Assalamu alaikum everyone, Please see the book recommendations and some non-Muslim scholarly quotes on the preservation of the Quran below: The History of the Quranic Text: From Revelation to Compilation (2nd edition) by M. M. Al-Azami. Hunting for the Word of God by Sami Ameri. One of the best sources on ancient Quran manuscripts: www.islamic-awareness.org/quran/text/mss/ Non-Muslim scholarly quotes on the preservation of the Quran: Richard Bell and Montgomery Watt (1970): ‘This establishment of the text of the Quran under Uthman may be dated somewhere between 650 and his death in 656. It is the cardinal point in what may be called the formation of the canon of the Quran. Whatever may have been the form of the Quran previously, it is certain that the book still in our hands is essentially the Uthmanic Quran. Uthman’s commission decided what was to be included and what excluded; it fixed the number and order of the suras, and the 'outline' of the consonantal text (that is, its shape when the dots distinguishing letters are omitted). If we remember that to preserve every smallest fragment of genuine revelation was an ineluctable requirement, the commission under Zayd must be adjudged to have achieved a wonderful piece of work.’ (Introduction to the Quran, p. 44). ‘Thus on the whole the information which has reached us about the pre-Uthmanic codices suggests that there was no great variation in the actual contents of the Quran in the period immediately after the Prophet's death. The order of the suras was apparently not fixed, and there were many slight variations in reading, but of other differences there is no evidence.’ (p. 46). ‘On general grounds then, it may be concluded that the Uthmanic revision was honestly carried out, and reproduced, as closely as was possible to the men in charge of it, what Muhammad had delivered. (p. 51). ‘Modern study of the Quran has not in fact raised any serious question of its authenticity. The style varies, but is almost unmistakable. So clearly does the whole bear the stamp of uniformity that doubts of its genuineness hardly arise. The authenticity of a few verses has indeed been questioned. (p. 51). Angelika Neuwirth (2006): 'As a whole, however, the theories of the so called sceptic or revisionist scholars who, arguing historically, make a radical break with the transmitted picture of Islamic origins, shifting them in both time and place from the seventh to the eighth or ninth century and from the Arabian Peninsula to the Fertile Crescent, have by now been discarded, though many of their critical observations remain challenging and still call for investigation. New findings of Quranic text fragments, moreover, can be adduced to affirm rather than call into question the traditional picture of the Quran as an early fixed text composed of the suras we have.’ (Structural, Linguistic and Literary Features in the Cambridge Companion to the Quran, 2006, p. 100-1) Marijn Van Putten (2019): "This paper has shown that idiosyncratic spellings of certain words are not due to the whims of the scribe, but are reproduced with the same spelling in all early Quranic manuscripts. The only way that such a consistent reproduction can be explained is by assuming that all the documents that belong to the Uthmanic text type go back to a single written archetype whose spelling was strictly copied from one copy to the next, showing that these copies were based on a written exemplar. The manuscripts examined in this study are sufficiently early that a codification of the Uthmanic text type is perfectly consistent with an attribution to its traditional source: ʿUthmān b.ʿAffān." ("The Grace of God” as Evidence for a Written Uthmanic Archetype: the Importance of Shared Orthographic Idiosyncrasies (2019), conclusion). Nicolai Sinai (2020): "There is thus a peculiar disjuncture between the version of the quranic text that remains the basis of academic work, on the one hand, and the physical evidence for the Quran’s written transmission, particularly its early transmission, on the other. This disjuncture is sustained by the near-total dominance of the above-mentioned standard recension of the Quran’s consonantal skeleton, the so-called ʿUthmānic text: a student of the Quran who takes the trouble to check early codices will generally encounter a more or less undotted and unvocalized version of the same consonantal skeleton that underlies her modern print copy, often with some orthographic variation (e.g., whether or not medial ā is spelled plene, i.e., with alif) and minor textual discrepancies such as the presence or absence of particles like wa- (“and”). This supremacy of the Quran’s canonical rasm, which must have arisen early, is apt to douse some of the interest that scholars who are not card-carrying codicolo-gists, palaeographers, or art historians will take in manuscripts of the Quran." "To be sure, one may well hold that the gamut of viable hypotheses about the date of the Quran has now shrunk to the seventh century, thereby defusing some of the issue’s long-standing contentiousness." ("Beyond the Cairo Edition: On the Study of Early Quranic Codices." Journal of the American Oriental Society 140.1 (2020): 189-190). In light of the above non-Muslim scholarly opinions, anyone who argues against the impeccable preservation of the text of the Quran is either ignorant, malicious propagandist or in need of medical help. Best wishes.
Allah Yahfadhak brother Adnan! Wallah I LOVE History and I Love you for the sake of Allah. May Allah strengthen you in all your endeavours and guide us all to sincerity ya Rab... Ameen
JazakAllah Ustad. Can you please also record a an interview similar to this in Usool e Hadith and discuss evey grade briefly along with the verification process.
Jazakum Allahu khairan for the talk and info, brother. I enjoy listening to you and I love you for the sake of Allah. I am so happy that you shared the Islamic Awareness website. I have lost it and couldn’t find it anymore. I am currently translating the letters of the Prophet (Saas) to the kings beyond Arabia to Portuguese and I was looking for this website. Alhamdulillah!
My dear brothers and sisters in islam ☪️ memorizing Qur’aan is not difficult. At the age of 12 I have completely memorized the Qur’aan and now I’m 21 years old living in east Africa #Somalia. If you believe that only those who speak Arabic can memorize Qur’aan, for me I never speak Arabic. Thanks brother Adnan 🙏
Gee, thats pretty virus ridden and highly dangerous sortware you've uploaded. You need to get your hard drive wiped. So far this diabolical code is responsible for 60 million+ deaths and rising.... thereligionofpeace.com/attacks/attacks.aspx?Yr=Last30 There is a detox available. Jesus said "The Truth will set you free" (John 8v32)
@@User-4517 *Gods Wondrous Plan of Salvation in Jesus Christ* Jesus Christ, the Eternal Everlasting Word of God, took upon Himself flesh and blood and dwelt among us. Forsaking His deity He humbled Himself and became a mere man who slept, ate, sweated and got tired and hungry like us all. As prophesied, He was rejected by men, and was viciously scourged to the very bones by the Romans. The historian Josephus tells us that many didn't survive a Roman scourging, some being literally disemboweled in the process, others bleeding out to death shortly afterwards. Jesus was so brutalised that this sturdy 33 year old 'blue collar' carpenter in the prime of life wasn't even capable of carrying his cross afterwards. On arrival at Golgotha, the place of the Skull, nine inch iron spikes where then hammered through his wrists and ankles and he was hung up naked on a cross to suffer a slow, shameful and agonising death. But it never ended there. We're told this 'sacrificial lamb' was the fore-ordained lamb slain before the very foundation of the world. The old testament typologies now lit up like beacons. The *passover lambs* slain in Exodus, all the *animals sacrifices* and *scapegoats* under the Mosaic law, the deep drama of Abraham, Isaac and the goat caught by its horns on the mountain top, the very fact He was born in a lowly animal stable, all were mere signposts, pointing us onwards towards *The* Lamb, *The Eternal Lamb* now pathetically hanging, nailed to a tree on the very day of Passover, the very same day solemnly remembered for nearly 1500 years since Gods Judgement passed-over those hebrew dwellings marked with the *lambs blood* in Egypt. The Heavens now darkened to black as the Divine Mystery hidden for ages past unfolded and the unfathomable Divine exchange took place. The sins of all mankind both past and to come were soaked into this dying, bleeding, rejected lamb and The Eternal all Encompassing Pardon was issued to all and any who would take it, singed not with the blood of goats and bulls but with the very life blood of Gods only begotten Son. Gods New Testament, His New *Blood Covenant* was now revealed. *My God, My God, why have you forsaken me* uttered this bedraggled ruin as he was dying, the very words penned a thousand years before by King Davids inspired hand in the 22nd psalm. This *Last Adam* now fell asleep in death and pouring forth from His opened side came Water and the Blood and His Church, His Bride could now come forth. The *first adam* too had been put to sleep by God as He opened his side and took from him that which was needed to form his own bride. The beacons were lighting all over now throughout the old Hebrew Scriptures, perhaps none brighter than Isaiahs Chapter 53 from 700 years before biblehub.com/niv/isaiah/53.htm *Gods Divine Exchange and Proven Love...* *2 Cor 5v21...* God made Him who had no sin to be sin for us, so that in Him we might become the Righteousness of God. *Romans 5v8...* But God *Proves* His Great love for us in this: While we were still sinners, *Christ died for us* *John 3v16...* For God *so* loved the world that He gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in Him shall not perish but have Eternal Everlasting Life. *Acts 4v12...* And there is salvation in *no one else* for there is *no* other name under heaven given among men by which we *must be saved.*
*And We will surely test you with something of fear and hunger and a loss of wealth and lives and fruits, but give good tidings to the patient,Who, when disaster strikes them, say, "Indeed we belong to Allah, and indeed to Him we will return,"Those are the ones upon whom are blessings from their Lord and mercy. And it is those who are the guided.*
Who is we???? Multiple Gods or Allah alone? Can you please explain because it maybe makes fully sense for you but to me it's xxxshit. There is only one God. This alone shows something is wrong here. There is no we. There is only one God.
ma'sha'Allah tabarak Allah , this channel needs much much more subscribers , Brother Adnan provides powerful insight to strengthen imaan and to answer alot of non-muslims questions to bring them closer to the haq
The Qur'an is an oral tradition, exactly sheikh Adnan. It's an oral tradition before being a book. Most of the millions of Muslims who memorize the Qur'an today didn't learn how to write it but how to recite it from memory, and when they memorize it fully they are given ijazas (meaning certifications) only from a teacher with an ijaza, with two witnesses present, and in the ijaza is a chain, similar to a Hadith chain of narration, that starts with them, then their teacher, and goes all the way back to the Prophet PBUH. And currently any new Qur'ans printed in an Islamic country must be inspected by a committee of people with ijazas first before being printed. Praise Allah for perserving His words for us.
@Lilya Sh the good believer is the one who obeys the commandments of the Supreme God. All religions have certain prohibitions, Islam and Christianity being very close on this. For example, both prohibit beer, pork such vices as cheating, killing, fornication etc. But we humans quite often err, even with our limitations Allah is most forgiving. He can admit you into the gardens of paradise regardless.
@@PDCCIV that was funny really you made my day, now can you read what you typed in a slow mo, 99% of accuracy what we have from sold evidence and 1% + 99% through generations after another of accurate memorising what do you want more? really mate get a life .... don't edit your comment OK?
@@BigBoss-ti1wo I love it when you are so curious about our true religion, the only problem is you never pick up a book in your life also you seem arrogant and ignorant, don't fool me mate, I know who picks up the Quran and read it from the one who goes to hater websites or watching crazy people claiming false information, don't embarrass yourself, go read from the source and educate yourself.
The wonderful Adnan Rashid. Sorry Ustad Adnan Rashid. We humbly thank you for all you give to help our community. Mashallah may Allah preserve you in great health. Thank you.
One of the most important topic, preservation of Quran, with Brother Adnan is informative and authentic, hope we will have more episodes with the same topic ? as mention in the video. Ma sha Allah 🌻
As Salaam alaikum. I’m a new Muslim and I can’t speak Arabic so what would be the best Arabic/English Quran to have? I just came across your page and I love it.
Thanks for having on our esteem scholar Adnan Rashid may Allah continue to bless this brother, his knowledge and history of Islam is excellent and I appreciate his accurate true explanations of the events of the history of Islam, As Salaamu Alayikum, Allah is Alone and he has no partners.
A Point I would make is that missionarries spend vast majority of their time attacking Islam by making up lies.They don't even preach Christianity.This is very telling.It means they don't even care if non Muslims accept Christianity as long as they don't accept Islam. Why does it bother them so much that people accept Islam christian missionarries Lack of honesty in their study about Islam,they are studying with intentions off finding mistakes not to understand,to save their fellow christians from the growing of Islam in their countries.
Very true. They are obsessed to say false things about islam. Remember that only those who are not content with their faith will have obsession, hatred, making lies, etc. You will never see any good muslim wasting time criticising Christianity and their false beliefs.
@@gabrielabdul8372 I know brother,western world pregnant to Islam,this birth is coming soon,InsAllah. Sahih International: And say, "Truth has come, and falsehood has departed. Indeed is falsehood, [by nature], ever bound to depart."
Wow..... May be Allah taught them taquia🤣🤣.... Muslim speaks only truth and nothing but truth.... 😁😆... Missionaries brought up change and growth of civilization..... .... Giving life is not marrying 4 and enjoying sex.... Leaving everything and working for others growth... Missionaries do this... Your imman use taquia🤣 Holes in narrative..... Muslim says Jesus is prophet.... That is why we need to talk about Islamic lies..
Because you call polemists missionaries. There purpose is the same but their methods are different. The polemists expose the lies your are being told about Muhammad, his self-created Allah, Islam and the Quran; the Apologists(who may also be polemists), expose the truth about the Christian faith. The missionaries basically do the latter and reach those who will not easily receive the message except by extra effort but all want you and other people to turn to the true and living God and not be deceived.
So sorry I'm new. But I don't know Arabic. But I say my Sala in Arabic to the best I can. Insha Allah one day I can read or recitation the Holy Qur'an Arabic. O Allah grant me understanding.
Recently UK university (possibly Birmingham University) discovered the oldest Quran written during the lifetime of Prophet Muhammad (SM).. it’s same as it is available today. Brother Adnan and other scholars can refer while answering to non Muslims.
Salam Adnan Rashid Bhai, I hope u are well, I will watch this video shortly. During last few weeks including during Ramadhan iv been watching ur videos which I really enjoyed, I rewatched them like the quranist ones with Marwan and Kamran aka Cameron lol (Kamran is actually a family friend of mine lol jus to give u short story) Shaykh I know u said before that u had no interest in discussing or debating mufti Abu layth, I don't agree with his views mind you, he has mentioned twice on his Monday q&a that he would like to have you on as a guest on his other show for a dialogue and not a debate, if u can somehow fit that in ur schedule I would be grateful, I think we can all benefit the both of you on screen having a dialogue
Yet we still have people like Jay Smith arguing that the Qur'an was not preserved. He thinks that the oral tradition was unreliable and then creates a strawman argument saying that "oh so the oral tradition is better than writing it down?" even though that isn't what anyone is saying. He fails to understand that the oral tradition was primary to the Arabs at the time who were mostly illiterate.
@Lilya Sh Allah is not the Moon God ... I can understand that truth can't help you so you seek help from falsehood... But be in Bible's YHWH's given boundaries ...
What about the oral tradition while Quran was canonized? If there is a oral tradition before the canonization, how it matched with today's written Quran? The sequence of Sura is changed by the compilation and canonization. When the sequence of Sura in the oral tradition changed?
The chronological order is known. Generally, the Quran was rearranged order wise from longest chapters to shortest to make it easier to read. The arrangement doesn't mean the text has changed.
Did I understand Adnan correctly? Did he say it was forbidden to translate ("transliterate") the Qu'ran into another language? If so, doesn't that lock out over five billion people from understanding the message of the book? For example, I am 68 years old and am reading the Qu'ran for the first time. Am I supposed to study Arabic for the next 25 years in order to read the text with sufficient comprehension to judge whether I can accept its message? What about my 95 year old father? If an imam can teach about the Qu'ran in English (obviously quoting its meaning/translation/transliteration while doing so) why would an English translation be wrong? Why do societies for the propagation of Islam translate the Qu'ran into many languages?
There is a huge difference between translation and transportation. A translation tells you the meaning of words in another language. A transliteration doesn't tell you the meaning of the words, but it helps you pronounce them. Transliteration changes the letters from one alphabet or language into the corresponding, similar-sounding characters of another alphabet. Hope this clarifies.
Hi adnan bhai...salam from bangladesh..Want more videos even more detail about this topic.. Covering who Write down quaran, What is the names of them, Who make the sura serial etc.. Or can you please recommend some books where i can learn all this.. Thanks
Brother I am sure you have major scholars of Ahlul Hadith there in Bangladesh. I am sure they have information on that as well. By the way, do you know Urdu? But in short, here some names of the scribes of the Prophet ﷺ: Imam Ibn al-Qayyim (rahimahullah) said: The scholars of seerah (Prophet’s biography) have mentioned the names of the Sahaabah who used to write down the wahy (revelation) or the letters of the Messenger (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him). They were: Abu Bakr al-Siddeeq, ‘Umar ibn al-Khattaab, ‘Uthmaan ibn ‘Affaan, ‘Ali ibn Abi Taalib, al-Zubayr ibn al-‘Awwaam, ‘Aamir ibn Fuhayrah, ‘Amr ibn al-‘Aas, Ubayy ibn Ka’b, ‘Abd-Allaah ibn al-Arqam, Thaabit ibn Qays ibn Shammaas, Hanzalah ibn al-Rabee’ al-Usaydi, al-Mugheerah ibn Shu’bah, ‘Abd-Allaah ibn Rawaahah, Khaalid ibn al-Waleed, Khaalid ibn Sa’eed ibn al-‘Aas (whom it was said was the first one to write down anything for him), Mu’aawiyah ibn Abi Sufyaan and Zayd ibn Thaabit. He requested them to do that and allocated this task to them. Zaad al-Ma’aad, 1/117 Ibn Muflih al-Hanbali said: A group of them wrote things down for the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him), including Ubayy ibn Ka’b, Zayd ibn Thaabit, ‘Ali, ‘Uthmaan, Hanzalah al-Asadi, Mu’aawiyah, and ‘Abd-Allaah ibn al-Arqam, who was his regular scribe in charge of writing and responding to letters. He was the one who wrote down all the Revelation and whom the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) commanded to learn how to write Syriac so that he could respond on his behalf to those who wrote to him in that language. So he learned it in eighteen days. Al-Adaab al-Shar’iyyah, 2/161 And Ibn Hajar (rahimahullah) said: Al-Qadaa’i said: Zayd ibn Thaabit used to write to the kings on his behalf, as well as writing down the revelation. And al-Zubayr and Jahm used to write down the records of zakaah. Al-Talkhees al-Habeer, 4/346, 347 Every Surahs name and the number of the Surah - all of that is Tawqifiyyah, i.e. from revelation from Allah.
Jazakum Allahu Khairan. Allahumma Salli Ala Muhammad Wa Ale Muhammad. The Qur'an means the recitation. Thus, it is perfectly logical that it be recited. Subsequent writing merely confirms the authenticity of the original Divine Revelation which itself came as verbal recitation by Arch Angel Gabriel AS directly unto the Messenger of Allah, Muhammad SAS. Moreover, unlike other religions books, Allah swt promised to preserve the Qur'an in its pristine purity as Divinely Revealed.
We just have the read the hadiths to see that the quran was no perfectly preserved. There's 37 different recitations of the Quran today, far more than uthman ever authorized. And why was uthman an authority to determine which 7 recitations were correct? If he chose 7 recitations and had all the other qurans burned, it meant there were many other recitations at the time of Uthman. So who today had the authority from allah to determine 37 quranic recitations? Who approved of the additional 30 that have come into existences since Uthman? Reading islamic history there's been possibly 700 different recitations throughout history, contradicting the the idea that the quran on earth today is the same as the one on clay tablets in heaven.
But he did not talked about ahuruf, actually Prophet himself (PUH), compiled whole Quran in his last two yrs,,, sequencing the sura, than Qiratul Ammar / later Nafs
Wt heck r u tryna say....... The Quran is being recited on a daily basis 5 time a day cross community of muslims..... all over the world each confirming each other..... Eg when in prayer the imam forgets or mistakes the recitation every one prayeing behind corrects him by saying out loud the correcting him.... ( u might as well vist a mosque u will know ) We hv recitation compitition all over the world and wht all recite is same in letter to letter To test this all u need is take a muslim hafiz from east n take 1 from west or different place and make them recite n see it for ur self......... I mean wht r u trying to say really.... The fact is so clear its written in stone.... So its really a joke... when said any illogical thing about this issue.... There r miilions of muslim who memorize the Quran all over worldwide.... they learn from teachers n this can be trasced all the way to Prophet Muhammad (salahualiwasallam).......... I mean i personally memorized already quarter of Quran..... So for muslims when outsiders make this outright blantent lie or erroneous mistakes this is simply laughable..... The Quran is not only preserved in 1 way but my multiple ways all confirming each other....
3:10 These claims are fine for the east, but in west they will not continue to work. 33:6 is but one example: - *"He is a father to them,"* but it is *no longer* recited since it is *at variance* with the version of ‘Uthman. -(Muhammad Messenger of Allah (Ash-Shifa of Qadi 'Iyad), Qadi 'Iyad Musa al-Yahsubi, translated by Aisha Abdarrahman Bewley [Madinah Press, Inverness, Scotland, U.K. 1991] - Surat 33:6 "The Prophet has a higher claim on the believers than [they have on] their own selves, [seeing that *he is as a father to them]* and his wives are their mothers…" -Muhammad Asad translation actually re-inserts this back into Quran. - "The Prophet is closer to the Believers than their own selves, and his wives are their mothers..." "...In some Qiraats, like that of Ubai ibn Kab, occur also the word *"and he is a father to them..."* (A. Yusuf Ali, The Holy Quran, 1975, note 3674).
@Philip Njoroge If you're defending CP, I would ask you to look at the videos at Farid Responds. Please listen, I am NOT telling you who's right and who's wrong. I just want you to have the will to know the truth and look at it for yourself. May Allah guide us all.
@Uthman ThaLayman Why do you group everyone together. The evidence above was from your own Muslim scholars who translated the Quran! Don't harden your heart to truth when God has been merciful enough to give you opportunity to know it so you can be free.
Hadith حَدَّثَنَا إِسْحَاقُ بْنُ إِبْرَاهِيمَ الْحَنْظَلِيُّ، قَالَ أَخْبَرَنَا عَبْدُ الرَّزَّاقِ، قَالَ أَخْبَرَنَا مَعْمَرٌ، عَنْ هَمَّامِ بْنِ مُنَبِّهٍ، أَنَّهُ سَمِعَ أَبَا هُرَيْرَةَ، يَقُولُ قَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم لاَ تُقْبَلُ صَلاَةُ مَنْ أَحْدَثَ حَتَّى يَتَوَضَّأَ " قَالَ رَجُلٌ مِنْ حَضْرَمَوْتَ مَا الْحَدَثُ يَا أَبَا هُرَيْرَةَ قَالَ فُسَاءٌ أَوْ ضُرَاطٌ Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) said, "The prayer of a person who does Hadath (passes urine, stool or wind) is not accepted till he performs the ablution." A person from Hadaramout asked Abu Huraira, "What is 'Hadath'?" Abu Huraira replied, " 'Hadath' means the passing of wind." Sahih al-Bukhari 135 In-book : Book 4, Hadith 1 USC-MSA web (English) : Vol. 1, Book 4, Hadith 137 (deprecated) Sahih Bukhari I invite everyone to learn Islam ☝️ For the sake of allah.
With that logic don’t force a child to go to school then since at school they are forced to read books, learn and memorize words. A child cannot critically think yet, they are at the stage of life of absorbing information instead of critically analyzing it. Which is why they learn everything quickly and pick up complex languages with ease since their memory is at a peak. So, at the age of absorbing information what better thing for them to memorize than the words of God. It actually strengthens their memory and will make the journey of knowledge easy for them as they got older. This is someone speaking to you, you had experienced this myself.
Question: What are the scriptures from the bible or Dead Sea scrolls do you accept, adopt or approve to be authentic or not tampered with by the clergy. & if the old testament is also tampered with then what about the 10 commandments? thou shall have no other God's before me (God), thou shall not bare false witness(Lie) thou shall not murder thou shall not take the name of the Lord your God in vein. He will not hold him guiltless who taketh his name in vein. As I have, have you ever committed or done such things? Broken any of the old testament 10 Commandments?
@Belinda Thanks for the link & information. Question please: Which of the 10 Commandments do you obey, observe, practice & or abide by? For example: 13 Thou shalt not kill. 14 Thou shalt not commit adultery. 15 Thou shalt not steal. 16 Thou shalt not bear false witness Exodus 20:13-16 And to what measure of punishment does your government authority officials carry out/perform upon citizens that break such commitments & or Laws?
@@jonathanpeterson2296 I understand Christians believe that breaking any commandment equals eternal damnation without some perfect blood atonement. Please understand that this is something Christians made up and we do not hold the same belief. Please read Ezekiel 18 and tell me why Christians believe God stopped being able to forgive people without blood. Does that not raise any questions in your mind? Why would our loving Creator suddenly require innocent blood when He was fine with simple repentance before? That is what we believe in, repentance, not vicarious atonement.
David Wood has no credibility. He made full-time job to criticize islam and say false things. Why is he obsessed with other people's faith when he could simply sit down and worship his false three Gods known as trinity. Hahaha wait Trinity?????? Hahahaha
TheTranq how can anyone give a “technical response” to an utterly disgraceful and pathetic joke that’s David Wood. But if you really want “technical” than search up Farid Response. You’ll find all your answers there.
If, for example, we believed in the qira'at which we do not, what has been provided for the hadiths? Name me one reciter or transmitter for the hadiths, remembering of course, that the hadiths were written 200 -250 years after the alleged death of your so called prophet. They also are the make up of the next three most powerful sources in Islam.
The message from Angel Gabriel to Mary Luke 1:30 The Angel said to her, Do not be afraid Mary for you have found favour with God 31 And now you will conceive in your womb and bear a son, and you will name him Jesus. 32 He will be great and will be called the Son of the Most High, and the Lord God will give to him the throne of his ancestor David 33 He will reign over the house of Jacob forever and of his kingdom there will be no end 34 Mary said to the angel, How can this be, Since I am a virgin? 35 The angel said to her, The Holy spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you therefore the child to be born will be holy he will be called Son of God. Please note the presence of the Most High Living God and the presence of the Holy Spirit and the child to be born Lord Jesus Christ all the three are present according to the message of Angel Gabriel proclaimed to Mary which means one God three persons God the Father God the Son God the Holy Spirit
@Roid Astria what Strawmaning? Quran isn't preserved word by word.... Allah's internal attributes? Allah's internal tablet and this quran on earth are same copies.... And hence Only Arabic recitation in mosque or shahada..? Allah speaks Arabic, language of heaven? Only quran preserved by allah? One quran in the entire world? What happened to all of these? Perfect recitation technique.... All gone... Now talk about manuscript... Pre-Uttman .. Nothing available as king uttman burnt all of them. So reliability of quranic text is at question... ? ⭕holes in quranic narrative.... It is pure miracle of Allah that it is becoming bigger and wider😆😁 Don't fool yourself bro. 😉🙃😇
your comments on these after clearly showing the text rather than talking - ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE--qtkz-41I3M.html and ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-cuNJZHlht0w.html
I think Sh.Adnan should challenge Sh.Yasir Qadhi's contentions on holes in the narrative. I'm not sure Adnan would qualify as an Islamic scholar but he seems better versed than Yasir Qadhi on this issue ..I really thought that Qadhi who spent over 10 years in Saudi studying with some of the Salafi giants plus the hundreds of books he claims to had studied for his phd ,would have been more knowledgeable than Adnan in these fields. Ah well...I guess its wishful thinking.
