Guided tour through the world's largest turboprop - the Antonov An-22

Подписаться 167 тыс.

Просмотров 41 тыс.

50% 1

Join me in this detailed tour of an Antonov An22 heavy transport aircraft on display at the Technik Museum in Speyer, Germany. This includes the exterior, the cargo section and the crew/passenger compartment.
Other videos from same museum(s):
Tupolev Tu144: • Guided tour through a ...
Buran-class orbiter: • Guided tour around the...
Other similar videos:
Avro Vulcan + engine run: • Guided tour through an...
de Havilland Comet 4 tour: • Guided tour through th...
Vickers VC-10: • Guided tour of a Vicke...
BAC TSR-2: • BAC TSR-2 Guided tour ...
Airbus A300: coming soon
JFK's Air Force One SAM 26000 VC-137C: • Detailed tour through ...
Lockheed VC-121E “Columbine III”: • Tour through Eisenhowe...
Douglas VC-54C “Sacred Cow” : • Video
The first Boeing 737 tour: • Detailed tour around t...
The first Boeing 727 tour: • Detailed tour around t...
Tour around the first Boeing 747 in Seattle: • Detailed tour through ...
Lockheed YF-12A tour: • Video
Tour around a Saturn V rocket in Houston: • Detailed tour around t...
Tour around the Northrop YF-23 in Dayton: • Tour around the Northr...
Detailed tour around the Lockheed F-22 Raptor: • Lockheed F-22 Raptor d...
F-117 Nighthawk: • Tour around the Lockhe...
NASA Shuttle Carrier Aircraft 747-100: • Detailed tour through ...
Space Shuttle Orbiter: • Detailed tour through ...
Hughes H-4 Hercules "Spruce Goose": • Detailed tour through ...
Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress: • Detailed tour through ...
Boeing B-29 Superfortress: • Detailed tour through ...
Convair B-36 Peacemaker: • Tour around the TEN en...
Boeing B-47 Stratojet: • Tour around a Boeing B...
Convair B-58 Hustler: • Tour around the first ...
North American XB-70 Valkryie: • Tour around the North ...
North American X-15: • Video
BAC Concorde: • Detailed tour of a Bri...
Lockheed SR-71 Blackbird: • Detailed tour through ...
Northrop Grumman B-2 Spirit: • Detailed tour around a...
Grumman F-14 Tomcat: • Tour around the Grumma...
Tour around a Titan II missile silo on Tucson: • Detailed tour through ...
Tour through an AVRO Lancaster bomber: • Detailed tour through ...
Tour through a QANTAS Boeing 747-200B: • Detailed tour through ...
Tour through a QANTAS Boeing 707-138: • Tour through the uniqu...
Tour through a QANTAS Lockheed Super Constellation: • Tour through a Lockhee...
Tour through a Douglas DC-3: • Detailed tour through ...
Tour through a USAF Boeing B-52: • Detailed tour through ...
USAF/RAAF General Dynamics F-111: • Full tour through a Ge...
RAAF CAC Avon Sabre: • Tour around Australia'...
RAAC CAC Dassault Mirage III: • Tour around the Dassau...
100 years of QANTAS aircraft on display at the Qantas Founders Museum: • Video
Tour through the first ever Boeing 747 in Seattle: • Video
Tour through Concorde: • Video
Tour through a VC-137B - Air Force One: • Tour through a Boeing ...
Onboard the LAST EVER Qantas Boeing 747 flight in Canberra: • Onboard the LAST EVER ...
Tour through a DeHavilland Comet 4 at the Duxford IMW: • Video
Tour through the Museum of Flight in Seattle: • Video
I have two RU-vid channels: Paul Stewart (aviation travel vlogs): / paulstewartaviation
Paul Stewart EXTRA (unedited inflight aviation footage): / @paulstewart2ndchannel
Check out my Instagram account: @paulstewartaviation ( / paulstewartaviation ) and Facebook: /
If you enjoy this videos and want to see more, you can send me a donation via Paypal :) paypal.me/paulstewartaviation
#airplane #plane #plane
0:00 intro
0:40 history and nose
1:30 Auxiliary power units
1:52 fairing design and unique landing gear
2:58 Kuznetsov NK-12MA turboprop engines with four-bladed contra-rotating propellers
4:25 wing design
4:50 tail end with dual fins and cargo doors
7:00 entering cargo bay
8:38 internal electric hoists
09:02 navigators station
9:30 upstairs crew area and cockpit
11:25 nuclear powered An-22
12:32 Tu-144 and Buran orbiter

Наука

Опубликовано:

9 июн 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 148

@bkdexter79 Год назад

I appreciate your videos very much! No loud background music, just honestly good fact filled narration. Thank you Paul!

@PaulStewartAviation Год назад

Glad you enjoyed them Bruce. I try and keep them on point and avoid faffing about

@kevinbarry71 Год назад

The Greek mythological character that the Russians named this plane after is all powerful provided he stays in contact with the ground. Which strikes me as an absolutely insane name for an airplane

@zorilaz Год назад

This planes were built by ANOTOV which was founded by Oleg ANOTOV. That was his name. Nothing to do with your Greek character . People making up shit lol

@dallesamllhals9161 Год назад

@@zorilaz Antaeus!

@kevinbarry71 Год назад

@@zorilaz you are an idiot

@dr.jillalicecooper2587 Год назад

@@zorilaz Antonov not Anotov😂

@watsisbuttndo829 Год назад

No worse than the brits naming their carrier bourne aircraft the "gannet". A bird that dives head first into the sea!

@crashburn3292 Год назад

I learn something every time I watch. I didn't know the Antonov An-22 had the same turboprop engine as the TU 95 Bear.

@boeing747iscool Год назад

i didn't know this plane was even made but now i know thank you

@jasongarufi8187 Год назад

Another great tour, the Antonov An-22 is certainly a huge aircraft

@fattywithafirearm Год назад

Thats insane how big it is.

@brentsummers7377 Год назад

Very nice review! The navigator had a very spacious work station.😀

@keithammleter3824 Год назад

Paul, at 5:20 you said that having 2 small fin/rudder arrangements instead on one large one reduces torque (stress) on the airframe. That doesn't make much sense. To achieve a given level of yaw stability you need a certain total fin area. To achieve a specified amount of directional control you need a certain total rudder area. With these predetermined areas, the torque imparted on the airframe is the same, regardless of whether it is one big fin+rudder, or 2 or more smaller ones adding up to the same total area. There is, however, a very minor, almost insignificant, structural advantage in the fin(s) themselves. You don't want them bending, nor oscillating in the wind like a violin string. To achieve the required fin stiffness, the amount of metal needed in the internal framing/bracing in 2 small fins is less than that needed in one large fin, due to lower internal leverage. This may have been what your source was referring too - torque within the fins, not torque imparted to the airframe.

@ronjon7942 Год назад

That’s interesting, I never gave it much thought either way.

@PaulStewartAviation Год назад

Thanks for the extra information Keit and what you say makes perfect sense too.

@Calebs_Aviation Год назад

Great video Paul! The Technik Museum is definitely on my list to visit hopefully this winter when I head to Germany! Also this aircraft the AN 22 reminds me a lot of the Soviet built Tupolev TU-114 airliner and TU-116 VIP transport turboprop aircraft which were based off the TU-95 bomber and built to compete with the American built airliners and VIP transport planes like the Lockheed L-1049G Super Constellation and its military counterpart. 😊Soviet Leader Nikita Khrushchev has the TU-114/6 built! 😮

@792slayer Год назад

Definitely a cool museum. Looks like you can walk through a lot of the displays.

@Calebs_Aviation Год назад

@@792slayer Hope to walk through the LH B747-200 there! 😊

@792slayer Год назад

@@Calebs_Aviation that would be pretty cool.

@Calebs_Aviation Год назад

@@792slayer I hopefully will visit this winter and keep an eye out for a video about if I do on my RU-vid channel Caleb’s Aviation! Thx!

@Calebs_Aviation Год назад

@@792slayer I hopefully will visit this winter and keep an eye out for a video about if I do on my RU-vid channel Caleb’s Aviation! Thx!

@gordongott127 Год назад

Absolutely a beast what a amazing aircraft still. Thank you for your videos .. I enjoy all of them..

@xmanhoe Год назад

😯 Ohh I've just peed my shorts 😬🤣 Cheers for this one Paul 😉 I have a soft spot for these bad boys

@dvmurkus Год назад

Though I have already read about this plane before, today I have learned more, especially about propellers and the crew cabin. Thank you!

@flyonbyya Год назад

Remarkable Aircraft… Remarkable vid Presentation !!

@DropBear69 Год назад

Thank you Paul. Awesome video once again. I learn something new from every one of your vids. Looking forward to your next drop. Cheers.

@applejacks971 Год назад

Awesome video and information, thanks for sharing with us! Getting to watch a new Paul Stewart video is the perfect beginning to any weekend :)

@koh_ling Год назад

Great tour Paul! Really interesting.

@nathensieben Год назад

Awesome tour mate, always been amazed by these big buggers, would love to see one up close.

@rob737700 Год назад

Another great video, thank you.

@peterandkyleemingham3923 Год назад

Always love your videos Paul

@whatever8282828 Год назад

It is fascinating how contra-rotating props were prized in USSR and dismissed by western militaries in the same era. As you discuss, they have some obvious advantages (no torque/yaw) but some similarly obvious disadvantages (very complicated gearing and maintenance). It is interesting to see USA finally musing about them for future helicopters all these decades later.

@keithammleter3824 Год назад

Contra-rotating props were used in many aircraft of both Britain and the USA as piston engine power output rose during wartime development in WW2. The classic example is the Spitfire fighter - it started out with a 770 kW engine and three propellor blades, and ended up with a 1700 kW engine and 6 blades in a contra-rotation configuration. The US Mustang fighter had the same engine and contra prop arrangement. Quite a few American aircraft large and small had contra-rotation props. But post war, both countries concentrated on jet engines. It is not the case that the US military didn't like contra-rotation props. It was that they wanted jets, because jets are simpler and more reliable. In the early 1950's the thinking in both the US and Britain was that flying at very high altitude was required, in order to make it hard for enemies to shoot them down with ack-ack. At high altitude, props loose their fuel economy advantage. The poor serviceability and high failure rate of the B-36 large post-war propellor bomber made the USAAF concentrate on simplicity and reliability and go for jets. In the USSR, their post war planning concentrated on turboprops as they had much better fuel economy than the early jets. But to handle the large power output of the turbine engines, you need more propellor blade area. So you need more blades - hence contrarotation. The USSR planners expected their turboprop airliner to sell well in export markets - unfortunately for them the travelling public preferred jets.

@whatever8282828 Год назад

@@keithammleter3824 i must insist that is not true

@paulsengupta971 Год назад

Both the Shackleton and Fairey Gannet used contra-rotating props.

@eefregelneef2956 Год назад

Thanks Paul. Nice vid.😊

@heathertruskinger6214 Год назад

I love your comment " unique interpretation of the owners manual ! 😂 LoL A real " muscle man " of the skies Thanks Paul 😊

@cupidstunt22 Год назад

Fantastic stuff!

@arronjones6985 Год назад

Absolutely loved this 👍

@katimboallan4605 Год назад

Very nice video

@petr-podrouzek Год назад

Fantastic job as always, Paul 🙂

@PaulStewartAviation Год назад

Thanks Petr

@markwng Год назад

Quite a display. Soviet era development was surely diverse.

@HAL-xy3om Год назад

Good show thanks

@richierich2534 9 месяцев назад

Another great video

@PaulStewartAviation 9 месяцев назад

Glad you enjoyed it

@marknagle1912 Год назад

Nice to see you in the antonov in sinsheim had fun whilst climbing in it

@jirihamersky6152 Год назад

Nice and interesting video. Thanks.

@Bad_Karma1968 Год назад

Playing catch up informative Paul

@PaulStewartAviation Год назад

haha thanks Ted. Yes I've been releasing quite a few videos over the last few months :)

@anjinsanx44 Год назад

Well done the keep it up

@sergei6572 Год назад

Отличный обзор! Спасибо, Пауль!

@Hughes500 Год назад

I really liked that video. Soviet aircraft are so tough and agricultural. I mean that thing just looked so solid. Amazing that they could change the tyre pressures in flight. I imagine the navigator would be a very lonely job :(

@RodCurrin Год назад

I didn't get an idea of just how big it is until around 4:50 when my brain was confused by the chopper that looked too small to be between the AN-22 and the camera!

@leofriedwald9901 Год назад

Dihedral increases stability, Anhedral reduces it. That bit of Anhedral you mention @5:40 probably goes away during flight when the wing is generating lift and flexes up.

@PaulStewartAviation Год назад

I'm happy to stand corrected but my understanding was that anhedral increases stability in side-wind conditions. I recall watching a video where Kelly Johnson explained the wing on the SR-71

@tsegulin Год назад

Great video, thanks! Always liked this aircraft but never seen inside it. Soviet or not, Antonov created some exceptional large cargo aircraft.

@user-tn1vc1xz5d Год назад

Large Soviet turboprops....not known for being quiet inside. Always liked the Tu-114 with its massive props but few on display and those are in countries not easy to access at the moment. To minimise "beating" sound effects, large prop aircraft can allow synchronising of engines against a reference engine, say no.1, fine controlling of rpm of the other 3 so they all match and thus reducing harmonics and noise on cruise.

@ronjon7942 Год назад

That’s pretty cool, I wonder if that’s a common thing amongst all multi engined props. Ah, after re-reading your post, it appears so. I do remember flying with my boss in his Cessna 340, and the dissonance when they were out of sync was really annoying and it even felt my balance was off - I believe I’d have gotten nauseous, or at least very fatigued, if the entire flight was thusly. As powerful a light twin as the 340 is, there wasn’t anything used to synchronize the props - it was done by manually adjusting the prop pitch until the harmonics matched. After all, the 520 cubic inch, 310 hp piston engines were a tad smaller than the Antaeus’ four 15,000 shp (each! Eeks) NK-12s.

@matty99 Год назад

Great videos Paul, I really enjoy your content. I’ve been trying to think who your smile reminds me of and I’ve worked it out. Wallace from Wallace and Gromit, please tell me you love cheese 🧀 😉

@damienwilloughby Год назад

COOL 😎

@SaturnCanuck Год назад

Wait! A giant Russian transport aircraft? That never happens. Man, did they ever built some big aircraft then, including the world’s largest helicopter. This thing is big! I have been fortunate enough to see and tour an Antonov An-124 and that is massive! Next to her was a C-5, and it was interesting to see the analog gauges of the An-124 opposing the digital C-5’s! Nice Paul. Oh and did I see a Guppy at the beginning? Dude I HAVE to see that!

@PaulStewartAviation Год назад

Yep Gubby was at Toulouse and a video coming for that soon…

@SaturnCanuck Год назад

@@PaulStewartAviation Always loved the guppy.

@Travelsbydreamer Год назад

Great overview! She’s a big girl for sure 😃

@lolsomeyoutuber.1425 Год назад

coincidence or not, the AN-22 is the largest turbo prop and the AN-225 is the largest plane

@E_Legal_Alien Год назад

Was*

@lolsomeyoutuber.1425 Год назад

@@E_Legal_Alien ):

@workaholica Год назад

And the AN-2 is the largest single engine biplane. There is a pattern emerging ;)

@lolsomeyoutuber.1425 Год назад

@@workaholica hmm

@simkahop8519 Год назад

Crushed yet, unforunately, SO there is 2-nd scelet, never Ever been finished, but may BE will be rebuild 2-nd time, anyway China bought all the plans, So we will SEE, but AN 225 destroyed/does NOT exist any more - sorry. :(

@SnappyWasHere Год назад

I hope you did a video on that helicopter as well!

@PaulStewartAviation Год назад

Afraid not. I ran out of time and the gopro was playing up. Putting everything up on those poles also makes it difficult to film.

@FSXNOOB Год назад

Way bigger then i was used to in flight sim.. 😶

@ronjon7942 Год назад

Russian cargo aircraft look so….military. With a touch of Klingon. Meant as a compliment, btw. As with the Bear, the engines of the An-22 look so spindly next to the fuselage, throwing me off on the actual size of the airframe. Paul’s video did a nice job providing size context, and of course they’re ginormous, but like the C-5, B-52, 747, I’m still awestruck seeing large planes in person - I hope to see the An-22. Actually, I may have, but from a distance - I couldn’t see if the engines were turboprops, or turbofans and that it was an An-124. Anyway, they delivered the Milwaukee Art Museum’s Calatrava structural steel ‘wings’ or ‘sail’ from Europe (sorry, can’t remember the country; maybe Spain or France) to MKE Mitchell Field. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milwaukee_Art_Museum Aviation fans will admire the beauty of the architecture. With a few exceptions, I always thought the building was far better than the art. In fact, whenever I did go visit it, I never new what was ‘playing’ as I only went to admire the construction - especially after some insulting garbage by some student far left liberals…handicrafter hobbyists trying to make a statement about the establishment. Typical trash that had no business being in such a stunning piece of actual artwork. Oh my! Guess I had some pent up annoyance! Apologies! Paul, please carry on. 🫡

@davidbarnsley8486 Год назад

I was in a Russian plane many years ago and don’t you just love the colour scheme Green and blue All there planes are the same I would to know why the dashboards are green when we paint everything black Good one Paul 👍👍

@PaulStewartAviation Год назад

Thanks David. I mention the cockpit green in my Tu-144 video :)

@gglasser8375 Год назад

Hi Paul, love your vids! I'm really curious about whatever it is in your shot during the intro at 19 secs. Seems to be a giant cockpit with no wings? Can you let me know what it is so I can look it up. If you have done a vid on it, I'd be very interested to watch! Thanks

@PaulStewartAviation Год назад

Super Guppy in Toulouse. A video is coming on that in coming months :)

@Thanhnganaviation Год назад

hello paul why the il 96 , b747-8i, b717 , md 90 , md 11 , a340-200/300/500 was not in the museum

@edward9 Год назад

Hi Paul. Great videos! Is your accent Kiwi?

@PaulStewartAviation Год назад

Aussie

@edward9 Год назад

@@PaulStewartAviation thanks 👍🏼

@willmo1725 Год назад

Cool look inside and out. Have you done a episode on the A400 it was at the airshow in chesterfield , missouri but no tours inside. I guess boeing couldnt stand the competition..

@PaulStewartAviation Год назад

I haven't been inside an a400 I'm afraid.

@willmo1725 Год назад

@@PaulStewartAviation i bring it up, because i think it is the largest nato turbo prop. Also damn good looking airbus product. Love your u tube show., keep it coming.

@ronjon7942 Год назад

@@willmo1725 wow, I just wrote the Atlas off as Europe’s Hercules, never realizing how much larger than the C-130 it was!

@Noah_The_Magician Год назад

Early ❤🎉

@jkkshhhab Год назад

8:00 😂

@divox9pqr Год назад

Was there a jet engine version of this plane?

@PaulStewartAviation Год назад

@user-vu6zx2pu1g 8 месяцев назад

Это первый Ан 22 построенный в Ташкенте

@userhessenone1469 2 месяца назад

That's 01-03, it's a prototype, yes, but not the first one which was 01-01.

@judefernandez827 3 месяца назад

Is this a real size model because the wings snd engines look small

@PaulStewartAviation 3 месяца назад

Nope, it’s just a really big plane :)

@userhessenone1469 2 месяца назад

That's serial number 01-03, so that's one of the prototypes

@malcolm824 Год назад

I think you mean the Tu-114 was the fastest turboprop airliner ever, not the 144

@PaulStewartAviation Год назад

Yep my mistake

@sanek7015 Год назад

👍👍👍

@anjaliraychoudhury7253 Год назад

AY GORU EYAT KI HOKISO ,MAY KIR USOROT JA

@marcel-rudimantaj4773 Год назад

i know the owner of this and its sister museum in sinsheim

@userhessenone1469 10 месяцев назад

there is no owner. its owned by an Association

@gate7clamp Год назад

It wouldn’t be Russian aerospace technology if it didn’t have titanium in it

@tarnejehovahson2148 Год назад

Why is it with Russian aircraft they need 6 people in the cockpit I mean at most a captain first officer & engineer What was was the need for 6 pilots plus a navigator??

@PaulStewartAviation Год назад

Someone has to pour the booze?

@judefernandez827 3 месяца назад

Has the AN 22 ever visited Australia?

@PaulStewartAviation 2 месяца назад

Good question. I've seen an An-12 in Perth before, and the 124 up in Darwin.

@judefernandez827 2 месяца назад

@@PaulStewartAviation I've seen a lot of An 32s and IL 76 when I lived in India near an Air Force Station

@charlestaylor253 Год назад

Soviet Air Force officer: "Comrade pilots, the AN-22 with nuclear reactor aboard will let it fly more than 27,500 kilometers!" Soviet pilot: "Comrade officer, what if nuclear reactor starts leaking in flight?"... "Then comrades, you fly into NATO country and you all become Heroes Of Soviet Motherland!...😏

@paulsengupta971 Год назад

It was more, "We throw it out of the aeroplane and it becomes someone else's problem."

@didgerihorn Год назад

3:50 Didn't know the supersonic TU-144 was a turboprop 😎

@badgerello Год назад

We know he meant the tu-114.

@PaulStewartAviation Год назад

Ops 😂😂

@KNMK259 Год назад

First...........

@TransportCats Год назад

Bit late my friend

@r3ndszergazda Год назад

I believe it’s pronounced “A.N. - 22” and not “AN-22”

@PaulStewartAviation Год назад

Fair enough, Ive seen it pronounced differently in various sources :)

@lejviator 9 месяцев назад

Will we ever see the sole active civil one again... after being damaged in the war ...😭😭😭😭😭

@TransportCats Год назад

First!

@petethebastard Год назад

If it's Soviet Air... it's wow/Great! Gret vids as always Paul Stewart! How is the band going?! Painters and Dockers....

@nikerailfanningttm9046 Год назад

My son was adopted from Russia and I’m proud of his heritage. It’s a shame today that the president had to be such a dick and start a fucking war.

@lsdzheeusi Год назад

No toilet? Lol

@userhessenone1469 10 месяцев назад

Im pretty sure the serial models have one. But this testbed (01-03, third one built) hasn’t 😊

@johno9507 Год назад

Ukraine may be the poorest country in Europe but they have some of the best aero engineers around. Slava Ukraini 🇺🇦 🇦🇺

@zorilaz Год назад

Lol not even that. This company was founded in Russia .

@johno9507 Год назад

@@zorilaz Hasn't been in Russia since 1952. Now the only thing worthwhile to come out of Novosibirsk is Garage54.

@zorilaz Год назад

@@johno9507 USSR company not Ukrainian

@johno9507 Год назад

@@zorilaz Well considering Antonov moved to Ukraine in 1952 and the USSR has been dead since 1991, and it's owned by the Ukraine government...I'd say that makes it a Ukrainian company

@zorilaz Год назад

@@johno9507 neah . Ukraine uses what USSR left . No wonder they are the poorest country in Europe