Тёмный

Fujinon 17.5-105mm F1.8 Parfocal lens on GH5 4K. Test Footage 

Flare Vision
Подписаться 387
Просмотров 16 тыс.
50% 1

Video test of C-mount Fujinon 17,5-105 f1.8 (C6X17.5) parfocal zoom lens with Panasoniс GH5.
Shot in 4K 30 fps, with EX-Teleconversion function in GH5 (crop factor 1.4x (2.4 in FF equivalent)). On full M4/3 sensor lens has slight vignette.
Panasonic GH5
Fujinon 17.5-105 1.8 (C6X17.5)
Tiffen 77mm Variable Neutral Density Filter (with step up rings - size of the thread on this lens is 58mm)
Shot handheld. From the start till 53 second - added stabilisation in Adobe Premiere (warp stabilizer). From 54 second till the end - no stab in post.
In camera stabilizer set to 50mm.
V-log L.
You can use this lens only with m4/3 sensor cameras. On cameras with larger sensor this lens will vignette havely.
To use this lens on m4/3 camera you will need a c-mount to m4/3 adapter.
In order for the lens to be Parfocal, you need to find a slim c-mount to m4/3 adapter (this adapters are all different - some of them will be to thick or too slim)
Adapter thickness directly affects Parfocal abilities of the lens.
I suggest you to buy several different c-mount slim adapters, just in case.
There's a way to define what adapter you have - the slim one or too thick one:
1. Zoom in your lens to 105mm.
2. Focus on some object.
3. Gradually start to zooming out and watch were your focus going:
- If while you zooming out your focus goes further from the object you were focusing on step 2 - your adapter is too slim, and you need some shim between the lens and your adapter for the lens to be parfocal.
- And if while you zooming out focus goes closer from the object you were focusing on step 2 - your adapter is too thick, and you need the slim one.
This method works on all C-mount Zoom lenses.
There's a chance that your adapter will fit your lens perfectly and you will no need in adjusting it to make it parfocal, but don't count it - it's really a small chance.
So in order for your lens to be parfocal, you need to find slim c-mount adapter, and add a shim for adjusting parfocality. (There's no way to your lens to be parfocal adjusted with thick adapter)
About the shim: you can do it yourself using thin plastic, or electric tape or just a paper, also you can buy this shims:
www.ebay.com/itm/0-1-0-25-5-1...
(I'm suggesting you to buy several shims with different thickness).
When you finally get your slim adapter and make (or buy) the shims you need to add this shims, layer by layer, between adapter and the lens, add the shims until the lens becomes Parfocal.
All this instruction may seem difficult and complex, but when you get all the tools you need - it's really not that difficult at all.
The lens worth it.

Опубликовано:

 

29 апр 2019

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 157   
3 года назад
it feels like watching the office but in a chill way
@flare_vision
@flare_vision 3 года назад
Haha, that's an interesting comparison👍
@codyclarke
@codyclarke 5 лет назад
Looks phenomenal!
@flare_vision
@flare_vision 5 лет назад
Thanks!
@overthecounterintel
@overthecounterintel 4 года назад
I really love the look
@flare_vision
@flare_vision 4 года назад
Thanks man!
@snydereric6852
@snydereric6852 Год назад
This blows my mind. Thx
@flare_vision
@flare_vision Год назад
Thx for watching!
@andreybarekhov
@andreybarekhov 2 года назад
Ой какая атмосфера!))) кайфанул прям) теперь тоже себе буду искать такую линзочку))
@flare_vision
@flare_vision 2 года назад
Спасибо!) линза и правда интересная, творческая )
@vistvo
@vistvo 2 года назад
Интересное стекло) Тоже люблю поэкспериментировать со "старыми" кинолинзами 👌🏻
@flare_vision
@flare_vision 2 года назад
Стекло крутое правда) покупал его тогда еще не дорого, не знаю оно сейчас стоит.
@thattech477
@thattech477 3 года назад
Just got the lens, now I hope I will get a compatible adapter... (got one with a link below) . Thanks for the video and the instructive information in description as well as in the comments!
@flare_vision
@flare_vision 3 года назад
Your welcome mate! I hope you're like it.
@zhee.
@zhee. 3 года назад
Hey guys, I just got this lens and my C mount adapter is too wide, what kind of adapter did you get?
@thattech477
@thattech477 3 года назад
@@zhee. I cannot help you much... I used one I received with the cctv lens fujian 35mm 1.7 with mft adapter on amazon. It was too slim, so I put an elastic hair band between the lens and the adapter to add like 1mm and get "parfocality"...
@zhee.
@zhee. 3 года назад
@@thattech477 Thanks for your reply and info, appreciate that! I‘m considering doing the same, though I don’t like the idea of dropping the lens if it gets loose 😀
@thattech477
@thattech477 3 года назад
@@zhee. yes I definitely advise against doing what I did... I found a band that allowed the lens to be tightened while parfocal so it's not loose at all so I let the adapter on the lens all the time...
@imothy
@imothy Год назад
I have this lens on my blackmagic pocket cinema original and love it, I never tested to see if its actually parfocal, but this is a great idea, will try it out!
@flare_vision
@flare_vision Год назад
You should definately adjust it to be parfocal, it will be a great lens! 👍
@jamesquartararojr1298
@jamesquartararojr1298 4 года назад
Thankyou for this. Exactly the kind of reference shots I'm looking for when considering this combo. Does this lens have a back focus ring? If this one does, how easy & quick is it to set for different shots in a fast paced event scenario?
@flare_vision
@flare_vision 4 года назад
Thanks man! This lens doesn't have back focus ring. So you better to have a slim c-mount adapter. You can read more about it in the comments bellow. We discussed it with Cody Clarke.
@amarinofranca6181
@amarinofranca6181 4 года назад
Hey man! Love the whole thing you've done here. Can you give me a bit of info on this lens: does this zoom without the motor? I've found one at a very good price but the guy doesn't know if the motor is working. I'm just wondering, have you ever done non-motorized zoom? Thanks.
@flare_vision
@flare_vision 4 года назад
Thank you! My lens is without motor. And I actually don't know if there was a motor there or not. But it looks like there wasn't.
@amarinofranca6181
@amarinofranca6181 4 года назад
@@flare_vision OK. Thanks! :) Keep on going mate
@namesurname5256
@namesurname5256 2 года назад
Интересно получилось) Скажи пожалуйста, а что-то подобное можно на кроп 1.5 найти? Хочется парфокальный зум на aps-c? Ну, или мб где почитать про такие объективы
@flare_vision
@flare_vision 2 года назад
Спасибо!) Конкретно c-mount объективы под 1.5 точно не подойдут, слишком маленькие они, слишком большая виньетка будет. А про подобные объективы, но на 1.5, пока не слышал) я сам камеру недавно поменял, теперь у меня тоже 1.5 кроп. Все c mount объективы продал. Но Пока чего то подобного под этот кропа пока ничего не нашел..
@user-gx1jg7mr7f
@user-gx1jg7mr7f 2 года назад
@@flare_vision а на что Гаш поменял, если не секрет?
@flare_vision
@flare_vision 2 года назад
@@user-gx1jg7mr7f на black magic 6k pro. Последние видео на него у меня сняты) Bmpcc 6k pro
@AiurMedia
@AiurMedia 3 года назад
never heard of this lens lol i must look it up
@flare_vision
@flare_vision 3 года назад
It's a really nice lens! Especially for the money
@Kursenko
@Kursenko 3 года назад
очень очень получилось лампово. Картинка очень подошла бы под имитацию советского кино ! Вот оно! Зум очень интересно выглядит ) Спасибо за видео !) заказал 14-84 1.6 жду переходник, интересно что получится !)
@flare_vision
@flare_vision 3 года назад
Спасибо! Как раз имитацию советских фильмов и хотел сделать) если еще замарочиться и со штатива это все поснимать - совсем хорошо будет) Зумы эти очень интересные за свои деньги)
@Kursenko
@Kursenko 3 года назад
У меня панаг г80, скажи пожалуйста. Ты выставлял доп зум в камере что бы убрать виньетку ?
@flare_vision
@flare_vision 3 года назад
@@Kursenko местами использовал, да. Без доп зума небольшая виньетка на широком угле. Но нестрашная
@ziandthecoolthings
@ziandthecoolthings 4 месяца назад
Really great video! I just got one of these as a set! (Got 19 c mount lenses for $50). Mine has a bit of fungus growing inside which isn’t much of an issue for me. My question is, does an ill fitting adapter reduce the focus behavior on your lens? Mine focuses fine in 105 but in 17.5 doesn’t seem to do much. I suspect I might have some repairs to do but wanted to check if it’s an adapter thing first before potentially screwing up my lens haha
@flare_vision
@flare_vision 4 месяца назад
Thx mate! Great price for 19 lenses👍 It sounds like you gonna be bussy experimenting with them for some time, haha. Yes, as far as I know, thick adapters can messup the focus. I suggest you to try a few different adapters before trying to fix the lens itself👌
@ziandthecoolthings
@ziandthecoolthings 4 месяца назад
@@flare_vision sounds great! I’ll try to update as I go. I think it is the flange distance so I’ll pick up a few adapter to see what I can do. I’m also rocking a black magic pocket cinema camera 4k so a bit larger sensor so I’ll need to crop in to get the same look. By chance do you have a pic of the adapter you used? Seems like the market for adapters is smaller than it was even a few years ago.
@flare_vision
@flare_vision 4 месяца назад
@@ziandthecoolthings I've changed few cameras since this video, and no longer own any c mount lenses (I've switched to larger sensor) so I can't take a photo and I haven't any pics of adapter that I've used. Just try to order a few different adapters, at least one of them should work👌 BTW, I still missing this c-mount lenses, sadly they have no use on fullframe cameras.
@ziandthecoolthings
@ziandthecoolthings 4 месяца назад
@@flare_vision makes sense! I think I found a solid option. I’ll order and if it works I’ll drop the link.
@StringzMediaAV
@StringzMediaAV 3 года назад
Does anyone think these old/vintage c mount TV zoom lenses look more “filmic” - “cinematic” - “real film” than the super sharp native lenses? People have said my best work happened to be the projects I used the old TV zooms to film with. And I probably only used them in the first place for the long zoom range.
@flare_vision
@flare_vision 3 года назад
Yeah, sometimes this c mount lenses (and all vintage lenses generally) really looks more cinematic then the modern one. I think it's because they are a bit soft and have they own character. Modern lenses can be sharp as a razor, too sharp, without any character in them. So footage with modern lenses can look like just a "video", or like too "digital".
@AngeloVicoStudio
@AngeloVicoStudio 3 года назад
Hello! What mount have this lens? You know How could I adapt it to the m43 ? Thank you!
@flare_vision
@flare_vision 3 года назад
This is a C-mount lens. You can easily adapt it with c-mount to m43 adapter.
@AngeloVicoStudio
@AngeloVicoStudio 3 года назад
@@flare_vision thank you very much!
@flare_vision
@flare_vision 3 года назад
@@AngeloVicoStudio your welcome!
@lucaseastmure3637
@lucaseastmure3637 10 месяцев назад
I just got this lens cause of this video, great footage! I'm liking it aside for when I zoom in and out my image goes out of focus. Is there something I'm missing about this lens??
@flare_vision
@flare_vision 10 месяцев назад
Hey man! Congrats with your purchase 👍 About focusing while zooming: It's called parfocality. I describe the adjustment process in the description. I'll duplicate it here: In order for the lens to be Parfocal, you need to find a slim c-mount to m4/3 adapter (this adapters are all different - some of them will be to thick or too slim) Adapter thickness directly affects Parfocal abilities of the lens. I suggest you to buy several different c-mount slim adapters, just in case. There's a way to define what adapter you have - the slim one or too thick one: 1. Zoom in your lens to 105mm. 2. Focus on some object. 3. Gradually start to zooming out and watch were your focus going: - If while you zooming out your focus goes further from the object you were focusing on step 2 - your adapter is too slim, and you need some shim between the lens and your adapter for the lens to be parfocal. - And if while you zooming out focus goes closer from the object you were focusing on step 2 - your adapter is too thick, and you need the slim one. This method works on all C-mount Zoom lenses. There's a chance that your adapter will fit your lens perfectly and you will no need in adjusting it to make it parfocal, but don't count it - it's really a small chance. So in order for your lens to be parfocal, you need to find slim c-mount adapter, and add a shim for adjusting parfocality. (There's no way to your lens to be parfocal adjusted with thick adapter) About the shim: you can do it yourself using thin plastic, or electric tape or just a paper, also you can buy this shims: www.ebay.com/itm/0-1-0-25-5-10-C-Mount-Lens-25mm-1-10-/333146419983?mkcid=16&mkevt=1&_trksid=p2349624.m46890.l49286&mkrid=711-127632-2357-0 (I'm suggesting you to buy several shims with different thickness). When you finally get your slim adapter and make (or buy) the shims you need to add this shims, layer by layer, between adapter and the lens, add the shims until the lens becomes Parfocal. All this instruction may seem difficult and complex, but when you get all the tools you need - it's really not that difficult at all. The lens worth it.
@lucaseastmure3637
@lucaseastmure3637 10 месяцев назад
@@flare_vision Thanks for your reply! I'll try these steps. Using eos m, it seems there aren't that many options for adapters, hopefully I'll just have to use shims. Thanks!
@lucythegiant4104
@lucythegiant4104 8 месяцев назад
@@lucaseastmure3637 Hey, man! I use eosm too and I'm looking to buy this lens. Any luck finding a good adapter for it?
@lazysongsang
@lazysongsang 5 месяцев назад
I just bought the lens, but my c-mount to m4/3 adapter is too thick. Can I get a link with photos or information about the adapter? (those links that you posted below are expired...) I know this is quiet old video from your channel, but I would really happy if you help me out. thank you.
@flare_vision
@flare_vision 5 месяцев назад
Hey man! I've changed few cameras since this video came out, and sold my c-mount lenses (although I still really miss them). So for now i can't give your any more info on the adapter. But I think your best option is to order a few different looking adapters from different sellers. That was I did at the time. At least one of the adapters will fit, and you can sell others. Another possible option is to unscrew the lens mount and look into it - sometimes there's a small shims between the lens mount and the lens itself - so you can unscrew the mount take out one or two shims and screw back the adapter. Good luck!
@lazysongsang
@lazysongsang 5 месяцев назад
@@flare_vision thanks for your comment i will try it.
@lazysongsang
@lazysongsang 4 месяца назад
@@flare_vision I finally got my BMPCC 4K + Fujinon 17.5-105 2.8 Lens "PARFOCAL"! Cheap C-mount adapter that I used was a brand from "Fusnid". It is still availlable on Aliexpress. It was extremely slim and that was what I was looking for. to get it Parfocal, I had to put two shims (0.2mm each, total 0.4mm) between camera mount and adapter. I hope this little information could help those who wants to make videos out of this particular set-up. Thanks to @flare_vision!
@bog_bab
@bog_bab 3 месяца назад
Привет. Очень крутое комбо. Подскажи все ли c-mount zoom обьективы являются парфокальными? Может знаешь этот ли парфокальный и подойдёт ли к gh5 Fujinon TV Zoom Lens (H5x14HP-2) 14-70mm
@flare_vision
@flare_vision 3 месяца назад
Приветствую! Насколько знаю - да парфокальности можно добиться на всех c-mount зумах. Но изначально ее не будет, надо настраивать с помощью c-mount адаптера
@bog_bab
@bog_bab 3 месяца назад
@@flare_vision спасибо
@syedkahar4679
@syedkahar4679 3 года назад
Honestly this is such a cute video
@flare_vision
@flare_vision 3 года назад
thanks!
@codyclarke
@codyclarke 5 лет назад
Please let me know what adapter you used, I bought a C to m43 adapter but I can't get proper focus with this lens like you're getting.
@flare_vision
@flare_vision 5 лет назад
I've used "Slim C-mount adapter" from aliexpress. You also can find it on Ebay. And then, I've used some shim (electric tape) as this adapter was too slim. There's a way to define what adapter you have - the slim one or too thick one: 1. Zoom in your lens to 105mm. 2. Focus on some object. 3. Gradually start to zooming out and watch were you focus going: if while you zooming out your focus goes further from the object you were focusing on step 2 - your adapter is too slim, and you need some shim between the lens and your adapter. And if while you zooming out focus goes closer from the object you were focusing on step 2 - your adapter is too thick, and you need the slim one. This method works on all C-mount Zoom lenses.
@flare_vision
@flare_vision 5 лет назад
@@codyclarke You're welcome! Just be shure that you're buying a proper slim adapter.
@codyclarke
@codyclarke 5 лет назад
@@flare_vision Bought one off ebay that promised it was slim enough and it still wasn't right. It looked exactly like the slim aliexpress ones. Can you take a picture of yours? I wanna make sure I buy the right one this time.
@flare_vision
@flare_vision 5 лет назад
@@codyclarke So your focus still goes closer when zooming out? Is it any better then with your first adapter? I'm out of town right now, in a few days I'll send you a pic of my adapter.
@codyclarke
@codyclarke 5 лет назад
@@flare_vision Thanks man. And yeah, same problem. A little better than first adapter, but still that problem. Latest news is I found an Amazon review for a Neewer adapter (now out of stock) where the reviewer says the Neewer adapter was the only one they found that worked for their C6x17.5, albeit with shims (like you have to use). Luckily the photo was still available for that adapter, so I used that photo to then order one off AliExpress that looks to be exactly like it and has the same exact lettering. That'll arrive in 2-3 weeks I guess. The one I had ordered on eBay that I thought would be right, and didn't work, had slightly different lettering on it than the AliExpress / Neewer one, and had a little star icon next to where it said 'C-M4/3' on it. Fingers crossed that the AliExpress one works, but I of course won't know for a while. If you photo matches it, it probably will work.
@mauriceschoenen
@mauriceschoenen 5 лет назад
Your girlfriend is awesome :D
@arthur_dlx
@arthur_dlx 2 года назад
Great! When you're using this lens on full Gh5 m4/3 sensor in 4K how bad is the vignette?
@flare_vision
@flare_vision 2 года назад
Thank you! Unfortunately I don't have that lens and camera anymore, so I can't tell you the exact vignette size. As far as I remember, vignette where visible only on the wide end of the lens. It was visible but usable, for my taste.
@arthur_dlx
@arthur_dlx 2 года назад
@@flare_vision Ok Thanks! I want to use it on Gh5 and Blackmagic pocket 4k , I found the link of the adaptor in the comments on aliexpress. But you said you were using some shim on your adaptor?
@flare_vision
@flare_vision 2 года назад
@@arthur_dlx yep, you should use a slim adapter c-mount adapter for this lens to be parfocal. I suggest you to buy several different c-mount slim adapters, just in case. And about the shim: you can do it yourself using thin plastic or just a paper or electric tape, also you can buy this shims: www.ebay.com/itm/0-1-0-25-5-10-C-Mount-Lens-25mm-1-10-/333146419983?mkcid=16&mkevt=1&_trksid=p2349624.m46890.l49286&mkrid=711-127632-2357-0 (I've also suggesting you to buy several shims with different thickness). And here's an instruction how to define what kinda adapter you have (slim or thick): 1. Zoom in your lens to 105mm. 2. Focus on some object. 3. Gradually start to zooming out and watch were your focus going: if while you zooming out your focus goes further from the object you were focusing on step 2 - your adapter is too slim, and you need some shim between the lens and your adapter. And if while you zooming out focus goes closer from the object you were focusing on step 2 - your adapter is too thick, and you need the slim one. This method works on all C-mount Zoom lenses.
@flare_vision
@flare_vision 2 года назад
@@arthur_dlx I've also just added all the info you need about adapter and shim in the description of a video. Check it out👌
@vasilisstavropoulos6189
@vasilisstavropoulos6189 2 года назад
Very nice lens. Could you please tell me how much does it is weight and what is the minimum focus distance?
@flare_vision
@flare_vision 2 года назад
Thanks! I sold this lens shortly after the video (I decided to keep the Navitar 16-160), so I can't tell you the exact weight of the lens. In general, this is a small lens, and it does not weigh much (modern full-frame lenses are much larger and heavier). As for the minimum focal distance - I can't remember the exact values right now, but I think it was about 1.5 meters.
@tsb56
@tsb56 2 года назад
@@flare_vision 1.3 actually!
@flare_vision
@flare_vision 2 года назад
@@tsb56 yeah, focus definately not the closest one, but diopters can really help with it 👌 even a cheap ones works really well.
@tsb56
@tsb56 2 года назад
@@flare_vision focus distance isn't really a problem for me, i'm mostly struggling with lens haze. I bought two Fujinon 17.5 105 and both of them have unfixable haze (probably oxidated cement) in most of the lenses. At this point i think this particular model is faulty and to be avoided. I'm searching for a navitar like yours, or something similar, but there isn't much out there. By the way, your footage is always beatiful, you are a inspiration for me as a novel filmaker!
@flare_vision
@flare_vision 2 года назад
@@tsb56 Thank you for such a kind words! I'm appreciate it. I've also didn't feel the need for diopters for the close focus on this c-mount lenses, but I've got some interesting results with +10 diopter and macro shots with this zoom lenses. I think you're out of luck with your fuji lenses, mine where in a really good condition. Also, if you are looking for some of these c-mount zoom lenses, I can recommend that you search for them without the brand name, but only with the focal length. Try to search instead of "Navitar 16-160mm" just "16-160mm". The fact is most of this c-mount zoom lenses where also made by different companies, but with the same body and lenses. So you can find same body and lenses as in Navitar 16-160 but branded differently. I'm sure you will find some interesting lenses this way👌
@Ohheymynameisgavinandimakefilm
@Ohheymynameisgavinandimakefilm 4 года назад
When searching for this lens, what do I search up?
@flare_vision
@flare_vision 4 года назад
Try this: Fujinon TV Zoom Lens 17.5-105 F=1.8 (C6x17.5) c-mount
@Ohheymynameisgavinandimakefilm
@Ohheymynameisgavinandimakefilm 4 года назад
@@flare_vision I searched it up but everything online looks a little shady, can you send an image please 🤲
@flare_vision
@flare_vision 4 года назад
@@Ohheymynameisgavinandimakefilm looks exactly like this one: images.app.goo.gl/4G7jS1h1DEsna5Lf9 I've searched "fujinon tv zoom lens 17.5-105" and all resalts is this lens. Also, if you whant to find out more info, join "C-mount on digital" group on Facebook. There's a ton of information about C-mount lenses out there.
@briandipierro8865
@briandipierro8865 3 года назад
I got this lens from a pawn shop. Buuuut, I think my adapter is holding me back, since at the slightest movement of the zoom, everything is out of focus and I can't even focus to the same spots I was able to before.
@flare_vision
@flare_vision 3 года назад
Hm, sounds strange. It maybe the adapter, yes, cause c-mount lenses kinda sensitive to adapters - it should be not too slim and not too fat. Better to try adapter before buying, if you have such an option. Maybe you can't focus to the same spot again because adapter sitting to lose on the camera mount? You can try to use some shim, like duct tape to get it sitting tighter.
@danielgreenberg4751
@danielgreenberg4751 3 года назад
This lens is parfocal correct? Also is the color rendition a little warm compared to modern lenses or does it seem pretty standard in your experience?
@flare_vision
@flare_vision 3 года назад
Yes, this is a Parfocal lens. But you need the right c-mount to m4/3 adapter for this. It should be not too slim and not too thiсk. In this video I've used some lut, so this warmness is from the lut. I think without color correction it's just a standard lens, without any warmness.
@danielgreenberg4751
@danielgreenberg4751 3 года назад
@@flare_vision oh okay cool. I know fuji has made some incredible lenses. In your experience is the lens consistantly very sharp? It appears. To be I just want to double check. Also, did you keep the ENG zoom device on the lens or remove it?
@flare_vision
@flare_vision 3 года назад
@@danielgreenberg4751 i can't say that this lens is very sharp, like modern lenses. But it's diefinately sharp enough for most cases, and its sharp across all the focal distance with the right adapter. There wasn't any ENG stuff on my copy of the lens. I think maybe there's versions of the lens with and without ENG devices.
@danielgreenberg4751
@danielgreenberg4751 3 года назад
@@flare_vision Thanks for your input. Also, have you had any exeprience with other B4 style lenses? I was looking at Canon B4’s and was wonderfing if you have you ever used one before? If so, how does it compare to this lens? Lastly, if I want to get a solid parfocal without breaking the bank, would you recommend getting a B4 lens like this one?
@flare_vision
@flare_vision 3 года назад
@@danielgreenberg4751 i haven't any expirience with b4 lenses. I wanted to buy and try one - but it was way more expensive than c-mount lenses. Also B4 lenses is heavier and bigger, and need some power supply. So for me B4 lenses are too complicated. And when i got my c-mount Parfocal zoom lenses i was pretty happy with them, and i felt that i don't need to try b4 lenses. I don't know about b4, but i definately can recommend c-mount lenses. In the end I've keep only my Navitar 16-160 lens, because it has more focal range than this fujinon lens, and picture quality is kinda similar. You can watch some of my videos with this navitar lens on the Chanel. Really nice lens for the money.
@imothy
@imothy 2 месяца назад
what adapter do you use? Specifically what brand?
@flare_vision
@flare_vision 2 месяца назад
It was some unbranded adapter. I advise you to buy several adapters from different sellers👌
@imothy
@imothy 2 месяца назад
@@flare_vision ugh, there are so many, what seller did you get yours from?
@flare_vision
@flare_vision 2 месяца назад
@@imothy it was years ago, so i don't really remember, and I don't own gh5 anymore. I remember that I ordered at least 3 or 4 different looking adapters, and one or two of them were good ones
@dreamprophet4499
@dreamprophet4499 3 года назад
How would you say this compares to your Navitar 16-160 lens? These are much easier to track down I see
@flare_vision
@flare_vision 3 года назад
Yeah this lenses as well as Canon 17-102 are much easier to find. Those are also a great lenses. Smaller then Navitar lens. They also have about the same picture quality. The only reason I've choose navitar is focal distance - navitar can go a bit further to 160mm. If you find this fujinon or canon lens for the decent price and in good condition - give it a try.
@gustavominikovsky
@gustavominikovsky 2 месяца назад
what adapter did you use to get par focal?
@flare_vision
@flare_vision 2 месяца назад
It was nonbranded adapter from aliexpress. I can recommend you to order a few different looking adapters from a few different sellers. One of them should be a good one👌
@gustavominikovsky
@gustavominikovsky 2 месяца назад
@@flare_vision thatd be very much appreciated bro!
@gustavominikovsky
@gustavominikovsky 2 месяца назад
@@flare_vision im reallty looking for the parfocal, afraid my adapter wont work
@flare_vision
@flare_vision 2 месяца назад
@@gustavominikovsky As far as I understand, you can't know the thickness of the adapter in advance, you have to try it.
@angelmartinez7301
@angelmartinez7301 2 года назад
Hola Llevas algún tipo de estabilización en la cámara o gimbal?
@flare_vision
@flare_vision 2 года назад
Hi! I didn't use any gimbals. It was shot handheld. From the start till 53 second - added stabilisation in Adobe Premiere (warp stabilizer). From 54 second till the end - no stab in post. In camera stabilizer set to 50mm.
@angelmartinez7301
@angelmartinez7301 2 года назад
@@flare_vision Thanks
@angelmartinez7301
@angelmartinez7301 2 года назад
@@flare_vision maybe buy old one for a GH2
@flare_vision
@flare_vision 2 года назад
@@angelmartinez7301 if you find this lens for the good price - you should definately buy it! really nice lens
@angelmartinez7301
@angelmartinez7301 2 года назад
@@flare_vision 130 eur
@evgenshatalovblog
@evgenshatalovblog 2 года назад
А где его можно купить?
@flare_vision
@flare_vision 2 года назад
Я на Авито покупал) время от времени они всплывают там. На eBay их больше встречается.
@PANDRIUX
@PANDRIUX 3 года назад
Is the zoom automatic or manual?
@flare_vision
@flare_vision 3 года назад
my version is manual, but i think there's also "automatic" versions with servo drive zoom.
@natalyapakhomova7433
@natalyapakhomova7433 3 года назад
Is this lens suitable for photography? thank
@flare_vision
@flare_vision 3 года назад
Да, подойдет и для фото, почему нет) Единственный момент - фотик должен быть системы micro 4/3. Если камера с бОльшим сенсором, то объектив не подойдёт.
@natalyapakhomova7433
@natalyapakhomova7433 3 года назад
@@flare_vision вот ёлки палки, у меня sony e )) я подозревала. Большое спасибо за ответ!
@flare_vision
@flare_vision 3 года назад
@@natalyapakhomova7433 Да, к сони такой не подойдет. Не за что )
@GriffyBoiii
@GriffyBoiii 6 месяцев назад
Bro is in
@SamuelBoooth
@SamuelBoooth 3 года назад
Did you have to crop out vignette?
@flare_vision
@flare_vision 3 года назад
No, I've just shoot it in exteleconversion mode in GH5. No vignette in this mode. However on full m43 sensor or has some vignette at wide end.
@SamuelBoooth
@SamuelBoooth 3 года назад
@@flare_vision ok thanks 👌🏼👌🏼
@jacobacosta5261
@jacobacosta5261 3 года назад
tarantino vibes
@flare_vision
@flare_vision 3 года назад
Thx man 😎
@alexandrzatonsky
@alexandrzatonsky 3 года назад
Ховрино. Вот так встреча.
@flare_vision
@flare_vision 3 года назад
Ага, оно самое )
@Nicolas-lv3pi
@Nicolas-lv3pi 4 года назад
im surprised how bad this lens is considering its price. There are lenses for a fraction that will give you the same quality
@flare_vision
@flare_vision 4 года назад
Nah, I don't know what you talking about. It's a decent lens for the price of 50 usd on average.
@surfspotelsalvador2901
@surfspotelsalvador2901 3 года назад
Where do you find a better quality on same focal range?
Далее
Panasonic GH4 meets Fujinon XA55
5:36
Просмотров 892 тыс.
Multicam Systems B4 to M43 Optical Adapter
13:58
Просмотров 6 тыс.
NYC On Super 8 | Willem Verbeeck
1:37
Просмотров 158 тыс.
NEW YORK IN SUPER 8
3:45
Просмотров 211 тыс.
6 hours in New York - GH5 Anamorphic
2:34
Просмотров 17 тыс.
THE ONLY SONY LENS I OWN
13:39
Просмотров 8 тыс.
Testing GH4 + Fujinon (B4 lens) + servo zoom
3:18
Просмотров 39 тыс.