Germany's Most Overkill Tank Destroyer 

Spookston when he's forced to play Germany:

spookston when he’s forced to play any tank that isn’t a light tank or spaa

you can be reimbursed by playing a light vehicle: the ratels >:3

I understand, but as someone who loves casemates I enjoy this vehicle, but I’m more of a fan of the Ferdinand or elifant due to teh reload

You can get one of my cookies 🍪

The maus was the heaviest tank ever yet it never saw battle, straight up threw a diamond away.

@@TheWeirdWritter maus was straight up stupid

@@TheWeirdWritterI don’t think it’ll be remotely useable anyway. So practically the same result just didn’t waste as much resources

@@TheWeirdWritter if by diamond you mean "a valubale object that can easily be spotted from the air and bombed to death." then yeah

@@TheWeirdWritter Diamond? lmao

and the p1000 ratte prototype lol

@@irirjhrhr4645 Prototype? There were some light drawings of it, at best.

​@@irirjhrhr4645there wasn't even a single part build, let alone a prototype lmao.

​@@adhx7506 Yea more like the doodles of a prototype

@fuckinantipope5511 yeah I meant the drawings

yea XD

rest in peaces

*Sad cup smashing noises*

​@@spades952 *rest in pieces

@@dawobblygaby937 XD

Its quite funny, cause it's the only timr ive heard him pronounce German stuff right

I hear it in German because I actually speak more german than English at home but I am not even native to Germany

Well actually no it didn’t break down. After all in order for that to happen it would need to drive first but no fuel for it to leave the factory

I don't understand why everyone talks about this tanks like if the designers were some kind of monkeys that were given some pencils and paper to play around with random shit. Is it that hard to understand that coming with an even just maybe decent tank design within the span of maybe not even a year is like trying to play the lottery? It's not a surprise that most of late war tanks were such a mess

​@@Van-lv7hybecause they were monkeys, their factories was bombed out to the ground and they still belived that this tank was good and necessary for Reich and then somebody accepted this blueprints and converted some Panzer 6B to jagdtiger

Problematik Hansmission

The T-34 had a higher failure rate than panthers. They carried spare transmissions strapped to the back for WHEN it failed not IF

Not quite. The Japanese purchased a Tiger but it sat on a dock because they had no way to transport it back to Japan. And when the Allies approached, the Germans just used it.

@@kirishima638guess they could not put a tiger tank in a submarine?

⁠@@toothpick8858I think they’d have needed one of the i400 class for cargo the size of a Tiger but I think it still would’ve been too heavy; if they tried stowing it in the Deck Hangar I imagine the sub would be at serious risk of turning turtle 🥶

@@SportyMabamba should have put floaties on it, silly japanese

No one had a cargo ship? Couldn't steal a Liberty?

I died laughing from the intro

lmao

It is loved by me! What's not to love about it? It has: Good turret traverse Good pen with HEAT-FS in case there is something too heavy Good engine Good transmision reverse included It looks funny

WoT players would recognise the SU-76P as the SU-26. Because of course Wargaming would rename it.

@@freyaeyles5178 The SU-26 designation was the early name for the SU-76P, so WG wasn't completely wrong.

The SU-12 I'd pay for. Yes, it would more likely than not be a Battle Pass vehicle.

There are test out with the JT and its pretty fast and manuverable even in the Snow ^^

​@@ikko93 even a pretty mobile 72 metric fuckton tank will get itself pretty stuck pretty often.

@@ikko93It's even less reliable than the infamously unreliable Ferdi ( that burst into flames when climbing hills ). It can move well in snow in a controlled test ? Wow, so impressive. Any machine can do that, good luck doing it all the time, that is what matters.

You say that but...... From Wikipedia Conclusions The Ferdinand/Elefant may have been the most successful mass-produced tank destroyer employed during the war in kills per loss[citation needed], reaching an average claimed ratio of approximately 10:1. During the Battle of Kursk, sPzJgrAbt 653 claimed to have knocked out 320 enemy tanks, for the loss of 13 Ferdinands.[13] This impressive average ratio was due to its superior firepower and protection, which gave it an enormous advantage when used in head-on combat or a static defensive role. However, poor mobility and mechanical unreliability greatly diminished its operational capability.

@@martron123 That's according to the nazis who are notorious for inflating kill counts for propaganda, wikipedia uses as sources books of former nazi generals who are biased as hell, so your argument holds no water sadly. Also regardless of kills, only like 90 or so where made, so their contribution is zero in the grand scheme, except in impressing german army fans that is. That is their only lasting legacy. And how NOT to build tank destroyers.

You’re right, it really isn’t that bad. It’s actually quite fun because unlike the Tiger 2, it has neigh impenetrable frontal armor at that BR but I guess we have to play up the memes.

the JT wasn't designed as a Stug, its role is completely different and many youtubers fail to understand its concept. These were made for long range encounters with secured flanks.

🧀👍

Completely comprehensible. Have a nice day

he's spitting

@@Spookston im somewhat of a poet myself

real😔

We do not care😂😂😂😂

"quick to claim that he not no snake like me neither"