How Does the Israel-Hamas War End? A Conversation with Ambassador David Satterfield 

Satterfields intellect and arguments collapse under the weight of his obvious israely bias.

Great talk

Mr Satterfield - I respect you. Please use a conversation about population control for long-term conflict control.

What if they don't want to live there 🤔

لا الہ الا اللہ و اللہ اکبر _ لا الہ الا اللہ و اللہ اکبر _ لا الہ الا اللہ و اللہ اکبر _ ---------____________________________________------------------------------------- -___---_

infortune one-side view of the case, poor analysis given.

Aaron, I fundamentally disagree with your perspective. David is correct in his assessment of Hamas having zero interest in a deal, but my conclusion differs. The Gilad Shalit deal was an excellent example for why Israel can-not make a deal with Hamas. Because it resulted in incentivizing terrorist organizations to commit more abductions and to increase their attacks to the point we are in now. The next example is when the Hadar Goldin family demanded that Israel apply as much international pressure it can to make Hamas return Hadar & Oron's bodies after 9 years. During this time they were accused by Israeli mainstream media as being crazy, assuming the family wanted to make another deal akin to the Gilad Shalit deal which they agreed would be a disaster. The family said that they opposed the Gilad Shalit deal AND the current abandonment of our people in Gaza because it will further incentivize another abduction attempt at a wider scale. And they were correct - given the 7th of October massacre. Now during this war, the Israeli mainstream media is pushing to commit a Gilad Shalit deal a thousand-fold, ignoring their previous statements. And ignoring the fact that the current head of Hamas in Gaza - Sinwar - is one of the terrorists released from the initial Gilad Shalit deal. This isn't irony. It's cause and effect: Reward terrorists for committing terror, and more terror will follow. And let me point out that the last deal for the release of 40 hostages was a failure. Hamas did not return all 40 hostages and broke every single condition in the deal at a daily basis. Yet Biden held Israel accountable and ignored Hamas' typically bad behavior. Biden essentially backed Hamas on the deal, and further negotiations, further incentivizing them to radicalize and act as bad faith actors. Why would Hamas go for a deal when Biden has been applying pressure only-on Israel (Have you forgotten that Biden is delaying arms shipments to Israel for months now (in contempt of congress bi-partisan decisions)? And that the Dem party has been publicly denouncing Bibi for months as well and calling for elections in Israel during the war?)? Why would Israel trust Hamas to commit to any deal when they have broken their word at EVERY single opportunity? In regards to the crises of the Gazan people: The only people who want control of Gaza is Hamas. And every single survey amongst the Gazans and the PA shows that the Palestinians will only accept Hamas as their governing body (including their ideals to eradicate Israel). So how does Israel relinquish control of Gaza this time, while ensuring an end to terrorism from Gaza? And how do we ensure the Gazans receive the humanitarian aid from the entire world when they refuse to fight for the aid when Hamas takes it from them (and Biden pressured the IDF to back out and let this happen)? And it is public knowledge that many of the hostages were taken by Gazans officially unaffiliated with Hamas. Hamas admitted this, and the 3 latest rescued hostages were held captive by a UN doctor. So who can Israel trust in Gaza?

Didn’t Hamas accept the deal? I saw a video of Hamas leader saying that he accepted the deal. It was Israel that rejected it. Please be honest in your presentation.