wouldve been really funny if on the last seed instead of a monster u just 'found' a really tall sugarcane. idk why but thats what i thought would happen lol
same, i dont know why people say its to grab peoples attention because i have severely untreated ADHD and it just gives me actual physical pain. is there ANYONE in the world who actually can watch these videos????
@@lemonmeatNo bc same- People will tell me shit like, "You have ADHD, you can probably lock into this and understand what's happening!" Meanwhile I don't even wanna look at it lmao
They need to find a way to hide in the code a tiny string that generates a sign saying you suck randomly in place of a single diamond ore somewhere in your world, as long as it's in range of a stronghold, as rare as the dirtiest block in terraria. The sign should be unable to be broken, like bedrock, but flammable, so lava could destroy it before you ever find it.
A very easy way to disprove these fake videos is if they spawn in the world not facing a cardinal direction or with items, or even not in the center of a block but that's harder to spot, and if the world contains blocks that don't generate naturally
Oh wow seed 000 comes with the cave dweller mod pre-installed so i dont even need to spare a few megabytes downloading this on my computer since its already implemented in this seed /j XD
fake anomalies are funny to hear about. it reminds me of playground rumors you used to hear as a kid about old games like pokemon yellow from your friend who definitely seen it just trust him bro
2:15 the guy in the short is playing Bedrock Edition as you can see from the coordinates in the top left corner, still when loading the seed in BE the birch tree is nowhere to be found, if he at least provided some coordinates...
These were all so scary! (But honestly for the giant Alex one I thought you would do the new size command to a 2nd account with a Alex skin for the joke, but that one was also pretty good.)
Watching you pretend to find fake anomalies is pretty entertaining, maybe you could explore some man made anomalies? Like things that are odd and unusual, but can only be seen by transferring up old worlds, tampering with the settings or game/world files, or mods like cubic chunks, far lands re-enabled, or that one mod that lets you corrupt the game in various ways, such as world generation. Also if you ever create another biome mixing video, I have an idea for a couple. First: Soulsand Valley and The Deep Dark, it has large sculk patches and each fossil is surrounded by sculk and has a hidden catalyst. Second: The End (and all its variants) and Frozen Ocean. I've always imagined the end to be cold, it doesn't snow but water freezes near instantly and you can find frozen lakes on top of and inside the endstone islands, aswell as large floating icebergs. You can also find end shiprecks, unlike end ships, these are completely abandoned and feature no shulkers. They also tend to generate halfway inside islands or icebergs. This biome generates more commonly the farther out you go. Third: Desert and Snowy Plains, inspired by the unused/removed biome, it's a desert but covered in snow, all water is frozen and snow, while still possible, is very rare. Cacti are less common too and you might come across a small layer of powder snow, but it's only one block deep. This biome is home to strays and frozen husks, aswell as all the other usual mobs.
Thanks for the suggestions! I'm not sure if I'll do another biome mixing video but if I end up doing it then I'll definitely keep these in mind :) And for the odd and unusual things I could explore, I have a video idea where I go through some of the biggest glitches in the game that would include things like the far lands. And I'm also making another video where I'm playing some of the scariest maps I can find in Minecraft, which is kinda like exploring man made anomalies.
the birch tree one reminds me of when i played beta as a kid and somehow got it into my head that oak trees that generated with branches instead of the usual straight trunk were "glitched". i ended up finding a lonely "glitched" tree in a plains biome and made it into a treehouse.
@@omegahaxors9-11 That's a seriously dumb take. By this logic anyone that owns a Volkswagen is a Nazi, since that company was started by Nazis. They're just funny internet faces; most people don't even know their origins. You're being absurd.
@@omegahaxors9-11 So what? They're just funny internet faces at this point, you're the only person I've ever come across to relate them to the zis (censoring myself because my original reply got auto-removed); no one else sees them that way. This is like saying people who own a Volkswagen are zis, because that company was started by them.
giant alex was actually a real minecraft myth just like herobrine and she would appear at the end of your renderdistance if it was set to 2 (but it is a (fake) myth)
I don't know if it's just a Bedrock version thing but for some reason birch forests there are full of trees that are 10-20 blocks tall. Suprised someone thought that this is rare.
2:30😂 bro don't know how Mojang making trees😂 they can't be taller or shorter. Mojang builds the trees and with a chance in a biome you can find like short tree big tree medium tree and more... They don't have a really chance which makes anomally😂
Look, I have ADHD but the editing on those shorts makes me want to throw my phone into mount Doom and live a solitary life in a hobbit hole, how the fuck do people watch that shit
Hm idk man, the first one could be real. Usually when people find extremely tall things (like cactus), they're like millions of blocks away from spawn, because they were found using algorithms. Did you check millions of blocks away? If not, you can't fully guarantee it's fake. Still, that said, it likely is fake, because even Minecraft@Home doesn't want to do it because of how complicated sugar cane spawning conditions are. And they found the craziest shit.
I mean, to be fair, that goes both ways. If you dont say the coordinates where you found the anomaly then you can't guarantee it's real either. It's easy for me to simply say "guys i found a 60 block tall cactus on seed '91748264828826' " but it's a lot harder to prove it's real or false when all we have is that seed number (can you prove the cactus isn't there, even though I just made that up in a few seconds?) so incomplete information like that always needs to be regarded as highly doubtful at best
