Dr. Kang repeated Chinese overcapacity propaganda without a second thought, 87%+ Korea's automobile productions are exports, that number for China is around 6%, meaning the overwhelming majority of Chinese production is for domestic auto market while Korea is the opposite, if overcapacity is a real problem South Korea should be the 1st one on the list to get whacked. she better not complain when there are 100% tariffs against Korean cars.
You beat me to the crunch. I was about to say the same thing. Unbelievable these people. You can't talk to these people. They don't use reason, facts or logic. They just invent their own narratives and act like it's the truth.
Thank you for your comment. Having read your comment, has made decided not to watch this video. I do not have time to hear propaganda nor to entertain people who are so brainwashed and unable to think for themselves like that Kang Kyung-wha - she must have bought her PhD because after so many years of learning, and reading, her brain is still not functioning. Again thank you.
I think there are some truth there, but maybe not related? There are reports and also local complains in weibo and douyin (taken down) that shows fields and fields of unsold electric cars in a car graveyard. You can still find the posts, using more creative keywords.
@@mikechiam2032 If you have to look for one specific case to extrapolate it to the entirety of a country of 1.4 billion people, you already lost the argument. Also i know exactly what you are talking about, its a debunked right wing propaganda originated from ASPI (US state department funded anti-China org in Australia), photos of a car junkyard in Hangzhou, news flash, such used car junkyards are literally in every country every city. Ppl like you are the exact reason why I support the Great Firewall, too susceptible to propaganda and will easily repeat such simple logic defying talking points, the US is waging an economic and propaganda war on China and they are counting on naive ppl like you to destabilize China so the US can forever remain the sole global hegemon.
It is about time that the Asia Society has an Asian as its president. The three short months Dr, Kang has shown her extraordinary leadership in organizing much better events and bringing more knowledgeable and balanced speakers. During the tenure under Rudd, we had mostly only white guests discussing Asia amongst themselves. Thank you, Dr. Kang😢
@@jakeh5799The one who pays the piper calls the tune. So far, her tune is one that is in line with the professed mission of Asia Society. Let's be optimistic!
The Geopolitical issues started all because of the Anglo Saxon issues. All Anglo Saxons listen to their King/Queen, if the new UK King hates China, the whole of Anglo Saxon countries like Canada, US, Australia, New Zealand and East India companies will attack China, either with mainstream media/social media or dividing China’s allies to revolt. All these issues have to do with Charles, the deep problem Anglo Saxons aggression.
@@peterpph126 You are right. It's more an American Society on Asia. Americans always think they speak on behalf of Asians. Let's hope the guest speakers are genuine in looking through the lenses of Asians for the cause of peace.
I am so glad that his constituent that he contested in 2011 election voted him out. It is not without reasons that Lee Kuan Yew put him there, knowing that the voters would vote for the opposition instead of him, because Lee Kuan Yew wanted him out, because George is incapable. His speech at the Asia Society further confirmed LKY‘s view. He has little to no knowledge of CCP and merely being a lackey of the CCP.
I'm pleasantly surprised that George Yeo is invited. Asia Society under Kevin Rudd has degenerated to become a forum of guest speakers with known anti-China views to serve not the cause of peace and understanding but one of hate, fears and falsehoods. Kevin mostly kept the comments section closed, a tell tale sign of a propaganda mouthpiece. George has a keen understanding as an observer and practitioner, in cross-cultural and geopolitical dynamics. Above all, he's a man of peace. In these dangerous times when tribal mindset threatens to exterminate humanity, we need more peacemakers than warmongers. The world is doomed if it's about US vs China but incredibly synergic if it's US + China, together with EU, India, Japan and Russia, uplifting the rest of the world to become partners to solve existential global problems. I hope (naively?) that's the mission of Asia Society too. Let's start with the premises that US and China are stronger together, a positive sum game and that they want peace.
Yes, in a few incidents, i provided alternative views, they were deleted and then the comments section was closed since. Yes, it was one sided propaganda under Kevin Rudd and got even worse under Orville.
Kevin Rudd and many so called "Western Chinese experts" learned to read Chinese words but never understand the cultural philosophies (Confucianism, Taoism, Legalism, etc...). Many proverbs and idioms in Chinese pictographic language/literature need context and explanation to understand the intended Objectives. Hence, George Yeo numerous expansion always add clarity. Just because someone are a visiting scholar for 1 year in China and have access to documents do not mean they can read between the lines and understand the tactical and sometimes contradicting nature of dictum. Pragmatism and outcomes are keys to China guiding governance. If you default to the Western perspective and point of view in framing every arguments, then you will never convince Chinese of the merits of Western governance system when they are not persuaded by the observed results, in Western society.
Well said! The suppression of China by the Western countries and their Allies is not exclusively China's problem but of all the non-Western countries. Remember if China falls under their pressure all non-Western countries will fall like dominoes.
This has to be one of the greatest talk by a statesman of our time, answering a multitude of pertinent questions with clarity in simple language. Bravo, Mr George Yeo.
I am so glad that his constituent that he contested in 2011 election voted him out. It is not without reasons that Lee Kuan Yew put him there, knowing that the voters would vote for the opposition instead of him, because Lee Kuan Yew wanted him out, because George is incapable. His speech at the Asia Society further confirmed LKY‘s view. He has little to no knowledge of CCP and merely being a lackey of the CCP.
Those differences led China and the US to grow ever further apart Reason 1: There's no slaughter, loot and genocide against ethnic minorities in China, the 'I Can't Breathe' incident never happened in China. Reason 2: China does not allow 1% of the population to own more than 90% of the population's total wealth. Reason 3: China does not allow its people to die in mass shootings, let alone let school children get massacred by guns. Reason 4: China does not allow the drug problem to plague the country and kill more than 100,000 people every year. Reason 5: China has never invaded other countries or engaged in colonial expansion. Reason 6: China never interferes in the internal affairs of other countries, and never seeks and fosters agents abroad. Reason 7: China has never based its foreign policies on 'cheating, lying and stealing', unlike the US China sees such motto is shame, not pride. Reason 8: China has never sought to dominate the world, nor deprived any country (region) of its right of development. On the contrary, China shares development and prosperity with all trading partners. Reason 9: China will never do anything to weaken or eliminate an opponent in order to win. Instead, China is focused on bettering itself. Reason 10: China never fires missiles at wandering balloons, but heavily invests in better infrastructures so Chinese people can enjoy better life, safety and health.
@@ramrao668 Most educated people do. When they contrast that information with the likes of CNN, FOX, BBC, Reuters and Guardians. It became apparent why the world is losing trust with western source for reliable information. Ironic, isn't it? Well, at least in your head I supposed.
The potential prime minister of Singapore who was not to be. An engineer by training, historian par excellence, views well sought after globally. In my opinion, his global views n perspectives is second most sought after, after LKY! The other is prof Kishore. Wonder who has more global stage? But doesn’t matter. Both are Singaporeans, both are well respected globally & both do Singapore proud at the world stage!
That she talked about Chinese "overproduction" as an assumed fact was quite revealing. I see plenty of Kias and Hyundais around where I live. It must be Korean overproduction.
@@deanzaZZR overcapacity is US propaganda. Like the propaganda against Sinovac. Good luck to those who took mnra vaccines. Dr Campbell says all lot in utube
Would've been ideal if she is, but it's understandable. Reasons 1) Asia Society, her present employer is a US-funded think-tank 2) She was formerly S Korea's foreign minister hence her views & values are very aligned to those of US & West. In any case, S Korea is a US satellite state 3) She has studied & worked in US, has lived & spent significant time there hence her views & opinion is heavily influenced by those in US making it skewed & biased.
Tq you Sir 🫡😇 for sharing your knowledgeable, understanding and explanation problems that we are facing now. Indeed a very Sad 😭 thing to see people's always creating unhealthy atmosphere among themselves. We need more leadership like yourself to bring more understanding,harmony and peaceful in this modern world.🙏🙏🏻🙏🏼🙏🏽🙏🏾🙏🏿🌈❤
These knowledgeable speakers will serve the cause of peace and better understanding between the US and China, in these dangerous times of sabre rattling: Jeffrey Sachs, an American diplomat/academic who tirelessly advocates diplomacy in conflict resolution. Pascal Coppers, a Belgian with deep knowledge of Chinese culture and doing business in China. Prof David Kang, a Korean American prof who can unravel many false assumptions about China. I'm sure there are many many more that your viewers can recommend. My underlying premises is that without China and the US coming together, humanity is doomed. Why? Technology developments like AI will be used for war rather than for peace. Any miscalculation based on mistrust could spiral into Armageddon in hours ending humanity. Existential threats like climate change will be neglected. I hope Dr Kang will pursue the professed mission of Asia Society courageously.
There is never a doubt of George Yeo vast experience n knowledge on China and its historical extrapolation. But I have to disagree with his comment that US is the bedrock of ideas and designs n China is exceptionally prowess in manufacturing abilities. It is not true now, China has the most articles published on science and technology n patents over the last 5 years. A recent article from ASPI pronounced that China is ahead in 37 out of the 43 new technologies that would figure prominently in the Future.
East Asians still have remnants of toxic confucianism, where those perceived to have seniority abuse their position to anchor and pin down brighter talents. It's a serious problem in scientific and engineering endeavours.
Superb conversation! Informative, thoughtful, nuanced. My understanding is deepened, my perspective broadened, my curiosity sparked. A privilege. Thank you. Best wishes.
"In our society today there is not enough of the feminine instinct, to see each for what it is and to help that person to interact with another person for what he/she is. The Mother cares for all." Refreshing to hear this. Something I have thought about my whole adult life. The feminine is missing from American politics and political power structure and whenever it gets introduced, there is a huge backlash, not just against the feminine aspect as "weak,' but against women themselves. I hope I live long enough to see this change and all will be respected and sustained, whatever our gifts and talents.
Mr Yeo's point about corruption is right on. Chinese People who have benefited from the corruption in the early years are usually ones pessimistic about the country's future.
This is the only point I disagree with. Corruption has nothing to do with Confucianism. Corruption has a greater relationship with human nature. For example, political donations are legal in the United States. It is tantamount to legalizing corruption. But the same goes for buying cups for $900 in the army and sheep for millions of dollars in Afghanistan, and the sheep are nowhere to be found. You can't say that the United States has something to do with Confucianism.
@@snowlost8233I think George Yeo is trying to find an link to Chinese culture, that does not exclude corruption in non-confucious societies which may be explained by the thanksgiving culture, or others.
@@snowlost8233 ， Interesting, or rather intriguing, to witness that George Yoe not offer any logical explanation within the definition of causation as to why corruption is exclusively related to Confucianism. He simply pasted the two words "corruption" and "Confucianism" together, in pretty much the same way a lot of people would link a purely incidental occurrence of an event to another that is also incidental, and then immediately jump to force his conclusion onto the audience that the two must be related and one causes the other. For example, a dog was hit by a street car, when some dude was trying to strike up a conversation with a charming girl standing nearby and got refused. Then the dude concluded if it were not because the street car hit the dog, the girl would not have refused to carry any conversation with him.
@etbuch4873 you didn't understand..Confucianism teaches...ritual...protocols....It is embedded when you call on some...you hv to bring gifts...In China you can hv $ 20,000 MOON CAKE...WHY ? IT IS CAKE WITH GOLD embedded..
George’s understanding of world affairs is superb. Together with LKY and Prof Kishore their insights and knowledge on diplomatic affairs have greatly influenced and shaped the geopolitical situation globally particularly helping build bridges between China and the West whose understanding in this area were often superficial.
To Dr. Kang, how do you define over capacity? China only export a small percentage of the EV they produced. Compared to South Korea and Japan, whose auto industry heavily depends on exports.
I agreed whole heartedly with this speaker as geopolitics as currently orchestrated will not on its own create the platform for multicultural engagements to secure trust amongst its citizents
Amazing person with such clarity & well read .... Just my utmost respect ... Easily among top talent globally along with Paul Keating of Australia & the likes
George Yeo is absolutely right and the U.S. should recognise China as an ancient, resilient and now once again, a global superpower. However, China should also introspect and ask itself why so many Asian countries turn to the U.S. for security assurances etc. China is THE power in Asia and will lead but should also be the security provider in the Asian Pacific region.
Too few questions from Audience. George has a reputation as pro china in USA. He is not pro china but bridge builder. West should send more students n tourists to the east.
Starts with a criticism of asia society for sewing division, the audacity of this guy! If more people like him speak out, maybe we can pass over the world to our kids without breaking it.
Really love the conversation, but am I the only who thinks the audio quality of the video is very poor? Sounds very difficult to hear the speakers, and almost sounds overcompressed, clicky and full of noise.
China's economic success is at the heart of why the West has always feared and hated "communism"...even w/ a Chinese character. Capitalism (privately owned bus. and industries) cannot compete with industries and resources that are well managed by the central authority of a nation-state who have access to the collective contributions of their population. This is what capitalist have always understood, and now insert terms like "overcapacity" into the lexicon to divert from having to explain capitalisms failure to compete in the free market. It reminds me how they invented the term "whataboutism" to divert from having to justify brazenly hypocritical positions.
Yao BLINDLY forgets that there ha😂ve been several Democratic movements in China mainland(militarily crushed) & that all ‘western’ democracies were at one point dictatorships of kings.
WHEN..? TIANAMEN ? In 1989 the Chinese don't even have a clear understanding democracy ...TIANAMEN was when Opening up their economy...there were corruptions..and very high inflation...further more..there was faction infighting......Thank to Deng China did not go the way of the former USSR...even the student protectors...of TIANAMEN understand today...where Deng have to do what he did....Although they came down hard of the protest...they also listen...and there were many positive change after TIANAMEN...most importantly...by 1991 Deng open the door of China...told chinese..to travel and learn..Study...even earn money...Then come home to build China...Many chinese did ! The Ccp..Kmt (Taiwan ).currently there is 8 other minor party were born from Dr Sun Y S revolution.....When DR Sun became president he already realised Democracy cannot work in China...his prodigy Chiang KS if the KmT is a brutal Dictator....
Could George comment on the recent fiasco on cooking oil in China, where his employer (former?) also owns Yihai Kerry, who has about 50% market share in cooking oil market in China. If he thinks that the CCP is so great in managing its country, perhaps he, as a former minister, would like to suggest to Singapore government to adopt China’s system of managing the country, especially in the food and drug regulation.
The competition between China and the United States is welcome if the extreme risks can be properly managed. Mencius said that should there not be any enemy states and foreign aggression from outside the country, the country often perishes. If we look back at history, the period of the Cold War coincided with the fastest scientific and technological development of the United States and the Soviet Union, as well as the fastest improvement in people's living standards.
Re the first audience’s question on US gov as a protector of human rights in South East Asia, you got to be joking. First of all, the US gov got no rights to talk about human rights. Are you so naive that you still believe that the US politicians care about anyone else other than their own political and economic interest? Look at how US politicians are supporting and funding Israel’s genocide on Palestineans, do you need further elaboration here? Secondly, US is a troublemaker everywhere they set foot on, including their very own soil which they conveniently robbed from the red indians. South East Asia, and the world would be in greater peace without US
:You will know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes from thornbushes or figs from thistles? Even so, every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can a bad tree bear good fruit. Every tree that does not bear good fruit...[will become a pile on the heap of history].* Therefore by their fruits you will know them."--Jesus Chris, the Palestinian Nazarene of Galilee Matthew 7:15-20😢😢 *Parenthetical expression.
Like or not, there were many silent and important, uncomfortable things spoken out loud which would be beneficial for US foreign policy but doubtful if there are any serious listeners coz of this crazy election every 4 yrs.😢
Minus the alleged Chinese government support (i believe most governments support their industries thru subsidies &/or tax holidays like the recent ?USD52B support to the microchip industry in the US?), how can Chinese merchants sell their products or services at a much cheaper rate compared to others?
Wisdom is far above rubies! He/She who earnestly seeks Wisdom, obtains favour from The LORD! 🙏😇 The fear of The LORD is the beginning of wisdom! Knowledge dispels fear! 😇 He/She who has an understanding heart, is of a calm spirit! 😍. Be quick to listen, n slow to speak, for a slow answer turns away wrath, n a gentle tongue 👅 breaks a bone 🦴. However, unusually stupid arrogance simply stay stagnant, even be left behind in the 21st Century! 😵💫 Self-righteousness is sin!. Whoever harbours sin, shall not prosper! 😭. To many words, sin is not absent, n GOD hates the perverse tongue! 😱🥵 What is desired of man is Kindness! 🙏😍.
Dr. Kyung-wha Kang is really sharp on her feet! She quickly pointed out the curious contradictions of GY's assertion of CCP's collective leadership being a determinant of corruption. GY is a Taoist Roman Catholic. Is that possible? He is a Singaporean agent of influence for China. lol. His characterization of the Philippines' defence of her sovereignty as childish while at the same time asserting China's rightful use of arms against Taiwan & the Philippines is appalling.
When a big power...vs smaller countries...there is no such thing as fair or equal...that is why it is childish...in the case of Philippines...you hv to consider..Marcos has cases outstanding in America..regarding his father assets..over USD 350million...He was a wanted fugitive in USA ..because of the cases...They invited him to America as president...when he return he completely overturn plans with China...😢😂
George has a very limited feel on the south china sea issue . He's a little dismissive of the idea of some members of ASEAN in their claim in the region as ' we don't need another trouble...'. His notion of ' the Americans egging the clueless (he's suggesting it) Filipinos...' is way out of line and entirely false.
George Yeo always talk well of China and blames all other countries for problems in relationship with China. Can forget what he says. There is always this bias.
I was at the opposition rally during the time of the election of 2011. The Workers Party liked GY. The were signs made calling GY for President. The WP said it was important to get more opposition into parliament. They knew they would win in GY’s constituency. The ruling party knew this. They could have removed him from this consituency but did not. He was Foreign Minister, very well respected in many countries. I believe there was also an agenda against him in the ruling party to sacrifice him.
As far as I can gather, George does not reside in China, nor his children. In fact, his children are probably residing in the US. That is enough said about which country is better.
Why does he not make speeches or speak naturally in mandarin when learnt chinese in sg school? What is the success of Bilingualism of sg? Does he understand china when he is perceivably not comfortable speaking in mandarin in public? Could he misunderstand the China? And is he Anti-USA? Does he learn china from a english perspective?🤭🫣🤭 Or christian perspective?
Chinese is second language in S’pore schools. During GY’s time in school, he did not attend a Chinese language school. He has a double first class honours from Cambridge University.
@@jennifertan8085 Are you an apologist for GY? Most of us did not take Chinese as first language in SG. Yet , many like me can speak fluent English and mandarin. Are you saying GY did not take Chinese as Second Language in SG education system? I doubt so. You can clarify. Bilingualism comprises having Chinese as Second language. An ex policy maker need to walk the talk. He broke record as the first full minister to ever lose his seat. This record is for eternity of SG history. In the age of A.I, who cares about first class honours? It's nothing to do with practical capabilities of a human. Education is regurgitation of someone's created knowledge. It's not creating knowledge. SG is a follower of technologies invented by other countries for most if not all the tech
Indeed, for he is open minded and knowledgeable. His tenure in both the politics and private sector had offered him numerous personal experiences to share with his audience.
Excellent interview. One minor point though: at the end of the interview the host expressed that George Yeoh has 20 decades of experiences. Being a Singaporean we know that George Yeoh is definitely not over 200 years old 😊
