Hello, hi there! I am a person from 2024 and I have come to tell you people that this is actually not very accurate. The candidates are too old to know what emojis are
Well it’s 2024 now, and seeing as how the biggest argument lately is who has the least severe case of dementia, I think two young guys having an emoji debate would be a big improvement.
Ive got a feeling in 2024 we’re gonna look back at this video and be like “he was closer than he realised” or maybe even “this aint even close to how ridiculous it actually is in 2024” 😂🙈
actually that last line biden used quite frequently telling democrats mostly (who ask biden a tough question) to vote for trump or someone else. We will see if the ending is the same soon enough XD www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-election/joe-biden-2020-election-campaign-voters-viral-videos-a9524731.html Trump 2020
I still don't understand what the complaining is about. Washington is set up for crooks to steal the treasury and build a prison state for us, and we're upset that they don't take debates seriously. This is our entertainment every few years, where they pretend to be civil leaders who aren't enslaving us and selling our country and bullying the world to enrich and empower their families and friends. Anyone who feels insulted at the level of debate somehow believes our representatives should be far above the society of people they represent. We're grossly ill-informed about almost everything, and our culture barely make sense anymore. The absurdity of debates is meta.
And so Mr. Smith went on to become the United States’ first mute president, and brought the country into a new era of accessibility and acceptance for the disabled, especially in ways of communication
I'm an introvert, and autistic, but I have a deep passion and craving for complicated messages, but most of all those that are *actually meaningful, CLEAR and diverse* in their details. And the way that they're communicated, when they take the form of anything that's not electronic (e.g. body language, oral/written words, tones of voice, the "atmosphere/room", facial features, etc...), is an art I think is underused and underestimated when writer-directors in live-action or animation want to complement their dia-/monologues, for the same reason, I think, that they "underuse and underestimate", to use the same terms, the "Show, don't Tell" rule. So what I want the unsaid words of faces or body languages executed while words are said to work with them to expand the diversity of the message, and I want something like neurotypical-level of subtle facial modifications that convey these implicative cues, and for those to be put *quite often* in films and shows. None of the live-action actors, not-a-single-one, ever comes even remotely close to that standard, and it's pretty surprising to see the perfection of the *big, fat, fucking 0* of that number And this rather facial and physical way of carrying rich and ultra-dense (but organic, neurotypical AND clear, EVEN for autists, which I'm sure would pick all of these meanings with their lack of intuition and strong habits of nitpicking and logical thinking due to the clear sign that "THIS different facial shape conveys what looks like anger !") implicative messages is also applicable to screams : I really have a sort of fetish for screams when it comes to my tastes in actor writing-directing, and you can plot graphs for the intensity and the wavelength of the screams in your head to see what I mean : So, for example, if you see a narrowish plateau on the wavelength graph where it's flat and the same height everywhere else, that would show a surge in anger due to an intermittent thought that surged due to smth. And this kinda proves why animation would be my favourite form of writing-directing, as I could more easily and organically have the environnement animate, along with some sort of aura around him, that shows exactly what "kind" and "intensity" of anger he has, AND what he's thinking by showing pictures of what he sees in his head atm where the background would be normally; so, you would have that plateau on the graph correlate with an image that the audience knows is smth he hates, and you could setup all the "scream scene" with : "the guy was pissed at smth, and that smth's connection to the photo made him think after a few seconds, just like how someone can get a joke by itself after a lil' while, about that other thing, which made him even angrier !". And these 3 variables would change at organic levels of rapidity, and, since I know that you've never seen this kind of direction before, just understand that you't feel like the changes are "too rushed" or "too prolonged", as people already believe that people can shout at higher wavelengths when they're angrier. It's not that I don't think it's possible that the human face can be malleated in such a shape adequate to my standards that I don't think I could make actors under MY power due those faces, though. I just believe that no director really wanted to do anything like that, and now that I think about it, this description of my standards of acting sounds a lot like how exaggerated characters in plays, most importantly *D R A M A T I C* ones, are. That makes me think, that I also am someone that wants opera music and such styles of orchestral music, for emotional moments, just like the _Portals_ scene from _Endgame_ , and Caesar's death in _JoJo's Bizarre Adventure Part 2_ (Which ). they say that realism is not as important as communicating the message and make the spectators genuinely feel true emotions, or smth like, so aren't my standards what it's all about ? Maybe I just sound more like an autist as opposed to less like one due to how I basically say "make the emotions more OBVIOUS; I can't believe it and therefore can't feel it if I can't see enough proof/display of it", heh...
@@nicholasleclerc1583 I believe this sentence was both a run-on and an incomplete sentence. "As an introvert" .... ", communications of messages" ... "and expressions"..."and those made through screams" ...what was the conclusion? Or did I miss something?
It's genuinely baffling that real life 2024 is actually somehow dumber than this old satirical bit from five years ago thought it was going to be. We actually are living in a really stupid timeline.
I think you mean "🎉🎉🎉🎉🧔♂" I guess all the silly writing, is for old people (you know: over 25 years). You can see that they already didn't bother to have the article itself readable, it's really just there because everybody knows that newspapers have these funny grey lines.
@Chris King data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/tabledata_v4/GLB.Ts+dSST.txt This is a table of the global mean temperature data from 1880 onward (0 is the average between 1951 and 1980, the change is shown in 0.01 degrees edit: °Celsius, in case you are from the US you have to multiply by 1.8 to get °Fahrenheit). These data are being compiled by NASA. I have been following it for roughly ten years, the trend was pretty much as clear then as it is today (although it has gotten warmer obviously). NASA's official position also hasn't really changed. It is possible that there were individual scientists who disagreed but NASA as a whole was pretty consistent as far as I can tell.
@Chris King I neither drink nor smoke and I did study formally. You want to report me for spam because I back up my assertions with data while you don't even provide any of your own? These are NASA data btw. you were the one suggesting that NASA thought the earth was cooling two years ago, I disputed this assertion because they were relying on the same data back then (just with two years less data obviously). If your actual assertion is, that NASA are fudging their data and have been for decades then say that, instead of stating that they thought the earth was cooling.
@Chris King 1. Ok, it's true though 2. What even is your point. What you posted about NASA is wrong and you still haven't given me any data of your own. 3. Ok glad you enjoyed it or whatever
@@daerdevvyl4314 You know what will destroy the economy? The immense destruction of property and wealth, as well as the massive destabilization of global financial markets and international relations, that will follow from the effects of climate change.
@@johndarcy179 I’m not convinced of that. Maybe it’s because of hearing apocalyptic, but conflicting, predictions my entire life. In the 60s and 70s, people thought a new ice age was going to wipe us out. It didn’t happen. Back in the 70s, overpopulation was supposed to cause western societies to collapse and worldwide famine by 1980. It didn’t happen and the professor who made the prediction is still a well respected leftwing professor. Intermittently since then, there have been doomsday predictions about earthquakes, volcanoes, pandemics (and as bad as Chop Fluey is, it isn’t causing the world to end), “the planets lining up,” Mayan calendars, computer bugs (Y2K), and more. None of it panned out. In 2006 the movie _An inconvenient Truth_ made bold predictions about Miami being underwater and other disasters caused by climate change. Whoops! Those predictions should have happened by now, but they haven’t. So the timeline keeps getting pushed back. It didn’t happen by 2000 or 2010 or 2020, so maybe now it’ll happen by 2030. I guess if you yell “wolf” every day, some day there might actually be a wolf and then you’ll be “right.”
@@daerdevvyl4314 Did 99% of scientists who were experts on those matters agree on those predictions at the time? Also, weren't the public health experts who predicted a global pandemic correct? Aren't some fairly extreme predictions actually true? Wouldn't we do best to take seriously science and evidence over your disillusionment with a few bad predictions? Or should we just go with your gut feeling on this one?
Wait! By 2024 we'll have at least one candidate that wants to talk about issues instead of call everyone who doesn't agree with them names? Sign me up!
Yes please. I'm getting a bit fed up of people thinking they've "won" a debate because they got everyone else to attack people who oppose their beliefs or, god forbid, because they said so
I just wanna leave this quote here, without citation as to not further this politicians demise: "Pokemon Go? More Like: 'Pokemon. Go. To. Tha. Polls.'" *sighs heavily*
@@j.l.5966 Are you joking, or do you mean this comment seriously? If it's the former, please forgive me and understand that this is an internet comments section we're in right now, where not all ridiculous statements are meant to be taken in jest (unfortunately). If it's the latter, I'm not sure this "fresh dab on the Ellen show" is really enough to convince many in the public that Hillary Clinton "understands the young folks".
Eric Hanson Yes I was definitely joking. But Hilary clearly was not, as she tried to portray herself as being connected to the younger generation by using (and failing spectacularly at) pop culture references. And not just the youth, as she used a fake southern accent at a rally in South Carolina, and just recently in Alabama. And she taps into her Ebonics for her rallies in inner city areas.
@@johnb0815 as a US citizen with no clue of what happened then and no clue of what's happening in my own country, I frankly do not want to know how far this cesspool of ignorance and hate is going
Nah, the "both sides are bad" argument doesn't work when: * ONE SIDE wants good education, good health care for everyone and diplomatic solutions * And the OTHER side wants... er, lower taxes for the ultra rich, more government money for companies that make bombs and... uh... a reality tv show host for president Cue conservatives furiously hitting reply to say that cancel culture is bad and something something Marxist radical left something something
Sadly we skipped this phase and went entirely to the “I don’t want to debate” after this past election. A trend I see continuing in the new presidents following
Well I don't know how to break this to you but this was a pretty accurate representation of the campaign in my country during 2020, the year of isolation.
@David Wührer, how is it not about the future? He fell asleep in his time and woke up in the future, and the future he woke up in was in an absolute chaotic state. their government had devolved into a political cesspool of tyrannical, narcissistic, megalomaniacal, egomaniacs who only cared about money and themselves...(any of this sound familiar) Education and healthcare we're basically non-existent and America had turned into a third world country that had zero food output, no clean drinking water (look at Flint Michigan and a few other cities now) the entire west coast was nothing but a wild fire, every little infraction including being poor either had you sent to prison or killed by the militarized police . and all this happened when a celebrity became the president. if this doesn't sound like the future that we are heading to I don't know what does. WE ARE ALL SCREWED.
"That's three trees, that means nothing." Well, the word emoji comes from Japan. And if you're writing Japanese, and you're using kanji, and the kanji is three tree kanji put together, it means forest. So by that logic three tree emoji could also mean forest.
Hi, it’s me in the future. Political debates are not like these, the candidates probably have no idea what an emoji is and definitely don’t know common trends
To be honest this would a step up from the debates we have now. Right now candidates just attack each other and everyone takes clearly biased sides. No one discusses the issue anymore, and people don’t seem to want them to. Might as well move to pure emoji format. At least then I don’t have to hear them slinging insults against each other as if that proves anything
Agreed. No name calling, no interrupting, no climate change denial, no weird conspiracy theories, and the winner is somebody who endorses cycling! Let's hoe that Ryan got this right! I guess a female candidate would have been asking too much, but I guess then the entire comment section would have erupted into a gender discussion.
The first 2024 debate is now upon us, and to be frank, I think I would prefer an emoji debate instead of the adjective and mumble word salad the two walking corpses we call candidates are capable of...
