Тёмный

How to Train Your Anaerobic Threshold to Improve Endurance 

Physiology Made Easy
Подписаться 12 тыс.
Просмотров 33 тыс.
50% 1

*2024 UPDATE: • How to Test and Train ...
In this video I discuss three training approaches that can help to improve your anaerobic threshold and endurance performance.
1) Continuous high volume endurance training
2) Maximal steady state training
3) Interval training using the 2:1 (work:rest) approach
The video is useful if you wish to improve your endurance performance for a wide range of sports (e.g. running, swimming, rowing, boxing, cycling) and is based on scientific and coaching knowledge. To conduct the program you need only print and familiarize yourself with the Ratings of Perceived Exertion Scale.
Please accept my apologies for the slight focusing issue at some points in the video.
For information about the underlying physiology governing the anaerobic threshold please refer to the following videos:
• Ventilatory, Anaerobic...
• Carbon Dioxide Transpo...
• ANAEROBIC THRESHOLD: H...

Кино

Опубликовано:

 

8 июл 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 73   
@mikemaresh2417
@mikemaresh2417 3 года назад
This and your previous video are the best explanation about systems, energy, and training I’ve seen on RU-vid. Thanks for making this!!
@physiologymadeeasy216
@physiologymadeeasy216 3 года назад
Thanks Mike for this feedback - I really appreciate it. All the best with your learning (and training).
@treeoflifebahrain08
@treeoflifebahrain08 Год назад
One of the best and informative videos on RU-vid. Wish i knew about this 10 years ago when i started running. Still inspires me to rethink my training around exercise physiology...many thanks!!!
@dietaryselfdefensefoundry6657
@dietaryselfdefensefoundry6657 3 года назад
Your videos are great. Clear and concise. I’ve been using them with my students and for myself as a coach. Appreciate your work. Thank you
@physiologymadeeasy216
@physiologymadeeasy216 3 года назад
Thank you very much for leaving this comment. I greatly appreciate it, and I am pleased the videos are beneficial to you and your students. All the best for the future!
@seraphimseraphimovich7855
@seraphimseraphimovich7855 4 года назад
Thank you for the clear and concise presentation, I will definently try it in my training
@physiologymadeeasy216
@physiologymadeeasy216 4 года назад
Thanks Ivan - all the best with you training!
@jk3266
@jk3266 Год назад
Extraordinary skill of explanation.🎉
@superstrada6847
@superstrada6847 3 года назад
Very clear. Thank you.
@physiologymadeeasy216
@physiologymadeeasy216 3 года назад
Glad it was helpful!
@1990seany
@1990seany 2 года назад
Beautifully explained! 🙌👍
@physiologymadeeasy216
@physiologymadeeasy216 2 года назад
Thanks Sean.
@siyz250
@siyz250 2 года назад
Thank you for helping me on my way to achieving my mountain bike fitness & racing goals. Simon, Christchurch, New Zealand.
@physiologymadeeasy216
@physiologymadeeasy216 2 года назад
Thanks Simon for taking time to leave this comment. I am pleased the information helps. All the best in future competitions, I hope for a lot of success for you.
@leporoso1986
@leporoso1986 Год назад
Excellent video!
@physiologymadeeasy216
@physiologymadeeasy216 Год назад
Thank you very much!
@running-man9138
@running-man9138 2 года назад
always enjoy your videos ,very easy to understand
@physiologymadeeasy216
@physiologymadeeasy216 2 года назад
Thanks Running-man. I am pleased the info will help you keep running!
@shay9732
@shay9732 3 года назад
Great video, thank you!
@physiologymadeeasy216
@physiologymadeeasy216 3 года назад
My pleasure!
@K2-Fitness
@K2-Fitness 4 года назад
Another great video 👍
@physiologymadeeasy216
@physiologymadeeasy216 4 года назад
Thanks Fiachra! :)
@jibroniuk3604
@jibroniuk3604 4 года назад
This is an excellent presentation. Very concise and educative video....Please keep up the great work.
@physiologymadeeasy216
@physiologymadeeasy216 4 года назад
Thanks Jibroni, I very much appreciate this feedback.
@onformpt2538
@onformpt2538 3 года назад
Thank you for this, great video.
@physiologymadeeasy216
@physiologymadeeasy216 3 года назад
Your welcome - I am pleased it was useful.
@TRI5T4N
@TRI5T4N Год назад
Great videos - thanks!
@physiologymadeeasy216
@physiologymadeeasy216 Год назад
Thanks for watching!
@turbokeene
@turbokeene 3 года назад
Very informative. Thanks 🙏
@physiologymadeeasy216
@physiologymadeeasy216 3 года назад
Glad it was helpful!
@brockgoris8211
@brockgoris8211 4 года назад
This is valuable information 👌🏼
@physiologymadeeasy216
@physiologymadeeasy216 4 года назад
Thanks Brock. I am pleased you found it useful. All the best with your training!
@mattoniy2840
@mattoniy2840 3 года назад
I found this very useful thank you!
@physiologymadeeasy216
@physiologymadeeasy216 3 года назад
Glad it was helpful!
@zxtenn
@zxtenn 4 года назад
Great information Doctor, I had open heart surgery in 2002, a 4X bypass and I was only 46, I know the Bruce protocol test specs well. 20% progression X4 weeks =80% not 100 so it would take 5 weeks to reach 200. I had a VERY good Cardiologist after the operation, caring and knowledgeable. Yes I used to ride road bikes and a BIG difference between riding say 60 miles on a nearly level course and riding the same distance on HILLY rides, makes me cry but yes it does give improvement, done plenty of HIIT treadmill work, not a joke when you really push yourself
@physiologymadeeasy216
@physiologymadeeasy216 4 года назад
Hi Jim, good to hear from you, and I am pleased you are now doing well after the bypass surgery. You have the knowledge and experience regarding exercise, you just need to continue being active as a lifelong approach to managing your cardiovascular risk. Take care and all the best.
@discreetknight
@discreetknight 3 года назад
20% progression gets you to 207 min if you compound the 20%
@NicolaiCzempin
@NicolaiCzempin 2 года назад
Yes, and to explain to those who may not have fully understood the compounding part: Adding 20 % per week does not mean adding 20 minutes per week. That would be 20 % of the original 100 minutes. What you want is to increase by 20 % each week, so first you go from 100 to 120, then from 120 to 144 (because 20 % of 120 is 24, added to the 120), 172.8 and finally 207.36 minutes. Just multiply by 1.2 (adding 20 %) each week.. This is similar to how simple interest vs compound interest works, hence the choice of vocabulary.
@taruncyclist
@taruncyclist 6 месяцев назад
Really it's helpful please give us more knowledge about mussels and traning ❤❤❤ God bless u
@norbertcondoros6803
@norbertcondoros6803 3 года назад
Hello, Dr. Sandoo. Thank you for the great lecture! I hope you won't mind some more questions from me. Your videos are making me curious. I am wondering about the adaptations you mentioned, mainly the increase in mitochondria, and the increased capilarisation. Can resistance training and fat loss benefit from these two adaptations? I suspect that there might be benefits, but I would like to hear your opinion. Many people say that doing cardio has adverse effects on muscle building, but I found out that doing a moderate amount of cardio/aerobic training has no negative impact on it. I even think that increasing the number of mitochondria will increase the muscle's energy using efficiency, which makes perfect sense. This might mean an increase in resting metabolic rate and even a slightly greater force output during resistance training. The increased capilarisation might be able to reduce fatigue due to metabolic stress, meaning that one could be able to do more repetitions with a certain weight (~70-80% 1 RM) before fatigue. The cause for this might be the increased rate of metabolite removal from the muscle. Or is it the case that these two effects cancel each other out? I mean that by increasing the number of mitochondria, the quantity of metabolites produced during exercise will also be greater. So, the increased blood flow will be just enough to clear this out, and the net benefit will be zero. Also, by doing a few high repetition sets (30+ reps) at the end of each resistance training workout, can we improve in the long run our 1 RM or our number of reps with, let's say, 70-80% 1 RM by taking advantage of the same kinds of adaptations? I know that there are several things which can contribute to these improvements, but the question is if moderate endurance training can have benefits on these training aspects? Thank you in advance!
@physiologymadeeasy216
@physiologymadeeasy216 3 года назад
Hi Norbert, Apologies for my delayed reply to your excellently presented question. My view is that endurance training can benefit the muscle architecture (increase mitochondria, capillirisation, enhanced enzyme activity), and athletes in strength based sports should consider regular inclusion of endurance training in their training plan. To my knowledge, the two modes of training do not cancel each other out. I think the proportion of time spent on strength building exercises and improving technique should be greater than the endurance training component, but adaptations from endurance training will enhance blood flow to working muscles and improve efficiency during energy production (even if that energy production is largely from anaerobic sources). I do not know of any studies that have examined whether training with high-reps influence 1-RM (they may exist so worth searching Pubmed/Google Scholar), but I suspect any training program should include high rep work. Some individuals have sessions where they select a light weight and perform 100 reps (for example for squats). The easiest way to see if this works for you is to perform a baseline 1-RM, conduct this type of training for a few weeks and then repeat the 1-RM. I hope the above provides some insight, and thanks again for a great question.
@jordangabriels
@jordangabriels 2 года назад
In essence this is what Strava nudges you towards. It all makes sense now! 🤯
@physiologymadeeasy216
@physiologymadeeasy216 2 года назад
I am pleased you found it useful Jordan.
@marathoner44
@marathoner44 Месяц назад
Excellent lesson!! What is the RER verification number for VT1 and VT2?
@bmp713
@bmp713 3 года назад
Which exercise intensity do you think most increases stroke volume and the hearts internal chamber diameter? I see endless debate and conflicting research. Thank you for your thoughts.
@KeithRobertson57
@KeithRobertson57 3 года назад
I’m looking for some physiology on endurance training with the MAF (Maximum Aerobic Function) principles. Also known as 80/20 where 80% of your training activity is done at quite low HR levels. Doesn’t mean you run or ride the bike ‘slow’, just slow HR. Building your aerobic power over time. Keep the HR constant, but getting faster, growing all those capillaries, etc. You don’t go anywhere near your VT2, mostly around VT1, if I have that right. 20% is harder interval style HIT sessions. You can try and work out your MAF HR with the formula 180 - your age. I’ve trained like this for a little while and it seems very good so far for me. Your talks are good, but mostly it’s about going towards VT2, which I don’t want to do at all, possibly all winter on the bike. Any thoughts??
@dragonchr15
@dragonchr15 2 года назад
From what I have seen about MAF is that you train MAF heart rate the majority of the time and increase the pace as you get closer to race day.
@itsmichaelakin5421
@itsmichaelakin5421 2 года назад
Hi Dr Sandoo thank you for the video. I'm a beginner runner and found this really useful for developing a regimen. My question is does RPE correspond to how hard my breathing is or how tired my legs are? I find that I can run quite fast and long without too much breathing difficulty but my legs get very tired within a few minutes
@jackelliott4139
@jackelliott4139 11 месяцев назад
Hi, RPE is basically how hard that exercise was for you. I like to do a scale of 1-10 so 10 is very hard and 1 is very easy. You can also do RIR (reps in reserve) for terms of lifting. RIR would be opposite of RPE so if you have 1 RIR you are almost at failure and 10 RIR is you have 10 reps left before you fail. So RPE is more of the intensity you feel during the exercise and is custom to you. You can also increase your RPE, so something that was a 10 3 months ago is only a 7 today or something like that.
@konnor9577
@konnor9577 Год назад
At what heart rate % should we train Continuous and steady-state ? And the rest of the intensity levels??
@gthegreat2009
@gthegreat2009 2 года назад
What book are you using?
@avocado6779
@avocado6779 Год назад
Hi professor. Can you explain how substances like meldonium and Cardarine, assist in boosting endurance? And should they improve endurance in theory
@Website9
@Website9 Год назад
Cardarine will allow you to recover quicker, train harder, lose more fat which will then boost your endurance etc....
@abhisheksharma7084
@abhisheksharma7084 4 года назад
Hii sir, First of all how we suppose to divide 100 min on first week according to days Second - how much time does lactic acid takes to remove completley Third - Plz make a video on RPE scale along with its utilisation. Topic was awesome 👏👍
@physiologymadeeasy216
@physiologymadeeasy216 4 года назад
Hi Abishek, Answer to questions: 1) You could have any number of different options. For example, go for two long session that are 50 minutes each, or you could for 4 x 25 minute session, or do any other variation in times. The 100 minutes is a good starting point, but ideally you want to develop longer aerobic sessions which are greater than 35 minutes. 2) some interesting papers that will answer part of your question: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25920410 www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20544484 3) I will try to make a video about this soon. I have some others that I need to do first, but I will keep this one in mind. Finally, thank you for your enthusiasm and interest, and all the best with your studies.
@abhisheksharma7084
@abhisheksharma7084 4 года назад
@@physiologymadeeasy216 Is it necessary to go for 100 min first
@physiologymadeeasy216
@physiologymadeeasy216 4 года назад
@@abhisheksharma7084 No, just do what you are comfortable doing to begin with and then progress as the weeks go on.
@jacopotronconi6790
@jacopotronconi6790 3 года назад
Thank you Doctor for the video. After watching it I was a bit confused though: I'm 39 and I recently had a CPET which set my anaerobic threshold at 116 bpm (cycling). The CPET was performed solely to assess my athletic condition and I have no heart or cardiovascular condition whatsoever. I was pretty surprised at that number anyway, as I feel only a very light exertion at that pace, probably between 9 and 11 on the scale you showed. You mentioned that in order to improve, one is to include sessions where RPE should be somewhere between 13 and 15; but if I exercised at that perceived exertion, my heart would jump at 130-140, which according to the CPET is way above my AT. I'm very confused and I don't know how to proceed in my training routine; jogging and exercising are among the few things that help me cope with anxiety and they're very important to me, but I also would like to do them in a healthy way. I've jogged for months without improving my endurance much. Right now I'm trying to exercise with brisk walking to improve my AT, as it's the only way not to exceed the 115-120 bpm, and I do that 4-5 times per week. What would you do in my shoes? Another question I'd have is about the three types of training that you introduced in the video: as I understand, they should be mixed during the week, which 70 to 80% of the total training time belonging to the first type of training (aerobic, i.e. below the AT), and the remaining 20 to 30% beloning to the second or third type of trainings, which should never be performed back to back. Is that correct? Thanks for any suggestion you may give me Doctor. Thank you.
@NicolaiCzempin
@NicolaiCzempin 2 года назад
Not a physician, but here are some thoughts: 116 sounds very low. I'm 52, was sedentary for decades and even before that I was never the endurance type, and I could go on for hours at that heart rate. If you can sustain activity at 130 (or at any other level), the lactate/H2 ions are being cleared out of your system fast enough, so you'd be below what is normally considered to be the anaerobic threshold. To train your AT, for example using interval training as described in the video, you are actually _supposec_ to go above your AT for a while, then go back below it but not for long enough to recover completely. This will eventually become quite painful (so don't overdo it); part of the adaptations due to the training moves the threshold "further out", so at the same exercise intensity / heart rate you hit the threshold later. And part of it lets you endure the pain from the acidity a little better. Hope that helps, and I hope someone with a deeper understanding of exercise physiology can correct my mistakes and/or clarify bits that I perhaps phrased confusingly.
@jk3266
@jk3266 Год назад
What is the significance of doing 20 minutes cardio at the end of resistance training session?
@rallyboy101
@rallyboy101 3 года назад
Question if i may. I'm male nearly 49yrs old, quite fit, but a worry is that when cycling (indoor) my MHr has peaked at 186bpm.... (maybe due to overheating?). Outdoor i can peak briefly around 181bpm. Reading lots of stuff my MHr is way beyond what it should be. Also, on bike rides (20-30miles), i give everything, my HRM says i'm 80-100% in Z4/Z5....... i seem to be able to sustain it for the duration of the rides, is that normal? Thanks in advance
@joseborges2119
@joseborges2119 2 года назад
I'm 54 and my HRmax is about 200 (running, cycling should be lower). The 220-age formula is just an average and not a very good one. Individual HRmax is what it is, if yours is 186 (or 181) that's above average, but not abnormal.
@joseborges2119
@joseborges2119 2 года назад
If you can sustain effort for more than one hour at a certain heart rate, it means you are working below your lactate threshold. Traditionally the lactate threshold is considered the frontier between Z3 and Z4.
@ahaider7871
@ahaider7871 2 года назад
on 10:00 what heart rate should I be targeting? or what heart rate zone?
@NicolaiCzempin
@NicolaiCzempin 2 года назад
Basically, whatever effort that's required to make it unsustainable for more than a few minutes at a time. The concrete heart rate will be different for each individual. The zone will probably correspond to 3 to 4 (if you compare his explanations on RPE).
@ahaider7871
@ahaider7871 2 года назад
@@NicolaiCzempin Yeah thanks, I figured it out, it was in Zone 4 but as far as you can go before it hits Zone 5. So around Zone 4.5 - 4.9
@dr.mohamedaitnouh4501
@dr.mohamedaitnouh4501 9 дней назад
What is RPE? Can we measure it with heart monitor?
@physiologymadeeasy216
@physiologymadeeasy216 6 дней назад
Ratings of perceived exertion. It can be found online by search Borg RPE scale and does correlate well with heart rates at different exercise intensities.
@miodoh
@miodoh 3 года назад
what is RPE?
@andypenniceard6235
@andypenniceard6235 3 года назад
Rate of Perceived Exertion (RPE)
@LeeYang07133
@LeeYang07133 6 месяцев назад
Everyone says your video is great. But i couldnt watch it. The camera was constantly going in and out of focus and the sound the marker makes while you write is like finger nails to a chalk board. .. .. sorry. It tried to hang in until i couldnt anymore. .. 😢
@physiologymadeeasy216
@physiologymadeeasy216 4 месяца назад
Fair play - I completely agree with you and sorry the video was not watchable for you. The pen sounds are quite bad, and I was gutted the camera was going out of focus. As I shoot and edit all the videos myself, at that time I was still on a learning curve about camera settings etc. I plan to do a new video on this topic soon for which I intend to shoot using the skills and experience I have gathered since this video was made. Hopefully it will be a much better production.
Далее
The Anatomy of the Ventilatory System
2:36
小天使和小丑离家出走#short #angel #clown
00:36
Short Interval Blocks for Endurance Athletes- Part1
15:48
Acute Responses to Aerobic Training | CSCS Chapter 6
18:21