Hinduism, commonly understood, is just another religion 

Neither sikhs nor buddhist.. wants to call themself as hindu 😂

I never found any book which says the term hindu defined in article 25 of the constitution. Though the supreme court interpretated hindu as 'way of life' in some cases. Family laws which applies to hindu's are also applicable to Buddhists, Sikhs, Jains etc. This doesn't mean that they are hindu, it only explains than our legislature is so lazy that they don't want make law for convenience of people.

The sarkari forum point is so true, my religion is still not recognized by Indian government so I had to fill hindu in every forum

hi Vimoh have you read God's Debris, is it worth reading. reading description of the book makes me confused. I am an agnostic atheist.

This Neo charvaka guy is so desperate to include everyone in hindu religion. Most of the religious scriptures of Hindus existed after shankaracharya. The oldest manuscript of Vedas was from 14th century. I don't know why he is associating himself with charvaka I am sure that he can't even prove the existence of charvaka. He should to reed a lot rather than making vague argument that he can't prove.

Sir as a teenager I have some questions pls reply and tell how to contact

Nice

This video is going to be controversial.

कल्प वीगर्ह नाम से एक मूर्ति है जिस पर दावा किया जाता की ये 30000 साल पूरानी और यह विष्णु की हैं । कृप्या इस पर बताइये।🇮🇳 💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙🙏🇮🇳

Bro when yr channel says Vimoh live then it should only have live videos. Yr channels which is onky with yr name should have all the short recordings, clips and vlogs. I mean common vimoh why we have to scroll down so much to get to a live video. Be consistent please

It's very important for people to understand the term Hindu. It has become some sort of fuzzy concept. It is used interchangeably as per wish. When one points out the term Hindu as non religious and the concept of religious brotherhood didn't exist in the past in India, right wingers vehemently denies and says it was always a religion. When one says in the present context that it has become as common as any other religion, right wingers fears people getting away of the hindu fold due to the formation of new thoughts like atheism, etc. This is a typical age old Brahmanical ideological practice which happened at the time of Budhha too. Buddha who exposed the Brahminical nature of vedas was made another awtar of the God Vishnu so that people don't go on to make new religion and expose the Brahmins. Any offshoot was forcefully given a hindu character thereby maintaining the Hindu caste order. This happened at the time of independence too. Tribal and Dalits were clubbed under Hindu even when non of the upper castes had any dealings with them. How can one say Dalit/tribal as Hindu if they are denied worshipping through temple entry? Same is happening with atheism now by saying Hindu is an overarching identity which includes atheism also. As Vimoh said, we don't need a religious overarching identity, we already have one, its Indian. The fun fact is that the term Hindu would have been irrelevant had the people of India never questioned the caste order or moved away to be part of Abhrahamic religions.

Sanatan Dharma is the religion, Hindu is a Way of life.