Тёмный
No video :(

How Does LaserDisc Work and Why Did It Fail? 

Snazzy Labs
Подписаться 1,2 млн
Просмотров 79 тыс.
50% 1

LaserDisc was the incredible format that never took off. The problem? The technology was just simply too ahead-of-its-time. What could have been the world's most important format until the DVD died off because of high prices and inadequate global distribution. Learn more about the history and technology of LaserDisc.

Опубликовано:

 

27 авг 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 309   
@austinevans
@austinevans 9 лет назад
I had heard of LaserDisc before but never really knew much about it. Great video dude!
@xXTheNextKillerxX
@xXTheNextKillerxX 9 лет назад
Aye Austin what's up?
@stellar022
@stellar022 9 лет назад
Wutttt austin commenting on a snazzy video? HYPE
@LuisGomez96
@LuisGomez96 9 лет назад
Austin Evans The hype Is real.
@snazzy
@snazzy 9 лет назад
Thanks, good sir!
@TheRosemontag
@TheRosemontag 8 лет назад
+Austin Evans Me too I've always seen the Laser Disc player, but never the actual discs.
@TLD
@TLD 9 лет назад
Awesome man!
@snazzy
@snazzy 9 лет назад
***** Thanks Jon!
@CarlosDeBernardMrAgapi
@CarlosDeBernardMrAgapi 9 лет назад
***** hahahaha I still have a player of those. I thing mine is pioneer and still works
@youngatom
@youngatom 7 лет назад
I also have a Pioneer and I use it often because I have some great movies. The sound quality is great, but maybe I am stuck in the seventy's
@transtremm
@transtremm 8 лет назад
You forgot something VERY IMPORTANT, you could record on a VHS tape, but not onto a laser disc. That is the reason why few people purchased laserdisc players. DVR eventually killed the VCR.
@michaeldickens1101
@michaeldickens1101 8 лет назад
You could actually burn LaserDiscs in the same way that you can burn CDs, DVDs and Blu-Rays today, so in a way, it was possible to record on LaserDiscs, problem is it had the same compatibility pitfalls as CD-R/RWs did, so you couldn't always rely on a burned LD-R playing on your LD player Also, unlike commercially stamped LaserDiscs, LD-Rs came in a caddy-like device, and as far as I remember, it could not be removed from the caddy unless you purposely broke the caddy to remove it, so you needed a player that was LD-R compatible and could accept caddies On top of all that, LD-R burners/recorders were cost prohibitive for the residential market, and were difficult to operate, not to mention huge (not something you would replace a VCR with), so they were not very popular, and afaik were not even sold in stores
@johntate4638
@johntate4638 8 лет назад
+transtremm You are so right and I jumped on DVD recorders when they came out, but I soon switched to using My PC for all media and still do so this day. I got a LD for my 12th birthday and it was cool. I had an awesome Pioneer Stereo receiver and speakers to go with it. The novelty wore off quick though and soon girls and sports took my attention away. I was always a nerd, but turned into a jock. I am a nerd again. Might as well learn and better yourself if you aren't getting laid. lol
@Edubarca46
@Edubarca46 5 лет назад
It was EXACTLY THE SAME with vinyl records. You couldn't record on them That is why it has live side by side with tape, being cassette, 8 track or open reel so vinyls could be recorded. Laserdisc lived side by side with the terrible VHS and the better Beta but mostly for bad marketing decisions, it was not as popular as videotape. A pity because it had several advantages over DVD let alone videotape. But that's life.
@joeyclemenza7339
@joeyclemenza7339 4 года назад
transtremm and streaming killed everything else
@dancarlin5434
@dancarlin5434 4 года назад
LD recorders were actually a thing, the problems however was the obscene price they comanded and the lack of decent availability for blank discs.
@alfredoizg789
@alfredoizg789 9 лет назад
This why I love this channel you are all over the place with tech old and new , your channel is remarkable :) great job
@snazzy
@snazzy 9 лет назад
Alfredo Izg Thanks Alfredo!
@tookitogo
@tookitogo 7 лет назад
So many little mistakes in this video... The biggest outright error is claiming the DVD didn't originally support Dolby Digital. This is just wrong. In fact, a Dolby Digital decoder is mandatory according to the DVD standard, together with PCM.
@tookitogo
@tookitogo 4 года назад
Daniel Kufer Eh, I don’t think I agree with you there. I think that to most consumers, it very much was video disc vs video tape, and by the time the cost had come down enough to be relevant to most households, it had boiled down to VHS vs LD, with everything else having lost the race
@dancarlin5434
@dancarlin5434 4 года назад
Incorrect, Dolby Digital was added some 2 years later when the standard was officially adopted, I worked in the industry at the time.
@tookitogo
@tookitogo 4 года назад
Dan Carlin Then it is correct, insofar as DVD players without DD support were never sold. What happened before the standard was finalized is irrelevant.
@dancarlin5434
@dancarlin5434 4 года назад
@@tookitogo many were made that originally did not support Dolby Digital.
@tookitogo
@tookitogo 4 года назад
Dan Carlin Not according to Dolby Labs, as well as every other source I’ve been able to locate. Everything confirms that DD has been mandatory on players from day 1. Plenty of discs without DD soundtracks have been sold, but not players.
@GlaciatorGaming
@GlaciatorGaming 8 лет назад
VHS vs Beta-max Not hipster enough Film vs Theater Better.
@Scudmaster11
@Scudmaster11 2 года назад
It's film vs tape
@XcaptainXobliviousX
@XcaptainXobliviousX 9 лет назад
You forgot to mention that laser disc produced an HD format 15 years before the tech was replicated by dvd or blu ray!
@joestradamus75
@joestradamus75 9 лет назад
+XcaptainXobliviousX i just recently found out that there was an HD laserdisc. Did you know there was an HD VHS?
@WebVManReturns
@WebVManReturns 8 лет назад
+joestradamus75 I knew about HD VHS. They used a lot more images of film, but ran faster so you had shorter play times on each tape.
@michaeldickens1101
@michaeldickens1101 8 лет назад
+joestradamus75 I think it was called D-Theater, though it used the VHS format and was backwards compatible with regular VHS tapes
@benji888578
@benji888578 6 лет назад
The LaserDisc HD format was primarily in Japan, based on the Muse Hi-Vision 5:3 1080i analog system. It fizzled out when the current digital HDTV 16:9 became standard.
@dancarlin5434
@dancarlin5434 4 года назад
This is accurate, also note japan had 1080P years before the west, it was very costly however.
@dancarlin5434
@dancarlin5434 9 лет назад
I still have my LD Player.
@dancarlin5434
@dancarlin5434 4 года назад
@Rising General LD's in working condition are difficult to find these days
@dancarlin5434
@dancarlin5434 4 года назад
@Rising General LD's are randomly subject to "Laser Rot" vhs is not.
@kingcrimson234
@kingcrimson234 3 года назад
I still watch Laserdiscs several times a week. I refuse to get rid of my collection. I'll own it until I die!
@howellwong11
@howellwong11 3 года назад
I haven't played mine for years, but it is still kept on standby power. I hope lubrication is not required.
@ThePowerPCHub
@ThePowerPCHub 9 лет назад
Another immensely interesting video. You've been killing it lately dude. Keep it up!
@snazzy
@snazzy 9 лет назад
***** Thanks so much! Kind words. :D
@Linuxguideontheair
@Linuxguideontheair 9 лет назад
Ayy
@UNAL0504
@UNAL0504 9 лет назад
20 years for a format its not bad .Did it fail, i don t think so.
@TheMediaHoarder
@TheMediaHoarder 7 лет назад
Some good info here, but info at 6:00 is wrong- DVD had 5.1 Dolby Digital from the very beginning. DTS was added a few months later. Many of the first DVDs had 5.1 mixes that hadn't been available on laserdisc. I didn't even get my first DVD player until I could also upgrade to a 5.1 sound system, as without one I'd be hearing the 5.1 tracks mixed down.
@kit6041
@kit6041 8 лет назад
I've heard people say that LaserDiscs were analogue before but I never heard someone explain how that was so. thank you
@steverobert1
@steverobert1 8 лет назад
Good video. I own e a pioneer Laserdisc player and 70+ discs.
@TimurTripp2
@TimurTripp2 5 лет назад
Since this video was made, others have pointed out that the ability to record to VHS was what made it more popular than LaserDisc in the early '80s, in reality the price of both the players and the discs was competitive with VHS at the time (this would change later on partly as a consequence of VHS already being far more popular). And since many already had or wanted VCRs for recording live TV broadcasts, there was little incentive to also buy a new LaserDisc player for slightly better video and audio quality on prerecorded discs.
@canoopsy
@canoopsy 9 лет назад
Great video Quinn, thanks for all the info!
@artl52
@artl52 7 лет назад
Nicely done video. I still have dozens of discs I bought in the early-mid 1980s and two players - one is the first the Pioneer VP1000.
@BrendanKOD
@BrendanKOD 3 года назад
Actually the earliest laserdisk players were a little cheaper than the VCR's they were competing with. But in point of fact, they weren't competing, because while Laserdisks were being sold to play movies you buy, VCR's were being sold to record TV shows and especially football games to be watched later. So for the early 80's consumer, a laserdisk was a device that would see occasional use to watch movies you've bought to add to your collection, while a VCR could see near daily use letting you watch that one beloved TV show that was airing in a very inconvenient timeslot.
@nazhif1
@nazhif1 9 лет назад
I still have my dad's old Pioneer CLD-D702 player. It's actually a Laser Disc AND CD player. And I remember watching Antz on it when I was like 5
@snazzy
@snazzy 9 лет назад
nazhif1 Yup. Those were neat!
@claytonberg721
@claytonberg721 4 года назад
I had the CLD S201. It didn't output 5.1 or DTS, but at the time when I bought it 5.1 was a very high end thing and not many people were running it. It also had a dedicated cd tray, it was bascially the stripped down version of the CLD-d702. I got a lot of enjoyment out of that machine.
@JacobVossFilms
@JacobVossFilms 9 лет назад
My dad has a collection of like 50 of these, pretty cool to hear the history. He even had a Pioneer player (although his was a consumer version).
@fireup081
@fireup081 9 лет назад
Jacob Voss Is it one of those that plays both LDs and audio CDs, because I still have it till this day.
@andymcroon
@andymcroon 5 лет назад
I'm still so in love with the LaserDisc format. It is still being used by people who are into fanres as some of those discs are very well mastered in terms of colour and brightness. A very good example is the Laserdisc version of the movie The Thing that was used as reference for colorgrading a fen restoration version. Something you didn't mention is that LaserDisc was used in a wide variety of arcade games with one of the most poplular titles being Dragon's Lair. Now laserdisc wasn't the first attempt to put video on a disk. Prior to laserdisc there was actually video on vinyl. It is still a mystery to me that laserdisc survived for this long being from the late 70s upto the early 2K's. And yes, it also had a high vision version (more or less an HD verion) but only in Japan. The popularity of the format was also there because of it's introduction to special edition of movies. It was the only format you could get content on that was displayed in widescreen or letterbox. It is of no surprise to me that more of the pro laserdisc players are still very expensive. For a video and mediabuff, this is a format to own. It shaped the way we now consume digital entertainment.
@smwsmwsmw
@smwsmwsmw 6 лет назад
Contrary to what was said in the video, Pioneer was actually pretty well known in the 1970s for their audio equipment line, in Japan and actually throughout the world.
@MAXIVINILElCanaldelVinilo
@MAXIVINILElCanaldelVinilo 8 лет назад
Hi. Can you tell me what video camera use to do this videos? Thanks!
@coolspot18
@coolspot18 8 лет назад
This is a great history of LaserDisc! I was blown away by it when I was a kid - truly futuristic for its time. Also, a lot of early DVDs were actually remasters of LaserDisc releases ... purists would prefer the LaserDisc version because there would be video degradation when it was converted to DVD format by the studio. Also, I remember in Canada prices for LaserDiscs were >$80 - $100 in the early 90s? That was probably around $50USD+?
@cubdukat
@cubdukat Год назад
Especially the first version of "Twister." A lot of the reviews knocked the DVD version because of the encoding. The early encoders were easily fooled by things like film grain and the wind storms in "Twister." Audio-wise, though, it at least matched the Dolby Digital track on the LaserDisc.
@Culturedog
@Culturedog 9 лет назад
5.1 surround tracks didn't appear on LD until the mid-90s, but hybrid discs with digital audio (usually with matrix-encoded surround sound) actually hit the market in the 80s.
@jeamelagger
@jeamelagger 9 лет назад
you really know how to fill up a technology channel. great content man, I've been subscribed since 2011 and I'm glad to watch the channel take off again
@snazzy
@snazzy 9 лет назад
jeamelagger Thanks a million for your support!
@Decrepit_Productions
@Decrepit_Productions 8 лет назад
I still have my Pioneer CLD 3030 player and a good number of disks. In fact I watched the 1935 'Bride of Frankenstein' on laserdisc just prior to supper today. This was the first time I viewed it since being able to upscale LDs to 1080p (via a Pioneer A/V receiver). Image quality was very nice, exceeding my expectations, especially since my disk is an old 1985 MCA Encore Edition pressing that, so far as I know, received no sort of special treatment. Not a hint of laser rot either. I've watched a decent number of LDs lately. Last week I watched my Criterion Collection King Kong (early sound version), which sports the first ever audio commentary track!
@spendle
@spendle 6 лет назад
My parents have a LaserDisc player, I don't remember it being used that often, but I still have memories of it.
@dylan-nguyen
@dylan-nguyen 3 года назад
Yet here I am baffled that this video is in 4K in 2015 😳
@scottscheetz
@scottscheetz 8 лет назад
Grew up with LaserDiscs. Thanks for the nostalgia! So much better than VHS.
@brettknoss486
@brettknoss486 8 лет назад
Yes, it was a great technology. They problem was that MCA did not release the laserdisc for video rental, at least not early on, and they limited the content. Originally the laserdisc was to be sold like records, while VCR was to be used for playback of tv, an early PVR. People already had VCRs, and shared recorded programs, so an industry formed around pre recorded VHS tapes, and it didn't make sence to buy a laserdisc player.
@KayoMichiels
@KayoMichiels 5 лет назад
8:05 the reason why they where big and bulky was because they are the same size as vinyl records, so that you don't have to develop a new shipping method or even display method (store display).
@param9888
@param9888 6 лет назад
laser disc are the best still have more then 1000+ in my collection
@howellwong11
@howellwong11 3 года назад
It makes my 300 disc collection looks puny. Remember the Criterion Collection?
@d3xbot
@d3xbot 8 лет назад
I like to think that in an alternate universe, LaserDisc became the defacto standard for video and its quality improved such that 4k video with 7.1 high-res audio could be stored on it. Can you imagine a PS4 that used 4k LaserDisc rather than BlueRay?
@michaeldickens1101
@michaeldickens1101 8 лет назад
The discs are a bit unwieldy compared to a Blu-Ray, but it makes you think, how much data, digital or analog, could fit on a LaserDisc using Blu-Ray technology I believe, using both sides of a regular sized LaserDisc, triple layer, using Blu-Ray technology, we could possibly get at least 1TB on one disc
@bigoranget
@bigoranget 3 года назад
Laserdisc being more expensive in the 90s is true but in the early 80s, both the players and discs were typically cheaper than VHS. VHS pre recorded tapes really didn’t become cheaper than laserdisc until the late 1980s.
@jojep1737
@jojep1737 3 года назад
We had this as kids growing up! Thanks for the memories!
@artamussumatra6286
@artamussumatra6286 8 лет назад
Ironically, in the very early days of the format, Laser Discs only cost about $15.00, to $25.00 while the same movies on Beta, and VHS would be anywhere from $50.00 to $120.00. It was definitely the superior format in the pre HDMI SD CRT era, but alas, even the most expensive players eventually only got up to S video outputs, and to really look good on modern HD TVs, you need at least an RGB component output. I'm not sure if newer sets even have those inputs anymore. I have about a hundred LDs, and my player only has composite outs.
@Sanne3D
@Sanne3D 7 лет назад
Laserdisc is just composite video, so there's not really any need to split that beforehand. However a good scaler can do wonders on a modern screen delivering it as yuv rgb hdmi or whatever to your modern setup.
@LuisGomez96
@LuisGomez96 9 лет назад
I'm glad you are back Snazzy Labs! the whole retro videos was what got me hooked to your channel when I first started watching RU-vid videos. Thanks for the content man!
@snazzy
@snazzy 9 лет назад
Luis Gomez Glad to be bring them! Thanks Luis. :D
@Crlarl
@Crlarl 8 лет назад
Can you do a video on CED?
@michaeldickens1101
@michaeldickens1101 8 лет назад
+1, I thought it should have slightly been mentioned in this video as it did technically compete with LaserDisc
@Garvm
@Garvm 4 года назад
Is that because you want to skip the 5 parts os 30 minutes each in the Technology connections channel?
@Crlarl
@Crlarl 4 года назад
@@Garvm Why would I ever want to skip the 5-part "trilogy" epic of Technology Connections? That guy gets way into the weeds and I love it! However, that didn't exist 4 years ago when I commented.
@Garvm
@Garvm 4 года назад
Carl Siemens I didn’t see the time stamp of the comment :)
@BoxOfCurryos
@BoxOfCurryos 9 лет назад
You should do a video on future technology. A few ideas like implants in our optical nerve. Augmented reality helmets and implants. Cybernetics. And wearable tech. I know it's not your style Snazzy but it would be so cool. It's a mix of Science and Tech so I'd totally be watching. With regards from New York!
@b22chris
@b22chris 9 лет назад
BoxOfCurryos Trying to predict the future is a discouraging and hazardous occupation. n.If by some miracle a prophet could describe the future exactly as it was going to take place, his predictions would sound so absurd that everyone would laugh him to scorn. The only thing we can be sure of about the future is that it will be absolutely fantastic. So, if what I say now seems to you to be very reasonable, then I will have failed completely. Only if what I tell you appears absolutely unbelievable have we any chance of visualizing the future as it really will happen.
@BoxOfCurryos
@BoxOfCurryos 9 лет назад
What the fuck are you talking about? Lmao I just want a video on cool future tech. I already study prosthetics and DNA so I know what our future is gonna be like. I already have a plan for this world.
@b22chris
@b22chris 9 лет назад
BoxOfCurryos I was just quoting this guy. And thats pretty awesome that you do that research. I hope you do change the world for the better and I hope your dreams are so far fetched that everyone will laugh at you now only to be biting their tongue when you prove them wrong.
@circuit-studio
@circuit-studio 9 лет назад
Snazzy Labs Awesome video !!!. Pls do this kind of videos more.. Want to know how the technology evolved over time. Very hard to find such videos.
@blackpearl2133
@blackpearl2133 9 лет назад
Great video! I don't ever remember watching LaserDiscs, but I do remember renting VideoDiscs when I was young.
@snazzy
@snazzy 9 лет назад
Jason Deason Thanks for watching, Jason!
@SebisRandomTech
@SebisRandomTech 5 лет назад
I do miss these type of videos, where you focus on tech other than Mac and PC. I’d love to see you bring these kind of videos back, maybe a review of the new Technics SL-1200MK 7!
@solarias2583
@solarias2583 5 лет назад
In reality, the VHS/Betamax vs Laserdisc did end up being a format war of sorts (add in Video2000 for EU countries) initially Laserdisc and VHS/BM weren't in competition. Early cassette based formats did not offer prerecorded media during to this was not their original purpose. The purpose was to time shift (think modern DVR). The reason it didn't catch on was that Home Video was a completely new idea, and one that, at least initially, wasn't worth the price.
@pf5658
@pf5658 4 года назад
I wouldn’t necessarily call laser disc a failure. It was ground breaking technology for its time and better technology eventually came along. You must remember that when this was out it was not cheap and not many normal folks could afford it like the way, say DVD, Blu-ray took off.
@Mike_cuomo
@Mike_cuomo 9 лет назад
Loving the content your putting out man!
@codname125
@codname125 Год назад
I think format wars will still exist just in a different form. These days you have wars between video codecs like VP8 vs. H.264 or VP9 & AV1 vs. H.265
@Wonderlaust
@Wonderlaust 9 лет назад
Wow, same size as an LP. Love these types of videos, a nice surprise in my sub box. Keep it up!
@randomrazr
@randomrazr 9 лет назад
quins videos on my subscription list is always "expect the unexpected" type videos XD
@snazzy
@snazzy 9 лет назад
randomrazr You betcha! :D
@mariogiresi6792
@mariogiresi6792 4 года назад
Good vid, but, I wouldn’t use the word “ failed”. Technology just advanced, and the format was never meant to be recorded on anyway. I purchased my first my player back in 1993 and have built an extensive library since ( luckily before EBay was founded). CDs, DVDs, and now Blu-ray, are all children “of” the laserdisc. Blu-ray is a beautiful and superior format, but nothing replaces the extras you would get with laserdiscs; fold out gate covers, exclusive books, posters, 8x10 glossy photos, cd soundtracks, and limited autographed copies were all worth their prices when compared to the sometimes microscopic liner notes that come with the current formats. I suppose it all comes down to taste and preferences.
@Glooomyy
@Glooomyy 7 лет назад
aye thank you so much for this!! i recently came across some LD's for one of my fav series but had no idea what it was. but now i know and it's REALLY cool!! i'm thinking of getting it now even though i won't be able to play it cause it's just so gosh darn cool!
@CitiesAndColours
@CitiesAndColours 9 лет назад
Great video Quin. Very inciteful. Keep up the great work and more videos along this line would be great. Mini Disc? HD DVD vs Blu-Ray? Digital formats like FLAC vs MP3 or MP4 vs xvid or alike? Could become a great series! Thanks again
@snazzy
@snazzy 9 лет назад
Mikey Ormerod Will do. Thanks a million!
@drumaddict26atGmail
@drumaddict26atGmail 9 лет назад
I LOVE your videos man and the way you respond to your viewers is great, because I imagine it can be a headache. Keep it up the great work!
@garirry
@garirry 9 лет назад
I really like how it looks and somewhat works like a vinyl, but with a CD texture on it. Nice video!
@snazzy
@snazzy 9 лет назад
Garirry Thanks for watching!
@huskerfan4life
@huskerfan4life 11 месяцев назад
Laserdiscs were ahead of their time. I'm surprised they didn't go over better than DVD.
@johntate4638
@johntate4638 8 лет назад
I got a laser disc player for my 12 birthday in 92. It had so much better picture quality and sound and all my friends thought it was cool. Well for a year. I have no idea what I did with the player, but I still have all the movies I bought in that short time.
@zakbutler2683
@zakbutler2683 7 лет назад
a lot of concerts were released on laserdisc, perfect example, most of Tina Turner's concerts are on Laserdisc, and the 1993 documentary The Girl From Nutbush
@cubdukat
@cubdukat Год назад
Concerts were where LaserDisc thrived in the beginning. At least half of the LD market in Japan were concerts and music videos.
@justanotheryoutubechannel
@justanotheryoutubechannel 5 лет назад
I don’t remember any of these, because my family was too luddite-ish to have HD DVD or Blu-Ray, as we were still using VHS, and I was too young for any of the older format wars. But I know about most of them now, and the one I know the best is the VHS vs Betamax Format War, I even know about Video2000, which came third in a two-horse race.
@PragmaticDany
@PragmaticDany 9 лет назад
I the snazzy labs logo there in the wall a printed carboard or a piece of paper after a piece of glass?
@freddyiglesias6110
@freddyiglesias6110 8 лет назад
just bought one today at my local goodwill for 2 bucks!! will look great on my bedroom wall along with my records
@tdcattech
@tdcattech 8 лет назад
Really enjoyed this. Interesting to hear the history. Thanks.
@Elemino
@Elemino 9 лет назад
Excellent video! One of the best run downs on a piece of tech I've seen in a while! I didn't laser disc was analog, but I knew you had to flip them... FM huh? So basically it was like excellent cable from a disc. Good stuff!
@cubdukat
@cubdukat Год назад
Every failure should be this successful.
@thatguyontheright1
@thatguyontheright1 8 лет назад
In the 80s, Laserdisc was cheaper than VHS. In the early days of VHS, a tape would cost $80 to $100, while a laserdisc would be $20...but Laserdisc players were more expensive than a VHS or even a Betamax deck due to more manufacturers producing VHS players which drove the price down. Pricing wasn't the cause of people not buying Laserdisc in America. If that were the case, CED would have had a longer foothold than 4 years since it was considerably cheaper to get a CED player and disks. The main cause was Laserdisc (and CED) was read only at a time when people in the States wanted recordable media, this was not an issue in Japan. This is one big reason why VHS won out over Beta, since VHS could record for 6hrs while Beta was limited to 4-5 hrs. DVD didn't take complete foothold over VHS till affordable set top DVD recorders were available as there were still pre-recorded VHS tapes being produced commercially till 2007 with Borat being the last one.
@zacksstuff
@zacksstuff 7 лет назад
Just bought a Laserdisc at a thrift store for $1.50. I don't have a player, but it looks pretty sweet mounted on the wall.
@tookitogo
@tookitogo 7 лет назад
The other major error is saying that the track on an LD varies in both frequency (distance) and amplitude (height); no, you just said it's FM modulation. That's frequency modulation; the entire point of using FM is to avoid distortion caused by amplitude error. By definition, only the frequency varies, then.
@avihayas20
@avihayas20 8 лет назад
Are there advantages in laser disc compared to a DVD?
@thompsonpatrick79
@thompsonpatrick79 8 лет назад
A lot of laserdisc movies had special features that dvd didn't and audio tracks not accessible via dvd. The only downfall of ld is that it only plays in svideo and you can only really appreciate that on an older crt tv (tube tv) or perhaps a plasma tv
@avihayas20
@avihayas20 8 лет назад
I see... I have led TV and I think it's too much for my Laser Disc player, can I use some special cable to make the view better?
@thompsonpatrick79
@thompsonpatrick79 8 лет назад
+Avihay Asseraf you can try running it through a receiver with hdmi that might upgrade the picture quality or a dvdr recorder/player that has video in and component out
@KRAFTWERK2K6
@KRAFTWERK2K6 8 лет назад
Fullrate DTS (if a disc comes with such a digital track instead of a standard PCM audio soundtrack), no copyprotection, no region locks and NO unskippable menus or trailers. Plus bigger cover artworks and sometimes Bonusmaterial and audiocommentaries that never made it to DVD or Blu-ray, or were only available in a censored form on later homevideo mediums.
@superhavi
@superhavi 8 лет назад
The best way to watch a LD is via composite cable (since the stored video itself is composite) or if you have a "newer" Player like the CLD 925 or the CLD 2950 via RGB-Scart-Cable. S-Video is always the wrong choice, since this cable is not meant for composite video. Also modern LCD-TVs (as of 2010) have better comb-filters, than the earlier ones. Those TVs (and those LD-Players) will show you, that the picture quality of LDs can be nearly as good as of early DVDs.
@Rome.Monroe
@Rome.Monroe 9 лет назад
I'm loving this new format!
@syncmonism
@syncmonism 7 месяцев назад
As far as failures go, this was a pretty good one. It certainly wasn't a complete failure. On an engineering/ technical level, there wasn't really anything inherently wrong with it, and the format WAS popular in some regions, and was in production for over 20 years.
@christianale
@christianale 6 лет назад
One thing i believe you have wrong, are the prices. I started buying Laserdisc in 1991, and by then, Laserdisc were cheaper to buy than VHS in the US. I still have magazines like Billboard, Premiere and Variety with advertising prices. If you wanted to buy a movie in VHS, the regular price was 89.99 dollars, where the same movie in Laserdisc costed 29.99 dollars. (some titles were 39.99 dollars) There where always exceptions, like for blockbusters (for example Terminator 2), VHS prices would be same as Laserdisc.
@magicpickle7621
@magicpickle7621 9 лет назад
Another awesome video! I love your retro reviews!!!
@jonasrasmussen1692
@jonasrasmussen1692 9 лет назад
Really excellent video! Keep up the good work Quinn!
@TianWu
@TianWu 9 лет назад
nice way to end friday haha
@snazzy
@snazzy 9 лет назад
Tian Wu Well thanks! LOL.
@TianWu
@TianWu 9 лет назад
yeah haha ;)
@JonasAndStuffDK95
@JonasAndStuffDK95 9 лет назад
Great video! You're also very good at keeping the viewer hooked. :)
@cengawer
@cengawer 8 лет назад
Very educational video... Learn a lot... Thanks 👍🏻
@MGSBigBoss77
@MGSBigBoss77 8 лет назад
Excellent Laserdisc review man! Think you practically got the best review of Laserdisc out there. Although it would've helped somewhat if you put some videos up as examples or narrated through clips while explaining Laserdisc's advantages over VHS when i was commercially available. But you didn't mentioned Laserdisc's uncompressed superior audio and colour schemes over DVD & Blu-ray. While DVD and Blu-ray have Laserdisc now beat over picture resolution, Laserdisc has the advantage when it came down to its audio quality. I just think you should've highlighted this fact way moreso is all. It also failed in Europe for the exact same reasons you outlined already, again you should've stated this however.
@joestradamus75
@joestradamus75 9 лет назад
there was also different video disc formats. There was a weird one that actually played like a record. I forget what it was called, but the disc player would have a needle actually touch the video disc, and play the movie. I can't remember if the the disc was made of vinyl or some other thing.
@michaeldickens1101
@michaeldickens1101 8 лет назад
You're thinking of CED
@jameslaidler4259
@jameslaidler4259 8 лет назад
The aluminium reflects the pits and lands on the plastic. On the plastic is a layer of protective varnish. So please get that right. CDs were a derivative of Laserdisc technology and use similar, though improved manufacturing techniques. Also laser rot was an issue because the glue used to affix the two sides together would seep through. Google laser rot with The Eraser. That one is an interesting story.
@claytonberg721
@claytonberg721 4 года назад
I used to own one. By that time the hardware wasn't that expensive, I think I paid $300 for mine. Around 1995 it was the only way to watch widescreen. Practically all VHS releases were in 4:3. It was where extra features first started coming out. The star wars definitive collection laserdisc still has information that has not been released in any other format, to my knowledge anyway. The movies themselves were prohibitively expensive though. I for some releases I was paying $75 CAD. But it was the only way to watch films in their original aspect ratios. Plus the picture quality was so much better than VHS.
@cubdukat
@cubdukat Год назад
I bought my first one in the late 80's, and one of my first discs was Fox's Japanese Special Collection "Return of the Jedi." It was 3 discs, CAV, and included a demonstration of the difference between letterboxing and pan-and-scan. Eventually I got the other two, as well as CAV widescreen versions of "2010" and "Brainstorm."
@abs2fast2furios
@abs2fast2furios 9 лет назад
My family still has a Pioneer Laserdisc player and I remember watching the first Toy Story movie on it. I always used to wonder why the hell did I like it more when I watched on Laserdisc only now to realise it was a much better quality.
@Blam1111
@Blam1111 8 лет назад
Well... It's nice video, but some of his information is flat out wrong. The aluminum surface of the disc is only for reflective purposes. All "pits and lands" are molded into the acrylic plastic. Side changes from 2-sided players varied slightly based on title (reversing rotational speed of 1800 rpm to 1800 rpm the other direction being the most significant timing), but Pioneer had this down to well below 10 seconds by the mid-90s. Dolby Digital multi-channel audio was available on DVD at the exact same bitrate as LaserDisc upon it's inception in 1997.
@peabody66
@peabody66 8 лет назад
LaserDisc seems to be a precursor to today's DVD.
@coolspot18
@coolspot18 8 лет назад
+peabody66 I was, but it was far ahead of its time - very popular in Asia and also widely adopted by Asian communities in North America. The quality of the video and features were way ahead of its time. Problem was the price of the disc - they were routinely $80 to $100+. so most people just rented them from local stores.
@HarmonicWave
@HarmonicWave Год назад
My best friend with "rich" parents had a laserdisc player at his house in the 90s with a surround sound system and "big screen" TV (a 46" projection TV, not even high def or widescreen). I always thought that it was a digital format just like CDs and DVDs, I actually looked up this video to confirm the claim that it's analog. Mind blown.
@RCPhotosVideos
@RCPhotosVideos 9 лет назад
I still watch my Star Wars movies on Laserdisc it is the best and most pure way to watch them
@WebVManReturns
@WebVManReturns 8 лет назад
Laserdiscs are better than DVDs because they can carry an HD picture. Only Blu-Ray can produce an HD picture better than LaserDiscs. Sadly, the HD Laserdiscs were only available in Japan.
@awesomeferret
@awesomeferret 8 лет назад
+WebVMan that was a separate specification called Muse LD. And I just want to point out, since DVDS can technically hold any type of data, a full length 720p HD movie can be fit onto one, and in perfectly decent quality.
@awesomeferret
@awesomeferret 8 лет назад
***** it's called h.264, (or, you could even say h.265, but that isn't necessary). The DVD standard relies on (by today's standards) a ridiculously inefficient video compression method, and modern compression methods (such as h.264 and h.265 can fit TWO full HD movies on a single DVD that are perfectly acceptable. Granted, those DVDs wouldn't be playable in a DVD player, they would only be playable on a PC, but that's not the point. We are talking specifications and capabilities here, not practicality.
@TheGingerburger
@TheGingerburger 8 лет назад
There was a VHS format called D-VHS that Could do 1080i
@musicman257
@musicman257 5 лет назад
I love my laserdisc player and have few hundred titles some of brothers friends are blown away when they see this format there in there young 30s so few of them never seen it
@BBarNavi
@BBarNavi 5 лет назад
Laserdiscs were the lifeblood of the East Asian karaoke scene. My mom still has a few dozen lying around!
@SiyathWidyaratne
@SiyathWidyaratne 9 лет назад
Absolutely awesome video! Informative and delivered well :D
@TheMGMfan
@TheMGMfan 8 лет назад
7:32 Actually, the VHS was arguably more durable than any optical disc for the same reasons as cartridges: if you drop them, they aren't gonna shatter (unless you drop it too high), you can slide them across the floor without them being damaged without them in their case/box, you don't have to be careful when handling it (which in that size is a little hard to do very comfortably), etc. They also couldn't record tv, which could've been involved too. VHS is actually my favorite format, probably a mix of how much or a novelty they are and the fact that they are easy to find at thrift stores and really cheap.
@TheGingerburger
@TheGingerburger 8 лет назад
DIVX wasnt a competitor to DVD it was a rental version of DVD,you'd buy it take it home and once you started watching it it would be playable for 48 hours or longer if you payed the additional fees
@Knightmessenger
@Knightmessenger 7 лет назад
You are correct about what DIVX was, but it was a potential competitor to dvd. Thankfully with all the DRM crap, it never took off and most people have never heard of it.
@SSteelification
@SSteelification 8 лет назад
I don't own any laserdiscs but quite frankly they're awesome with a nice TV and S-Video if the tv has it. Flipping the disks reminds me quite a bit of VCD with changing it for the next part of the movie.
@Clesarie
@Clesarie 8 лет назад
Blu ray vs HD DVD may be the last physical media for entertainment media but there is always format wars in other things. Hell i'd say the amount of streaming services is a format war because they're all offering the same basic services.
@TheGingerburger
@TheGingerburger 8 лет назад
They're NOT formats though they are subscription services and completely pointless because you can get anything you want for free on the Internet,ill admit now i never pay to steam content but if its good ill then buy it on DVD or Blu ray because artists should be paid for their work unless its shit I've never bought digital goods as they're not tangible and hold absolutely no value for me
@Clesarie
@Clesarie 8 лет назад
TheGingerburger I can see where you're coming from totally and I also choose to not buy digital goods. I do however subscribe to netflix and hulu since they're cheap and offer a convenience value I deem worthwhile. Especially since netflix 4k is one of the only sources of true 4k. Though its highly debatable if 4k streaming at such a low band with is even worthwhile. Most of the time is doesnt even look up to par to a quality mastered blu ray disk.
@Kahuna21
@Kahuna21 9 лет назад
Nice my parents still have their laserdisc pioneer from the early 90s. They used mainly for karaoke lol
@themidnightracer9937
@themidnightracer9937 7 лет назад
How did you get english versions of laser disc?
@cyrusbasil626
@cyrusbasil626 9 лет назад
This reminds me a lot of regular show
@stellar022
@stellar022 9 лет назад
How
@bread9583
@bread9583 9 лет назад
SivixTheGamer They have episodes called the format wars, the first one was VHS being replaced by laserdisc. The second one was laserdisc being replaced by DVD, and then there was a battle between DVD and online streaming. It's weird.
@stellar022
@stellar022 9 лет назад
GloB A. That sounds... interesting That's weird I don't know that considering I'm a fan of the show
@benji888578
@benji888578 6 лет назад
This is good, but, the reason LaserDisc didn't make it big is more complicated than content price. The guy over at Technology Connections has a more complete explanation that I just watched titled Laserdisc's Failure: What Went Wrong.
@dimasprajoko
@dimasprajoko Год назад
Its such a shame to lost a media that can record analog audio without having to convert it to digital with its compression and what not. A true analog audio as it is meant to be reproduced. Perhaps with the advancement of current track sizes of a disc whether it be dvd or cd we can reinstate the technology of recording audio in analog, would that be something studio or enhanced listener be interested in?
@JonathanCruz-rj2ys
@JonathanCruz-rj2ys 9 лет назад
Fantastic video! Thoroughly enjoyed it and hope to see more like it :)
@awesomeferret
@awesomeferret 8 лет назад
I can't believe Quinn _actually_ said "Blu-Ray VS HD-DVD may very well have been the last format war of all time". Hasn't he ever heard of wireless charging? Of video codecs? There are currently format wars going on right now, and there will be for quite a while into the foreseeable future.
@snazzy
@snazzy 8 лет назад
Was referring to physical media format wars. :)
@awesomeferret
@awesomeferret 8 лет назад
Snazzy Labs although one can certainly infer that, he made no mention of that whatsoever.
@awesomeferret
@awesomeferret 8 лет назад
***** hahahaha, good one. MP4 for LIIIIIIIIFFFEEEEEEEE!!!! Ha, no, seriously, MKV is superior, so I can't really say that. The only reason I use MP4 is due to compatibility issues (which are very nearly a non-issue now, but not quite yet).
@JReynolds09
@JReynolds09 9 лет назад
Great overview!
Далее
Laserdisc: Features, Follies, & Evolution
24:14
Просмотров 654 тыс.
LaserDisc: You’re Watching It Wrong
45:53
Просмотров 40 тыс.
Ajdarlar...😅 QVZ 2024
00:39
Просмотров 484 тыс.
New Dyna Skin is OP🥵🔥 | Brawl Stars
00:16
Просмотров 138 тыс.
Domesday Duplicator - Ultimate LaserDisc Preservation
13:34
DVD: The Death Knell of Laserdisc
26:13
Просмотров 1,7 млн
Laserdisc's Failure: What Went Wrong
18:06
Просмотров 2,5 млн
I Sold My $100,000 Cybertruck After 50 Days
22:46
Просмотров 840 тыс.
Remember when HD Movies came on VHS tapes?
16:26
Просмотров 2,6 млн
RECORDABLE ‘Laserdisc’ - Sony CRVdisc
22:21
Просмотров 494 тыс.
Why is HD 1080p? | Nostalgia Nerd
20:59
Просмотров 283 тыс.
2015 - Time to buy my first Laserdisc Player
22:41
Просмотров 1,2 млн
Laserdisc: An Introduction
14:56
Просмотров 630 тыс.
I wasted $1,000 on old junk at the Apple Store!
31:24
Просмотров 755 тыс.
Ajdarlar...😅 QVZ 2024
00:39
Просмотров 484 тыс.