GAME SINS | Everything Wrong With Assassin's Creed: Origins 

And of course - not only baiting DLCs but a second part... With - what's her name in the end? D'uh...

Dartigan Actually, you can make Bayek have his hair and beard back. In the equipment screen, hold down the Y button (triangle on PlayStation) And press one of the triggers. Right trigger for hair, left trigger for beard.

I'm surprised you didn't mention the fiery sword of death you get from What's his fuck in siwa.

Dartigan 18:25 What the fuck?! He died?!

Dartigan I vote CoD. It's an alright game for a shooter.

Actually they used silphium as a kind of birth control drug

Pull out is no form of contraception

They accualy had condoms back then no joke, they were made of gutts from animals but still

@@OGBOOP they were used by rich ppl not by poor people they costed money they were made by their doctor not every one had money for the "modern" medicine of back then insurances did not existed not were in that time period condoms were treated and they were made of pig intestines (guts means most stomach organs lol) also women used a misture of plants as a birth control but as i said poor people had no money for that and most ppl were poor underpaied jobs others worked for food only ... egypt was great in legends in reality it was another bottom sack kingdom like rome and greece allout of showing off and the truth ppl were seen as rats and cochroaches

@@zee1645 its a joke idiot lol

Now where have I heard that before

@@kodyco7262 it's a totally original idea. So I don't know where you would've heard about it.

“Assassin’s Creed:God Of War”

Hmm... I genuinely do not know where you got that idea.

If tht happened we wouldn’t have the assassins

In the comics his body was shown, he was stabbed.

Fair enough, I can't speak to that, but that doesn't change the fact that Rogue was more ambiguous on the matter.

Doesn't change the fact he was confirmed to be killed and Origin just has him show up with 0 explanation.

Okay. I'm not really trying to defend Origin, just Rogue.

Which is fine.

I don't think it's unpopular at all, people liked this game much more than unity, rouge, and syndicate. I personally enjoyed syndicate but origins was much better. Black flag is my favourite Assassin's Creed and I don't think that'll ever change but I agree that Origins was far superior to some of the other games. The combat, the story like you said, the overall beauty of the game, the cool missions. I loved it.

I havent started playing origins yet but im glad you said that. Black flag was my favorite AC game by farr up to this point

Couldn't agree more.

I played for like 5 hours and got bored. The unnecessary grinding and forced sidequests, not to mention the tedious task of spotting the enemies one by one with the eagle was a pain. The combat was clunky and not fun, and i hate Dark Souls for the same reason. When every enemy you face HAS to be this epic duel to the death, it becomes a chore after a while, not to mention wasting my time. And speaking of wasted time, all that grinding the game forces me to do was tiresome. If i play an AC game, i expect to deal death to my enemies from the shadows, not to hunt animals and wander around aimlessly for an hour trying to figure out something FUN to do and grinding my level so that the regular guards won't kick my ass. The game was not fun in the beginning, so how do they expect me to keep playing any further?

@@DerClouder That's why I decided to play this game quite differently then other AC games (a couple of missions per day or two days, because otherwise, I will get bored, and I want to finish this game (not completely, but finish it).

They never needed to be related to the ancestor, not since Rogue and Unity. People can just pop in and relive memories of whomever they want, that change happened a long time ago.

Logan Productions yes, but that was only possible by extracting desmond's DNA. And even then they were only able to acess his genetic line. Aya's animus is unique in that she found a method to synchronize different genetic memories with her own.

Dustin Vance Arno and Shay (and every protagonist after Black Flag) are not related to Desmond though, so this is not correct.

In AC4 they talked about having a whole bunch of DNA doners which would account for Shay, Arno, and the Fryee twins.

@@LoganProductions54 Yeah but it only happens in Abstergo, now Layla brought that technology out there.

Alberto Guarnieri I love Latin.

Plus “et tu, brute“ is utter nonsense, because it isnt correct syntax. Correct would be "et tu brutus"

Actually, Caesar's words to Brutus were in Greek - "καὶ σὺ, τέκνον", this means pretty much "You too, my child?", so...

@@herrott3633 'brute' is vocative, which is used when talking to someone, so 'et tu brute' is correct latin

I groaned a little there but honestly was more annoyed that the whole "Go to Rome, Kill Ceaser" felt so half-assed, like they desperately wanted to tie the birth of the assasin brotherhood to the asassination of Ceaser but ran out of time/money/resources to properly set it up. Not to mention killing Ceaser doesn't have much weight behind it because his AC character isn't developed very much due to him being in the game at all. Killing Flavius had some weight for being the murderer of Bayek's son at least.

The game even tells you also it never says she went back to Egypt

Isn't it just so convenient how these politically correct stuff just so happen to pop up as time goes on? You do realise that back in ancient times women weren't allowed to do many things, ranging from combat to politics.

Yeah, I'm sure the Romans were just planting gladiatrix skeletons with full paraphernalia, cackling to themselves all the while. "Ohoho, Alexandrius. You understand not the joke now, but approximately two-thousand years from now, this shall tie in nicely with the SJW agenda!" Evidence doesn't stop being evidence just because it conflicts with how you imagine history to be. Yes, women were not allowed to do a great many things in the Roman era -- it is, however, an error in thinking to go 'Welp, women couldn't do anything, full stop, they stayed at home and weaved.' History is rarely so neat and orderly. In the case of Rome, the divisions of gender were less important than the division between 'equites' 'civitas' and 'infames.' Gladiators were, by law, all 'infames,' -- to fight in the arena automatically diminished your status to that of an infames. And women who were infames had much more freedom in how they acted than women who were civitas, or who were the wives of equites (who were all male). For the Romans, it was entirely palatable, even titillating, for two infames women to fight -- the unspoken rules that governed what infames could or could not do were not the same as that of citizens or nobility. Cassius Dio, writing favourably about Emperor Titus, talks about how he used many female gladiators, but he's quick to point out that Titus' gladiators were all infames, and Titus didn't indulge in the habits of other emperors by demeaning himself to fight in the arena. Female gladiators were just not that controversial. Sorry if that contradicts what Hollywood has told you, but the truth doesn't change just because you think it should. tl;dr: Read a fucking book, you blithering idiot.

Because faking/misinterpriting historical evidence totally never was a thing. Just saying, and no I don't get my history from Hollywood, besides why on Earth would anyone want women to fight to the death in an arena? If anything slave servants make far more sense for lower class women if you want to go with that. I highly doubt female gladiators could provide the same entertainment as males could.

Ah, yes. "Hmm. I didn't know this fact ... is it possible that I just didn't know something ... No. No, it must be a conspiracy. They're faking it all, I say!" Also, you talk about faking or misinterpreting evidence, but that would require multiple different sources stretching back decades to fake or misinterpret: Human remains, artwork, inscriptions literally carved in stone (such as one referring to a local magistrate's ruling in favour of 'women of the sword'), and the writings of numerous different people over the course of centuries. Also, hey. Hey. I'm going to let you in on a little secret: Lower class women were also slaves. And servants. There were, in fact, quite a lot of lower class women, and they didn't all do the same thing. Also, I like how you go "Why would anyone want women to fight to the death in an arena?!" as if wanting men to fight to the death in an arena is a normal thing, but women? "Pshaw, everyone knows that women die in far less entertaining ways! I, Mate397, should know." Here's another secret for you: The Romans were a decadent, entertainment-obsessed people who *thrived* off lavish spectacle, and arena battles were less about 'wooo, yeah, murder!' (and, in fact, most gladiators didn't die in the arena) and more about theatre and athleticism. Taking the case of bestiarii, where we have writers talking about female bestiarii felling lions, the feat of killing a lion is really equally as impressive whether you're a man or a woman (and also not that impressive in general, given how controlled the environment of the arena often was). Look. Clearly you are of a delicate disposition, and I can see this is difficult for you to cope with, but I need you to know that I don't care, and you learning new things is not proof of a ~conspiracy~ by historians and archaeologists. They aren't out to get you. It's okay.

Ah, gotta love the "clearly you're wearing a tinfoil hat" thing to make yourself sound so smart huh? You know what fine, I'll give it the benefit of the doubt that indeed there were female gladiators. Then how come these things only and only now in the oh so voiced "current year" are coming up if it was known for decades?

Yeah a lot of the sins are just because the guy is an idiot

@@00Batman no. The game sins series isnt supposed to really be serious.

@@TheIceFlowe he sounds like its serious

@@00Batman he sounds serious? Have you heard this series? The dude gives out joke sins left and right. Pretty sure Dart just does this for fun. Not meant to be taken seriously. Its just light leveled nitpicking.

Yes but Gladiatrix were very rare to the point there are few notes about then, in fact there are no surviving records of how they were trained. Point is, for a very long time women were discriminated and this should be reflected in any attempt of historical accuracy, not inject 20th century sensibilities into it because at one point your own propaganda will became true and the errors of the past will be ... rewritten.

That may not be true, interestingly. There's evidence that suggests we may simply not *have* the data, but that it might have existed. References in other works of the era, statues, and other minor things are causing historians to rethink the role of the Gladiatrix. In general, women were second-class citizens, quite true, but there are historians who suggest even that may not have been as extreme as we'd thought. Like everything else dealing with history, it's an ongoing process as new data is discovered, and old data is filtered through new data.

How about stfu and stop saying shit like girls are worth anything 2000 years ago, unless you wanna rewrite the history books to include this fake ass women equality through out history...... a thing that only happened within the last 100 years

I never said anything about equality. Reread what I did say with less of your own misunderstandings.

They could be gladiators but theywere not allowed to be actors, if you go and see the show at alexandria you'll notice all the female roles are males, because a lot of those shows were "political" and women weren't allowed to partake in politics

They did that in AC1, too. The finger was removed to let the blade slide out. Leonardo improved the whole mechanism so it'd no longer be a thing.

Actually no. Altair fixed the blade after he realized Assassins walking around with their ring finger missing was a big giveaway of who they were. Leonardo used Altair's Codex page to repair Ezio's blade. Hence why Ezio's father nor any of the other Assassins lost their fingers. The only Assassins who still chopped off their fingers were the Spanish as they did it to prove their commitment to the Creed.

He did not, he said it was improved...

Welp, my bad. Played AC2 ages ago and haven't touched any other game in the series.

Uh yes he did. Altair fixed the blade. It was HIS CODEX. Leonardo worked off of ALTAIR'S DESIGN.

I'm gonna have to do it to you bro. r/woooosh

@AquaJetEmpoleon Its been done.

@@bigdickgod2442 What's the dlc? I really don't know

Hidden ones and something I can't remember

Calum Bovaird curse of the pharaohs

Thechrisanator 1 what most people don’t understand is that the whole assassins creed series’ goal is to track Desmond’s bloodline back to when the ISU were around so that they can analyze there technology and use it against the Templar’s. The thing is that the games follow real world logic that DNA degrades after every few generations and that they will need older DNA samples to go further back which is why after Desmond’s death Abstergo can’t go back any further because they don’t have any DNA to use to go further back. Hence why Abstergo in modern day isn’t a threat and haven’t gotten anymore pieces of Eden. With the DNA from the spear of Leonidas they can track the bloodline even further back now.

Mad King Yes not to mention the fact that their is a dlc for ac odyssey called the hidden blade in which we see the hidden blade in use.

He didn't check, because not only his humor falls flat, he also doesn't fact check

Jamon Gourd well rome outskirt

Yes he doesn't check the facts 💯

Ram Saravanan it even says 3 days later the outskirts of Rome and not only that she never goes back to Egypt something he also dose not check

Ahan Bhalla omg I feel the same way

I had never played any AC games, but Origins was my first and it was awesome. Okey, is Ubisoft, with bugs and micropayments, but the game still very entreteinament and a beatufil map. The storie is not good enough compare to other games, but is decent. I really enjoyed this game. Now I prefer Red Dead Redemption 2 or The Witcher 3, but AC Origins is a nice game (sorry for my English)

I love a lot of the games this guy makes fun of. But it is entertaining at least. But yeah, Origins is a really good game.

Ahan Bhalla I agree completely, at the same time a lot of the 'sins' can be explained or brushed off fairly easily, and others just genuinely made me laugh: Ubisoft *ding* . Gold.

i disagree. it's not a bad game, but it completely changed it's style in the newer games to appeal to a more generic audience. they took away all the "assassin's creed" & left nothing but a generic rpg like most sequels nowadays.

He didn't "lose" his child, his child was killed. And just because you can have more it doesn't mean the pain of losing the first just goes away.

Then he joins the hidden ones

If you are a river, does that make you gender-fluid?

You mean you're full of hippos?

No,Yes,Yes.

lolo ayyy I like your Name.

Pharaohs used to jerk off into the nile signifying that the pharoah grants fertility to the land. Go on, swallow all that load

Climbing got so boring since all you have to do it point forward and hold the climb up button.

And for some reason he gives that a sin

And when he suddenly changed language in the tomb that was because Caesar spoke Greek and Latin so he was probably speaking greek the whole time so everyone could understand him but then talked latin when he seen the tomb because he was surprised

Ancient floor fans?

The dress.... it's alive! The symbiote....

Maybe one day when a company decides to spend 7 years on a game just tweaking little things in it, maybe. Modern companies want to push out games as fast as possible, they want it to look amazing and feel amazing, so they don't have time to spend on working on how to process clothing, hair, and skin collision, which most games don't have.

Bruh you're talking about shit that can't really be done yet with current tech. You'll need one of those super computers that extremely hard-core pc gamers have with like 3 gpus and 128 gigs of ram and shiz. There's no way that you can have a world with the size, quality and variation of AC Origins and still have that smaller stuff. I'm surprised they even paid so much attention to the fire stuff in the game

I have an issue with this too but I don’t expect it to be corrected any time soon. Even the most insane tech demos feature various forms of clipping. You’d have to have multiple physics systems to implement no clipping and hair physics alone is something that can bring strain to a system that otherwise didn’t have any stain.

NeoMatrix you know hair and extra-long clothes is THE HARDEST thing to animate in movies and games.

How bout when the character is wearing a necklace and in the cut scene they bend over but the necklace sticks to their neck...

Sian Palmer Brown exactly, he got a fair amount wrong with the sins in this one

Well, it is retconned now because you can see darius' blade in the Odyssey post launch trailer and his blade extends from top of his wrist, not under... So that hidden blade is a cheap knock off probably

@@Shifty135792468 Meh, he is as wrong as AC:O is. Considering that Bayek only loses his finger after you assassinate the bathing guy, it seems like Ubisoft totally forgot that it wasn't a tradition but a necessity for the blade to function until Altair modified after events in AC1 according to the codex in AC2. It pissed me off so much.

equality ? it was just propaganda cuz the ruler had a cunt between her legs .

notoriousbig3k I'm sorry, last time I checked, I was the Egyptian over here and am the one who read about Egyptian history from Egyptian books.

Don Kapsalon but by being politically correct isn't it realistic? I didn't know how to form the sentence, so forgive me if it doesn't make sense

OHHHH I see now, I was thinking something else. Thanks for the answer

xZinaRefaatx you do recognize that the Egypt that they are portraying here isn’t even Ancient Egypt? This is the middle eastern Egypt, after Alexander the Great ruined it So all that ur talking was lost

shane hallberg i thought the story was good😕

Jordan McClure it was good. Nothing groundbreaking but executed very well.

The story has to be paid attention to and actually thought of to follow. Not like most other games where the story is right in your face and it's obvious. I guess that somehow makes it bad? "Ow my brain". Yeah it's not great, but it is definitely still good. Not only that, a fair amount of sins in this video were blatantly incorrect. I get that these videos are supposed to be satire but some of these sins make it seem like he actually has no fucking clue what he's talking about. If you're gonna try to be funny, make good points. Don't make them up and call them sins

exactly, cyanic. well said.

Cyanic Dream Unfortunately these sin channels rarely pay attention to the story of games and only do minimal investigation. You could make an entire video that renders most of these sins pointless. Dart clearly only plays these games to make sin videos for cash and has no intention on putting time and actual effort in finding actual sins outside of his own bottom of the barrel nitpicks. These videos make games look worse than what they actually are. He has the expectations of a in your face, explain everything in cutscenes painfully obvious stories

Caesar didn't actually say anything when he died, most agree that he was just silent

Alex Battaglia Suetonius said he didn’t say anything after his death but others there had reported he said the Greek words it’s lost to history at this point

? Then were did they take Darius' corpse from? He is an assassin way before AC:O takes place. Why would they include him as one of the seals in AC2 if there was no brotherhood before AC:O?

Its tech

Yeah what a dumb question literal magical Gods and Godesses being real in the AC universe for about 10 years now and this guy is still questioning if magic is real in AC

@@benjiboy4477 REALLY alien high tech = magic to us primitive apes!

And THAT'S Why Its Called ORIGINS.

These games are convoluted garbage anyway

It at least took a step in a positive direction(in gameplay I mean, the story was still kinda...Ubisoftish.)

Scare crows while I agree its a familiar template, this is my favorite execution of it.

a fart can get 10/10

Xamufam no it can’t. IGN has a bad reputation for scoring games poorly. Especially giving them scores that are too high. However if you look at any of their top 10-100 lists, you’ll find that most if not all games on said lists are very good and deserve their spot. To this day IGN has never given out a perfect 10 that I’m aware of. I believe 9.8 is the highest score they’ve given and it was for one of the metal gear solid games if I’m not mistaken. The idea that it’s easy to get top tier rating is asinine. There’s no evidence for that anywhere.

shane hallberg majority of people would agree the newest Assassin's Creed installments is a great game and at very least deserves an 8 if not higher

In your shitty opinion

Hahaha, in fact, the joke is that Bayek killed his own son.

UnagiTempura not in that period not in that country not that often so its waaaaaaaaay too convinient even if it was in respective era, dont you think?

Maurice Anderson um ? Female gladiators have almost always been a thing , and in Egypt they had the same rights as men , so having female gladiators in Egypt is by no way "ahistorical"

no, no there weren't allowed however many just disguised as men and fought: later however people found out and then they were recorded in history as badass women who were excellent fighters.

I think this guy forgot about the first civ in this universe. Magic exist in that world but its just advanced tech that humans can not understand so we just say its from the gods thats why byake just rubs his experience of as something the gods left for them or from being in the desert for to long

Actually if you go back to ubisoft 10 commandments for ac they state that magic doesn't exist everything that happens has a explanation and is related to advanced technology but then they went against it and the franchise began to fall

let’s go over a list of things that apparently aren’t magic to dart. - a metal ball that can be used to control peoples minds - a sword that shoots lightning - a fleece that makes you immortal yeah, magic is totally a new thing.

bummer, you'd think it be Murder + Accidental Genocide / lesson learned= Assassin

Deus Umbra for a non ac player and ubisoft hater this is the right explanation. But the majority of ac players disagree

i have played almost every assassin's creed game and i don't disagree in the slightest. nearly every assassin's story (with the exception of shay the assassin turned templar) starts with a dead family member then is continued by one dumbass decision after another.

Deus Umbra extra family death

The Origin of the Assassins is older they appear since the First Great Precursor War were the race was divided in two the ones who wanted to make man kind slaves and the one who wanted to live witht hem and help them there were 3 Great Precursor Wars all 3 ended with a natural calamity 1first was a Flood and 2nd and 3rd were Solar Explosions 3rd one eliminated them for good but humans survived inspecially the bion-engineered ones who were the Body Guards and Spys of Precursos those turned into the Assassins and then there wore the Elite Enforcers who were normal humans who turned into the Grand Order then as Templar now known as Abstergo

In the sequel comics, William's corpse is shown, he was stabbed.

parrying, blocking, dodging, shield attacks, bow attacks, and melee attacks, on top of fire attacks, poison attacks, and sleep attacks, in the air, on the ground, in the water, or on horseback. There is so much variety in how and where you can attack in this game. If you only hacked and slashed you weren't playing right.

J. H. Dude there are only 2 finishers per weapon it doesn't matter about the fire or poison it's still the same and you can only get a kill animation on the last enemy witch just ruined the unpredictable patterns of seeing it over and over the bow was a great touch but really just because they switched the combat it is still just as easy and is still one on one with a.zoomed in cam to close and the weapons are way to cartoon like way to big with fire and poison and sleep health on hit that's not making the game better that's just adding so plp will not see the laziness in the combat don't let them.fool you bruh shadow of war combat put this to shame where you actually need some skill to get kill finishers through a combo system and multiple enemy's will attack and you csn counter them with skill

Interviewer: What's your standard for a good game? A variety of weapons, tools, and shields with different stats and attributes? A good levelling system with cool upgrades? An extensive open world with many side quests, and locations that have worth while loot? A beautiful and stunning open world with an interesting setting? NATE DIAZ: No, kill animations

J. H. Yea but I didn't say it was a bad game it is a good game but it could have been the greatest game ever and they kinda blew it and had 2 years to make it great they can't fool me just by adding a few tools and a doge button the witcher 3 combat is way better and shadow of war is also so go play them and come back this is a cartoon hack and slash dark soul type combat and I just think assassins don't fight like that why can't you unequip the sheild that would have been great and parry with the sword deflect arrows back at enemy's double stealth assassination like unity instead of using the enemy sword to throw back at another enemy on a chain overpower kill why not just pull the bow and get an instance headshot kill why when you do kill finishers its the same camera angle it least change that so its not so repetitive why not get 2 enemy's to attack and get a double counter kill finishers why is all the stealth assassination the same animation even on different size enemy's why us every weapon a reskin I have 123 hours in the game so it is worth the money but man I love assassins creed and this could have been one I could re play over if it was not just copy and paste on so many level's

A message appears when they hack the Assassin network, says William was dead. In the follow up comics we're shown he was killed by being stabbed here he's alive with no explanation.

Logan Productions i dont understand why you keep spreading this misinformation but so far you have yet to say what comic that is because nobody else heard of it. William is alive with no explenation cause there is no needed. He never died, in Rogue that message was just fake news.

mireknycz the msg is real absertgo got him proff is in orgin in email of Layla which show a picture of him tied up they probally told someone to kill him and told everyone hes dead but the assassins saved him during the break in to stop the memory transfer and broadcast that he survives proven by the is alive msg

That quote goes back far beyond Far Cry 3. While widely attributed to Einstein, the only documented trail of it is from Alcoholics Anonymous pamphlets. They've used it, in one form or another, for nearly 40 years.

i think you did not understood it .

Assassin's Creed: Wild West

Ew

Raul Ortiz after they get their greenbook

Assassin's Creed Tacos

Beard dlc was a joke.

Because it’s Ubisoft