Scripture: The Word of God - Empowers the reader, to a deeper walk in Grace, as it expounds and opens open more understanding, in meaning and application. Scripture also corrects, by means of the Holy Spirit that only He can do, to encourage, chasten, REPROVE, and direct the "way we should go".
@@kingdavid2785 lol just learn about the foundation of your religion. Sorry the Holocaust and slavery and witch trials and inquisitions bother me I want you to stop harming humanity.. I know I know silly me thinking basing our decisions on reality and not a bronze age fairytale would be a that for society please stop
@@kingdavid2785 Look across the world and the country places that base their society on a religion are always violent disgusting crime-ridden failures that's what made America great we got that s*** out of government and you people are trying to shove it back in
@@kingdavid2785 tell you what is soon as Christianity stops being the worst thing that ever happened in all of humanity I'll stop trying to point out how terrible it is.. enjoy team genocide and slavery. I'm sure you really like the idea of Christ being your loot all out of getting out of decent moral behavior though. Just don't claim to have morals if you could come from in the Bible you need to go to jail immediately
1. What was Reuben calling........ 2. What was Simeon calling....... 3.what was Levi calling........ 4. What was Judah calling...... 5. What was Issachar calling..... 6. What was Zebulun calling..... 7. What was Dan calling...... 8. What was Gad calling...... 9. What was Asher calling..... 10. What was Napthali calling.... 11. What was Joseph calling...... 12. What was Benjamin calling...... Each tribe has a specific calling from GOD.....calling such as sonship....watchman...and high priest.
The Septuagint is a sham. “Scholars” always repeat that the Septuagint was created in 285BC and that Jesus and His Apostles used the Septuagint. They didn’t. This lie is pushed because the Septuagint contains the Apocrypha which contains many unbiblical teachings, many of which Roman Catholicism uses to push much of their nonsense. There is little to no evidence that holds water that proves a BC Septuagint nor that Jesus and his Apostles ever used it. There is so much deception. Satan is working so hard to attack God’s Bible (in English The King James). I urge you to check out David W. Daniels work. He has an entire series on here about the Septuagint and has written books that speak directly to this issue. One is called “Did Jesus Use The Septuagint”. Search for chicktracts on here and look at his play lists. You will find the one for the Septuagint.
@@AVKingJamesBible Good afternoon AVKingJamesBible. You said; "He has an entire series on here about the Septuagint" I don't know why David Daniels spends any time trying to discredit the LXX Septuagint. NONE of the modern Bibles use the Septuagint to translate the OT. Because all scholars recognize the deficiencies in the LXX. ____________________ *HOWEVER* the KJV translators used the Septuagint, exclusively to translate the 14 books of the *APOCRYPHA* The 1611 contained the Apocrypha. And the KJV contained the Apocrypha until 1884.
@@AVKingJamesBible I am interested in what YOU understand about the KJV translators using the LXX. I am not, in the least, interested in what David Daniels teaches. I would like to know what YOU know.
That's not talking about Egypt the country. It's actually talking about the fact that the worldliness of the Christian decreases as he matures in Christ.
@@lawrence1318 You must be a theologian to twist the scripture that much!🤣😄 You may be right that it isn't talking about the country Egypt. But a more likely explanation of that scripture is found in Revelation 11:8, "And their dead bodies shall lie in the street of the great city, which spiritually is called Sodom and Egypt, where also our Lord was crucified." So we see that JERUSALEM is spiritual Egypt (and Sodom). They were once with the LORD. The country of Egypt never was, so they can't return to him, but Jerusalem can. Although the knowledge that Jerusalem is spiritual Egypt is found very late in the scripture, that doesn't prevent them from returning to the LORD earlier.
The Dangers of King James: Here we go! If we are dedicated to going by Scripture, which translation are we going to prefer? The ONLY translation that contains the word Easter instead of Passover is the King James. You may ask, "What is the error?" Do you want your children to grow up worshiping a pagan fertility goddess, or the only true God who caused the angel of death to pass over the houses of the people Israel who had put blood on the doorposts and lintel? Our culture is more interested in eggs and bunnies than on the true meaning. What other Christian celebrations have been hijacked for secular purposes?
There is no error. Easter was the Roman fertility feast of the gods. Israel was under Roman rule, so the Acts 12:4 simply refers to Easter in passing. You're dramatising it.
Your versions are a corrupted text. Evidence is being shown that Sinaiticus is a fraudulent text from 1840’s. Has never been tested for age and authenticity.
There are few errors But we know of them. Like the misplaced comma at the crucifixion bc the translators were Catholic and didn’t know what they didn’t know and were never taught. There’s another misplaced comma in the story of handkerchiefs being laid down for blessings. The Easter ref emergence is another instance where their bias and teaching showed. But even you know if it so it’s not an issue is it?????
Jesus instructed us how to be saved just before he went to Heaven in Mark16:16. The Apostles taught it and Paul taught it as did all Christians. Any other way is not of Christ
You should actually learn about the real origin of the Bible it's a politically compiled and edited hack job that is documented fact Church admits to look up the Council of Nicea
@@darkeen42 Nope. YOU look up the council of Nicea. I have studied church history. The council of Nicea is blamed for just about everything in church history by conspiracy theorists. Have you read the Nicene Creed that came out of the council? The purpose of the council was to stop the Aryan heresy and affirm the deity of Christ and the Biblical doctrine of the Trinity. It had nothing to do with the politics of which books were in the Bible.
The KJV was translated to fit King James' ideas and his own interpretations. Stories handed down for many generations do change because of details left out, some are exaggerated, some are added. Other versions of Bibles have the same situation. Therefore, which one is really correct? No one knows for sure, except some who pretend to know.
I’m going to venture to say you are regurgitating what you’ve been told without actually comparing the KJ to other versions. It’s very clear the other versions water down the gospel, attack the deity of Christ, eliminate hell, damnation, attack the virgin birth and many other things. Exactly the kind of religion you would expect Satan to prepare for the end times.
Revelation 22:19 the Lords words say and if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy ,God shall take away his part out of the book of life. And out of the holy city ,and from the things which are written in this book. KJV is the only way to go it's the true word of God. Kent is in to easy believe say this prayer and your born again . Takes alot more than that to get the new birth .
hi man, if you’re not absolutely sure that you are 100% guaranteed heaven, please watch this 7min youtube video with an open heart: => “the bible way to heaven sanderson1611”
Are you aware that there is a textual variant in that verse? All known Greek manuscripts of the book of revelation at that verse say “tree of life” not “book”. the book reading was almost certainly a mistake of Erasmus based on the fact that his sole manuscript of the book of revelation (most likely borrowed from Johannes reuchlin, aland miniscule 2814) did not contain the last 6 verses of revelation, so he was back translating from Latin at that point. The Latin word for tree is very similar to the Latin word for book. Either the manuscript Erasmus was reading from had the mistake, or he read it wrong and created the mistake. Either way it stands against 100% of all known Greek manuscripts of that verse.
@@SwollenostrichTM Exactly! The correct translation in the Book of Revelation 22:19 is Tree of Life, not Book of Life. All the ancient Greek texts clearly says Tree of Life.
You do realize that this verse only applies to the Book of Revelation, not the entire Bible? Not all of Bible is prophetic and when John wrote Revelation he did not know it would be included in a compilation of 66 books.
Gotta call BS on any version of “The Bible”. The KJV was assembled (yes, that’s the right word) in the early 17th century AD, translated from the 11th century AD texts. Mr. Hovind talking about how the early books were thrown away when they “wore out”. The printng press was not in wide use until the 16th Century AD. “Books” until Gutenberg’s press, were carefully copied manuscript. None of the KJV, JW, or any version uses the Dead Sea Scrolls as a reference for the texts in the KJV. There are books left out, mistranslated passages, and deliberate omissions done by the translators under James’ reign. There is no “REAL” version of the bible, especially the New Testament. Jesus’ story was an oral tradition, that was not written down until at least one hundred years after the death of JC. There is no way to know how much is history, and how many bits of myths from other traditions leaked into the story of Jesus before a quill to paper? It’s a book, made and written by men, with all the knowledge, predjudice and ignorance of the time they were living in. Why is there no Book of Thomas, or Book of Mary in the KJV? They were found with the other biblical scrolls, along with other versions of both old and new testament books. Read those bibles - any of ‘em - with a grain of salt.
@@darkeen42strange that you think you know the answers but you never witnessed what you claim to be fact. Be careful when professing wisdom. Romans 1:16 For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth; to the Jew first, and also to the Greek. 17 For therein is the righteousness of God revealed from faith to faith: as it is written, The just shall live by faith. 18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness; 19 Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them. 20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse: 21 Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened. 22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, 23 And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things.
He's a con man and a scam artist, he also has his head stuck so far up his own arse that when he takes a shit he can wipe his ass and nose at the same time.
Defending the references Kent made regarding the history of the early church and the scriptures then later the 15th-16th century works could not be defended, orally or in writing, for a doctorate. Even on a Master's level it would be turned down. As an undergraduate work it wouldn't be acceptable. I believe a high school student would be sent back to the library for further research. So sad that this passes for Christian Apologetics. Completely refutable.
@@Christ_is_Lord_ how much time do you have? Almost every sentence of this presentation is refutable, who is going to take up that immense task in a RU-vid comment? James white does a good job in a series of RU-vid videos going through this.
@david808323, He has a gift for repeating the same nonsense he has been corrected on hundreds of times. Nobody is saying we came from a rock, and something didn't come from nothing, unless you believe the nonsense in the bible where something came from nothing, and man came from mud.
@@mikeekim242Can you provide some examples of said “nonsense”? Lots of evolutionists ultimately claim that we came from a rock- albeit not directly. Many evolutionists also believe in the Big Bang, but don’t have any legitimate idea of what started it. Not sure where you’re getting the notion that we came from mud, unless you’re describing how God used the dust from the ground. But ultimately, God made the ground as well. But claiming that the Bible said we came “from mud” is a bit disingenuous.
@@gdubb4892 What we do have is reality. We can see the physical world around us, and we're trying to learn about it. We don't know how everything came to be, and we're honest about that. You made the claim "God made the ground"... Can you demonstrate that is true? At what point is it logical to insert a God? It is more logical to say existence has always been, and adding a God to that explains nothing. I don't have to demonstrate reality is real, but you do have to demonstrate your god exists.
@@mikeekim242 It’s not logical at all to say existence always has been. That’s thermodynamically impossible. If existence always has been, all matter would have broken down by now. Even major evolutionists know that the universe will break down to nothingness in “trillions and trillions of years”, unless something outside of matter (God) intervenes. You’re also attempting to use proof related to matter in order to expect proof of God- who doesn’t consist of matter and thus doesn’t fall under the same existential obligations.
@@gdubb4892 "That’s thermodynamically impossible." LOL, explain that. You can't destroy energy, so that follows what I said. " Einstein's famous E=mc2 equation, which states that energy and matter (or mass) are interchangeable. Nuclear reactions in the sun and at nuclear power plants regularly convert matter into energy."
Sorry Kent, but I think James White gives a FAR superior explanation of the Biblical manuscript history that demonstrates that the word of God is perfectly preserved in the whole of the Biblical manuscript tradition, instead of a single translation. He goes into a much more clear, unbiased and thorough examination of the Alexandrian, Western (Latin), and Byzantine manuscript families and the place each of them had in both the KJV and the more modern translations.
James White is a blaten liar, a pathetic wanna be scholar, a legend in his own mind. James supports fake counterfeit bible versions, which has numerous omissions and doctrine errors.
James white is a heretic - The exclusive publisher of the NIV Bible is printed by Zondervan, who is owned by Harper Collins who prints GAY PORN and the satanic bible of the church of satan. The NIV uses manuscripts under Vatican control and they are even called "VaticANUS" Can you believe they spell it this way? These satanists want you to believe the catholic pope has held the "true words" of God. they want you to believe the King James Bible has ''added" words. The Pope's VaticANUS manuscripts do not even have the entire book of revelation in them, which is very handy for them and their father satan since it was written to warn you of the beast that shall come one day. They want you to believe that the true words of God were lost until they were found in a trash can at a monastary claiming these are "older and more reliable" see they want to destroy your faith in the Bible and Jesus and eventually want you to follow the beast and take his mark 666 in whatever form it comes The strongest language against sodomy is the King James, it says they should be put to death. So they claim "king James was a sodomite' and it is a lie. Notice all the catholic priests that play with altar boys/ The NIV was the "perversion that had a sodomite and lesbian" on the committee NIV 1984 edition says do not be a shrine prostitute - is that a male or female? KJV says Sodomite
Compare the versions side by side. You will very quickly see the satanic infiltration in the other versions. The KJ is the preserved word of God. Don’t take anyone’s word for it. Do the work. Compare them side by side.
Yup. James White is who the Lord used to show me my huge error in understanding regarding Bible translations and history of manuscripts, etc. His book on the KJV only controversy was instrumental for me. Now I can enjoy a multitude of translations with a pure conscience, because my ignorance was taken away.
The KJV.... Thompson Chain Reference.....THE BEST BY FAR.....Even offers detailed instructions for marking the Scriptures including The Golden Scripture's.....!!!! Barnes & Noble... For around $ 75.00....!!!!!
There is no such thing as the "Mormon Bible". The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints uses the King James Version of the Old and New Testaments of the Jewish people. The Church of Jesus Christ also use The Book of Mormon, which is of a completely different ancient people in the Americas. These two books combine the stick of Judah and Joseph as explained in Isaiah.
No DNA for lost tribes of Israel, they’ve never been lost. No cities mentioned in Book of Mormon have ever been found. How did we ever make it all these years without the Book of Mormon?
@@gatzu8599 So which version is the most accurate, because these verses clearly have different meanings? “The humble shall see this, and be glad: and your heart shall liue that seeke good.” - Psalm 69:32 (KJV 1611) “The humble shall see this, and be glad: and your heart shall live that seek God.” - Psalm 69:32 (KJV 1987)
The underlying Greek text of the AV KJV, is by far the superior underlying Greek text, being in agreement with the majority of copies ever made or discovered. The reliability of a copy should not be determined by its age, anymore than a witnesses testimony in a court of law should be determined by the age of the witness. Especially when that witness's testimony disagrees with the overabundance of the majority of witnesses, whose testimony harmonizes with one another's. Don't be fooled by margin notes that state, "The Oldest and Most Reliable MSS Omit This Verse." That refers to less than a handful of abundantly corrected and corrupted manuscripts that disagree with the majority of manuscripts ever discovered. Manuscripts that were most likely found in such a pristine state of preservation due to the fact that early Christians knew of their corruptions, thus they were not handled for purposes of copying.
@@jct4418 lots wrong with what he’s saying. He’s saying because Origen was a heretic all the Alexandrine manuscripts are wrong, that’s just not accurate. There were heretics using the Byzantine manuscripts as-well we don’t assume all the manuscripts are corrupt. He claimed that if a copyist made an error the entire copy was thrown away this is another lie. The earliest manuscripts were made on Papyrus or Parchment and they didn’t have money to just waste when an error was made. Scribes made errors constantly that’s why there are so many textual variants today. Ancient scribes wouldn’t sit at a table and copy they would sit cross legged on the floor, poor lighting and a rush to copy to earn money caused many errors. Also further down while copying the scribes would sit in a room while the one elder read the text out loud. The others would copy from what they heard, you can probably tell how difficult that would be. We have additional passages found in the KJV that aren’t found in the earliest manuscripts ( Comma Johanneum). The original 1611 was filled with textual notes and alternate readings. The manuscripts Erasmus used were very low in number, Kent claimed a big number I can’t remember the exact but it was a lie. He had about half a dozen Greek manuscripts but travelled and examined other manuscripts but the number would still be small, compared to the manuscripts we have today. Not to mention Erasmus had no manuscripts with the book of Revelation in them. He had to borrow a single manuscript of revelation from a friend that was imbedded with a commentary. It contained many errors. So just off the top of my head, there are many errors in this video, I don’t mean to attack the KJV but there are better sources of the bible we can use today.
He is such a intelligent person but how come he made such a grave error. His Presumption it self is wrong. There were writing of scholars but there were no Bible because its has not been complied by the Catholic Church up until 370AD. The Vulgate is the Original Bible. Still existing today. English translation is Douay Rhiem Version.
If your entire worldview revolves around making sure you've got the correct translation of a book from 2000+ years ago, you need to grow up and get a real life
It’s interesting…..you place all the versions of the Bible side by side for comparison and the King James by far glorifies God and Jesus Christ the most. It’s not even close. And this version of the Bible is hated the most. Sounds about right. We live in a world run by Satan and his deception is being swallowed by most Christian’s. May God have mercy on your souls.
Ken you just said when I got saved .......hmmmmmm isn't that for Christ to decide and not you? Your not saved because you heard about the gospel you are saved by doing God's commandments and believing in Jesus Christ .
@@lavishangel4069 interesting that your reply States the the Law not sure what law out of 165 of them is a curse As you have indicated in your reply. You must have notice that the Ten commandments never was the curse and those commandments have been around since Adam not just the Jews. The other 155 laws were the curse and how the Jews applied the Law. The law (10) was fulfilled by Christ, you can read throughout the NT about keeping those commandments. Jesus never deleted his laws but explained that by having faith and by his grace you are saved , he wants ever one to live by those 10. You will find in Revelations this statement talking about the remnant and who are they " those who keep the commandments of God and the testimony of Jesus Christ ". If that dosent answer the question about keeping Gods commandments then I don't know what will.
You should look into the origin of the Bible it's not Superior to anything it's a politically compiled and edited hack job look up the Council of Nicea there was no Bible until then and they left out all the bits that weakened their power which was a lot of the manuscripts get the father to learn before you believe that's the order it should go away in not mindlessly believe and refuse to learn
@@davidmathews9633 I can't prove anything to you over a RU-vid, you have to actually find some integrity be responsible human being and learn on your own. Verify what I said dude I don't know what the f*** you think proof is. I'm sorry the facts make you feel like a retard so you hate facts.
