A car burglary where a cellphone and a gun were stolen lead police to a house in Homestead but how they treated the homeowner is the source of an investigation.
Lol your just focusing on the negative the found the stolen phone in his possession that mean he is the o e that broke in the car he is trying to play dictum and you're falling for it
Almost ALL take it personally, like it's some kind of personal insult you're throwing thier way. It's sad that they are all on a power trip in this way
I mean, in this case, the guy is probably guilty, seeing that he had the stolen property in his possession but regardless, it is every single legal citizen or immigrants right to exercise their rights to not speak without his lawyer present. That's all of our right
Total horse crap. The cops are there to do a job not to make you feel nice. You’re supposed to cooperate with the police and answer their questions. If you’re innocent you have nothing to worry about.
Big mistake challenging authority and standing up for your rights in this country. It’s like finding yourself suddenly in the midst of a pack of snarling dogs.
@@curiousgeorge5992 I beg to differ. 1776 was mostly about entitled white wealthy men who thought they could enrich themselves considerably by being traitors to their own country; doing a wholesale land grab by forming a new country out of whole cloth (second theft; first was colonist of various sorts and origins taking away the land from the indigenous population) and setting up a system (constitution) that would be at their beck and call. It seems to have worked for the most part, until it doesn't anymore as we are witnessing the demise of the planet (climate change, unending war, nuke weapons). Greed and avarice eventually catches up with oneself, though it may take generations, such is the grace of nature. Ultimately, though, there's there's no free lunch and payment is coming due.
@@theshadow5800 Wow, you've really bought the leftist narrative hook line and sinker. You have literally been brainwashed. If only you knew the truth of the pure evil you enable by supporting so called "democrats" (real life global supervillains)
Warrant doesn’t need to be on hand. Just had to be one signed by the judge. They don’t have to have the paper copy in hand in many many states and cities
@@magicmillhouse9586 yes they need a paper warrant to enter your home. They do not need a paper arrest warrant to arrest you, but they must provide a copy of the search warrant at time of service.
"The stolen phone was in his possession" Of course it was. That was why he called THE OWNER of the phone AFTER his father found it discarded, while walking the neighborhood. He talked with the owner of the cellphone, to return it to him and was treated like this? Guess stuff will just have to stay where it lays, if this is the response for being helpful to strangers.
The news some how didn't include the part where the homeowner called the owner of the cellphone. Also, how are police able to give that update if they "can't talk about an ongoing investigation".
It's amazing how the police were able to give the news an update and say it was about a stolen gun and the cell phone being in the guy's possession. I thought police couldn't talk about an ongoing investigation?
@@kyleperrett3198 There were a lot of other commentors on the other threads that said the Father in law, had found the stolen phone that was ditched by the thief and he gave the phone to his Son in law (Steven Schmidt) who had already got a hold of the cell phones owner about his phone being found, but the original owner of the phone had already pinged it to that address, so that's why the cops showed up there, while the real perpetrator is still out there with the gun!... 🤯
@@_A4A yet none of that was shown or said. And as of now that could just be speculation because one person can make multiple accounts for comments. (I suspect yelp has that issue). It’s very hard for me to believe people on the internet, for well obvious reason. Second why would you automatically say you won’t answer any questions as soon as you here the word burglary. Like what got stolen? Why are you here? Haven’t seen you knock on anyone else’s door. His dad found the phone and gave it to him, convenient excuse. What did the dad say? What kind of phone was it? A lot of questions are there that aren’t answered unless of course you wish to believe the internet without verifying.
Rule.#1 Don't answer the door when cops knock. If you do, that means you are complying to a conversation with them. Then they can control you through threats of violence or unlawful arrest.
That is false. Answering the door does not in any way say you are "complying to a conversation with them" and such a thing does not even exist (legally speaking). If you open your door and want to close it again, you may certainly do that. You have not given up any rights by opening the door. I do agree with the idea and I never open my door for anyone unless i have invited someone to my home and am expecting them. The way you say it, makes it sound like if someone opens their door then they now have a legal obligation to answer questions. Not true.
"I'll answer when I want to... Shut up!" Why do cops still ask, "Why don't you like/respect cops?" This, right here, this kinda thing, this disrespect.
From what I understand and what this report fails to mention is that this man's Father in law found the phone on the ground while he was out walking and that this man had called the owner of the phone so he could return the phone that had been found and the owner of the phone agreed to meet in a public place and that is how this man was brought into a robbery investigation and immediately being treated suspiciously and his very pregnant wife being treated rudely and incorrectly and the police acting incorrectly and being ignorant POS and now these people have to deal with people not knowing the entire correct story immediately assuming and labeling him a criminal all because he returned a found phone and invoked his right to not talk which is not only what he is allowed to do but also the smart thing to do . He had no idea the phone was stolen when he called the owner to return something his Father in law had found and it certainly doesnt make any sense that he had stolen it only to call the owner to return it .
Except the guy in the video who the police were questioning had the phone the whole time and never admitted it and only after the police left got scared and called the owner and wanted to return it. Very suspicious.
This homeowner needs to get a civil attorney and go that direction. This is coming from a retired police officer. Whether you're innocent or allegedly guilty of anything always invoke your fifth, even if threat of arrest or if they arrest you. Cops questions are answered through attorneys and through the court system only.
thank you for your objectivity here. Curious - not sure how long you're retired, but - do you see a difference in policing now vs. when you first joined? along the way? at retirement? I'm 41 and I'm disgusted with the state of "policing" in general. When I was a kid I used to want to be a cop. Now I cant stand to even see one just out and about. Makes me sick to my stomach knowing how many people are needlessly harrassed and victimized by the government monopoly on violence.
This video is the reason why the public don't trust the police. They would rather accuse whoever than admit they were wrong. That in it itself is disturbing to start with.
Correct. But, his wife does come home later in the video, and they block her out of the driveway and stuff. So there is a good chance it would be inevitable he would have to deal with them.
Bro, did you finish watching the video? the dude did have the stolen cell phone in his possession, a car was broken into in a gun and a phone was stolen and phone was found in his possession, so the officers were correct in their suspicions
If I could replay something I saw a cop do once... you wouldn't believe it.... I wouldn't help a cop for nothing...let em burn...they think everyone is a criminal but them, then they proceed to be criminals...we all know it..
The biggest mistake you made was walking out when they knocked on your door. Leave it locked, leave everything locked and don't answer it...unless they have a warrant they can't come in. If they're doing an investigation without a warrant it means they don't even have enough probable cause to charge you with a crime and are trying to talk to you to establish that probable cause. Never helped police put you in jail.
I would like to know how the police can stop a resident from entering their home because they're waiting for a warrant? Until they get a warrant they have no authority over a private dwelling.
If they are able to get you outside of the thresh hold.. Meaning outside the front door.. They can detain the property until said search warrant shows up physically.. Yet if you are inside the residence they cannot come in to make you exit the residence.. They should not be able to approach a residence until they have a physical search warrant.. 🐧
About a year ago I was given a fake 50usd bill in change from a either a restaurant or gas station(still not sure). I in turn tried to spend. "Simply cooperating" and answering questions was the dumbest thing I could have done. The police aren't your friends. They don't give you the benefit of the doubt particularly when it's your word against a business. Silence is being prudent not admitting doubt.
@@Dodgers-sw2uk Except they don't. It hasn't been determined that he was involved in the armed car burglary (the article's term, not mine), and he returned to the phone to the victim. As far as I could tell, he is no longer a suspect and not being charged with anything.
“Please articulate that.” “I don’t have to.” Uh, yes you do. WTF?! “You guys need to identify yourselves.” “Shut up.” Law enforcement doesn’t give AF about constitutional rights, laws, policies, or people of color. This is the perfect example of that.
@Bill Dundie Of course not you pathetic POS. They however should know and follow their own policies and the laws that they are required to uphold. You’re making the point for me, that they don’t know how to do their jobs correctly. Way to defend thugs with badges blatantly ignoring constitutional rights, policies and laws. Educate yourself and stop reacting to your fragile emotions. Learn how to cope.
@Bill Dundie You don't have to be the one who wrote the policy to follow it. Police have to tell you why they are questioning, detaining, or arresting you, they can't just tell you to shut up or say they don't have to. The same goes for identifying themselves, they have to do it.
Guilty until proven innocent these days. End qualified immunity and make law enforcement carry their own individual insurance so their county stops paying for their mistakes. At the end it’s the cop that misbehaves and the local taxpayers are paying their lawsuits off. Nothing will change until they’re held more accountable for their actions just like everyone else is.
If you had a burglary in that street there's no way that you are going to be relaxing in the front garden 100 yards away. I would expect the burglar to flee the scene and to get as far as possible away.
Never answer the door when cops knock. They don't care that what they're doing is wrong or arresting the wrong person, they just need to arrest someone, anyone.
“Internal review” I can see it now…….” While the conduct and verbiage of these officers may seem unbecoming, and mysterious disciplinary actions have been taken, we have determined their was no real wrong doing and any further action will not be taken.”
Which is why civil rights violations should automatically be charged under criminal law instead of making us pay 10 20 30k in attorney fees to end up settling and them averting admitting wrong doing. Bootlickers out there say if we do that then cops cant do their job how is it they can function while having accountability for their actions it's just beyond me
In the comfort of my bed and reading about encounter with the police scares me because even if you are an angel anything can happen. I mean anything. Please put more of this out there. I am sure it will check the droves of migrants coming your way.
The bad part is when outside people investigate this, the police denied there was any records pertaining to this incident, even when presented with the date, time, and address. They refused to release body cam and other public records. Then tried to blame it on erroneous information in the FOIA request. More corruption covering for their fellow thugs with badges. Pathetic.
The only started the investigation after the video and people like lackluster started sending freedom of information act requests they are using the investigation to block transparency
They only investigated after lackluster started pushing them and requesting records and we messaged the leader of the Florida police state ron desantis
they cant be taught....if u get your certificate and still don't know Miranda...then you are a moron...kids know more about rights than these gangs in blue.. Still, go home and get paid and benefit and pension from this...
I like how the police gave extra information at the very last minute, to scam the reporter into not also disclosing that the "suspect" called the owner of the stolen phone himself to return it.
interesting how you yourself left out the propensity of criminals returning stolen items (usually by selling them back to the owners). A call may have been made to cover the fact that the phone can be traced but was brought to their home. Police are not wrong to investigate. They didnt kill anyone. didnt arrest anyone. Didnt beat anyone. What exactly is your problem with them investigating a crime?
While your right in the sense of they can look into the stolen property, does it really take 6 cops to do that? There had to be more to this than what's being shown.
Cops: we've investigated ourselves & as usual have found we did nothing wrong. Never, ever, ever open your door for police if you didn't call them! Never!
@@zoultronzoultron9723 true, true but thieves aren't usually wearing costumes/uniforms that ID them as thieves. If I'm not expecting anyone, I don't answer the door. I'm 61 & though my dose of grumpy is pretty high I'm not as strong as I used to be. I'm nearly never in a mood to wrestle somebody over my few valuables so I keep my kinetic security device near to hand & holding the high velocity projectiles that tend to deter would-be thieves, nosy cops & ppl pushing their brand of religion (shudder).
@@zoultronzoultron9723 even more reason not to open the door! The story as I understand it was that the father of the guy in the video found the phone while on a walk in the park. He asked his son what to do & the son was attempting to find the phone owner's info on the phone. In the meantime, he got infested by cops. You saw the rest on the video. And I say again, never, never ever open your door for the cops if you didn't call them. And even if you did call them consider communicating via a nearby window or something. If you open the door they have a tendency to stick their foot into the frame which prevents you closing it. If you touch them even a brush past them you'll be arrested for assaulting a police officer. Never open the door & don't talk to them either. Don't believe me? Ask any lawyer. Any of them. Stay safe & don't talk or open your door for them. Peace
@@selenepickins4874 I know not to answer a door . I’m with you on that but remember criminal’s don’t think straight in the first place . U actually believe the story he has ? Even in this report it says he didn’t try to call the actual owner of the phone till after police showed up .
It's amazing how the police were able to give the news an update and say it was about a stolen gun and the cell phone being in the guy's possession. I thought police couldn't talk about an ongoing investigation?
Actually we live in a country where you are guilty till proven innocent. You will just sit in jail while waiting for your trial if you have no money for bond.
That's why you don't respect the justice system and always vote not guilty when blackmailed into jury duty. Only vote guilty if it's a cop, judge or lawyer on trial
3 rights everyone should know and use when talking to the police. 1st, 4th and 5th Amendments of which the 5th is the one you should always invoke. "You have the RIGHT to remain silent" (5th) do not talk, do not answer ANY questions. You are under no obligation to assist the police in their investigation. The more you say, the more they use against you. Say nada, nothing, zero and if possible, record the interaction ( 1st ). Back the blue until it happens to you.
The reason why cops get mad when people know their rights is because now they actually have to work. If they really want to investigate 🔎....WORK!! AHHHH!
I love how the news makes it sound like he stole the items. This could be further from the truth. How awful of this reporter. He should be sued for slander!
@@wwaynemcg You're watching a click bait video. They got you! 🤣 Look up the whole story. The "suspect" contacted the owner of the phone earlier. Letting the owner know he found the phone. Thanks so much for being a nice guy, right? Now the police come along and try to violate our 4th, 5th and 6th Amendment. The trifecta! Hey, why even believe me? Look it up! Smh. Lesson here is that police need more than 26 weeks of training. Should be a minimum of 2 years before you can put someone's life in your hands.🤔
@@donleon8879 I wouldnt trust most cops as far as I can throw them, the guy had the phone they were looking for, suppsedly. The guy said they came to his house and there was video of it
@@natedasaint That is very possible. It is somewhat common for thieves to make contact, with victim, to return certain items or sell them back to the original owner and use a "I found it" type of thing. In this case, perhaps the father came home, learned his son stole the items, called his son an idiot for bringing the phone home, as they can be traced to an address, and dug his kid out a prison term by calling (IE covering) for his son that the phone was "found". People do need to realize that just because the police investigate, without an arrest, does not mean they are wrong to investigate.
WOW !! Invoking your rights gets you a automatic your guilty! They laughed at identifying themselves and when he asked them to articulate the reason for them being there he said I’ll answer questions if I want to just like you don’t want to talk .. 🤦🏻♂️he is a private citizen your a public servants. One that is held to higher standards at all times!! People wonder why there is a huge distrust and dislike for the majority of cops!
@@maruraba1478 isn't it funny how the exact person that the cops went to and did up later on mysteriously "finding the cell phone"....... Funny how it always works out that way huh? 🤦🏼
Why is it so hard for police to talk in a cordial civil manner. Share information why they are there and their concerns. I feel people would be more receptive to answering their questions.
Everyone just needs to learn the lesson that you NEVER talk to the police and you NEVER answer their questions. It CAN NOT BENEFIT YOU. It can seriously hurt you.
Because people take those jobs to act that very way. Theres no accountability in policing theres an officer on New York with 45 lawsuits in ten years costing the city 100s of thousands he is in a leadership position making 6 figures still even when caught nothing happens. They have to kill or seriously injure someone before a DA will even think about pressing charges.
Uh had the phone stolen from a car? How did he come across that exactly? The police are looking into the officers demeanor?? How about looking into how he got the cell phone and where the freaking gun is?
You must not be from S. Fla, a stupid teen steals a few things and possibly at gun point. Then cousins baby momas lil brother sold you a cellphone for a good deal on local market. Then you get the KNOCK.
His Father-in-law found the phone while walking through their neighborhood. The guy was leaving his house to return the phone to the owner whom he had called and agreed to meet with the phone.
@@daniellebarker7667 That was their story and no, he didn't call the owner of the phone until 4+ hours after this video of his police interaction. He knew he had the phone when the police were on his doorstep and he said nothing which should tell you something. Read the police report...the guy's a thief.
Yet those cops if asked would have no clue why ppl hate them They act more like thugs not peace officers How are we to respect them when they act like that?
He had the stolen property so how wrong where they for going there? Clearly dude wasn't answering just to be annoying he wasn't answering because he knew he did it
From this same news channels article. "They said the incident began with an armed car burglary in the early morning hours of Jan. 15. During the burglary, a gun and a cellphone were taken. Police said they were contacted by the owner of the car who said he was tracking his cellphone to the area of the 100 block of S.E. 33rd Place. According to police, officers went to the location where the stolen cellphone was pinging. It led them to an area near Schmidt’s house. That’s when they said they interacted with Schmidt and other residents in the area. On the same date, police said that the victim called them to say that a man had called them from the stolen phone and said he wanted to return it. The victim agreed to meet the caller at a shopping center in Homestead. That’s where Schmidt comes in. Schmidt told the owner of the phone that his father-in-law found the phone on the side of the road while walking through the neighborhood. The stolen cellphone was returned to the man and it was Schmidt who returned the phone, according to police."
YES, and he didn't tell the cops that. Hours later he called the owner of the phone after he got scared from the police visit and offered to return the phone. He's a thief!
@@Tijuanabill Wrong. The call was made four hours after the cops went to his house which is why the cops were present when he (phone thief) showed up with the phone at the meet location to give back to the owner.
I just went through the same thing. I was bullied, threatened and finally cuffed when I chose not to speak to them. I am sooo Flippin angry and I am amazed that they arrested me for not answering their questions. I was sober, which I had to take a field sobriety test, as well as another one when I got to the station. Both showed I was sober. So basically the cops came over to me and peppered me with questions I didn't want to answer and then I was arrested for non- compliance.. I was only sitting at an outdoor Cafe drinking my coffee as alone.
@@Dante-tk7gb You didn't really mean all police? Or you don't really think cities become hell holes without any law enforcement? Because it's not like there aren't examples.
@@patrickgalban1110 put the pipe down a lot of people do. There are tons of sellers that sell them for a reason there is a huge market - Who is dumb enough to not know that? Just look at a local online market over 2 thousand current ads where I live. You cant really be that stupid?
@@tomr3422 he is in possession of stolen property, that is illegal, the right thing to do would be to cooperate and tell the police who he bought it from.
The statute for possession of stolen property requires knowledge and intent. When you call the owner of the phone, it sort of negates the intent element of the crime, don't you think? (The phone was found by his father in law, and the owner knew this guy had it, before these cops arrived.)
WTF? I think the homeowner acted within his rights and was more professional than the cops. I am amazed at the homeowners composure and demeanor! What if the homeowner didn't open the door fast enough - for instance if he was in his bathroom or napping. Were the police going to barge inside his house? Can you imagine if the homeowner did not have a home surveillance system? Geez Louise!
I’m amazed at the cops responding en masse to a house over a cell phone. My house was burglarized and everything stolen and 1 cop came hours after I reported it to say they couldn’t do anything.
His father-in-law found the phone along the side of the road and was able to contact the owner before this incident to return it but police had pinged the phone to that location and wanted to intimidate the family for answers as to how they got the phone. It's in another news story
Telling him to SHUT UP when he is politely asking questions they are DISGUSTING AND DISGRACE TO THOSE LAW ENFORCEMENT WHO ARE POLITE AND DO ANSWER QUESTIONS EVEN WHEN THE PERSON IS BEING DETAINED FOR REALLY NO REASON. HE HAD HIS BELONGINGS IN HIS CAR AND IT WAS HIS FIREARM WHICH IS A MAJOR SITUATION AND THEN HIS CELL PHONE WAS STOLEN TOO. I THINK THESE OFFICERS WERE DISGUSTING. THE ONE TALKING TO THE MAN IN A DISRESPECTING WAY WASNT EVEN STOPPED BY HIS PARTNER.
Your crazy clean your ears out that man had a phone that’s linked to a stolen gun and he’s clearly playing the victim . The cops are doing there job . Next time something happens to you and your in need off 911 . Call your momma
@@chrissinclair4442 TLDR he found it and called the owner trying to return it. The rest of the story that you were not given is below. According to police, officers went to the location where the stolen cellphone was pinging. It led them to an area near Schmidt’s house. That’s when they said they interacted with Schmidt and other residents in the area. On the same date, police said that the victim called them to say that a man had called them from the stolen phone and said he wanted to return it. The victim agreed to meet the caller at a shopping center in Homestead. That’s where Schmidt comes in. Schmidt told the owner of the phone that his father-in-law found the phone on the side of the road while walking through the neighborhood. The stolen cellphone was returned to the man and it was Schmidt who returned the phone, according to police.
One of the most dangerous item in the world is a cell phone just finding one could change your life forever false accusations and lawsuits and if a crime was committed and the phone was pinged and in your possession, you can and will be implicated!
There have been multiple stories like this where someone picked up a phone on the ground in front of a business and started asking around to see whose phone it was and ended up with a "police encounter". Just leave it on the ground.
Very poor handling of the situation by the police. This is one of the main reasons we need federal oversight in the local police departments. No more chiefs of police. Every officer must report to a federal review board!
The last thing we need is federalized local police. It would be an absolute fustercluck. Especially when politics started to seep into it as is the norm when the federal government puts their nose anywhere it shouldn’t be.
No shame to this guys' game...The phone pinned at that address..."Bingo"!...What are these criminals thinking?...What was the purpose of him making this theater act, to embarrass himself and family like this?...I don't get it...
Some people like to make up stuff and think its facts. Funny that you think standing up for your rights is a "theater act". You just embarras yourself and family
@@Rose-pl5jj I am just going off of what is common sense and the report. The guy didn't get arrested, no search warrant, this tiff happens all the time most cop just come out and tell you why they are there instead of being stupid. I used to repair phones in my spare time, I got a knock at the door and they said they wanted me too come out and talk to them they told me I invited them in showed them they phone told them they guys info they left it called the guy and he got the phone off craigslist, sent me the txt I told him to call pad and he did.
Go back in the house, call 911 give them your address and request a supervisor. However if a cop knocked on my door and they were investigating a burglary, I would simply show them my ID with my picture and then ask who called in the alleged crime. When all was said and done I would’ve thanked them for coming to check it out, as that is their job.
another commenter said that the father-in-law was walking the dog or jogging and found the phone laying on the ground. He gave it to the guy in the video (his son-in-law) who turned it on and contacted the owner maybe thru Facebook, Twitter or Instagram and said we found your phone on the ground. You can meet me at Starbucks to pick it up at this place and time. He didn't ask for any reward money or anything. All the dude needed to do was come get it later on that day. But instead of doing that I guess the owner of the phone tracked it's location and called police. From what I understand the guy wasn't charged with burglary because I guess his story checked out. Also what thief is gonna return a phone for free and let the person he stole it from see his face? Doesn't make sense.
If you open the door the officers will force their way in and claim they didn't need a warrant because you "invited them in. Even if you only open it a crack they will stick their foot in it. If you try to close the door then they will push in and arrest you for "assaulting an officer". If you don't try to close it they will tell you to "step back" for "crowding the officer" then when you do they will push the door the rest of the way open and enter the house. Once inside they can rip the house apart searching without a warrant. Most people have no clue what a mess the courts have made of innocent peoples' search and seizure protections.
Funny how the news failed to mention how the department tried to cover up the incident by claiming that there was no body cam or documentation when people tried to put in foia requests for that day and address
@@zoultronzoultron9723 He wasn’t a thief. Apparently his father found the phone on the sidewalk, took it home to his son (who knew more about how phones work than his old man did). By the time the police arrived, the son had _already_ contacted the owner to try to return it to them. Meanwhile the police come looking for the phone at the address it had been pinged at. If he was actually a thief, the police would have charged him with a crime and arrested him. And the police would have released a statement to the news media saying that he had been charged. Instead they merely mentioned that the phone was in his possession, to try to make him look bad on the news even though they had no evidence to charge him.
Waaaah, I’m a criminal and they didn’t treat me with respect, waaaah...must be just a coincidence he had the stolen phone they were looking for. Now flip his home until they recover the gun....guilty, throw this punk under the jail
🙄🤔.. "After a few minutes they just up and left without offering any explanation.."--because they realized that they had committed a major balls-up. Whenever police show up at your front door and insist on asking you questions--which they aren't supposed to do without Mirandizing you first--without explaining how or why they ended up at your address, that usually means that they are acting upon bad info, which they realize partway through "the confrontation", and just leave.. A lot of folks don't realize that **you have the legal right** to completely ignore any questions put to you by law enforcement until : A. They specify why you are being accosted and questioned ; B. They place you under arrest, at which point they are **required** to Mirandize you..
This is why the people in communities need to be able to have more control over who is wearing a badge and a gun amongst them..over top of police cheifs and mayor's and governors..if the people had more control over this they might not hatre cops so much..
@@HomeSkillit or maybe not treated like dirt by people you are playing to protect you..I seem to be much older and wiser than you..I worked in the personal protection business for sometime and have personally witnessed bad cops in action..most are on a major power trip and believe people are beneath them..and can't wait to get their gun out..
@@jojobaker1764 you are the ignorant and arrogant one. So, you, a security guard and most likely a wannabe cop, is judging the police. I saw the video and I do not think that the police acted poorly, they were investigating a crime. And, so you think that you are " much older and wiser"? There are two jobs that way too many people think they know how to do: One is a NFL coach and the other is a police officer. If I were you I would stick to coaching football.
