FIVE things we LOVE about the Can-Am Outlander! 

Maybe not even hate but just dislike or feel they "cheaped-out" on something??

@@Dusdaddy lot of people are bitching about the seat height,and it being a single.

@@edwardcote1331 lol...all that crap I have already disregarded. That's like bitchin about the color. One: some of the best machines are singles. I don't mark that as a pos or neg. Two: of all the riding videos I have seen, not one has commented on the seat height. Yes, it is taller by the specs, but no one can say it is a plus or minus until they ride it. Yet everyone that has ridden it has commented on the great comfort. Hell, my dislike of all Can-Ams is that DESS security system. They give you one key now and god help you if you lose it.

They are never going to tell you what they hate !! And I’m sure there is a few

@@Dusdaddy can am has always been known for being the biggest in performances and power and than they bring out a single cylinder cheap quad ??!! Buy a 700 grizzly or Suzuki and get a better quality quad

No, because they designed the air to flow front to back under the plastic and out the back.

@@Dusdaddy yeah with less of an engine bay opening all the way around, the heat now has 1 path to exit not just the free will to release heat anymore...... thank you come again

@@cactusanal9395 Well hell, maybe they shouldn't have used any plastics so it would get max air. They put the hottest part, exhaust and cylinder head, behind your legs, no need for anything farther forward. Engineer much or only on the internet?

Obviously the dealer's from the first videos won't but these guys will, otherwise they lose all credibility. Some reviewers of Grizzlys bitch about the square tire set-up. Some reviewers of Honda bitch about the lack of....everything.

@@Dusdaddy if Yamaha and Honda would start to build a new bigger and better quad, they would probably out sell every other manufacturer

@@markbuck9299 Yamaha's problem is they are stuck pricewise. If they come out with a newer, nicer machine they have to charge more than a Grizz for it or everyone would think it's a lesser machine. So now they would be in the XT-P price range. It better be damn good for that cash. Honda will never change, they're damn near the same since the 90's.

@@markbuck9299 Honda focuses more on Utility type, and actually Work type applications. Farms, Ranches, etc. Honda knows what their sales are like, if it's not broke, don't fix it, that is just Japanese engineering. Think Toyota, Honda, Yamaha, Suzuki, and Kawasaki. They build quality, reliable machines, but they aren't known for the latest features, but they usually build the most reliable, and dependable of those features when they do incorporate them into their products. While I believe Can Am has better build quality than Polaris, whether they are in line with the Japanese manufacturers is questionable. I personally like the Pro models, but for work I am not sure they can handle what a Honda can. The most miles I have seen on a Polaris is around 19,000 miles from a farmer that used it on a farm, but it wasn't problem free, and required engine work, along with a lot of other things. I have seen Honda's with nearly 50,000 miles on a machine, still running. These machines are used on Farms, and Ranches so they are used on a daily basis. I seen a 1984 Suzuki with over 50,000 miles on it, so these machines have actually proven to be reliable. I haven't seen these kind of miles on Can Am, or Polaris. While I don't think the Rotax engines are bad engines, there really isn't any reputation to base them off of, and them being new models. When you take into account the Out the door price of these machines, and how much money it really takes just to have one of these machines now a days, if it's hard earned cash it's difficult to justify paying for something so unproven.

@@Dusdaddy Honda focuses more on Utility type, and actually Work type applications. Farms, Ranches, etc. Honda knows what their sales are like, if it's not broke, don't fix it, that is just Japanese engineering. Think Toyota, Honda, Yamaha, Suzuki, and Kawasaki. They build quality, reliable machines, but they aren't known for the latest features, but they usually build the most reliable, and dependable of those features when they do incorporate them into their products. While I believe Can Am has better build quality than Polaris, whether they are in line with the Japanese manufacturers is questionable. I personally like the Pro models, but for work I am not sure they can handle what a Honda can. The most miles I have seen on a Polaris is around 19,000 miles from a farmer that used it on a farm, but it wasn't problem free, and required engine work, along with a lot of other things. I have seen Honda's with nearly 50,000 miles on a machine, still running. These machines are used on Farms, and Ranches so they are used on a daily basis. I seen a 1984 Suzuki with over 50,000 miles on it, so these machines have actually proven to be reliable. I haven't seen these kind of miles on Can Am, or Polaris. While I don't think the Rotax engines are bad engines, there really isn't any reputation to base them off of, and them being new models. When you take into account the Out the door price of these machines, and how much money it really takes just to have one of these machines now a days, if it's hard earned cash it's difficult to justify paying for something so unproven.