Hitler wasn’t a Nationalist | Yoram Hazony

Подписаться 635 тыс.

Просмотров 6 тыс.

50% 1

In this clip, John and Yoram Hazony discuss the cause of declining support for nationalism in the West. Hazony makes the case this is primarily a consequence of the erroneous conflation between national socialism and nationalism.
Philosopher, scholar and political theorist Dr. Yoram Hazony joins John for a rich and interweaving conversation about conservatism, nationalism, democracy and modern politics. Dr. Hazony, who has recently completed books on several of these topics, provides a compelling critique of the political right - where has gone wrong, the great benefits it can convey for society and how it diverges from liberalism.
John and Yoram touch on many important topic areas, including multiculturalism, identity politics, globalism and why nationalism seems to be surrounded by an unearned air of controversy.
Yoram Hazony is an Israeli philosopher, Bible scholar and political theorist. He is President of the Herzl Institute in Jerusalem and Chairman of the Edmund Burke Foundation. He has written several books, including The Virtue of Nationalism (2018) and his latest, Conservatism: A Rediscovery (2022), which have both met popular and critical success.
Educated at Princeton University (B.A. in East Asian Studies), and Rutgers University (Ph.D in Political Theory), Yoram founded and was the first editor of Princeton’s conservative student journal, The Princeton Tory, while still an undergraduate. He lives in Jerusalem with his wife Yael Hazony. They have nine children.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See full interview here: • Conservatism Rediscove...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Conversations feature John Anderson, former Deputy Prime Minister of Australia, interviewing the world's foremost thought leaders about today's pressing social, cultural and political issues.
John believes proper, robust dialogue is necessary if we are to maintain our social strength and cohesion. As he puts it; "You cannot get good public policy out of a bad public debate."
If you value this discussion and want to see more like it, make sure you subscribe to the channel here: / @johnandersonmedia
And stay right up to date with all the conversations by subscribing to the newsletter here: johnanderson.n...
Follow John on Twitter: / johnandersonac
Follow John on Facebook: / johnandersonac
Follow John on Instagram: / johnandersonac
Support the channel: johnanderson.n...
Website: johnanderson.n...
Podcast: johnanderson.n...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Follow Yoram Hazony:
Twitter: / yhazony
Website: www.yoramhazon...

Опубликовано:

29 сен 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 68

@thomasjoseph3488 Год назад

Of course, this Jew is the expert on National Socialism. Sure.

@ArnoldTohtFan Год назад

they always are, aren't they? as Joyce says, they insert themselves like barnacles into those channels via which a culture converses _with_ itself _about_ itself. if we abandon Christian ethics, abandon soul equality, we can then restore our immune system and flush out all these parasites that are overwhelming us.

@pennypothoneypot634mimmahappun Год назад

To replace Nationalism I much rather relate to a Ü TURN or something similar description, other than Nationalism since it unfortunately is associated to GREEDY POWER

@paulrevere5197 Год назад

Internationalism is by far greedier than nationalism. The international communist don't want to just rule one nation, they want to rule all nations...

@peterwebb8732 Год назад

The “association” mostly exists in Leftist propaganda.

@kayleneemery8217 Год назад

I have learned a great deal about love and appreciation of Nation from you and your guests over the past 3 Yeats John . I continually learn from your channel - thank you.

@BankruptStates Год назад

Nativism - protect the interests of native-born or established inhabitants

@555Trout Год назад

I'm very interested in AH's political theory. He darn near conquered the world.

@AuraysTimelessChannel Год назад

There is a book written in 1960 about all this. The Nazis had diaries and recorded much of their lives and ideology, day by day. Basically lie, lie, lie, propaganda, violence, intimidation, feigning peace talks, and pure ruthless brutality.

@paulrevere5197 Год назад

Germany was by far the most effective and well trained fighting force in the world at that time. Their technology was also the best. It took a near total world effort to defeat them and should (if we care to look closely) prove who the money power was then, and today.

@555Trout Год назад

@@paulrevere5197 Indeed.

@franekspeak953 Год назад

The political theory was to tell the nation that they deserve better and to find an enemy to blame, so that all the nation would be united. Additionally, he managed to built a cult of himself as an omnipotent dictator and centralised the decision making for everything, including the economy. I would add however, that it was a different kind of centralisation than the top-down approach of the Soviet Union. In my opinion AH introduced something like the modern governance through values by repetitively proliferating values (many of them were anti-values from our perspective) and letting the government as well as normal people to fulfill these values in the best way they could. That created a kind of a competition of ideas and solutions around AH, in the end leading to the worst things ever witnessed in the human history.

@555Trout Год назад

@@franekspeak953 Sort of like how our current regime is recruiting "black" people?

@Alois_Schicklgruber Год назад

EVERY SINGLE TIME🤦🏾‍♂️🙆‍♂️🤦🏼‍♀️

@erlofcambridge7006 Год назад

The problem wasn't his Nationalism, it was his Socialism!

@deeznutz8320 2 месяца назад

His socialism worked fine it pulled the working class out of poverty very quickly

@robhaythorne4464 Год назад

Lots of words, meaning nothing. Define your terms, or don't argue.

@kotarorune Год назад

He absolutely was a nationalist.

@Io-Io-Io Год назад

Of course you should read it, otherwise you don't know what you're talking about

@txdmsk Год назад

Yeah. If kids these days read the book, maybe they would not scREEEEEm Hi.ler if you preferred your cheeseburger with bacon or something.

@jdsiv3 8 месяцев назад

but we dont believe in nationalism for everyone. We believe in nationalism for "free liberal democracies on the western model"

@oskar6607 Год назад

I don’t really agree with Mr. Anderson that nationalism has now fallen into disrepute. It was certainly the case for a long time that it was in disrepute, also here in Sweden 🇸🇪. However, over the past couple of years nationalism has become more popular here in 🇸🇪 and even liberals are trying to co-opt it by saying they are ‘liberal’ nationalists and recently the head of the Social Democratic Party here in 🇸🇪 came out saying she was a “patriot.”

@txdmsk Год назад

I remember losing some "friends" when I read Adolf's book. I actually recommend reading and analysing it. Well, that is if you have two brain cells to smack together. You can learn how to use language and ideas to incite hatred, pull people together, and move their hearts. He often associates eww and icky words with a certain ethnic group (sorry for talking in riddles, RU-vid automatically deletes comments if it deems your language naughty). He says things like how bad they smell, how they don't like to bathe, and so on. I wonder if Adolf knew about this stuff instinctively or was just lucky, but modern science is clear that associated uncleaniless, disease and eww and icky stuff with people will make you feel moral / political and other types of disgust as well.

@tomhamilton7726 Год назад

Excellent analysis.

@fernandosegala3964 Год назад

Yes, he was. Or does "Über Alles" mean nothing to you?

@alongsleep Год назад

Composed by Joseph Haydn in 1797. The verse originally meant that the Germans and their rulers have to overcome existing divisions and keep in mind the goal of a unified Germany.

@SkyrimCZtutorials Год назад

Those words composed many years before AH was born mean something different. Do not study from Hollywood movies.

@fernandosegala3964 Год назад

Sure, because words spoken by Haydn in the context of the German unification and words spoken by AH in the context of WW2 mean the exact same thing. Give me a break... If I buy a hoover and come home to say "this hoover sucks", what do I mean? Depends on whether it's broken, doesn't it? Thus, context is everything.

@mohamedali2858 Год назад

Nationalism that was the engine that moved all imperialist colonial Europe criticizes German imperialist colonial nationalism

@alongsleep Год назад

Have you heard of the Arab Invasion, in which all of North Africa was conquered?

@mohamedali2858 Год назад

@@alongsleep The Arab " invasion" has gained minds and hearts and has been accepted and embraced to this day in that spot you mentioned & many other places. But colonial imperialism was fought and defeated in all parts of the world Can you tell why is that ⁉️

@alongsleep Год назад

@@mohamedali2858 Because they killed or enslaved or forced to convert everyone in their path. Look up the castration of African slaves by Arabs. Dont pretend they weren't conquering other peoples.

@edwardrburgess3308 Год назад

Nationalism and Imperialism are not the same thing.

@mohamedali2858 Год назад

@@edwardrburgess3308 I think They are crocodile jaws, can you tell how they are not related ⁉️

@zargonfuture4046 Год назад

Sounds like American in its being as Mistress of the world today.

@peterwebb8732 Год назад

Not true. America, for all its faults, does not dictate to its neighbours in the way that Germany did .

@txdmsk Год назад

Son, there must always be a Lich King, otherwise the Scourge will run amok, headless. If there is no leviathan deterring others from behaving badly, then there is war and destruction until a leviathan is born from the ashes. As the US starts to fizzle out (not when, but as), we will see wannabe strongman nations flex their military, economic, geopolitical muscles to an extent of hot wars.

@haydenwalton2766 Год назад

could it be that this argument is being made with the sole purpose of defending the state of israel and their actions??

@theflaver Год назад

you're anti semitism is showing Hayden...

@iggyblitz8739 Год назад

Ok, but even if he was not all Nationalism is bad anyway, if it's done the right way with no evil intentions snd just forthright policies protecting the nerds of the country without any fanaticism or extreme ideas, then so be it.

@JullianRoman Год назад

John. I’d be great if you could interview the US Bishop Robert Barrón

@em0_tion Год назад

"Nationalist - a person who strongly identifies with their own nation and vigorously supports its interests, especially to the exclusion or detriment of the interests of other nations." 🤔

@peterwebb8732 Год назад

Not necessarily true. The world is connected and it is not a zero-sum game. Therefore you can love your nation while simultaneously accepting the truth that the interests of your nation are often best served by having due regard to the interests of others. Trade and alliances are good examples. You give something you have, to get something you need, and both parties are better off.

@em0_tion Год назад

@@peterwebb8732 I'm just quoting the definition and by it, he *is* a nationalist, which directly contradicts with the video title. Nothing to do with your (or my) personal interpretations and implementations of the word. Words have meaning. Facts, not feelings and beliefs. Just like a chicken is a bird, even though it can't fly. 😉✌

@allansmith3837 Год назад

Think that sums it up for me yes he was a ultra Nasionalist Germany is me and I am Germany

@dheerajpimoli9539 7 месяцев назад

@@em0_tion that definition is not based on fact. Yeah for a nationalist good of his own nation comes first but that doesn't mean it has to be bad for other. The same could be said about an individual also. A person will always put his interest first but that is not always bad for other.

@em0_tion 7 месяцев назад

@@dheerajpimoli9539 Hence my 2nd comment, but since this is also the internet and 10 sites = 10 different definitions, I'll personally agree with you. Still not convinced about the title of this video. 🤔🤷‍♂

@edwardrburgess3308 Год назад

Spot On!

@rampartranger7749 Год назад

I would point out that in the 1950’s and 1960’s was commonly referred to as “The Age of Nationalism” because former colonies were becoming independent nations. So all of us that “leaned liberal” loved the term.

@franekspeak953 Год назад

There is another term out there and it's 'PATRIOTISM', which is almost an equivalent. I just realised that in the US no one is calling themselves nationalists and almost everyone is claiming to be a patriot - is brilliant as there's absolutely no bad connotation to this word! There might be a slight meaning difference as patriotism implies the state while nationalism - a nation (which used to be interpreted as race during II WW). In the end the practical use is the same so why don't we switch to the more positive word?