A few months ago, Wizards started publishing decklists from Magic Arena. To qualify for publication, a deck needs to win at least six matches in a row at platinum rank or better. This sounds simple on its face, but some incredibly janky lists end up being published every time lists are published. This has led to speculation that a bug in the system allows decks that didn't actually win six matches in a row to be published or, for the most tin-foil-hatted crowd, the idea that Wizards just publishes whatever it wants to make the metagame look more diverse than it really is.
This week was actually a pretty tame week as far as MTG Arena lists are concerned (and by this I mean all the decks published had a sideboard!) However, there's still weirdness to be found, like an Emergent Ultimatum deck with 18 ones-ofs and a massive 21 cards that cost six or more mana! Is one of the 'bad' Ultimatums from Ikoria good enough for Standard? Can the curve possibly work? Let's find out of this Emergent Ultimatum brew is a Meme or Dream!
Today's video is brought to you by Card Kingdom. You can get all of the Magic: the Gathering cards you need (and help support the show!) at www.cardkingdom.com
► Read more about this deck (full article): www.mtggoldfish.com/articles/...
► View this deck with the latest prices: www.mtggoldfish.com/deck/3635...
◼ Purchase this deck (paper): mtg.fish/JKyTF
◼ Purchase this deck (Magic Online): mtg.fish/z7rxv
0:00 Start
3:50 Match 1
20:27 Match 2
28:22 Match 3
42:00 Match 4
54:00 Match 5
1:06:30 Wrap Up
10 июл 2024
