Bro can you tell me what the diameter the slip-on is please I need a 60.5mm slip-on for my V2, I have a link pipe but I'm searching for a slip-on... Racefit, AR and a few other manufacturers have refused to supply a custom slip-on for my bike. I'm trying to avoid getting a Chinese generic slip-on but I may have to.
Power is one thing, but the overall drive ability is really improved. I did this to my 2022 S1000XR and it completely changed the bike. Also Bren has awesome customer support
Thank you for mentioning resetting the adaptions, I see many people leave that crucial step out. I have always had great service from BrenTuning, along with Motomillion. They are even going to help me with tuning my 24 S1000rr because BMW wanted my 23 S1000rr due to a manufacturing defect (heat treatment issue) on the connecting rods. They are a great business to work with.
@@shadowbroker1 BMW took it from me before it failed. I still don't have my replacement bike, supposedly it is now in New Jersey and will be headed to the dealership soon.
The Stage 2 Bren Tune on my 2023 Streetfighter V4 SP2 is absolutely savage, very rowdy compared to stock. I really want to pick up a 2023 S1000R M-Package next and have it Bren Tuned on E85.
Another great video. Impressive stock numbers. Another thing to make note of is, the proper RPM reading into the dyno just gives an accurate torque number. The horsepower number with be accurate without it
Torque is calculated by rpm. If you don’t have an accurate rpm, your horsepower will not be accurate. When you are measuring the force to be able to spin something it is measuring torque after all.
@Motomillion it's actually different than that. Without an rpm signal the dyno can measure the rate in which you can accelerate a fixed load (roller). This in-turn will give you a horsepower graph but no torque value. In order to get a torque reading the dyno needs to know where in the rpm band the horsepower value occurred. Thats why you can actually get a hp number without an rpm signal. Where the inaccuracies can happen is when the dyno operator determines rpm from the roller speed and not the actual rpm of the ecu. For example if your rpm calibration on the dyno is showing 100rpm less than actual the torque valves will show higher than they actually are because the hp occured at a lower rpm than it actually is.The horsepower curve will be identical but the torque reading will be off. We actually have a dyno so I take a lot of care when setting up the rpm signal from roll speed. Some cars are very difficult to get an actual rpm signal from the ecu so my torque values can be off slightly but I save the customers profiles so the delta/gains are measurable when they come back for more mods.
Awesome video and very informative. What I would like you to see is an Aprilia RS660 dyno tested from stock (with stock exhaust) and then mapped with an SC project exhaust and Dyno test. I own this bike and contemplating this upgrade but would like to see what my net gains are to see if it’s really worth doing cheers and keep the great content coming
Amazing finally something in detail ! Can you please make a dyno video for stage 2 full system with any filter you offer.. most of us the owners of s1k and m1k RR have different readings and this made it way more clear @motomillion
No worries dynos read differently but we believe in the products you offer... I mean I've spent already over 20k in motomillion. I think 80% have common parts like full system and air filter a dyno reading video like this with stage 2 tune can give us a clearer picture or maybe a peace in mind ..thanks alot Manny !
Nice video. You mentioned the K63 S1K, have you thought about doing a build series and dyno day on it. I know we say it's a lot like the K67 but the 63 doesn't have the shift cam motor so would really like to see what it gets out of Stage1.
Very good information. I appreciate your input and transparency. Great video. Now how about a Kawasaki. I know not much aftermarket support. Still have to keep trying 😂
I’m just so happy that he took fairings off… do you see how the bike doesn’t have that much coolant in it? I have a single r and the same thing is happening.. the dealership can’t even figure out where coolant is going
Hi, I have the same motorbike as in the video but in Italy. so it has European specifications. Ours certainly have more declared horsepower but they tell me that on the race map without the controls they don't have the limitations in second and third gear like those with North American specifications. do you know anything about it? Thank you
Wow, I've heard plenty of people talk about the flat spot in the power band on that engine, but seeing it on a dyno is truly just pitiful. How could they even release something in that bad of a state...
Not all manufacturers have this kind of restriction, it goes to show you maybe BMW did not want to take time to develop the bike to be compliant and also not have flat spots like this.
Yes. Just use the contact us section of the website for now to reach out and we can send you a custom invoice. It will be added to the site for an easy purchase starting next week, till then we can always send you an invoice right away.
@@Motomillionawesome! I’m finishing up a couple of other things, so it will still be a few weeks out! Glad to hear because definitely want to do business with you! Love your work and content. Talk with you soon my friend!👍
Impressed but your math is off - for example, 2nd gear improvements approx 50, not 60 as you said. Similar error for the 3rd gear - improvement was 38, you said 48. Very impressed though
Bren tuning is awesome except everytime your bikes software is updated, you need to pay $300 for another tune. ...Im wondering how many times my sotware (2023 Ducati Streetfighter V2) would be updated?
The BT Moto FAQ webpage indicates if there are any dealer software updates with the modified tune on it, the device will be locked up and you have to pay to reset and remap everything. From what I see on their site, for a Flasher+ (not sure if that is all tools), it is $225 USD. May not be $300, but still is costly or time consuming to reload tunes every time you go to the dealer. I am wondering if I am missing something?
No doubt what these can can do for the k67 its crazy....BUT...that dyno is like having a midget put there hands around ur man veggies and sending someone a pic its rather flattering😂 i guess the same day before and after is what counts.
Good job inflating the numbers by using the STD correction factor instead of SAE that any honest and reputable tuner will use given SAE is the industry standard. STD over SAE will result in over 9HP extra here simply by changing the correction factor. People need to stop focusing on the peak HP numbers and pay more attention to the AFR curve, which wasn't shown at the bottom of every graph for some reason.
Good job for showing us how bright you are. We even say who care of peak numbers. Do the math (if you are bright enough) and calculate how many % the gain is. If you ae still bitter and not impressed, then try to light a candle or two to maybe brighten up a little.
And here you are not even understanding what I'm saying Mr. "bright". Your numbers are inflated and not true in terms of the dyno graphs. Your bike doesn't make 200+rwhp on pump gas, it makes closer to 190. I never said the gains weren't real. Clearly doing any type of unrestricting/fueling changes will increase the horsepower. STD yields 5% higher numbers over SAE does. 5% of 200hp is 10hp, so realistically your bike using the correct correction factor would show 190rwhp +- a couple depending on the setup and weather that day. That's my issue with these BT tuning numbers. Y'all wanna be able to show these guys "200rwhp" numbers on a dyno sheet because it looks impressive and gets their money. Take that candle or two and shove it 👍 @@Motomillion
@@MattJFilms Do you go on every single video and comment about sae/std? You start in one factor and keep it goin, not like he dynoed stock in SAE, and jumped over to STD to artificially inflate his number? Do a quick search on youtube for dyno vid's, you'll see most do it in STD...
The numbers are wrong, take 30% off the highest number and that’s about right on a dynojet dyno. The highest s1000rr that I ever saw was 196 on the first gen. And this was done by someone who built his dyno because of dynojet. Dynojet does not take parasitic loss into account, tire size and weight…….. nope this is bulls*it
