Greeny has issue with Bulls' trio of Jordan, Pippen & Rodman being ranked 3rd best | Get Up 

Really at least one of the celtics teams should have made the list

It has bird parish and Mchale

yeah.. those white unathletic truck drivers deserve more.. 😆😆😆😆

Cereal Killa but who do you bump off his top 5? Gotta keep Magic, Kareem and Worthy. The Spurs trio certainly stays. I can see bumping Miami for Bird, McHale and Parrish. Miami and GS could both drop out if it were me. I’d have: 1. 80’s Lakers 2. Spurs 3. MJ, Scotty and Rodman 4. Shaq, Kobe and Horry 5. Bird, McHale and Parrish

I'm thinking take the Heat off the list and put the Celtics 3rd or 4th.

It's because they won 3 without him with grant

💯 agreed, this analysts was a joke

The disrespect Rodman gets is unreal

they do this to get people to watch dumb ass

billyboy2108 they all are a joke. Love to hear themselves talk but dot know shit

Dennis Johnson was a beast. I take a "healthy: Bird-McHale-Johnson" over the Lakers trio. Even with Parish I take them.

Man I don't like the Cs but not being on the list is just absurd

BLASPHEMY!!!!!!!

They no way LeBron/Wade/Bosh is #5. They didn’t even average 60 wins per season (in a very weak Eastern conference) and only won 2 titles...

Best sf of all time + 3rd best sg sounds better to me

But we’re they?

Joel Embiid really it’s hard to say it’s either the longevity of the spurs or the dominance of the short but amazing bulls

You’re not wrong that they could’ve been, but they weren’t. The trio was only around for three years and simply couldn’t do as much as the spurs trio. It is what it is.

Killitwithfire29 it wasn't their fault they were separated

Jacob Rudy it doesn’t matter whose fault it is, the fact is is they were only together as a trio for 3 years where as the Spurs trio were together for much longer therefore they were able to accomplish more

true

That’s why that one guy said Horry. But to fishers credit bailed out Shaq and Kobe many times with some clutch threes.

Mark Geerdink fisher ruined it

@@JonTrades i was saying true to Rell his comment...

He was a great 3 point shooter dude!

Agreed

I know right.

I mean, they threepeted before he got their.

I mean horace grant can be replaced and they still three peated. just sayin

Did they not win a 3 peat before he got there? Of course he's replacable

Facts lmao

I'd still put them below Jordan and Pippen, however if they could get along then they would be the #1. The reality is they did not like one another at all.

Dereck fisher was still a pretty solid player tho

fisher was a great player though not an all-star but still a great player

Who Fisher Fox 🤣

Kobe never won without him

Yea they reaching

for real the media is fuckin sick they want to stretch content they even want to add robert horry thats some bullshit dude was never an all star. chauncy billups rip hamilton and ben wallace should have made that list

Only trio fisher was a part of was a love triangle, dude was fucking so many guys wives it was insane.

yes he is fisher matt barnes barnes wife

JoM but and I love the spurs but they've never went back to back they would always mess up after a great year sure longevity speaking they great and that why they on the list but never actually dominate for a 2 years in a row that what all those team have against them

@@maatcreed4440 first off they would've went 2 in a row if Ray Allen didn't make the shot of the century and second you don't need to successfully defend your title in order to be great

and the Bulls trio... played in a league with the stockton-malone jazz the ewing knicks the hakeem rockets the barkley suns and the bad boy pistons and they won 3 titles

thehawks33 na bruh,bad boy pistons had Rodman on their roster,that was back for the first three rings ... but I agree,they faced a lot of thought teams,Indiana was another,the magic w shaq and penny etc

anthony petre you don't have to go back to back to be great that's just even more impressive that the were good for that long and won that many titles without ever going back to back

nah

Yes, Heat triplets whofully underachived. Only reason Celtics didnt have more Finals appearances is they had to go back-&-forth with Dr J 76ers and Bad Boy Pistons while Lakers went through barren Western conference (only Olajuwon stopped their consecutive trip in the 80s)...

Bet you didnt even born and watched them play on those era yet you pick out the Heat. Celtics big 3 is overshadowed by Lakers big 3 in 80s

I'd put kobe shaq and Fischer over the Miami trio well, they 3-peated, and lost once due to kobe and shaq falling out. Miami lost twice, once to dirk nowitski, who had no super team

No shot

Jay Jay they do this to get people to watch dumb ass

LOL! Where does ESPN find these guys!

@Rico Wright hey fool Rodman replaced Grant. And he wasnt half the player Rodman was, nice try bonehead take your trolling elsewhere

@@JayJoe1984 so Rodman cannot be replaced by Charles Barkley.

Jay Jay facebook.com/groups/967348520070287/

If Golden State had gone 3 for 3 would u rank them higher than the Spurs??

@@ShaneMike112 As a Spurs fan yes, that big 3 was better than Duncan, Parker, Ginobili. Two MVPs and one of the more underrated players in Klay Thompson in their primes, definitely better than the Spurs trio. Yeah the Spurs trio was together longer and won four rings together, but collectively talent wise that Warriors trio is better.

@@michaelj450 NO

@@alexchavez9040 it’s true though I love the Spurs but Ginobli and Parker don’t compare with Curry & KD and Klay is one of the best shooters ever plus an amazing defensive talent

Partly cause of competition

Is that not a good thing? Having longevity on ur trio?

The trio Duncan Parker Gino win 3 title in 5 years

its not like they were garbage during the 14 seasons - they won 50 gm/year. If u wanna play the would coulda shoulda game, I can say Warriors is better teams than the Bulls

@@syazmanlyman peak over longevity is pretty much consensus LMAO

@@SamuelJ888 the warriors team shouldn’t even be there tho

Money analysis. My list: 1. Bulls 2. Warriors (Jordan is slightly better than Durant. Curry and pippen are a wash. And Thompson and Rodman are a wash). 3. Lakers with magic, worthy, and Kareem 4. Miami 5. Celtics with bird, McHale, and Parrish

@@RossRadikSherman I agree with this list but with one exception. I’d move the Celtics up one, and the Spurs to 5. If it wasn’t for ray allen, the Spurs should’ve taken both championships from Miami. The heat got rocked in the rematch too losing in 5 games. And we can’t forget the heat losing to the the Mavericks. The success of the heat was overrated bc the East was so weak, it was a sure thing they would be in the finals.

@@dustierbottoms The Spurs best player was Kawhi in that last title. Defensively, Kawhi was like a chicken with his head cut off, guarding the entire opposing team. Kawhi is still a beast on defense now, but he doesn't have the energy to run around the entire game and guard the entire opposing team the way he did when he was 21, 22. That spurs team play in the finals was the best teamwork I had ever seen from a team. It wasn't just the big four. It was Danny green, Boris diaw, it was everyone. I've rewatched game 3 four or five times. It was the best I had ever seen a team play.

@@dustierbottoms The Mavericks team that beat the heat had beaten the two time defending Lakers with a healthy Bynum, Gasol, Odom, and Kobe. Then, they beat a young okc team with Westbrook, Durant, harden, and Ibaka. Shawn Marion and Tyson Chandler were beasts defensively. Jason Kidd guarded Kobe, Westbrook, and Dwayne wade in back to back series. And offensively, Kidd was as good as ever at setting up his teammates. Despite all that, that Mavericks team would've lost if LeBron hadn't choked. If LeBron hadn't choked, that Miami team would be 3rd on my list. If losing twice in the finals is a disqualification from the list, then the only two teams that belong on the list are the warriors and bulls.

@@RossRadikSherman you actually raise a good point which totally slipped my mind...Kahwai wasn’t technically part of the big 3 that’s being discussed. The Spurs trio still did win 4 together, even if Kahwai was the best player on that team that year. And if you compare the stats in the last finals, Duncan, Ginobli, and Parker outplayed bosh and Wade. And you can also make an argument in the mavs final, Jason Terry had a bigger impact than Bron lol. I still have the Spurs there, simply bc I don’t think that heat team was that good. It wasn’t just that they lost two finals series, it’s how they lost, who they lost to, and how they won. They never dominated. Even the Shaq/Kobe lakers were more dominant and if they played the heat head to head, I have the lakers dismantling the heat. Shaq/Kobe/insert random laker player are still ahead of the heat trio on my list. You’re right about the mavs - they were a good team - they finished with the second best record in the league, tied with the lakers. But the lakers were a mess that whole season. Odom and Bynum played half the reg season (and this was before Bynum peaked and was constantly dealing with being injured). The team was burned out from winning back to back championships. I even think Phil was diagnosed with cancer or something that year and I think that was also odoms last year in LA. They were a team in turmoil. The baby thunder just werent ready yet, young talent often loses to experienced vets in the playoffs. Despite cruising into the finals, no one had the Mavs beating the heat. The heat were heavy Vegas favorites and they were also picked by the majority of talking heads and sports analysts. And you even said it yourself, if Lebron showed up, they beat the mavs. He didn’t. The only convincing win by the Heatles was beating the baby thunder. Ray Allen just happened to be at the right place at the right time when Bosh randomly tipped out that rebound. It was a fluke play. And we saw how the Spurs just rolled them the next year. I was more impressed at how the Spurs and mavs easily destroyed the heat than when they beat up on a young OkC team. That’s why they don’t make my top 5.

That entire 3 peat Denis made a all defensive team one time and never made one again. And can you compare any of their adversaries against Kobe and Shaq? Or Bird Celtics or the bad boys they beat a dinosaur team in Utah and a pretty good team in Seattle.

Turtle Boi the spurs trio are most definitely the best winning trio of all time

@@MrSlashblade To be fair though the Lakers were gifted two trips to the Finals. Portland and Sacramento should've won two of those Western Conference Finals. The Bulls adversaries were just as formidable as the Lakers. The Bulls just made it look easy.

@@MrSlashblade how about the Shaq and Penny Magic for one. Also that Utah team was dinosaurs? Malone was league MVP one of those years and Stockton is one of the best point guards of all time and still by far the all time assist leader. Stop trying to downplay the great competition the Bulls beat on their way to the titles.

@@Rainz_00 and you forgot to mention the Barkley suns, and Hakeem Rockets, or the fact that Jordan did in fact have to face the bad boy pistons and he swept them

Yes they still trying to discredit kobe they want them to see kobe always have a super team. if you realize only Shaq and pau are the only superstar caliber he play Lamar and Fisher are not even all star they are good but not all star. Bynum is potentially and one time all star but his attitude and injury make him not star caliber Lakers have Glen Rice 1999-2000 but he played 27 only in 1st year and his number go down in the next year. And they forgot Kevin love Irving and lebron. Also Boston have rondo an all star and double double machine that time when he is Boston and avg 2 stl per game. And in Miami big 3 ray Allen is there also and still deadly in 3s in two years run.

@@Me-sm9qk if they really wanted to put kobe in there, put him with gasol and odom. Made 3 straight finals then won back to back and beat the boston big 3 too. Shaq and kobe was more of a duo. Fisher... Wtf lol

If anything Horry would be that 3rd guy

@@98753741963 maybe Bynum gasol and kobe but I don't know if we say big 3 the 3 players is in the top 10 in their position. Wade in that time is in top 2 in sg position kobe in 1st James harden still young that Time Manu ginobli is not better that time. And Chris bosh is in top 5 in his position than time maybe 3. And that is a big 3. 2008-2010 odom is not even a top 10 pf in that time. Bynum is always in top 10 in that time so I guess Bynum gasol and kobe is the big 3 but he always injured. He never complete the 82 games in that 3 years 65 is the highest. And he did not played in 2008 finals in 2009 he just 6ppg 4.2rpg 0.6 apg 0.6 bpg not that effective and in 2010 he just avg 7.4 ppg 6.6 rpg 0 ap 1.3 bpg and lamar odom great number 13. 5ppg 9rpg 2008 13.4ppg 7.8 rpg 2009 7.6 ppg 6.6rpg 2010 good number but I can't consider it a big 3. So for me kobe and Shaq is a duo kobe and pau is also a duo. And kobe never have 2 all star caliber in his side. Wade is the franchise player of Miami before lebron came bosh is franchise player of Toronto before. Also Irving and love in Cavs and wolves. And this 4 can avg 20 points per game. Kobe never have 2 players can avg 20ppg only one so kobe always have duo. Not big 3. Kobe got big 4 but Payton is old and Malone too and they only play 1 year. They got big 3 Howard and Nash but Howard is not healthy and Nash is old and not also healthy. He got big 3 potentially dlo is young and randle too and his time is past that time because of Achilles and many injury after that injury. So I guess kobe never have a big 3 in his time I wish they get Chris Paul or Howard in 2011 maybe he got the 3 peats again and his 6 rings.

@@Me-sm9qk ginobili or parker didn't stand out when you look at their stats either but what the 3 of them did on the court when you were watching them made them a big 3. Odom was an integral part of their run. I believe he was more important than bynum though you can also argue about bynum being a big 3. I just think that what odom brought to their team was so tough to replace. He was a point forward when there wasn't many at his size. I see your argument about being a duo tho.

Yep and they beat KAREEM/MAGIC 86...ISAIAH defeated Kareem /MAGIC, and BIRD.

they had dj too to be fair..another former final mvp from the sonics

Bird wasn't flashy. McHale just efficiently put the ball into the basket. Parish stood tall and quietly put the ball into the basket.

“Better front line.” Most trios did not exclusively belong to the front line so that’s a pretty disingenuous comment

And They beat the number 1 trio of Lakers.

Memo Zavala RIGHT!!!!!

Agreed...and that’s the best argument against Rodman...MJ/Pippen threepeated without him. Rodman was great but you’re objectively incorrect if you say the due needed him over other potential replacements

You do realize that magic and kareem won multiple championships w/o Worthy. The point is just because the top 2 guys r great doesnt dismiss the greatness of the third guy. Who by the way happens to be a hall of famer.

I have no issue with top choice but no way is Spurs trio better than the Bulls. They shouldnt even be in the top 5

i know lebron choked in 2011 but miami should of 3 peated..they should be higher and McHale was not McHale that first Celtics title or in 82..he wasn't mchale until 83..lets be real and by 89 that trio was done....their a little overrated the addition in 83 of hofer dj saved them same with the addition of hoferin 85 walton saved them..anyone who puts them in that top 5 is crazy same for shaq and kobe and fisher..fisher was not important outside of 2001-2002...he really wasn't...

Right!!! The MAN isn't just a hall of famer but one of the Greatest Players of All time.

Draymond green X2

@@williescott1674 chill

@The Imp Tons of celebrities do far weirder shit. He'd never be judged that way today but somehow his rep sticks with him. He's odd perhaps but I loved watching him play and when watching those Bulls teams my eyes were more often on Rodman than on MJ or Pippen. Thought Rodman played the game the right way and beautifully. He obviously could have scored more if he'd wanted.

@The Imp thats not a factor in this kind of debate

Were the third best Trio in their decade honestly. Behind the Lakers and the Pistons.

@jamel Weeks I would have laughed hard, and to be fair I did (just a little), but it's the sad truth. ESPN is on some heavy crack.

He was good rebounder n role player with not much offensive game. Rodman shouldnt even be in hof n I'm a bulls fan. He couldnt gaurd pg's cauze he was to slow

@@davidchandler6885 what PFs guarded PGs during that time. WTF. He could guard Shaq as a PF, no one in the NBA now could of guarded Shaq. Rodman is arguably one of the greatest defensive players of all time.

Xander facebook.com/groups/967348520070287/

Rodman is very close to how Draymond plays the game. I think Rodman has more hustle and more hunger for rebounds, but Dray is a better offensive weapon than Rodman. People forget that Rodman avg 7 pts for his career. He was one of the best rebounders and hustle guys in NBA history, but had no offensive game.

When you have Jordan you don't need an offensive game... You find something else to do

Absolutely!!

Warriors woula done the same if KD didnt get hurt...

@@SamuelJ888 "would" is something that did not actually happen.. like saying grant hill, TMac and brandoy Roy would have had a better career than clyde drexler. But they actually do not.

Also all 3 first team all defense. No trio since has ever done that before...

It was a weak league though. Name another team during the Bulls prime that had another dynamic trio to counter them? They were the only one in the 90's to have a Dynasty level team. The 80's had about 4 or 5 dominant trios including the Pistons/Celtics/Lakers.. the 00's had Spurs/Celtics/Lakers, the 10's had the Spurs still, with the Heat, the Warriors, the Cavs. Seriously... consider what expansion in 1989 did to shallow the depth of talent in the 90's. It took a good decade for the NBA to increase its depth by expanding their influence overseas and that is when the Dirks of the world started flooding the league making the league deeper. Jordan and Pippen dominated a very thinned out NBA in the 90's. Granted it got more difficult for them in the later half as it was starting to recover.. but still.. no team in the league had a roster with a trio of stars that had a hope to match them. People rave about the Knicks but seriously.. look at that team.. it was Ewing with a bunch of role players. The fact they came close a couple times to defeating the Bulls in the post season is a marvel in itself considering the gap in talent between the two teams.

@@jamessackett9239 is it the bulls fault if mj and pip developed into such players? These teams you ate mentioning are teams that were formed by the players themselves (mostly).. They beat seattle in 96. The trio of hakeem chuck and clyde did not make it through the nba finals. Lakers had 4 all stars but could not get by utah too..

Jackson, Jordan and Pippen are better trio

@@plastikaaa thats a different kind of trio tho...

That's true they would of won more so would of the warriors trio

They should've gone 4/4. That 98/99 season was on their favour. Only 50 games.

BigOGXL 100. hia career is Over

He had credibility? Far as i know he aint play or been in a fo.

BigOGXL 100 facebook.com/groups/967348520070287/

Which one? Or both?

Freddy Calipari he only played college ball

J.H. Lowery the fool think manu was better then him he is an idiot.

So did Yao Ming.....

Every time they played Yao shook Shaq

Kirbs s young shaq when he was 23

@@BrySR Rodman did play him the best tho. Shaq was just to bbn heavy and strong for anyone else to guard. Rodman never backed down tho

You didnt watch the video you just got your own bias cause rodman cant shoot

Damian Presha Rodman brought DEFENSE ‼️Wtf you talking about 🤦🏾‍♂️🤷🏾‍♂️

Grady Jackson Bill CartWright wasn’t on the Bulls at that time

@@galvatron3290 Dennis rodman still cant shoot what you arguing about you got nothing else.

@@damianpresha5155 so a guy is only valuable if he can shoot? Lmfao so rudy gobert is trash too right? Btw the 3 pt shot was obsolete back then

thank you

It's sad that those facts have to be said for these ESPN analysts to comprehend! Best teams of all time goes 1.1992 Dream Team 2. 1996 Bulls, then everybody else!

Lmao dude took longevity into account. Should've change the name to most successful trios not best. Longevity take account to sucess not best. Pippen Jordan and Rodman is the best trio no doubt.

Mic drop!

@@shinoobigod3363 I mean seriously a goat, a top 5 small forward with ridiculous handles, and a top 10 pf! All 3 top 10 defensive players of all time

The guy is worthless!

FACTS!!! 💯 😂

@@gregcummings2826 🤣🤣🤣

Everyone in the 80's was kind of overshadowed by MJ and then 90's happened and we got even more MJ. In the end all those great players and teams just got buried under a historical avalanche of MJ as the GOAT. After that it just turned into a who is the next MJ competition. Its unfortunate but really shows how popular MJ became.

@@SmokeDog1871 Lol what are you talking about MJ got swept by the celtics twice, couldn't even win a game, iverson at least got 1 vs the lakers in the finals, the 80s were about the sixers, celtics, lakers, and pistons, know your history kid.

@@SmokeDog1871 MJ wasn't the man in the NBA till the 90's he got swept numerous times in the 80's.

No it's about downplaying MJs competition. Remember the team that swept Bull s first few playoff? If they recognised them as possibly best, then makes MJs losses still impressive. Downplay bird and Celtics, pistons ...you essentially downplay MJ. Guarantee it's why.

@@strykrpinoy lol it didnt matter MJ was a rookie phenom, did most memorable dunk in the dunk contest ever and even Bird called him God come down to Earth! He was huge during the majority if the 80's. You dont necessarily have to win to be the most popular player in the league.

Best trio ever people trying to knock them down but they are the best team ever

And were Champions every year.

Same goes with GSW they only played 3 years and KD and Klay was injured in thier last season together when they up against Toronto in the finals.

@@Sheeesh-ed3ks Yeah

They were in the finals every year and won twice

@@christianmcmahon1029 2-4 is worse than 3-2

@@WindowLicker_-9 doesn’t change the fact that team was in the finals every single year they were together

@@christianmcmahon1029 in the weak east that timehah

@@malandaytv7553 still made the finals every year

their*

They needed Kawai to win the last title... and even the won they lost, they had a lot of help. yes, they were the 3 best players. But they were on a great squad with incredible role players and a great coach.

^ Because they were the core of the team. When we look at the other trios, it's clear who carried their respective teams. For the Spurs trio, their team effort gave others a chance to flourish like Kawhi did.

As a jazz fan I hated those teams with those three in their prime, they dominated my jazz. Those jazz teams were very good 50 win teams every year but only remember the jazz beating the Spurs 2-3 times. In a 6-7 year period, but I still can’t put them over the bulls three, doesn’t mean they aren’t respected.

Ginobili is so underrated probably because he came off the bench.

Exactly!!! They manufacture BS Bc morons will read this or watch this and their emotions will take over

Salty ass 😂

Calwinston exactly. Rodman literally held HOfs to 0 pts at times. And rebounded against bigger men. Espn really trying to create shit for ratings

Facts no way you can leave Kobe and Shaq out of that I would definitely put them ahead of LeBron and Wade cuz they accomplish more

@@tonygaertner8863 that's what happened to me I'm outraged how dumb this dude is and trying to justify this like wtf I can understand the Lakers but come on he left out the celtics dude has no credentials who is he again lol...

MrTacticalApproach psst it was all mj stop lying hes the goat rodman didn’t do shit 20 rebounds? Pff mj had 50

And when they played Orlando in 96 Shaq still put up over 27 a game... Lol Rodman clearly locked him up.

Don't forget Penny, but agree. Rodman is being disrespected

bulls didnt need rodman they won just as many championships without him they only lost to the magic cause jordan was getting in shape and they didnt have a good big man all that changed after rodman got there to defend bigger players and get rebounds

@@josephjohnroe3678 Imagine if Rodman wasn't there Lol

You’re not wrong though but you can replace Rodman with Horace Grant and it would be the same thing. Grant from the first 3 peat

@@_L30NARD0 Nah, Grant was not fast enough to keep up with shawn kemp in 96 finals or good enough to guard Karl Malone in 97 or 98.

Yup

@@_L30NARD0 nope

It can be debated that Dennis was the MVP of all three championships won with the Bulls

Spurs couldn't even win back to back titles.

@@bobanderson542 The highest winning percentage in North American sports over a 20 year stretch probably makes up for that. Granted that was before the trio was actually established but they were there for most of it. Plus the, you know, 4 titles together probably helps. Back to back doesn't matter if you can compensate with sustained success. The Spurs did that.

They won 3 championships without him...

Tyler Ramsey but they wouldn’t have one the next 3 without him

Xander facebook.com/groups/967348520070287/

@Rico Wright yeah but look at his opposition lmao

they do this to get people to watch dumb ass

There is no argument he is the best rebounder and defensive player of all time wilt was 7 something playing against a bunch of non athletic white boys( no offense to my Caucasian brothers) bill also they didn’t have to guard shaq, David Robinson,Hakeem,Ewing zo,Kareem,Malone and also stay in front of guys like Larry Johnson,Oakley,Rick smits,detlef,horry, Webber, sheed,worthy,Barkley,Garnett but also guard Kobe, Penny,Reggie,Mullen,glen rice,vin baker,glen Robinson,Derrick Coleman,Eddie Jones fam I can go on and on Rodman is the best defender of all time hands down

Rico Wright Bill Russell was a better rebounder than wilt, being 5 inches shorter and a hell of a lot lighter still averaged more rebounds/minute in his career than wilt. Also you have to take into account how much the rebounding statistic was inflated back in the 50-60’s. It’s very difficult to compare Rodman or players from the 90’s to players from the 60’s. Rodman could honestly be the greatest rebounder of all time, it was much more difficult to grab a rebound in the 90’s than the 60’s. It’s hard to say, But I think that’s why the dude said “arguably” the best rebounder.

Yvans facebook.com/groups/967348520070287/

Cough Wilt

BIRD defeated Kareem/MAGIC...ISAIAH swept MAGIC and defeated BIRD...Bulls gotta be #1 since Rodman was on Detroit and Bulls.

I have Celtics over Spurs, but otherwise same teams.

Warriors get disrespect then why do people think they were unfair bro that's the best shooting team all time durant curry klay?? They would smash garnet pierce allen

@Nick jaramillo Im talking about 80s Big 3, not 2008...

3 for 3...you have a point

No!! He was a good role player, he was a player I respected but wasn’t on that level.

DaRealPeezyDBM fisher was in the list lol. Didn’t even make an all star team yet he is on the list 😂

No .Curry Thompson Green Durant Cousins İggy .WTF???!!!

it took them 14 years to do what the bulls would've done in 4 if bulls management wasnt a bunch of fckin idiots

Carl Holland doubt that, greater talent during the Spurs tenure.

They won FIVE CHAMPIONSHIP S

They won 4 together five with duncan

It can be argued that the Spurs dynasty feasted on opportunities rather than being a dominant one. Never even repeated.

A run for their money sure, but the Lakers won more rings than the Celtics in the 80's.. so there is that.

4:56: . That was an irrelevant and insignificant addition to his reasoning, saying Spurs beat Miami. The Heat beat San Antonio FIRST

@@mazengwe28 and Kawhi Leonard was the best player on the team when they beat the heat.

@@AugdogGaming So. What's your point?

@@mazengwe28 he was using the fact that that trio beat Miami to prove his point better but none of those players in that trio were even the best on the team at the time.

@@AugdogGaming The point is still irrelevant because Miami won first. So it negates the fact Spurs beat them the next year. So no point in bringing it up. It's an irrelevant point.

IslandBwoyLFC Allez.Allez.Allez 5 games in 91

They beat the Lakers in 5....would have had 8 or 9 if the GOAT didn't retire and Pippen didn't get that migraine against the Pistons

But were they all there? No so how is 6-0 relevant. It honestly proves his point that they did the same thing with and without Rodman lol 3-0..

The level of competition during the bulls dynasty was very weak.

Jordan not the Goat. I know a guy who play in 12 finales and won 11 of those his name was Bill Russell. All Jordan does is count rings but I think 11 is better then 6.

That aint weed....thats CRACK!!!

Jackson, Jordan, Pippen > Rodman, Jordan, Pippen

That list is 100% correct.

Leave molly alone

OnlyX fuck her

L

Perfect Moe can she even fuck ?

Masageny at its finest. Keep it up boys your mom's daughters and wives are so proud of you

Aaron Thomas he was 6’7 still impressive tho

Wow one whole inch really helps against 7ft 300lb centers or 250+ all muscle Karl malone lol

He didnt disrespect him. Didnt Jordan and puppet 3 peat without him? So who was the big 3 during those years? He never said Rodman was bad just they were great already

6'8 !! Not 6'6!!!✌️✌️

@@tylerramsey9502 they were better with Rodman did you not hear. Him joining they led the best winning record in Franchise history.everyone talks about the 96' bulls why?

if KD was healthy GSW trio would achieve that too

@@Mario-dw2bg "if......"

@@Reyfox1 true

If you thibk about it Duncan Parker and Ginobili almost won in 3 different decades

Duncan By Himself won in 99 a few in the 2000s and one in 2014 he won in three decades without Ginobili and Parker thats impressive

Tarantula Guy so they didnt help?

@@swolegod7724 dude get your facts straight. Rodman didn't come off the bench. He was a starter. Your thinking of Tony kukoc as he came off the bench for the bulls. As for Scottie pippen, it was really only during that last championship run the bulls had that his injuries became a problem as throughout the first two of that threepeat, he was rarely injured

Jordan and pippen were drafted. Rodman only came in after the spurs and no one wanted him around the league. He was 33 a great defender and rebounder. He was like a all star role player.

Ahhhhhh that's foolish for anyone to believe MJ did it by himself.

That Bulls team was stacked, they had the best player in the NBA, the best two way player in the NBA, the best rebounder in the NBA and the best 3 point shooter in the NBA. But these Jordan fan boys act as though the Bulls played these all time great teams in their title runs lol. The Bulls played teams that had one All Star and a bunch of role players. The 1990s was the most watered down decade in NBA, with teams like the Minnesota Timberwolves, Toronto Raptors and Vancouver Grizzlies entering the league. The freaking Vancouver Grizzlies best player was what Big Country Reeves lol, and the Timberwolves' best player was freaking Pooh Richardson. The Toronto Raptors best player was freaking Damon Stoudamire lol. So all the good teams in the 90s were assured 6 to 8 wins playing these teams. The bottom line, the 1990s was the most watered down decade in NBA history

The Heat should be 2. Ain’t no way I put the splash bros over the heat

If I could dislike comments, I’d immediately dislike yours

@@jordanpierre6775 Wade and Bosh weren't the same players they were in their primes by 2012. They were still great, but imo not enough to put them ahead of the trios put ahead of them. I might even put the 2016 Cavs big 3 ahead of the 2014 Heat big 3 personally.

@@mjxgr33n48 you can

@@jordanpierre6775 chill out man..... plz stop being dum

In their era yes, but in the modern nba jordan pippen and rodman would all be fouled out before the fourth quarter... Rodman might even get ejected...

Alejandro Ayala C. facebook.com/groups/967348520070287/

2-4 against the lakers trio in playoffs. that trio BEAT THEM

@@Donttalktomeifyoureabot Lakers is not a fucking trio ffs. its a duo

Would have been 3-3 if not for Fisher's .4 miracle shot. That's the difference between the Spurs and Lakers.... POINT FOUR SECONDS.

Yea it's like people judge by how "cool" or "flashy" a player is.

🤣🤣🤣

God loves you

Not really.

@@freezesaint7887 Very much so.

Lol the bulls had a super team in the 90’s. 4/5 of their starting lineup were all nba defense teams.

gun12 guage facebook.com/groups/967348520070287/

They are the super team. But ofcourse no one is clamoring on social media during those time, so? It didn't happen?

@Rico Wright Y'all just think that era was weak because the Bulls trounced everybody. I guess you'd be more impressed by them if MJ, like LBJ, lost to his rivals more. It always amazes me how losing helps LeBron's legacy.

Bc one player is extremely better than the competition everyone else is trash? That's your logic. There's plenty of great players who never won titles. Pippen never made an all-star team without mj,so what year did he win a championship without him bc you're high as shit,all you remember was the best player off a good team that was mediocre compared to the bulls. Of course superstars overshadow the rest of the team it's been like that in the NBA since its exsistance. Take pp of Boston before the big 3,bosh and lbj off the heat,shaq and Kobe off the lakers,Payton and Kemp off the sonics..... You see how dumb your argument is??? The Clippers beat the Warriors after trying to tank and trading Harris,Portland was steam rolling in the playoffs as the under dog. It's a team sport not an individual sport.

Can rodman shoot ?

We've have never seen another Dennis Rodman since he retired. He had the drive of a cheetah. On top of that, he was a under sized big man.

he was so critical that they won 3 titles without him

@TheRealist 811 Well ask reggie lewis rip im sure it can be done when you got a liability on your team.

I’ll pick duncan over rodman all day bruh

He's a Duke guy that hates UNC. No surprise.

because of the 14 years your right...maybe 6 in 7 years isn't the same cause kareem wasn't kareem by 88...lets be real and worthy in 83 wasn't worthy

Best Trio? They had David Robinson, Steve Kerr, Steve Smith, Robert Horry, Bruce Bowen, Steven Jackson, Kawhi and Danny Green. Not saying they are trash but they had a lot more than some of these others and most people wouldn't have Parker or Ginobilli that high compared to guess other trios.

Spurs trio never repeated OR even got to Finals two years in row. They deserve to be on the list but at #2??? 🤦🏽‍♂️

@@tdup191 Right

4 out of 14...one of worst return out of all them

Spurs should be number 1

Heres respect.Bulls were.6-0 and 72-10...Spurs arent even close.

Go spurs go hehe

The only thing that matters is rings.

@@Johenz lmao fuck no.

His Grandpa's fart.

He's very stupid white boy and he need go play golf and watch Nascar

He need to be drug tested i think

He can't lay off the WEEED!!!!

Carlo Robles he smokin the same shit Stephen a smith was when knicks news broke out

Potential to be the best trio of all time 👀

They need to replicate the same success as these trios to be considered one of the greatest of all time

@@patrickmatthews8191 yes

Injury prone

pippen was in his prime. And Rodman was playing his best basket ball. Jordan was slightly declining.

Ross is correct

Yea it’s a tough list to rank tho

Gregory L 👍 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Gregory L molly

Haha for real tho

True

Hondo, Sam, and Bill Wilt, Jerry, and Elgin

@@blazerfan7752 Baylor literally retired the year after they formed that doesn't count as a trio

@@JUSTIN_SZN Oops. Got that wrong......

@@JUSTIN_SZN He retired the year they won, but that trio played 2 Finals together...

These rankings aren't credible. Anyone who has been around long enough to watch them play should know that Bird, McHale, and Parish are a close second behind Magic, Worthy, and Kareem. Kareem or Magic should be the GOAT, not Jordan.

Adrian Parkes facebook.com/groups/967348520070287/

Totally disrespected how pivotal a player Rodman was for that Bulls team. The pre-Rodman post 1st retirement from MJ Bulls team was sorely missing Horace Grant and the defense and rebounding he provided. Enough so that they traded Will Perdue to the Spurs for a Dennis Rodman that I guess some thought was too much of a problem to deal with. That one move led to those championships. No Rodman, no 72-10 or second 3 peat.

Winningest trio of all time. #facts

And didn't turn up to practice :)

Would you look at that. Didn't go to practice but the fastest to learn the triangle offense accoding to both jordan and phil jackson.

I remember that. He was such a pariah around the league. But Jackson got the absolute maximum out of him.

Being 35 is one thing. Dude played with a hangover (that would keep most people in bed all day) almsot every game. He wasn't the most skilled, but man I wish I had 10% of his energy.

Because no one puts things into context. That's why the trio is apparently in 3rd

Wow!! That just hit me!! They did win more titles!🤯

In how many years

@@ugochukwuokoro6121 kobe/Shaq/Fisher trio 3-peated

Shaq and Kobe played in the weakest era of basketball. No superteams, just a bunch of decent teams aside from the spurs. Shaq and Kobe play the 17-18 warriors at full health and it's a sweep. I also think a prime spurs with Duncan, Ginobli, Parker would beat Shaq and Kobe Lakers. Actually every team on the list of top 5 and the Celtics with bird are spanking that Lakers team.

AJ Clips 2001 lakers went 16-1 in the playoffs, the most dominant run playoff history and they beat the spurs along that way. I don’t understand why the warriors are being considered a trio when draymond green is clearly a very important part of that team, a 3 time all star, dpoy, and based on what the media is saying an eventual hall of famer.

Thank you

Agreed, that team is so disrespected. As a trio, I might have Bulls trio ahead (and Showtime Lakers), but thats about it. As a team, only ones that could compete with that '86 squad is '87 Lakers...

@@bigbowss9817 individually you must say the Warriors and Heat are better than them-Bird is an all timer but McKale came off the bench for most of there run and Parish is above average at best

@@titankiller5287 you realise that Parish and Mchale were both top 50 players of all time. Mchale is a top 10 power forward ever and depending on who you talk to is a top 5. That 86 team is still considered one of, if not the greatest team of all time and it all starts with the big 3. You're tripping if you think GSW or the heat should be above them. People who were actually watching ball in the 80's put the C's trio above the Lakers trio pretty much every time...

You're**

I see this same exact comment on every video that has something to do with the NBA

Bird Parrish McHale...they have to be top 5...at least

Molly : loudly interrupts , ok wait .. So you're saying ( repeats everything Stephen A. Smith just said ) Stephen A. Smith : Yes , continues with his opinion...

I agree, the Trio is really Steph,Klay, and Dray

Without KD, that team isnt even top 10, stop it -_-

😀😀😀

that’s def close

Coach Pop vs Coach Phil Jackson. It goes to GAME 7.

I got the Bulls trio, but it will be at minimum 6 games in my opinion

LMFAO!! I'll answer the question this way: In 2006 playoffs Dirk Nowitzki beat Duncan, Ginóbili and Parker without another All Star on his team.