This man's lawyers were stupid and he should be suing them! If he used a Credit Card, the CC company should also have a record of him using it. Every transaction is a mini loan. You have a start of that loan and payments on it until its paid off. You payment is broken up and a little is paid on each mini loan.
The credit card does not record the minute THE CAR WAS RENTED. It shows the day when the card was processed. Go check your own statements. How many time stamps (down to the minute) do they show?
I think what steve meant to say is that the recorded transaction time with the credit card company doesn't exactly prove what time the card was swiped, just what time the transaction actually went through on their end. It takes time for the processing to go through before the CC company has record of it. Hertz would have an exact time stamp of the physical card swipe in their system. I would bet the CC company records show the time stamp late enough that the crime could still be committed in time to make it to hertz.
@@ytcommentor Your wrong, credit card transactions are date stamped but not time stamped except at the point of purchase. Which, in this case, was Hertz.
Hertz has no criminal liability at all. You can argue that Hertz could easily have provided the receipt, but they are not criminally liable in any way. The plaintiff’s attorney will attempt to argue that Hertz has some civil liability and this will be decided by a judge or jury. Hertz has no more criminal liability than a witness who refuses to testify would have. Additionally; it is not up to the defense to prove innocence. It is up to the prosecution to prove guilt. We don’t know what other evidence they presented at the trial, or how competent the defendant’s legal counsel was. There is also no indication that the presentation of the receipt would have been the difference between a guilty verdict and an acquittal. The receipt only proves evidence that the credit card was used. It doesn’t prove who used it.
@@KayFabe87 they defied multiple court orders to produce or show reason why they cannot produce said documents. They ignored the courts order thus they, the courts and his original attorneys all hold culpability in this.
Do you realize he told Steve that, doesn’t mean he was going to do it. He wasn’t going to show up period. He would take the lumps with the judge if it really came to it but it motivated Steve to get the case resolved or get the case adjourned. Vacations for cops are usually scheduled months or even a year in advance. Hence why he was going on vacation despite Steve’s case. Their vacation does not get automatically rescheduled because of a BS civil court case. Nor does the cop get the money back he spent on tickets , hotels . Nor does help with their domestic situation when they tell their spouse Steve’s BS case canceled their vacation .
The prosecutor didn’t drop the charges for ten months after the receipt was produced. They tried to make a case for ten months after the receipt was produced and could not do it.
If you or I failed to provide subpoenaed records, it would not take the judge three years to lock us up for contempt. It Hertz to see the double-standard.
@@dumbassdriversofdenver9113 he's seeing them its us who get locked up, but it would have been interesting if the judge had locked up the management of that legal team.
@@dumbassdriversofdenver9113 Lock up the majority shareholder(s) - I bet the board suddenly either cares about following the law (or gets replaced even more suddenly) Distributed profits = distributed responsibility.
The people at hertz who were responsible for not releasing the receipt should be made to sit in prison for the amount of time they caused this man to sit on prison. This would be justice.
Did you know that an eye for an eye is the concept that the punishment should match the crime? Prior to the eye for an eye concept punishment was much, much more harsh. Cut off a hand for taking an apple; kill a whole family for single murder, etc.
@@paulfrank8738 And much like how it replaced barbarism worse then it, we have long ago replaced it's barbarism with something better. So on and so forth untill we get to now. It's not 1280 any more.
@@Shiro_Amada I agree with you in the sense that I personally think that literally taking someones eye for an eye is an excessive (barbaric) punishment. But, I do believe in the concept of having punishments determined based on the crime, which is still the (non-literal) "eye for an eye" concept. In this specific case, it seems to me that the actual crime would be related to not complying with the subpoenas and court orders. In my opinion, 5 years in jail would be an excessive punishment for that crime. As far as the civil lawsuit goes, I understand that to be more about compensation for damages caused by someone's misdeeds. That's a totally different concept. It will be interesting to hear what the parties come up with in this case.
If that cop was so willing to lie about that, think about the many cases he's testified in and possibly lied about what happened. I hope you filed a complaint with his supervisor. They needed to know that they have an officer who is willing to lie to get what he wants!
If I spent almost 5 years in jail and I was not guilty, every single person in a position of power at Hertz should fear for their lives. I'd burn it down.
If you take revenge on someone, you need to wait @ least 5 years. When they go looking for people who could have done this, you won't even be on the radar....REVENGE IS A DISH BEST SERVED COLD.
@@mr.robinson1982 Bah... Shoot em from 1,000 yards away with a 5.56 NATO. You can be packed away and driving comfortably with a sound mind before anyone hears the report of a firearm being discharged.
They will find a 1cm microscratch on a bumper that you return to them 2 minutes earlier but they take 7 years to produce a receipt they were required to produce by a court order.
They tried to bill me for damage I didn't do, and said I never told them the car had damage. I had saved the copy of the notes I wrote about the damge. That doesn't hold a candle to this poor guy, of course, just point damn evil company. They will lie about anything
Enterprise is no better... I stopped into one of their stores to rent a truck to haul asphalt shingles to the dump with. I told them I wanted one with a bedliner because the shingles might scratch their paint job. They didn't have one but said it was okay... I rented it and upon returning it, the same Enterprise manager from before now wanted me to sign a damages claim so they could charge my credit card for the damages... I told him I'm not signing anything, left, and went straight to my insurance company. My insurance company told me that by not signing their form that I made their job easier and they dealt with it. My insurance rates didn't change but when I asked them about it later, I was told that Enterprise tacked on every type of damage except the kitchen sink! 🤣
I avoid renting if at all possible. Where I'm living, scooters are used a lot. To avoid the usual scams/leaving my passport with the scooter rental company, I take my own scooter in the back of my pick up. 5-10 minutes to load or unload...less time than actually renting and then no hassles with the rental companies, even if I cause damage...it's my own scooter.
@@tyree9055 Enterprise did something similar to me. Told me anything under the size of a dollar bill for scratches and under the size of a quarter for dings did not matter. When returning the vehicle, they find a few small scratches on the rear underside of the bumper. Not fresh. Old. Less than a dollar bill. I took photos and told them to f off! Nothing ever happened.
@@johnll1693 Yeah, my advice is to take before & after photos whenever you rent something from them. I do the same thing now for automotive work as well (except I make sure to get multiple pictures of the engine compartment and the undercarriage too).
The most scary thing is: If the records would have been purged like the lady said was possible due to age. This man would have spent the rest of his life in prison being innocent! All because they dragged their feet and violated the law.
@@sczygiel those records might not include the exact time of the card swipe. This was a situation where minutes mattered. I run a small business, and download credit card transactions into quickbooks. I've had an employee go on a work trip, make purchases, and when I'm reviewing the statement the expenses are dated several DAYS after the employee returned from their trip. I have no idea why. All I know is that I'm going through a stack of receipts to see if the $18 charge at "Mike's Sub Shop" from 3 days after the employee got back matches a receipt in the pile, or is fraudulent activity.
That happened to a man down here some years back. The only difference was the prosecution didn’t tell him about a 911 call (from a prepaid cell) until it was too late to identify the caller because the call records had been deleted.
@@PsRohrbaugh -- What you are seeing is the date and time the batch was processed. For many banks, it is M-F excluding holidays. (This relates to the old days when these things were all processed by hand by employees who worked "bankers" hours.) Despite other opinions, the credit card company has a record of the exact moment the card was swiped or the chip read or the information was otherwise transmitted to the financial institution. The reason the car rental transaction mattered so much was because the credit card company records don't prove WHO used the card, but the car rental company would have verified the identification of the person renting the vehicle -- this is much stronger alibi evidence.
Moral of the story: Always keep your receipts! My receipt story: Sheetz has a policy now to not print a receipt unless you ask for one. About a month ago, I went to Sheetz and bought several things that added up to $30+. I was charged $40+. As I was walking out, It stuck in my mind that the total seemed too high, so I put on my reading glasses and read the receipt (which I had to ask for) and it had a $10 charge for pre-paid gas on pump 11. I went back and talked to the manager and got my money back. She passed it off a a probable mistake. I think I accidentally discovered a new scam that store employees at gas stations can pull on you when they routinely don't give receipts. Add $5 or $10 in pre-paid gas to a transaction, and have your friend or family member put that free gas in their car when you leave. ALWAYS ask for a receipt and check it!
If I was Steve I would have pulled out my phone, put the subpoena up in front of the cop and take a picture. Then the cop could be charged with contempt at the very least for perjury.
Because he had neither a video tape camera nor a film movie camera with him! However, possibly he carried a cell phone that can record videos digitally. He should have had that handy.
In a case like this where a company ignores a court order the court should issue a warrant for the CEO, I guarantee that will instantly get the company to comply.
I am surprised that the Judge, having ordered them to produce the document, didn't fine them for contempt when they failed to do so, especially since it was so critical to the trial.
serving on a jury is one of the most wonderful things that can happen. A country that was founded on the idea we will select members of our society to hold that level of immense responsibility, it amazes me. I have never been called to serve, but if I was called I would go with bells on. To get the honor to serve society in a deep and meaningful way is nothing to shy away from.
On holding Hertz accountable; I am reminded of the scene from the movie Valkyrie where they attempt to arrest Goebbels. Do this with Hertz and make it stick. Hertz has wronged too many people with false charges and delays by their management.
The moment you brought up the cop saying he'd deny getting it, I just thought about pulling out my phone, holding the subpoena up with him visible, and snapping a photo.
and this is why so many people who give summons do exactly that! But then again police have boldly lied about what happened knowing there was video/photo proof to show otherwise. This is why I have an issue with trusting police.
Also, corporations have a "revolving door" of officers. They're constantly getting transferred, promoted, hired by other companies, and so on - so they often only ever see the "big picture" of what's going on in their department. Not only is this part of the cause of these problems, but it can shield them from liability.
@@PsRohrbaugh See also PG&E for the Paradise fire. 83 counts of plead guilty for murder. But how do you imprison a corporation? So all they had to do was pay the maximum fine set by law for the murder at $3 million per murder. The executives who might have been responsible for pocketing the money instead of maintaining their lines? Nothing.
@@machintelligence it's looking to be a cheap buy of a well known name for a corporate resurrection, don't be surprised if the name is in use for years ro come.
I would like to hear the justification from the court in allowing this to go forward with Hertz refusing to honor multiple subpoenas and/or warrants. What did the court do to Hertz?
The worst part is that once a false conviction has been nullified, like this, or an accused is proven not-guilty at trial, the police never, or rarely, go back to the case and try to find the real criminal. They 'get their accused' and if they wrong, they give up, leaving the criminal or killer go scott free.
You are right. In every false conviction that has been overturned story I never hear of any efforts or even a mention of looking for the actual perpetrator of the crime. And it's often a horrible crime.
What bothers me is that, had he went and loaned that car a couple hours later, even with a cooperitave Hertz, he wouldn't have an Alibi despite not having done it
@@tosifaliyev3554 Unfortunately, it's Chapter 11. I think they can even continue operations during the proceedings and will be fully operational after the reorg/discharge. But, I guess it's better than nothing.
It certainly is food for thought to wonder about his conviction and the evidence. Also, the man literally had to prove his innocence instead of the government proving his guilt.
@@clmhK5 the defendant does not have to prove that he didn't do it. The defendant has to find a way to refute the evidence that the prosecution is presenting. Guilty people with good lawyers and money do this all the time.
There was a case around here a few years ago with an even more perfect alibi. The defendant in a burglary case insisted that he was innocent, but he couldn't remember what he was doing on the day in question. During the trial someone said something that reminded me of where he was at the time. He told his lawyer and the lawyer talked to the judge and the prosecutor, and court was dismissed for the day. The next morning, the sheriff of a nearby county was in the courtroom along with his jail records. He was called to testify and to have his records admitted as evidence that the defendant was in his jail 80 miles away at the time of the burglary. Obviously, the case was dismissed.
and if you are male, in family court, you go to walk back the amount of money you need to pay. If you are white, male, straight and Christian, and have overwhelming evidence, you aren't going to win, ever. Welcome to American Court System.
@@carlh-thehermitwithwi-fi679 The judge in my divorce decree began this way: "The opinion of the Amicus's psychiatrist that the father is the more nurturing parent is only advisory...."
@@George4943 mine took an 8K custody evaluation that was over 200 pages long that said "don't take the kid from dad" and he threw it aside and said "that's nice".
Not millions, but billions. He lost 5 years of his ability to work - Hertz should lose 5 years of their annual revenue. That's between $8 BILLION and $9 BILLION per year. If corporations aren't given punishments that hurt, they will continue to ignore the little guy in the name of cutting costs and increasing profits.
@@PsRohrbaugh Really? Billions? What world do you live in? Even if they were fined (which they never will be) who would pay the fine? Their insurers and every customer of theirs in the future. Do you think the insurance company eats it? No, of course not. Everyone who buys insurance pays for it.
@@GordonWaiteJr The idea would be to bankrupt Hertz, or have similar catastrophic effect on the "corporate person" of Hertz. They'll have to sell assets, close branches - the same way a person who receives a large judgment in a lawsuit might have to sell cars, maybe even their house. There HAVE to be consequences that affect them. If they can just pass the cost on to insurance and continue with business as usual, there's no incentive for them (or other companies) to do the right thing in the future. "it's not about money, it's about sending a message"
@@StreetPeter Everyone should blame the individual's who work for Hertz, who neglected or refused to get this man his alibi. Those were individual people who decided for themselves not to act. They should be held liable for that as well as the company for fostering that type of behavior.
Wonderful that you are sharing this with your viewers. Hertz needs to suffer significant financial consequences since the law/authorities can't seem to hold corporations responsible AND ensure that they follow the law. How did this country get to this place?
Love the “Puddles Pity Party” reference at the end. Saw him perform in his terrific ome man show in Orlando, and at the end he stood outside in the lobby and greeted every single fan that was waiting in line to say hello to him. Even more talented that the Colt Clark Family Collective!
Re: cop admitting intention to commit perjury... You'd have to resort to destroying the credibility of your own witness!!! Yikes, talk about a catch 22.
Great story..It's supprising to hear that in some cases a subpoena can be ignored without any legal consequence and that a court action can proceed without that courts order being fulfilled. Why wasn't Hertz found in contempt.
4:14 I always thought "procure" meant "buy." Turns out it actually means to "obtain." 6:00 The most likely reason no one could find the receipt is that no one told anyone to look.
So my question to you Steve, how did that cop make you feel when he blatantly told you his word is more important than yours in the eyes of the courts? Just curious if it changed how you felt about cops in general. It would have changed my mind to a certain degree, and even hearing it now does. If they’ll say that to an attorney’s face, what do you think they’ll do to us citizens?
"That receipt may not prove his innocence." Even if the prosecuting attorney or jury doesn't agree, the defendant certainly has the right to present his defense.
@@BohemianGnostic I agree the prosecution must prove guilt. But the defendant has the right to present a defense. And in this case, the prosecution's evidence found him guilty.
@@BohemianGnostic in THIS case the man was clearly innocent yet he was required to prove that he did NOT murder someone so what happened to his innocent until proven guilty? That has NEVER been the concept for us.
@@christopherf8160 wrong, the court chose to ignore the reasonable doubt inferred by the inconclusive evidence as a third party witheld evidence they were ordered to release to the court. This is a gross misscarriage of justice at ALL levels.
@@Milesco If my attorney new for a fact that I did not commit this murder, knew for a fact that there was irrefutable proof and he dared not once to raise the objection in open court, yes, I'd report him for exactly that and those would be the words I'd use. Basically, he helped the states so the state had two lawyers to his none, it's no wonder he lost.
Convicting innocents leads to civil-unrest. Hiding those improper convictions leads to more civil-unrest. Exposing corruption (such as this video) is the beginning of healing those wounds and despite the pain and anger of exposing injustice, actually helps reduce unrest. Keep up the good work.
Yeah, that is what I was thinking too. But, it might be that the credit card company only saved the regarding the time and vendor.. but maybe not the location of the actual transaction.
Was thinking same thing . Credit card company . As stated. If anyone can use your credit card. But have to show ID also. How could someone else rent the car, if it wasnt their credit card ??
Indeed there would seem to be a triad of evidence that this would produce. The video, the Hertz receipt and some kind of credit card /debt card transaction. The failure to get one begets the question of the other two, or perhaps somebody was renting a car in his name? I dunno, I wasn't there...........it very well could be a travesty of justice. Hertz should obviously comply with the subpoena
I can imagine an alternate world where that "officer's word" vs "attorney's word" situation came down to whether or not said officer was wearing gloves on the day he took and passed back that subpoena.
I have seen law officers lie in court. Fact! In my work I was feared because the one place I would never lie was was under oath in a court of law. I'm retired fire & rescue.
Yes it's weird that a company can be a person when it suits them in the eyes of the law, but when it goes against them, they are just a nebulous entity...
Get records for everyone who was working in Hertz legal dept. at the time and turn this incident info over to every bar association that those people are members of. Let those people defend or throw the responsible parties under the bus. Hertz was mismanaged through and through and could not provide good customer service in one's time of need. I hope Hertz goes away forever!
I had an attorney friend in seminary who spoke of the frustrations of trying to get behind the wall of a corporation. This story fits what he described to me. Tragic!
Any of us could spend 60 years in jail if we can't prove where we were at a certain critical time. Today our phones could also place us at the scene of a crime that we are completely unaware of. I wonder what evidence made the jury believe that he was guilty.
I can vaguely remember a case that my father told me about. He's an Attorney in NYS, specializing in Tax Law. He was consulted in a case where he was called as an Expert Witness for the Defense. The client had pled guilty, and he was called in to detail how much the Defendant owed. He literally said, depending on how one interpreted the law (without stretching or breaking the truth, he could have proven everything from the Defendant owing over 1 MILLION DOLLARS, the the government owing the Defendant the same ($1m). Since the Defendant had pled guilty, he couldn't legitimately prove the latter (that would require a not-guilty plea), so he used the law to demonstrate that the Defendant owed a significantly lower amount then the government claimed, all by using the laws that the government had quoted... It's the vagueness of some laws, that make them subject to radical interpretations (poorly written laws), that really drives me nuts and explicitly drove me away from even considering the study of law...
What about his bank, the airport, or any and everyone else who saw him there? It seems off that a receipt was a make or break alibi when his own credit card company can produce the exact same date, time, amount, and location. In fact the receipt doesn't prove his alibi, ANYONE could be using his card.
@@Xershade I have worked in the hotel business for 40 years. Credit cards are pre-authorized when you arrive at the desk the same at a rental card counter and I do not believe that they hold these pre-authorizations. You do not pay for your hotel room or your rental car until it’s done and returned so the date that he checked in at the rental car counter has no impact on when the credit card would be processed. So this really doesn’t hold water for me even though it would make sense that it should. But I know for a fact and maybe you’ve seen it in the past that it’s pre-authorized I think in this case hertz can present the time the guest arrived at the rental car counter but the credit card transaction would just be the ending of the deal if that makes sense again I’m sorry I’m not criticizing your statement I’m just trying to explain how things could happen
@@b.arborio2404 $100 bill that goes to anyone that can prove that SCOTUS has ruled that a driver's license is not needed to operate a motor vehicle. Or so I recall.
To paraphrase, never attribute to malice what could be explained by incompetence. As a former Hertz IT employee I can tell you that incompetence is most likely the reason they couldn't find the data they were asked for, at least at first. They have gone through a lot of personnel changes as a result of outsourcing much of their IT infrastructure and support. Replacing intelligent, competent, and very experienced IT personnel with people from overseas that couldn't care less about being good employees has consequences. Hertz should pay through the nose for this guy's loss of time and reputation
The Federal government has subpoenas ignored all of the time by federal employees, the house the senate, other agencies and no one is held accountable. Accountability is the biggest thing that our local, state and federal governments need! Until they are held accountable and I mean really accountable for their actions, all will continue to be lost.
The receipt would of had his signature and they require you to show ID when renting, these added actions would be proof he didn't have someone else using his card.
I ignored several court orders for jury duty until one specifically stated that since their records indicated several "failures to appear", a failure to appear on (specific date, time and place) " will result in a warrant for my arrest and a charge of contempt.". I didn't ignore that one. I was surprised to learn that they do keep track of a person's response to jury duty notices and they will enforce them if they go unanswered. When I informed my employer, he told me that he needed me at work and started to explain to me that nothing would happen from ignoring it. He had never seen the information on the back of the notices explaining the law for "employers" either. They don't have to pay employees that have jury duty, but they must allow the time off or be liable. Now this was an about jury duty and I was released by noon and never assigned to a jury. Ignoring a court order resulting in a man being convicted and going to jail might have someone serving time on their own case.
Steve, if you ever get another cop who says he won’t show up, pay the sheriffs office to serve him. If he’s in the sheriffs dept, have his supervisor serve him. Ya gotta be tricky!
@@yumatom This. You are one of the few people I have seen that comment about latency. It could take hours to days for a payment to show. And when this case was + or - like 10 minutes, it matters.
The receipt would of had his signature and they require you to show ID when renting, these added actions would be proof he didn't have someone else using his card. Also most places don't keep camera footage to long, by the time the lawyer requested it, it might of been recorded over. I'm thinking older tech that doesn't hold more than a day or two and if nothing obvious happened on the day in question they didn't see a reason to back it up. I worked a a car dealer back then and they deleted everything on Sundays and only kept footage of incidents on the lot.
This story just reminds me of a story from this area where I live about a man who was able to foreclose on a bank because the bank failed to give the man information he was seeking.
"Reasonable doubt" fyi. And yes, you're completely correct, though I'll point out that the possibility of the evidence existing should have sufficed as a reasonable doubt, it should have been incumbent on the DA to prove it did not exist. I'm wondering if there is more to this and Hertz said it didn't exist at some point, but it's not like juries don't often use preponderance of the evidence standards when they are supposed to use reasonable doubt standards... some courts seem to encourage it, in fact (which is why I basically never vote for a judge who was a former prosecutor or cop).
a friend of mine who is a retired detective said that "eye witness" are some of the least reliable witnesses available. He ALWAYS would do what was necessary to verify the eye witnesses account. He ended our discussion with the comment "if you don't verify the eye witness, you are a lazy detective"
Steve, as a former officer, I actually got to serve a Bench Warrant, on an individual who skipped Jury Duty. My trainer and I were working a beat area that includes the city, district and federal district courts buildings. The district court called the station and requested an officer to come down to the courtroom and provided us with the bench warrant, and his location... (he didn't return after lunch), he was on the board of directors for a large corporation and was in a board meeting when we arrived. He was placed in handcuffs in the boardroom and transported directly before the court... The judge ripped him a new one because his excuse was that he had a board meeting, blah, blah blah, and he was an important person Yada, Yada, Yada... It really didn't go well for him. We were excused pretty quickly, so I don't know what happened... But the walls of the courthouse told us he was held in contempt for a few hours because he decided to get a huge attitude with the judge. I honestly wish I could have seen it. The guy was a massive entitled prick, and I almost thought we were going to have to fight him into cuffs because he didn't seem to understand he didn't have a choice.
years ago I served on jury duty and the people that were called that did not show up were issued warrants that day and the sheriffs were sent out to get them. the county clerk and the judges didn't f around... lot of potential jurors were held in contempt.
@@robertlee9395 By convincingly "proving" false accusations to a jury, preying on their gullibility. Just because you have the power to do evil doesn't mean you should exercise it.
@@klong9269 Steve has pointed out in the past there are Prosecutors that brag about having a 100% conviction rate. They are not concerned with such minor details of whether a defendant is guilty or innocent. They just want to get reelected by showing how effective they are.
For sure that card A was used at location B, at C time. Maybe not the itemized recite that hertz would have (which being a rental I believe would also have his state issued id linked to the transaction).
The receipt would of had his signature and they require you to show ID when renting, these added actions would be proof he didn't have someone else using his card.
Defendant produces the CC transaction receat(IE not the hertz one). The prosecutor will state that it could be someone else that used it. Now if the defendant's lawyer is doing his job, he will establish that the transaction report lines up with his client''s alibi under oath, and the prosecutor's claim that someone else could have made the transaction is an unsubstantiated speculation. Now as someone who occasionally sees a jury duty notice, I'd consider that a shift of the burden of proof back to the prosecutor where it always belongs to produce something more then a speculative "what if?" statement.
@@TheLoiteringKid In a fair just system, this is how it should work, but in a country that has for profit prisons, we have become product and the ways things work have changed a lot. I use to do IT for a town's police department and this would also cover the courts. I've seen and heard some things that scare me, even 8 years later. I would often have to sit in court while waiting for a open time to fix an issue with the judges computer. (nothing like porn, just really old software.) I also worked on computers for the prosecutor and of course the officers. I would hear things from them as well. Now mind you the officers in the department were great, the standards the town had for hiring was top notch. But they would still talk about cases when we were around, we were often like background noise, there but ignored.
@@TheCheshireMadcat A local county sheriff department had to get there own ISP contract after it was discovered one of the deputy's enjoyed, some flamboyant, fireman, explicit material on his in-cruiser computer, when the countie's Head IT asked his more competent assistant where was all the 27 gigs of the county's bandwidth was going. Head IT "so we have a 27 gig connection, and things seem slow can you tell me where its all going?" IT assistant "Sure, seems about 17 gig is going to the sheriffs department right now" Head It "realy?, can yo show me something high bandwidth they are accessing?" IT assistant "lets see, here is page cruiser 28 just accessed." PC "Quick plug the hose in!" Head It sighs, "Now I have to explain this at the next meeting." Yes, the system is rotten to the core at this point, the only light I see in it is the jury trial, even that they try to silence the rights of.
The justice system failed him. The judge that sentenced the innocent man to jail along with the police department that pinned him for the murder should be sued as well!
When they find the actual killer, five years of his sentence has already been served. The ceo of hertz should have to serve the same number of days in prison to send a message about honoring the courts requests.
