicapped
@m.w.2401
@m.w.2401 26 дней назад
Soon as they did the brace bs I put a stock on without their permission. Not sorry.
@NCHeel
@NCHeel 26 дней назад
So trump isn't 100% 2A. What you going to do? Vote for Harriss/Walz and show him. Not vote at all. That will really get us somewhere. Here's the real problem. One side is all the guns or you get nothing from me. The other side is we hate guns and want them all gone but if you limit mag capacity you go our support.
@itsapittie
@itsapittie 26 дней назад
Wow! He really lit 'em up! 😂
@EugeneWorth
@EugeneWorth 25 дней назад
Never gave up mine since I first bought five years ago
@marcofguzman3075
@marcofguzman3075 26 дней назад
They definitely where waiting for more orders from the administration 😂but that's my opinion and we know how that goes 😉
@fortheloveofnoise
@fortheloveofnoise 26 дней назад
Just got something wonderful from PSA today. The 2nd Amendment shall not be "but not this particular gun"ed amymore! 😂 please...😅
@ericmoney4572
@ericmoney4572 25 дней назад
Ah yes, the "Texas sharp shooter fallacy" applied in law...
@munsterr777-iz2ow
@munsterr777-iz2ow 26 дней назад
You know, I think I can make my arguments just as arbitrary and capricious and I have the perfect microphone that fits around the finger and has a very long shaft
@hunterrick4
@hunterrick4 26 дней назад
Congratulations
@marcofguzman3075
@marcofguzman3075 26 дней назад
Exactly what they want
@ronsorrentino6207
@ronsorrentino6207 26 дней назад
Wait a minute. I’m confused. I’m definitely not a lawyer and I haven’t even recently stayed at a Holiday Inn Express. But how is it the ATF can put on a side show to back or bolster their stance/position, but, in a recent case that the NSSF just screwed us on, we couldn’t submit a study about how many magazines are in the hands of Americans that shows they’re widely commonly used and owned, because a study can’t take the stand yet as I said, the ATF can present a slideshow that also can’t take the stand and be questioned? Not sure if I explained that very well to make the point of where I’m confused but why is it we can’t and they get to?
@texpatriot8462
@texpatriot8462 26 дней назад
The atf will have a hard time getting a ruling from an ATF Friendly court. All cases need a plaintiff and a defendant. If the ATF is a plaintiff, who could they sue? Random citizen? Gun Rights Orgs? They are stuck with the courts chosen by plaintiffs 👍👍👍
@Blain5700
@Blain5700 26 дней назад
No, the ruling was based on the administrative side. Where the rule proposed for public comment was significantly different from the rule they ultimately wanted to pass. Courts rule on admin issues first. Then the constitutionality of a rule comes last. The atf can propose the same rule they did for public comment and then pass that rule of they wanted. Then someone could sue on 2A grounds.
@nicz8005
@nicz8005 25 дней назад
They waited so long, because it’s all politics to this clown show of an administration.
@douglassfwilson
@douglassfwilson 26 дней назад
Nicely explained!
@jjacksonjr2
@jjacksonjr2 26 дней назад
I KNOW that I couldn't be a congressman or a judge with dealing with the aft!! I KNOW MY questioning and ruling would be MOSTLY beeped out and considered badgering. I feel sorry for the sensor person
@dannyo6699
@dannyo6699 25 дней назад
So at what point will penalties be applied to the ATF for violating the Constitution?
@lukepippin4781
@lukepippin4781 21 день назад
Not sure why it would be debated that Trump appointed pro 2A judged 🤔 Some people haven’t been paying attention to the Supreme Court apparently.
@2112user
@2112user 26 дней назад
Sounds like the judge seen that the ATF did, walked the ATF over to the "pile of shit left on the living room floor" and procedded to rub the ATF's nose in it to ensure they got the point. Works for dogs, so lets see which is smarter.... because we all know what the next step is, should the dog do it again.
@doncraig3665
@doncraig3665 26 дней назад
got that right!
@lgroves336
@lgroves336 26 дней назад
what a joke... You cannnot humilate the ATF. They will keep doing just what they have been doing... They do NOT feel bad for trying to MAKE LAW.
@zuriel1489
@zuriel1489 26 дней назад
So can I or cant I go to the range with my braced AR 15 pistol? Sorry I am confused.
@sinisterthoughts2896
@sinisterthoughts2896 26 дней назад
Yes, for now. Basically. It is vacated, which means not enforceable, but they are going back to get that changed, but until they win a case, they are still legal. I hope that clears it up.
@zuriel1489
@zuriel1489 26 дней назад
@@sinisterthoughts2896 thanks buddy!
@leesouth120
@leesouth120 26 дней назад
Thought they were no longer allowed to pull bullshit out of their ass,and make it a rule or law.
@user-lm7du9qx1r
@user-lm7du9qx1r 26 дней назад
Disband the att
@sinisterthoughts2896
@sinisterthoughts2896 26 дней назад
I mean, they aren't great, but they provide necessary telecommunications services to many people. As bad as they are, I don't find the demonstrably worse than the other phone companies.
@timwilliam8045
@timwilliam8045 26 дней назад
Time is always on the govs side.
@bhhvvbvgyvbuvv
@bhhvvbvgyvbuvv 26 дней назад
Oh you mean that law that i ignored ?
@barkermjb
@barkermjb 26 дней назад
Love it! 🇺🇸
@thediddy8117
@thediddy8117 26 дней назад
I see soon that sbrs will be challenged to be removed from the nfa list and win same with silencers
@burbanpatriot6953
@burbanpatriot6953 26 дней назад
so i cant see the video but i can hear it, i can only see if it while scrubbing. i assume they are trying to block your content
@user-lx2sh7gx5l
@user-lx2sh7gx5l 23 дня назад
The America hating insurgent democrat is a Tier 1 narcissist. Despite the fact that their argument is absolutely ridiculous and makes ZERO sense, they will not accept the ruling. Like the bf/gf that cannot accept the break-up that happened because he/she is an abuser.
@TheMcpvideo
@TheMcpvideo 26 дней назад
Defund the ATF👎
@cerahhaddix4806
@cerahhaddix4806 26 дней назад
Any update on the vanderstok case?
@AscDrew
@AscDrew 26 дней назад
Your hat's not level either! hahahaha
@mako8091
@mako8091 22 дня назад
So when are we going after the NFA?
Далее
Pistol vs Rifle, vs SBR: ATF Rules Explained
16:34
Просмотров 186 тыс.
Gun Cooked in an Oven Staged for Anti-Gun Propaganda
10:13
Самый БОЛЬШОЙ iPhone в МИРЕ!
00:52
Просмотров 905 тыс.
The Solothurn 20mm Anti-Tank Rifle
14:44
Просмотров 3,6 млн
Antigun Group Creates Illegal Guns...Again...
13:23
Просмотров 62 тыс.
223 vs 5.56 | What's the Difference?
11:10
Просмотров 164 тыс.
ATF Agents Going Door To Door Looking For Your Guns!
6:55
9mm vs 40 vs 45: Can’t Believe The Results
13:26
Просмотров 919 тыс.
Самый БОЛЬШОЙ iPhone в МИРЕ!
00:52
Просмотров 905 тыс.