To be fair, I think the thing with ageplay is more about a relation between Auth-Domination rather than a "taboo to my side thing". I mean, stuff like daddy and all that are more correlated with the implicit themes of domination. Also the P tag exists and isn`t centered in the auth axis as much as in the right axis. Great motivational video J-rooge!
i would assume its to do with authoritarians (esp authright) being more willing to take advantage of power dynamics. contrasts pretty heavily with anarchist ideas of breaking down power and preventing exploitation.
Two issues I have with this study. 1: If the participants knew the purpose of this, I’m sure there would be people who pick taboo kinks and pick the opposite political association to skew the results intentionally. Two: The more taboo options have less picks, so if only one person selected being a dirty pedo, wherever they put themselves on the chart is where it sticks, with no other datapoints to pull the dot. Id wanna see an interactive chart where it only charts one kink at a time so we can see the density of the selections
A lot of times people only get told afterwards what the purpose of a study was to exactly prevent such things from happening. When the sample data is too small you should also usually not include it. For example if only one single person would pick pedophilia then it most likely wouldn't get included. But I'd also like the dots to show how common it is instead of how taboo it is.
@@Zaher74 Sometimes people don't want to admit this stuff even to themselves, (and sometimes they don't know) so it'd still be an issue (and that would make problem number 1 a lot worse) A lot of sciences, specifically psychology, have a lot of trouble with studies that contain human participants, because things like lying and pride exists, where in other species, it's not likely that they even really understand the full extent of what's happening when a study is taking place. They are just reacting to their immediate environment So what you need to do is skip over what they think entirely. Record physical reactions to stimuli that is associated with a fetish instead. (stuff like hormone levels, erection status, however the hell you measure AFAB turned on status, etc.) Problem is that this would require a lot more funding and would drive away a lot of participants, specifically those who have taboo fetishes and don't want to admit it
@@Zaher74ot a solution in the slightest, pedos know exactly how society looks upon them, most would think it's a honeypot, what they would do however is pick a similar fetish, such as ageplay
@@dukedunac thank you kind sir for ur educated guess being a gd christian boy myself I'll be sure to do my research on AellaGirl to warn other believers of her blasphemous ways. #missionary
@@libertatemadvocatus1797 i’ve only known a few people who play it up as a joke to make people angry. it might be kind of funny but you have to commit to being hated by everyone
I think a big reason that the fetishes on the conservative side are more disgust based could very well be caused by the much higher religiosity of that demographic. A very large amount of religious beliefs center around the idea of sex being sinful and thus immortal outside of specific circumstances. I could imagine that to someone who was raised with that view of sexuality "disgust play" as a general category would feel like a natural way to make sex more intense. Just a thought based on the additional correlation between conservatism and religion.
Sex has never been taught as sinful, it’s literally praised as the highest order of love, connection and commitment. Hence the disdain of it’s degeneration by things like leftist fetish culture. You shouldn’t need to stab your wife in the jugular to get off you freak.
I mean I hate to say it but if this is a Twitter poll I think you would find that the majority of answers come from prople who lean more left and probably see plenty of people trying to make the other political side look bad. They didn't really give detail how it was conducted but given the large sample size that's my best bet
@@zachmondial2172 I'm sure Twitter is a pretty even split of the political spectrum now that musk runs it. I'm sure a considerable amount of leftist left and a considerable amount of right-wingers joined
Never trusted those political compass tests. Too finicky, never sure enough. Time to find out where I truly stand by picking the square with the best fetishes.
This political compass is what people will use to debate political opponents in the future. It is far too powerful of a weapon to be left in the hands of mortals
@@marverickmercer1968 another channel called lotus eaters or something like that actually smeared a Biden pick for the Dept. of Energy because some pics or tweets surfaced about their interest in pup play. I think it's a weird fetish but at least it's NOT furry.
@@crissyhutto8409 Lotus eaters are an anti-CCP group. The Biden pick for the energy dept was pretty supportive of the CCP before he came into office, which is probably why he was targeted, and I don't blame them for doing it to try and embarrass the pick considering his support for them. But that's probably why they did that (although I couldn't GAF about their fetishes)
@@Acechao111 I mean why wouldnt it be? You could argue that being gay or even straight is a fetish if your doing something purely for sexual pleasure isnt that basically a fetish?
When you said sounding could be an attraction to music, you then see her reaction and you can tell she’s thinking, “You poor, sweet little darling!” Lol.
Technically, everything that people can find attractive is a fetish, but the very mainstream ones aren't thought of as one. Liking boobs is a fetish, as much as liking feet.
people just... admit illegal shit sometimes. I don't know why. But I had several encounters where dudes felt somewhat comfy and just started talking about the absolute most depraved, fucked up desires you can hear
I think the saying you're more likely to be gay if you're lib left is slightly misleading, I think it's more accurate to say you're more likely to be lib left if you're gay, not that I think the first one is wrong. To me it just carries the connotation that the lib left just IS gay
@@airplanes_aren.t_real I think weight gain/feedeerism, or however the hell you spell it, wasn’t included (which is different from vore but similar in that someone continuously gains weight by eating food, usually greasy stuff that makes you gain weight, sometimes accompanied by a feeding partner) don’t ask why I know so much about this one
@@ninten1305 I've seen it, some weight gain doujin similar to those "NNN" one's where each page is a difference day, the people in the comments seemed really nice actually, they all agreed that it was weird but it's their preferences and the artist did a phenomenal job, it's not my thing(more of a femdom, futa, femboy kinda guy) but hey people like weirder shit, I've seen people do r34 of the tesseract, as in the 3 dimensional shadow of a 4d object(it's as confusing as it sounds)
I feel like a lot of these fetishes have a spectrum of how far a person is into them, like chocking and acphication have like SUPER extremes and then not that bad ones too
"I think the only way forward is forwards. Nothing exists but what is in front of you. Crawl." This is the kind of clarity I want when I've gone insane.
tbh my most interesting take away from the first sixty seconds alone is that females submitting/males dominating is something that apparently women are more interested in, while females dominating/males submitting is something men are more into...so I deduce that most people want to be dominated.
This is very true. In kink communities like 70-90% of people who only want to play one of the roles (not people who switch back and forth) are looking to be dominated. It's a common theme that people who do the dominating are harder to come by.
Beautiful woman casually talking about the effort she put into mapping random people's fetishes with their political leanings while eating food is a real power move
She's a sex worker and a centrist. Literally the weakest combo possible. "I don't really adhere to any particular view. I'm not conservative or right wing or leftist or sjw. I think all of them have valuable gems. I am fascinated by contradiction in all walks; it's maybe an obsession (I'm on the autism spectrum)?. I love asking about moral dilemmas trying to suss out the inconsistencies in our ethical systems. I am optimistic about being able to communicate with people who vastly disagree as long as you respect each other and understand that you yourself might be deeply wrong - because I know what it's like to so devoutly believe something that ended up so deeply wrong."
@@HaloDude557 Why do you think being a centrist and sex worker is the weakest combo ? And why in the hell do you know exactly what my centrist self would say even before I even thought about it??? I'm truly curious, this is fascinating.
@@user-qe3zy7cv3c because a woman selling her body for money is pathetic. Being a centrist is even more pathetic. What do I know about you? I never claimed to know anything about you. Never even fucking heard of you, pal.
ሠምራ he was making fun when he said that. he didn’t know what you would say, he was projecting his repressed feelings of inadequacy and intolerance, and what also looks like regret or disappointment, onto centrists for some reason. hope it’s not a fetish of his for his own sake
I find it very strange how the most disgusting and ALL illegal fetishes ended up on the same quarter of the chart even though these fetishes run counter to many of the beliefs associated with that corner. Smells fishy tbh.
I mean, how we think about fetishes is kind of interesting to me. The reflex is to think that raceplay, for example, is necessarily an indication of someone's proclivities. However, we don't generally think the same is true for fans of horror movies, or sports. Sometimes something is just a sexy fantasy. My guess would have been age as a confounding factor, the more extreme taboos skewing further left, but that doesn't seem to be the case. The only thing I can guess is the broader experiencial nature of political self-identification coupled with very specific cultural phenomena playing a role.
Too much liberty will only bringbyou anarchy. Also tabooness of each fetish are dependent on society it is in. In some place incest is frowned upon but in other places it’s what you supposed to do. Etc
I agree... Especially the pedo one. I find it hard to believe anyone might admit to that on a questionnaire about fetishes... But I can readily imagine someone snickering to themselves as they mark off the worst possible answers and then entering their least favorite political faction. I am not sure how much I trust this but it is nevertheless interesting.
Considering that the majority of convicted sexual predators in the US are practicing Christians (which has a significant overlap with the right) it shouldn't be surprising at all.
It makes sense. Think of the very outspoken anti gay Christian preacher that is almost always caught doing the acts they speak out against. It happens a lot.
Ageplay is roleplay, not pedophelia... when one of the lecturers at my last kink convention did a workshop on ageplay, there were no minors involved. It was just adults talking about relationships, power dynamics, and being nurturing their partners- and there wasn't any mention of sex at any point. The lecture ended early when one of the attendees broke down crying. The teacher came over to help them, and they talked about how their family had disowned them. So she gave her a hug, and sat with her for a while. Showing her support that she couldn't get elsewhere, and listening to her story as the attendees slowly shuffled out. That sort of roleplay isn't really something that I want to participate in, but I've dated people who enjoy it- and from what I understand it's just a form of intimacy for some people.
_Sexual_ ageplay is paedophilia, as it's a sexual fantasy which fetishises minors, though not all ageplay is sexual. But there's nothing inherently wrong with sexual fantasies if they are restricted to fantasy. An adult who has sex with another adult pretending to be a child is a paedophile, but obviously doesn't cause harm like it would if they had sex with an _actual_ child.
@@nathangamble125 I dislike the fetish myself, but I think comparing it to pedophilia is unfair. It would be like saying petplay is rooted in zoophilia, which is obviously nonsense - it's all about the power dynamic. Why would a pedophile enjoy pretending an adult person is a child? Makes as much sense to me as a gay man who's into fat men enjoying a slender woman pretending to be one.
... That's literally the basis of what pedophiles like. Pedophiles don't find kids ATTRACTIVE. That's very rare. Pedophiles find childrens VULNERABILITY attractive. It is quite literally the same exact thing. These people performing this kink in the dominant role ARE just settling because they don't want to go to jail. They would have sex with children and traumatize them if they thought they could really get away with it. It's crazy that people like you just..refuse to connect the dots on this? Yeah, they're going to settle because they don't want to go to jail. So, the closest they can get to it is their girlfriend pretending to be a kid ans them imagining being with a kid. Why this doesn't make sense to y'all... I mean, I can only guess it's just cope because you don't like that YOU'RE into that or that your partner is. Sorry. Either you or your partner IS a pedophile and has thoughts about kids. @@ImVeryOriginal
You’re wrong about centrists. According to the logic behind authoritarian right people liking scat, centrists should like the most extreme fetishes as being extreme is the most taboo thing for them. So my theory is that the extreme fetishes in the center are the actual centrist fetishes. Thanks for coming to my TED talk.
My 2 favorite parts of this video, Her casually monching on a chicken wing or something as you're interviewing her And your incredibly innocent guess at the meaning of sounding... you sweet summer child
When I was younger I made a dumb inside joke with my friend that was a short story about a boy named “Tossor” (pronounced toss-er, completely made up, idk where I came up with it lmao) who has every fetish in the world (not including paraphilias like pedophilia and beastiality bc I thought it was a little f’ed up to joke about that loll). Now that I’m older and have, unfortunately, learned about a lot more fetishes than I knew about when I was younger, my horror at the idea of such a person has increased. I don’t kinkshame or anything, but DAMN that kid must have been fucked UP. 💀
They're more into maledom, not BDSM. It hides that also many men love to dominate in kink, also femdom suffers underrepresentation and most of it's kink are seen as their own thing while BDSM evokes chains and collars.
Treat 'em mean, keep 'em keen. In the bedroom, of course, and don't forget the aftercare; naughty girls need to be treated like good girls from time to time.
I wonder if that has to do with selection bias? Remember that WAY fewer women responded than men, perhaps only the kinkiest women decided to respond whereas the sheer number of male respondents evened things out a little
@@Shade-Spark as a woman who's into maledom, every time I search for domination it's just femdom, even if I type "maledom"... I don't feel like it's underrepresented at all, I feel like the opposite
FYI this is a bunk study from the ground up, i spent a bit looking into it so heres what i found: So 3x more men were polled and in total it was only 2k ppl, a very small sample size for trying to establish 66% of the usa's traits. She drew her data from her fairly political and sex positive twitter and tumblr where very few average right wingers hang out so the validity of the data is in even more question aka selection biases. She also didnt hide what she was working on giving the ability for mass trolling mucking up the data even more. She never mentioned the amount of "votes" each kink got or how they were represented on the questionnaire. Basically all the data imo is trash and she should use some real effort if she want to claim any type of authority. Its fun to see what could be but we all know some people will use this as ammunition for hate.
@@m_winewood they are referencing horseshoe theory. Which is basically the extreme left and right are more similar the more extreme they get. Jreg clowns on it since its a centrist theory
If sexual arousal can be achieved in some people by way of inanimate objects and or situations, and people can have bonds and loving relations with others without engaging with them sexually, then why do we keep implying that "homosexuality, bisexuality" and just general same sex attracting is inherently "sexually"? I'm sensing some liberal concept creep here.
I just realized that since Jreg has ALL of the fetishes simultaneously, this means that none of them are overpowering the other so he can't choose, therefore making him a celibate.
I always had a feeling there was a relationship between political alignment, personality traits and fetishes. I'm glad to see someone has actually done the research! Psychologically, this is cool. Especially using the idea of repression in which fetishes are in the opposite realm from political alignment, combined with her mentioning of conscientiousness, openness, etc. I honestly think this is one of the most accurate overviews of the human mind I've ever seen.
"the more something is repressed the 'hotter' it seems to be" I can confirm that a big part of what im into is because of how innapropriate it feels, it inherently makes it more interesting and exciting
Let’s be honest, the only reason it turned out this way is because the only people that would want to fill out this kind of survey are Jreg fans. Also nice mustache.
@@whwhwhhwhhhwhdldkjdsnsjsks6544 female breasts aren't genitals either, so your definition of fetish lacks, as the aforementioned are biologically supposed to be attracted to.
Futa is an interesting topic. Right wingers enjoy it as a way to fetishize trans people without acknowledging the existence of trans people. Leftists enjoy it as what it is - trans porn
@@hexzyle Then again, considering how futa "mythology" portrays them as women with both female and male genitalia/exclusively male genitalia/exclusively male genitalia sans balls, one could argue there is a difference since the idea is that futa were born female as opposed to mtf transgender people. I'm not sure how much that factors in, and one could potentially just as easily say that it's just a halfassed way to "cover it up" but generally, you do see people accepting of futas being women far more than mtf trans people, at least from my experience so I feel like there is a potential point to be made here about the difference in perceived validity of these two things.
@@hexzyle Futa and trans are different though? If it’s defined, usually futa is defined as either a third biological gender, or a woman with a penis attached. Meanwhile trans people are people who were born with a certain biological gender, but have then either chosen to identify themselves as another, or have biologically altered themselves to become the other. Two different concepts.
“The more repressed something is politically, the more appealing it is sexually” mitt romney: ooh yes baby i love those medicare appropriation expansions
If you ask me, something about Mitt just screams freak in the sheets. I would never vote for him but if he had on a ball gag and would let me tattoo him, it could be the start of an interesting situationship for Pierre Delecto and myself.Jk
Rather typical that there is a section of liberals speaking abhorrently and no concurrent conservative section. There goes the idea of the party of "tolerance" out the window for the millionth time.
@@R0me0316 I am the conservative contingent. The link to the animated bad-boy Romney video I posted earlier was produced by Fox, which is still a surprise to me. I guess they used to have an edge lord sense of humor. SNL did too, but that's mostly gone.
I've noticed that people whose fetishes are emboldened by the current hierarchy (males dominating, raceplay) tend to be more authright leaning, and vice versa. This is probably because those whose interests clash with the status quo are more likely to question authority in general
You got to remember the reason why the female graph looks so close together is because there isnt as many people in the survey, if they added more people those dots would be more spread out like the male dots
@@hund4440 yeah like the obvious female oriented kinks are in different places the same with the male, but most of the middle ground stuff is thought about the same
@@DrRyan82994 man when you live with only females, and listen in on everything they say... im convinced that the male and female dominated kinks will be the only ones that are different Hell ive over heard my sister and her friends talk about so much shit that ive never heard before and i doubt any other guy has, and now im convinced that guys and girls talk about one another quite similar Guys talk about getting with girls for that night the same with girls, girls focus more on the PERSON their getting with and men well focus on THE person their getting with Like the only difference in kinks is literally social politics, like obviously the more bisexual you are the more gay/straight you could be, or if you like dominating or being dominated
I think the race play makes a lot of sense as authright because stereotypically left would probably not find any real amount of taboo or novelty in different race people or partners.
@@the-based-jew6872 I'm sure there are but I don't think a lib left Individual would consider it a fetish, just a normal relationship, while depending on their beliefs there might be certain risqué elements to interracial coupling for someone on the right.
I once searched it up out of curiosity. I wanted to see how bad it could get so I typed in the worse one: bwwm raceplay. The things I saw were terrible going from slave play (like as African slave, white Master type deal) to just straight slurs and dehumanizing black women to suggesting literal p3dophilia and r4pe. It's bad
@@airplanes_aren.t_real Honestly probably true. It's far easier to embarrass a Republican than a Democrat with a sex scandal. Although tbf, if I ran for office, I'd probably let it all hang out so I get more name recognition. It might prevent me from getting the evangelical vote, though. I might get the Mormons based on my opinions of bigamy, though (as in if you're consenting adults, who cares).
@@Zachomara You notice a similar thing with any socialist-ish figurehead and money-related scandals. Always seems worse when the scandal looks like hypocrisy.
"The most taboo fetishes seem to be authoritarian center or right center" wow the people who do the most repressing have the wildest fetishes WHO COULD HAVE GUESSED
Not really, bc they had to stretch the authoritarian-libertarianism axis to make the graph legible. Without the stretching, almost all the fetishes cluster almost on the boundary between authoritarian-libertarian line, which is quite shocking. It means fetishist have a rather balanced view of governmental power for whatever reason.
@@anonymoushuman7794 as someone who had more than 30 piercings and used to do scarification, the similarity is pain as well as control over your own body and what happens to it for once. That being said, I am against anyone being cut or pierced without their informed consent including anyone below 18 having their parents decide to modify THEIR body FOR them. Including fake "medical" reasons they use for boys.
“Every time you want to draw a conclusion about some data, think about what conclusions you’d be making if it were the opposite data” God-tier advice, 🐐
Which why I have a problem with "because it's taboo". When it's the answer "because it isn't taboo"? That's a result that could be reversed. If you give opposite answers, then it's "conclusions written in the assumptions" as in: "Left wing people like dirtiness because it's taboo and it's liberating to break it." "Right wing people like dirtiness because it's taboo and their repression makes it more attractive." "Left wing people like dirtiness because it isn't taboo, making it taboo to them and therefore more attractive". "Right wing people like dirtiness because it isn't taboo and appeals to their comfort zone". And that's from a couple of switches in two axis alone which could be switched. Better to interpret it before looking at the results and independent to where it hits, as in: "Dirtiness is related to relieving anxiety over maintaining cleanliness." "Dirtiness is related to sensory overload." "Dirtiness is related to physical activity and therefore physical fitness." "Dirtiness is related to stoic resilience." "Dirtiness is related to nostalgia." "Dirtiness is related to adventure." "Dirtiness is related to munchausen." "Dirtiness is related to neglect."
"Everytime you want to draw a conclusion based on some data, ask yourself what conclusion you would be drawing if the data was in the opposite corner" - went into this for expecting funny shitposty antics, somehow ended up with an honestly kind of profound sociopolitical idea.
Can we just take a moment to talk about how "dirtiness" being more taboo than raceplay, rapeplay, futa, choking and urine... yes, "dirtiness" is worst than urine.
@@chrisvisser-fee2631 I was really expecting rapeplay to be highly taboo but high reported interest , some studies say its the most popular fetish for women in particular
@@Otori6386 oh shit actually that's an aspect I didn't think about. I guess there's like a "dominant" rapeplay interest and a "submissive" rapeplay interest that isn't distinguished between. If those were split up I would be interested to see if they're a significant difference apart in terms of taboo'ness and popularity
@@Otori6386 it kind of was. I think the popularity of it makes it less taboo. Same with choking. Also, dirtiness and urine are pretty close on the taboo scale. It they put 95% confidence intervals, they might overlap
Considering dirtiness can more easily lead to actual harm, I'd say it makes more sense to me. Pee is (should be) sterile, choking i'd expect to be rather ubiquitous because of the adrenaline response from asphyxiation and display of strength, raplay, futa & raceplay is just roleplay. It's scat that doesn't make much sense to me.. but then human shit is more likely to have "friendly" bacteria than dirt. 🤷♀️
Its so annoying they exaggerated the diagram they posted for "memeability" so its actually just worthless and 99% of people are just gonna use that. There is basically no correlation with most of this data
I think the data is showing who is more willing to admit to certain fetish's, like for example you'd be hard pressed to get someone on the right to admit to enjoying the idea of being dominated, whereas on the left that is practically promoted and most men are confident in relaying that information, because to their political belief, it's something to be proud of.
Just remember folks: take all this with a grain of salt. If it seems like it absolutely confirms your suspicions of one side or the other? Take it with A MASSIVE amount of salt.
Thats what Im saying yo. This seems like the perfect confirmation bias study. I feel like even the country you live in would greatly change these numbers, even with relatively comparable political ideologies.
Indeed, for assumptions are the mother of all mistakes (especially with the data being only in the thousands, specifically only less then 4k women voting and likely a small group of guys having the specific fetish at a specific time at a specific place, all to invest in a single test)
R was extremely low for the study. All findings are nearly nonexistant frequency. maga uncle and soyboy are probably equally likely to have said fetishes but twitter & 4chan degenerates skew both directions. Remember that 4chan is unapologetically anonymous which attracts all weirdos.
It makes sense libertarians would have less strong ferishes, because a fetish is (as you point out) made more appealing by how taboo it is, and libertarians likely reject the idea of taboo.
I feel like this isn't fairly accurate because : 1. General dishonesty, political opponents would definitely use this to lie as their political enemies to larp out insults, as well as hide their fetishes. 2. If this was done by opinion of location on the political spectrum rather than a test, and even with a test it would depend, many fetishes that screw farther right would be more centrist, many people who believe they are "right leaning" are often centrist libs and the most "authoritarian" right I've talked to have been extremely liberal. Because of the overton window, misunderstanding of ideologies, and general belief being skewed to the left the graph may suffer for it. 3. How were the definition of the fetishes broken down? How specific are they? How in detail are the questions on it? Example. Female Domination. I, as a auth. right person, love my ladies to be femdom (in the bedroom) BUT the connotation is different from how I like it. I don't want a woman to beat me, peg me, or make me do anything disgusting, I simple want a partner who is very forward with what they want and show with taking the lead sometimes and physical affection, in addition, I like dominating my dominate women, would that be considered femdom or maledom? Another example would be race-play, is it dominating other races? Being dominated by other races? Or a focus on both parties shared race? Same with something like monsters/aliens. Is it full on monsters or monster girls/boys? (Big difference lol) Mon on fem, mon on male? Which is dominating which? But I will say, group play on center left makes sense, feet being slightly-right wing (weirdly) tracks, and women in general loving bdsm tracks as well. It's all funny to think about.
"Hypocrisy is merely conscience weeping in shame" We are hypocrites because we actually believe some things are wrong. You can't be a hypocrite if you don't have any morals.
That would be fun, but unfortunately the left wing is like an order of magnitude more likely to be diagnosed as mentally ill than the right, so it could be very hard to find a comparable number of right wing participants
I'm always bewildered by surveys that include sounding, which is a pretty niche BDSM activity IME, but not pee/golden-showers or breeding/pregnancy or any number of more common kinks. I don't think I've ever met someone with sounding as a standalone fetish.
Same here. I honestly don't think I've seen someone refer to sounding as a fetish overall? I mean, it is more "hardcore" I guess but calling it a fetish is just as weird for me as calling anal a fetish. It's just a sexual activity some people enjoy. Meanwhile, for example, peeing is not inherently sexual but turns people on. That's how I would define a fetish idk.
@@thomas7365 well, I don't think an average person is turned on by talk like "breed me", "fill me with kids" etc. It's considered a submissive kink - being nothing more than a breeding tool for example. Also, it's pretty prevent in gay porn from what I hear? So not really biological lol. Hell, tmi but, I have a breeding kink and I don't want no kids lmao.
4:52 It's interesting that the researcher equated dominance and submission with violence, when violence as a key concept actually means sadism and masochism.
Holy crap. I’m a Psychiatrist and I think this is a fantastic idea for an approach to investigating political polarization! Not to mention it is absolutely fahking hysterical and deflates the pomposity of people on all sides! I am going to go find the study. Thanks for posting this. If the study is well done, I am going to shove it in the face of (or leave it surreptitiously on the desk of) more than one person I know who needs to lighten up and remember that we are all human and their political opinions don’t make them better than anyone else. Good lord, I am going to laugh for days just thinking about it! Whew! Thanks for the belly laugh!
@@thelastmotel I think that this is at least interesting. At least, socially. In a societal sense, sex in general is not a well talked about subject. So it'd make sense that things like political views and sexual arousal are at the very least loosely correlated. Of course, I am not a orofessional, but I'd love to study this myself more in depth. Very interesting things.
Did they weight the distribution to equalize the number of respondents in each quadrant? If not, the results are skewed towards whichever political stance(s) are more common.
