U need to put the part when the Moors cut of the balls of the blacks so they could not reproduce, and the part when the Moors enslaved the Black woman for sex, and also the part when the Moors killed the blacks babys at birth just bcoz the skins was black.
I would love to listen to more. The pictures are great. Some of the beauty of architecture and variety of food the Moors gave to everywhere they touched can still be seen. Thank you for this video ❤
Brother Robin, I have been following you since Internet listserv days. I am So happy to see your great progress over the years. However, I have a little quibble with you - not a lot. You have fantastic info but if I was in your class I think I'd be offended and condescended to if you kept asking “do you get that? Do you understand that? You follow?” Just a little beef. Keep up the great work. It’s a Mind Game.
Islam moor I not apart of it the MSTA organization nomo but yk we are the people that they talk about that was teaching the highest science of the world we gods chosen ppl🤝🏾 -salom Aleichem🌍🕎
At least one deceitful statement out of many superficial ones: Arabs had reluctantly invaded after insistently invited to do so by a dissidence in the Visigothic hierarchy , Count Julian who even provided 4 ships for the expedition. Anyway Europe has been civilised thanks to Islamique Spain including 'to wash themselves ' including monumental hospitals and universities, non exhaustive 😮
This man is over-simplifying, glossing over or overlooking some migration/invasion matters in at least 3 areas of the world by the halfway mark of this video (where I stopped to make this comment); &, it appears that he's using partial truths in order to deceive folk. Now, I'll point out just a little to illustrate my point. He failed to mention the pre-Arab invasion Amazigh peoples of North Africa who were of various tribes of peoples having various skin tones (as much of the coastal regions of the Mediterranean were already racially admixed to varying degrees due to contact from trading & agricultural exchange long prior to the Arab invasion of North Africa; & the land area now occupied by Morocco was simply called by a different, Roman-given name: Mauritania); & then, he made it sound like everybody in Spain simply left Spain when the Germanic Visigoths arrived - which is ludicrous - speaking as if all in Spain were German Goths (now many other folk did leave Spain at the time, but not everyone - & over time peoples tend to become AdMix to varying degrees: they weren't all suddenly replaced by Gothic folk); &, he slyly stated something along the lines that there were no English in England before the Germans arrived which, without further information is a tricky way to use truth to mislead an audience, because the Angles were among the German tribes that migrated to the island that the Romans had named Britannia (meaning land of the Brits; & the name England which came later means land of the Angles) - as he totally failed to mention these native Brits who were already on the island along with the Picts, both of whom the Romans had been fighting on the island long before England was called England: long before the Angles arrived (as the Angles didn't come into Britannia in any great numbers until after the Roman armies had left). The way he words things & omits certain facts seems designed to lead his audience to some erroneous viewpoint; so, be wary of this guy (as his agenda doesn't seem to be educating folk well - but rather something else). P.S.: To his credit, he does wrap up the video with truth about the Moor invasion of Spain & how certain places & whatnot got their modern names from, but, I'm not sold that the vast majority of Moors were pitch black (they might have been, but there's still some room for doubt). Perhaps the darker Moors spearheaded the invasion - thus the writing about the Moors' fierceness & appearance (plus there's the chance that writers of history used some hyperboly). If Black genes are quite dominate as many claim, then why aren't Spaniards much darker than they are? Were all or most of the dark-skinned folk later driven out of Spain with only or almost only light-skinned folk being allowed to convert & stay during the pushback period against the Moors? What explains the lightness of today's Spaniards? Did these pitch-black Moors not breed with the locals? Are Black genes not as strong as Blacks would have all believe? I dunno. I'm a bit curious though.
Try Daniel 7:9~ God appears with a bright white cloak, hair white as wool, bright eyes of lightning, a chariot of fire, and wheels ablaze, and a river of fire coming out forth he. He freed the people from the land of the LION, God destroyed the beast with 10-horns. Symbolic for 10 kings. Same story in Ezekiel, and Elohim, same story in the book of Enoch, Revelations I believe the 10 kings were Esau's offering, the Hebrews. 10 Isrealites, while Abrahams son Isaac, had another son named Jacob with 12 tribes. Esau is the father of Edomites/ Jacob father of Isrealites! Now the offspring in Daniel was about Caanan, Egypt, Phut, Nimrod- Babylon, Chaldea, Assyria, Raamah, and Sheba. So they were black, dark skinned.
Let's include the fact that under Islamic rule, slaves were not treated like how you think and many slaves were freed strategically. The idea of suddenly and completely abolishing slavery after its integration into society is not a good, sustainable idea. Using Islam, Muhammad brought fair treatment to slaves and recommended people to free their slaves.
😂😂😂 Horse with reigns of fire, face black as pitch, eyes so bright you couldn't look at them is not talking about black people. It's taken from Daniel 7:9 Where God comes down with bright white cloak, white hair, bright eyes, a chariot of fire with wheels ablaze and a river of fire in front of him and behind them. He freed them from the land of the LION. A giant beast with 10 horns, teeth of Iron, and crushed and devoured anyone under him, and spoke very boastful. The 10 horns were 10 kings he tore the beast apart and threw him into the river of fire. Thus breaking up the prison of the evil Tyrants. Never speaks of a race or color, happened under Nimrod, at Mesopotamia, Assyria, Babylon, (UL) ancient Iraq, Philistine (ancient Palestine). These same descriptions come from KJV Ezekiel, the book of Enoch with the Elohim "g"ods. People have taken these stories and put imagination to them! Get your facts before preaching on them.
Look at the 'moors and wild men' tapestry from 14th century. Or most of the images ot moors in Europe are all Black people..including Kings. If moors were not Black, why is that? There are 3 African countries named after the moors, and a tribe called Maure tribe in Senegal and the Sahara till this day.
Thats not truth the visogoths are not spanish, the visogoths invaded Spain afther the fall of the Roman Empire, the original spanish are IBEROS, stop speaking líes about our country.
The term ''Moor'' does not actually refer to any particular ethnic group, and is applied as a blanket term to North African (Berber) and Arabian Muslims who colonized Spain during the 8th century. At this time, the Spanish territory was not yet a nation-state; the region that would become Spain was known as Iberia. The Moors overtook Visigoth rule, bringing Islamic religion and customs the furthest westward they ever reached in the ancient world. Moorish caliphates battled with Christian kingdoms throughout the Iberian Peninsula for hundreds of years, before falling in 1492 at the Battle of Granada to a newly unified Spanish nation. The Moors were eventually expelled by King Phillip III in 1609. Nevertheless, the Moors left nearly a millennium of influence in the region, which carried over into the Spanish colonization of the Americas. Moors Occupied Spain for 800 years.
@@v-mane2551Los Moros no colonizaron Amerika, los indios que se unieron a España son los conquistaron amerika, la gente envidia la historia española por eso todos mienten sobre la Española o proclaman ser los autores de España 🤡
The original muslims or arabs were umayyad and they were all black after they got overthrown in middle east in 750 ad by the abbssid persians some fled to spain, so moor does signify an ethniticy since its referring to the original black umayyad muslims then later white persians and turks adopted arab culture and was also called moors but there really is no such thing as a white arab, all the arabs were black, the white ones are actually turks and persians
Nothing funnier than someone trying to misappropriate another's heritage/culture as their own. Tariq was closer to looking like a white man than a black one. Its really sad to see people struggling with a sense of identity to the point that they have to resort to this. I don't need to listen to this bootlegged revised history, I can just look at the genetic genealogies of the regions and tell where someone is truly from, and North Africa was never black. One can argue that they were a minority of course, but the general population is not, never was. Hilarious how others will try to educate you about your own culture/history.
Well we all know that history is written by the victors and what he is saying is interesting. I think I might do some research to see how credible it is.
You don't think he said the lighter African tended towards the North, and the further South, the darker? It's just skin bro, and if where we are now in society doesn't seem denigrating, then I'd like to visit the secluded island your on. Racism is real, and very apparent. You know it is, and if anyone 'borrowed' another's history, explain why you say Amen, or have a Pyramid/ Roman shield on the back of your Federsl Reserve Note. Explain why there's no silver in your silver coins, as debt is a part of that very Fiat system, and realize the facade you've been utopianized with. Peaceful facade. Against principalities and governors is what we used to be taught. For thise with ears, Peace.
@@mellowrage4892 Definitely, that's what we need to do nowadays, no one knows the entire truth and most history books definitely won't help. I am African and knowing history is crucial. The past is the past anyway, we are all brothers and what happened before doesn't define our future anymore. Some still play the victim but many are rising and educating themselves.
@@funkypharaoh5970This man is more well read on the topic than you. Instead of talking out of your ass and claiming something is "afrocentric" show your source to oppose him or stfu.
