“Peace cannot be kept by force; it can only be achieved by understanding.” “Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that.”, "those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable"
@@theodorus956 debate is abt convincing the judge. You don't feel facts as you feel stories and analogies. That's why the best debaters use a blend of not just logos and ethos, but also pathos.
@@scipioafricanus2649 yeaa i know that's why none of the korean debaters get into the world champion ships koreans work so hard in their facts their perfection but in truth it's all based on facts not their analogies aor they're thoughts. but to be honest in this debate singapore doesn't really have a good look tho but than they won haha
@@jeongminkimlucian yea it's all about balance. You can sound great but be saying absolute bs, or u can sound bad but be spitting facts. sometimes the analogies don't work but a blend of everything is usually the most persuasive. imo this was a rly good topic and both teams performed rly well
I feel like I am the only kid watching this stuff but at the start "Fellow wizards and muggles" added a sense of humor to the speech. And the wand thing too. I joined the school debating club this year actually and am trying to get some inspiration and motivation for our competion.
Motion : TH Supports restrictions on free speech to combat the rise of the right-wing populism Government : England Opposition : Singapore Winner : Singapore
Iam feel like I am the only kid watching this stuff but at the start "Fellow wizards and muggles" added a sense of humor to the speech. And the wand thing too. I joined the school debating club this year actually and i trying to get some inspiration and motivation for our competion.
I think both sides were absolutely great. Singapore won because they were slightly better, and maybe a little bit more because the motion was biased at the first place.
Its not biased its basically debate in general, u could get something lucky or not yet If ur good at debating ur own government side or opponent side, will give u more points
majority of it is extemporaneous. we don’t debate by writing out every word we’re planning to say, nor complete sentences. it’s probably just a few key words or a thesis level claim they’re aiming to make
So the debate came down to a 0.5 differential and yet Singapore won by an 8-1 split? There's no way the debate was that close if Singapore won by a resounding landslide.
It's clearly singapore's side's win, becaues england haven't discuss how by changing this policy help the most vulnerables stakeholders in this debate, there're no analysis how why the restrictions are necessary; singapore discuss the vulnerables and solid reaosn how they help the laborers, addionally they discuss about why is it principally wrong on prop's side.
This house supports the restriction of free speech on the rise of right wing populism. Kinda late considering this comment was 3yr ago lmao but eh wth...
I’m quite sure he stuttered and meant “scapegoating” rather than the sake cake. Scapegoating minorities would be blaming them for something they didn’t do, and shifting the blame towards a certain group of people.
England: *arranges the argument in points Gives stats and data Points out what args Singapore missed* ADJ: And Singapore wins on an 8:1 split Kidding they both did GREAT ^^
nah kaya gini dong yg dibahas hal penting dan byk full ga dipotong potong yg bisa menimbulkan salah penafsiran.kalau indonesia medianya dipergunakan seperti ini bahas hal penting kan byk orang yg ikut terbantu dan mengedukasi .bukan yg spt berita dan acara tv sekarang yg dibahas malah gaya pakaian istri presiden dan statusnya satu per satu hal itu kan ga bagus dan publikkan spt di bodoh bodohi saja menampilkberita dan acara tv sekarang bikin malu aja yg disajikan bukan apa yg dibahas dlm g20 melainkan gaya tampilan busana istri presiden atau status pendidikan istri presiden . jgn menilai orang dari luarnya saja itu termasuk hal yg tdk baik untuk publik dan tdk penting untuk dibahas dan dibesar besarkan. apa kalian ga kira kalau negara lain mengecap netizen indo jd berakhlak buruk karena sumber dr berita dan acara tv yg menampilkan hal yg tdk penting dan remeh temeh di besar besarkan . jadilah netizen yg selektif jgn ikut arus berita dan acara tv yg tdk bagus untuk ditonton dan hanya memikirkan views yg besar biar byk pemasukan bukan mikirin bantu menolong orang lain lewat media .an hal yg remeh temeh dan tdk penting untuk dibahas.
