@@NickJohnsonSaxophone Not like that. I mean if I get rich somehow, it would be reasonable to dump 100-150k into a car of my childhood dreams (that is about the budget of 348 Spider). 550 and F50 are too complex end valuable to be "feel good" cars. I also adore the cheese grater!
I disagree. The people they blacklist have one thing in common: They're degenerates with too much money on their hands. They don't want them to tarnish their brand image. And who can blame them? Mercedes Benz nowadays has a brand image of making cars for money launderers and rapping imbeciles. Same goes for Lamborghini. Ferrari is doing the right thing.
I will never see Ferrari's perspective. If I buy a car, I own it. I can do what I like with it. Buying something and then a company telling me what I can/can't do with it and when I can sell it... hell no. Perhaps they should just lease their cars instead, then they can keep control on what the driver can/can't do with it.
If you release a product to the world, the world will change it. I do somewhat understand not being allowed to sell them right away. We don’t need scalpers trying to make a quick buck.
@@Kreeber yeah, that's something that companies refuse to see. I buy something I should be able to do whatever I want with it. Ugh scalpers, that's pretty much all dealerships in a nutshell.
I’m surprised that Ferrari doesn’t have stipulations about customization in video games. It’s no wonder they’re appearing less and less in games overall now.
Lucky for me I can't care less about new Ferrari's. The only Ferrari I would consider buying if I had the money is the F40! It's like Bugatti, their only interesting car is the EB110.
Just like apple.. they want the most GP at point of sale as its their "BTO" is the only way to modify.... Even if there is no option, or even less capable upgrades. at more cost ...
Ferrari is probably very articulate in their contracts, which recipients of their cars have to sign before they can own one of their cars. So no! They don't have to suck anything. They are only being lawful.
@JOHANNESwhoelse I'm stating my opinion.. There are many other high-end car manufacturers in the world, and in my opinion, Ferrari is overrated. I would have been like Deadmau and went with Lambo or another company. I'm not a fan of the red car color they tout, and it seems that they wouldn't even want me to paint it or wrap it.. Audi R8 is my fave 😍
@@JOHANNESwhoelse "They are only being lawful".... I doubt Ferrari's contract would hold up to many countries consumer laws, if challenged... Much of the wording in EULAs for consumer products, on the rights of the corporation in question, aren't legal. They will state any and all rights over their products or services that they can think of, even if they aren't legal. They won't ever change unless they're challenged legally, and lose, or a governmental body steps in and regulates them.... But considering the direction of consumer rights or 'ownership' of vehicles these days, challenging Ferrari's overzealousness isn't likely to be a priority for anyone.
I still blaming the management of the company who own Ferrari for killing Dodge Vipers, imagine what their engine department could do with an 8 litre V10 🔥 I would forgive them though if they gave me a free LaFerrari though, or a Roma (Its so pretty 😍).
actually the dodge vipers v10 shares more in common with the bizzarini v12 (lamborghini) than anyone of ferraris engines. and vipers do work a few mods and your past 600hp on first gens. same with the double daza v10 (im not calling it lamborghinis goofy internal name its just two daza 5 cyls put together )
