How to Deal With the QUEENSLAND POLICE While FILMING in PUBLIC 

Australia needs more More MORE video's like this ✅👍

You can film police you just cant get in the area, where they are working and be forced to move back out the way!

@@danquaylesitsspeltpotatoe8307 You can film them as a record if they try to arrest you or a friend.?

@@unclewazza777 If they are arresting you its going to be disrupted when they command you drop the thing so they can cuff you or you get another charge! the friend can but they better move back when they where told or they will be getting arrested too!

@@danquaylesitsspeltpotatoe8307 More and more a police state. And because we have been disarmed we can't even fight back.

Oof. Too soon! I’ve a friend from up that way. He says the cop won’t set foot in town for life, if he knows what’s good for him. The dumb shit has left a nasty bitterness in his wake. Fuck knows what he was thinking.

“Bugger it” he said right before tasering her. He’s still on bail and next hearing is October 4th. They waiting on post-mortem results. Let’s hope charges are upgraded to at least manslaughter

NSW police are the solution for Australia's age care system.

@@bretloyd8097 you’re terrible, Muriel…

If you are unlucky or just get a cop on a bad day then you are pretty much fuckd regardless off wat you may or may not be doing. They kill and get away with it....worse in other country's so aus is probably a safer place 2 reside.

The little brats with guns and badges?

And that is why you do not speak to them, other than to ask, " Do you believe that I am performing an unlawful act?". Do not give them any excuse to twist your words.

@darbeeroyal8503 No bad experiences at all. I follow my own advice about using common sense and I'm always respectful of private property. Thanks for kind words too!

Note the irony of spelling *intelligence incorrectly.

@@teeanahera8949 There was also an apostrophe missing from the first word of the comment, however I am sure that someone of your intellectual calibre would accept that a spelling mistake does not distract from the core message conveyed by the comment, which in itself is absolutely correct.

Always film the Police, it keeps them from breaking the law.

move along laws are not laws.

When they try it I like to move people on I ask the people around me if they would like the police moved on as they are the ones creating the disturbance, they don't tend to like that ...

Lol lets take you to Mexico bro where you'll find out just what corruption really looks like.

all pollyticians, bureaucrats and cops are corrupt, the world over - only different degrees

They're like that because we have no 2A.

but they act in their private capacity as the relevant police are a corporation and a dead entity , ask for their business card and a bonding number @@The_Scouts_Code

It's also not true.

Unlikely. In all my interactions, they've been kind and knowledgeable of the law.

@@kinchegayowie6167 Not private, the police are government entities. They don't have business cards, they'd have badge numbers or equivalent.

Nope, wrong. Crime and its associated requirements are not governed by the Australian constitution, therefore these rights fall entirely with the states to the extent that they may clash with any commonwealth law. Anyway, anyone employed by the Crown is an officer of the Crown. Warrants are used differently in each state & territory as designed by their executive arm of govt. Federal warrants for alleged breaches of federal law are covered by Australian constitution.

Ive seen many vlogger filming Brisbane and south-bank though. is Brisbane actually prohibited from filming as if there is something odd going on that no one knows ? Aah there's children.. So what ? we all humans what else do you expect. Ive seen many multiple vloggers and police walking by and people just film queen street and southbank and no one is stoping them. So do you have the correct information to what your saying ? Because from all videos ive seen i see people in the videos and evertything. What makes you think that you cant film at south-bank you cant film and queen st mall ? Because what i read online.... is no one stops YOU film filming southbank and queen street mall brisbane... So where do you get this impresion that you cant film around there?

Last time i remember visiting australia is Brisbane is a public place and southbank is public and no one indicated you cant film here or take photos.. Is the whole southbank and brisbane all privately own is it ? Then perhaps this starting to sound like North korea in brisbane.

Southbank is owned by a public entity... it's not Disneyland 😅

True. We were fronted by security at Eagle Street taking wedding photos. I wanted to have a go at him about publicly accessible areas but when he discovered that the reception was being held in a venue there it was apparently absolutely fine to take as many photos as we liked.

Ask 2 questions Am I under arrest? Am I free to go? Cut straight to the point, don't get involved with any conversation or argument because they love to get people talking to incriminate themselves Keep asking until you get the answers you need.

Nope! Police may only issue a move-on order if an officer believes on reasonable grounds that you are obstructing traffic, blocking another person, or (are) harassing or intimidating another person or group. Also, according to both NSW and QLD law, police must tell the person or group why they are issuing the order.

@joshuarose3186 isn't that what I said, basically a breach of the peace. About to commit a crime harassment or impeding traffic ie a offence ?

@@jamesmusker Police must have something called "reasonable suspision" before taking lawful action. In court, a jury must agree that the suspicion the officer had that a person was about to or in the process of committing a crime was "reasonable".

Yeah how about they notify us when taking photography of anything like our parks or homes.

Wtf are you on about Jonesy

@@sandgroperwookiee65 Well we give away majority of the country in native titles, can't enter the land without permission, and can't take photos without permission. How about THEY ask US if they can take photos of crown land. Just ridiculous.

Nope! they have tried the whole stop and move on while i did a shoot in southbank brisbane years ago. I politely handed over the laws which i carry a printed copy, then asked what in this list am i breaking? They tried all kind of BS and even tried to seize my equipment and cards.

The Move On Order is only used by police if you were disturbing the general public by filming like filming kids at a playground, filming people a the beach etc. If you were just filming yourself and not trying to harass anyone they wouldn't care

@@DK33236 or if you annoy them or any business owner or official.

They made him leave the beach in disgrace.

Yes indeed. It seems that the law is pushed aside in favour of TV ratings.

Yes it made me think of that too

To Edward Scissor Feet, whose comment is not showing - I'm not defending the man who wants to film the girl. He is just as bad as the girls who are walking around mostly naked. I think it's absurd for them to expect that they won't be leered at. And the double standard of the show, to do exactly what they pronounced judgement on the leering man for ... All three are in the wrong.

I see there's a big dollar recruitment program for Qld Police at the moment. High numbers of overseas police have successfully applied. So if you're an overseas cop, about to lose your job for some transgression, but you resign first, does the Qld Police Department pick that up??? Or are we just importing problems for the sake of filling a uniform?? Now the community would really really like to know the answer to that, but the politicians, and the police department, DILLIGAF!

But the same muppets go to the supermarket with cameras filming them from all angles

According to your comment you're probably a road rager when following someone doing the speed limit ...

That's because you're special.

If that’s your problem stay at your house cause in public there is no privacy buddy and plus 99.99% of the time they not even filming you it’s you happened to be in camera frame

They are PIGS. They need pushback.

@t-rocks1960 Thanks T-Rocks. I thought it was time to look at other aspects of filming and sharing of stories.

The comments are full of sovereign citizens and people who think the American constitution applies to them, the lack of knowledge of how our system of government and separation of powers works is astounding. Knowledge of the constitution is appalling and it is a very thin document that everyone should read.

​@@walkaboutwithrob Hey mate I got confused about one commenter called Rob putting shit on Queensland and I told him To F##k off and stay home then. I thought it was you but I stupidity then realised all your footage I've seen is in Qld. So It can't of been you. And you did start a very comment provoking informative conversation. Well done. But you got some weird haters. One about how you helped all perverts with information. That guy needs to be on a watch list of some type.

@@RandomRants525 No worries. I would never dump of QLD. It's awesome and just gets better by the day! Being a content creator we know that getting haters and nutters and oddballs comes with the territory.

@@walkaboutwithrob NO probs bro. I was born in NT but from 7 on North QLD. ALMOST all of Australia is amazing. Why haters gotta hate? That 'Thepeadophileprophit' guy was a weird one. I wouldn't let anyone I didn't know in my house in case it's him, from now on. WOW. I wonder what my haters will say if I ever get any comments on my stuff that is. I would appreciate the laugh though.

There is rights and freedoms then there is acting like a knob and antagonising people to provoke a reaction to justify your dislike for them.

You only have to go to your local beach and see the council signs telling you all the things you can’t do under bylaws. All freedoms are gradually eroded and most people don’t even notice or care until they wake up one day and they’re living in North Korea.

It was at Strathpine if it is the incident I am thinking of - from memory, the police investigation showed the vehicle driver was not following a police direction to stay in his crashed vehicle, and the policeman was justifiably stopping him from exiting the vehicle in accordance with his instruction. No charges laid against police, plenty laid against the driver...

Yes, I made the video to be straightforward and helpful to those who may not know the laws. As to why and when the spike happened, I'm not sure because the video seems to come and go. Over the past couple of days it has shot up in views. I have no idea why.

@@walkaboutwithrob it's the screwyoutube Al-Gore-Rhythm

@jimmyp1433 As long as you don't film people on those dunnies, you'll be in the clear.

By interrogation do you mean at the scene or in the police station? Because if it was at the scene and you stayed calm and didn't resist then you should get off but I don't know what compensation you can go for. In Merica they can get up to 500k and more. But at cop shop room you definitely can't have a camera there. I hope you weren't injured and you get the justice you deserve.Keep us updated mate.

​@@RandomRants525I should be able to record every step of the justice process.

Return all contracts in 3 day`s sign nothing swear no oaths never contract with your dead fiction name.

Wasn't that the William Tyrrell case ( Det Gary Jubelin) which was in NSW.

Exactly probably cops go there to drop off bodies and report missing persons 😂

Have heard about murders in glasshouse

illegal logging usually

It’s less to do with that and more to appease the “first nations”. Apparently aborigines is racist now.

I think it's ridiculous and it's all about control and the indigenous people will probably start making people pay to film and have to buy special permits. I don't aggree with the way they changed the name of fraser island. To "k'gari" I have always said... it's all about money.

@@Liams_Fraser_Island_adventures same with Ayres Rock

Yeah, they can request we notify them, but until they reference an actual section of QLD legislation, I'll be filming.

OK then we can deny their request @@Jonesy1701

I think you will find she was right as in they can not stop someone filming anything that can be seen from public, as long as they are not on your property there is little that can be done. People can film into your house but it is an offence to intentionally record someone in their bathroom or other places where you expect some level of privacy. If you have glass doors and large windows then it is up to you to create and maintain your own privacy.

Bugger them, they have body cams so hold them to account, it is also not an offence in Queensland to resist an unlawful arrest, just saying ...

I can tell you from experience that failing the attitude test doesent go well@@nigelrhodes4330

And in townsville 2yr ago a senior SGT ordered 4 officers to turn off their body cameras to screw over an innocent person and got away with it. @@nigelrhodes4330

Great advice, I've found that the difficult part is finding the actual legislation so we can read and know it.

@@IainThomson-km3hk Let google be your friend.

Such as?

@@walkaboutwithrob You can find the legislation under police powers and responsibilities act 2000 part 5 it is all available online. To sum up the main reasons (a) causing anxiety to a person entering, at or leaving the place, reasonably arising in all the circumstances; or (b) interfering with trade or business at the place by unnecessarily obstructing, hindering or impeding someone entering, at or leaving the place; or (c) disorderly, indecent, offensive, or threatening to someone entering, at or leaving the place; or (d) disrupting the peaceable and orderly conduct of any event, entertainment or gathering at the place. (2)If the regulated place is a public place, other than a public place in a safe night precinct, subsection (1) applies in relation to a person at or near the public place only if the person’s behaviour has or had the effect mentioned in subsection (1)(a), (b), (c) or (d) in the part of the public place at or near where the person then is. There is a bit more there so it is worth a read i think. The main points I find is that the police cannot just hand out move orders willy nilly like they actually do. An example I have actually experienced was walking home late at night and was stopped by the police who gave me a move on order, beside the fact that I was already doing it there was no legal reason they could have actually given me the order under the legislation. I liked the video though, only thing i thought would have been worth mentioning that not many people seem to know is that you also are not required to say anything to police. Unless they have a reasonable suspicion that you have committed a crime in which case you need to give them your name and address. But other then that you can remain silent the entire encounter.

Sorry to hear that mate, police should always aim to be calm. If the police can't control their own behaviour how can they expect to control or maintain the behaviour of others, or even more broadly, maintain general social order?

I don't think that was a cop but a tradie.

@@lordandrewbruceofthemcinne5046 ... It was definitely a Policeman. His name is Senior Constable Benjamin Arndt and had been previously convicted of common assault.

It was a cop. It was on the news last yesh. Here in austrslis​@lordandrewbruceofthemcinne5046

Qld parks are not Crown land as such. They have a set of regulations that are different to that of Crown land that is usually vacant. Your constitutional rights are always intact although Australia has very few rights embedded in the constitution, there is no Bill of Rights for example. You have some implied rights handed down through precedent from the High Court of Australia. Officials who approach you have Crown authority (which is the same as constitutional authority) either from a federal or state delegated authority. So really your sentence simply states what is already in place and so is redundant.

Watch the video again.

Those were the days.

Throwing my 2c worth in as well if Rob doesn't mind. Correct: You only need a permit for commercial filming / photography in national park UNLESS it's using a drone, in which case, you do (apparently) whether private or commercial use. *I'm touching on this topic if a video coming soon myself. Having been in a related field; I also agree that such 'move on' laws are in place.

@@SteveMack Yes, I believe you're correct in the "No drone fling in Qld. National Parks" ruling.

Nobody has the right to expectation pf privacy in public. Full stop.

@@doncoleman4938 ...Which 99% of travellers violate, of course.

@@AlBundyOz That is technically correct.

i think he was mistaken the police are aggressive and armed and can become right pricks whenever they want with no consequences would be more fitting

QLD police are aggressive as all hell, hit now ask questions later. Problem is this is supported by their bosses.

They're not protectors of the public though. They swear allegiance to the Crown and the current government. No where in the swearing in of Police does it say to serve and protect the public. They only carry out duties inasmuch as to keep the masses in check.

Not the police. They do whatever the hell they like.

The guy had done something wrong, but what he got was police brutality.

He recorded the police. That is your punishment.

@@wizrom3046 Lesson to us all - do not film a law enforcement professional leaving Donut King...

Biggest gang is the police force

🤣 this is so true

There is no commonwealth, so there is no common sense.

But it will provide evidence of the unlawful assault and aid the police in arresting them.

Common sense should come into it and a certain level of consideration.if someone is filming and I happen to get in the shot I wouldn't care. If they are zooming in on me or my family for a prolonged period of time I'd probably be somewhat annoyed if I'm just minding my own business. I don't really understand people who get annoyed by someone filming in public spaces especially if they are tourist hotspots for example. Or if someone is filming their kids or friends or say a shopping experience or event. I guess it comes down to a little common sense. I don't reckon i can be interesting enough as I've never had a problem 😂😂

The shopping mall is private property. Your entry implies you consent to their rules - just like you'd expect someone to obey "house rules" in your home. As for filming kids - there's a difference between kids being in the shot, and *filming the kids.*

@@NPC-fl3gq I agree with the kids thing, but in the UK if you allow public entry without payment, it automatically becomes a public place for filming purposes. But it's still private property and you can be asked/evicted for being a nuisance.

You are only partially correct. In the UK facilities like airports, shopping centres, hospitals, museums etc, are private properties to which the public have an implied right of access, that access being subject to the terms and conditions of the owner/tenant of the property. The owner/tenant has the right revoke that implied right of access at any time. It has nothing to do with payment upon entry or not as the case may be. @@stewartread4235

Privacy laws are detailed and quite specific. CCTV, like on public transport can be viewed live by staff who have been trained for security reasons like witnessing and reporting from a point of safety. Staff are not allowed to rewind, record or replay any footage without legal approval..which means they can't because they won't get it. The CCTV systems record all inputs or commands from the screen or keyboard. Breaking privacy leads to fines of tens of thousands to millions to the operator and the owner of the equipment. Only a police Sgt or higher can operate the rewind and review of recorded footage. Signs must be visibly posted stating that there a CCTV systems recording. By entering, you are consenting. As far as regarding your second sentence. Not everyone recording with children in shot are pervs. But all pervs record children. Go to a public place like a park and start recording with children in shot.... See how that pans out for you. Imagine a current affairs crew showing up and asking you why you were recording kids. See how you go arguing they crossed your shot. I'd be questioning your common sense to be honest.

To build an audience and reach the numbers you need to get monetized? RU-vid rules says you need (I think) 500 followers and so many hours before they will monetize your channel.

It is freely available online for you to read, with later 20th and 21st century amendments.

@omnomnoms3 I'm afraid the background story to this video is very dull. I had an extra week before shooting my next video and wanted to make something. I had seen many debates online about what people can and can't film in public, so I decided to research the matter and make a video. Like I said, very dull.

@@walkaboutwithrob I enjoy all of your adventures and off to the side comedy haha. This video in particular I thoroughly enjoyed. Keep up the great work, and ignore the whacky comments of personal opinions that are arising.

@@TheAnkleBitersClub thanks for the support. 99% of the time people are nice, but one must expect the fringe element and the anti-socials to make an appearance here and there. It's cool.

@@walkaboutwithrob I don't think "dull" and "Rob" go in the same sentence 🤔

In the foyer is a public space if you have a legitimate reason for being on the property. Remaining inside arguing etc. in the foyer may invoke aggression from the Police...

Are they Police or public officers? Did they swear an oath to the Crown or are they working for a corporation?

@@JohnSmith-pl2bk . Correct. Usually called the vestibule.

Note my response was censored and disappeared by YT...@@johnvienta7622

because the air space above your property is a public space, the home owner only has ownership of the air space above their property as high as what ever altitude the cities planning sets in that area. I assume some area's they have it high enough that a sky scrapper can be built, where I am I think 3 stories is the limit. Above that the air space is public space basically same as a roadway or a waterway, there are airways, how many planes fly over near you, they are following the 'highways' of the sky. Anything coming from satellites in orbit is beyond the jurisdiction of any countries laws. You are free to erect something to obscure the view from above though, if you you object to being viewed from above.

The crown owns the land under your house beyond a depth of 3m, they also own the air above you though there is no altitude set, a hole in the law that drones are quickly making an issue and we will likely have an established altitude for ownership.

@@MrUmbuku I didnt think the crown owned the land above. and I thought the land below was only for mineral rights.

Filming on the private property is a problem because, without permission to be there, it's trespass. You can film what you can see from the footpath.

@@martinXY yet they can film from a plane.

Cool story bro but needs more dragons

@@jesuschrist7169 It's a pretty tame sorta story so I didn't think it needed one, but have a thumbs up anyway, for being you 👍

@@jesuschrist7169 .. I am ex Q'ld Police and I have no problem believing every word of that comment.

​@jesuschrist7169 things like that happened heaps back in the old days.

@Liams_Fraser_Island_adventures why are you still called Fraser Island, that's not its name!

It's still private property (yes, even though it is government owned) and they can make up their own rules.

@@Crewonephotography Wrong the only place in a public building you cannot film is in a court room. Any publicly accessible space in government buildings you can film legally.

@@craigfrith7024 1. No you can't. Many places are limited beyond court rooms. 2. You definitely can't for commercial purposes (ie making money from a RU-vid video). 3. What makes you think you can just film anywhere you want?

@@Crewonephotography Anywhere the public has access to you can film. There is no expectation of privacy once you put yourself in the public domain. Public photography/filming is protected under Australia’s constitution.

Yep , ask me about Americas Constitution or their first 5 Amendments and i rattle them off , ask me about laws in my home country , Australia, and i haven't a clue.

Police may only issue a move-on order if an officer believes on *reasonable grounds* that you are obstructing traffic, blocking another person, or (are) harassing or intimidating another person or group. Also, according to both NSW and QLD law, police must tell the person or group why they are issuing the order.

I think the difference lies here. It *is* a public space, so if you pee on the floor, you did it in public. It is also a public space for photography. But it is still private property, so for any reason except class discrimination, a private owner can ask you to leave and you must. And photographers are not a protected discrimination class, so they can request you leave if you are filming.

@@jeremykothe2847 They can ask you to leave giving no reason at all. I was talking about justification based on public /private.

@@1977ajaxwell okay. The distinction is "publicly accessible but private" vs "public" then. Both are considered "public" in one sense, but one is privately owned and one isn't. I mean I get your point, but the distinction is quite clear. Sometimes words have different meanings in different contexts.

Yes that is very true. IT IS private property inside the building and sometimes the outside boundary

let me break it down to you in just a few words ......... There is no expectation of Privacy in a public space.

Fun fact: there's no privacy in public space. If you fear being recorded, stay in our house and wear as many masks as you'd like.

It would seem even stranger to me that people comment on You tube videos...What are you doing here you weirdo!?!?!?!? 🤣😛😜🤪