I DUG DEEP into CHINA's J-10 ELECTRONICS and this is what I found... 

Thank you very much for your amazing videos my friend but starting from what we know now about J10 C and SAAB Gripen 39 E which is better ??????

India got the delivery of rafale. Rafale isn't a beauty, it's a beast!! Beauties can't last in fighting 😂. J-10C is inferior to rafale in every single aspect!

@@heyhellohi Man why you gotta be a buzzkill here. We are all aviation lovers first here on this channel.

@@heyhellohi we have tea for rafael pilots

@@jaggafeen how soon can you surrender?

@@jaggafeen Beggars can't be choosers.

Love the comment

Unfortunately it’s already attacking PAF financially.

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-Atoh0PH5638.html

jf17 is a joke from 18th century half of them are already grounded due to poor performance and cheap Chinese electronics

@@xyz-iz2kf teja is simply a joke of 21th century

@@xyz-iz2kf ur the joke of 18 century ，because in 21 century u already in heaven 🤣🤣🤣

As a pakistanni,a country which will be getting 40 jets of those fighter soon,I'd still rather have a f 16 if all use conditions are equal

@@sharequsman596 why? the J10C seems like a good choce. it even has irst which the f16 lacks

@@rajasaid8227 Yeah it's better as a jet in terms of specs but the f 16s are super reliable,really old ones from the cold war era haven't broken down once.Not to mention the j 10c will probably be using SD 10s which means it's on the same level as the jf 17 as weopons lethality making the f 16 much better against India's super manuverable jets like the su 30 considering it has the amraam 120c which is better than the SD 10

@@sharequsman596 a mature design indeed, plus later models are quite up to date on capabilities. J10 seems to be a decent machine, i wonder if those chinese engines are long lasting.

@Griffin Taurus 👹🎭 Pretty sure it has better ones than our f 16 block 52s

Can I have the link of it ? I'm quite curious about it

Does link 17 work with both Chinese and US planes?

Thanks for pointing out.

@@sidv4615 Yeah

@@sidv4615 not with US planes, falcon still uses link 16. Link 17 is basically Chinese, although pakistanis love to call Chinese products as their own,it's not. Link 17 is only compatible with Chinese weaponry, f16 is not compatible with link 17.

@@dotsanddash8083 wrong..f16s can talk to link 17 via intermediary so can naval assets(which are western) and AWECS(most are western/saab)

I was thinking that since China produces a great variety of electronic products for civilian use, Arinc 429 parts might already be available in the parts bin.

Yes j-10c uses another radar which has 1300 recievers not 1000. Which is in jf-17 block 3

Bro Pakistan air force modified it's J10C according to their equipments that's why it took time

@@sufimaya7223 Lol

@@singatakberpura j 10 cp

@@lawrance6540 The prime minister would probably get a new girlfriend.

@@hallo84 a new haircut would probably do more help to his political career… 😂

Well, it's large, imposing yet elegant at the same time. Besides it has all these vibrant colors compared to NATO planes which are generally stuck with dull air superiority grey

Looks like f16

You’re right. Say what you want about Russian aircraft (and naval ships) but they build them looking good.

H I Sutton is really great

@@andresmartinezramos7513 Yeah

Aye

I'm glad I'm not the only one noticing the "blinking eye" watermark in certain parts of the video. It certainly distracted me a bit from the discussion and had to rewatch some sections

You mean tempest?

@@swordsman1137 yes tempest

Another junk

@@lifenugget3313 say that without crying

@@RAPTORGAMINGz say what? Who is desperate even for little dough from IMF,

I'm frustrated with my USA too.. but let me bring you a little peace of mind. IF we continue to ramp up production of the F-35 (and obviously if we don't all die in a nuclear fire, the Russian invasion will be an absolute boon for the MIC) we will be fine. For starters - attrition. For all the bellyache about the F-35, let's be practical; the entire aircraft is built around LO/LPI. Although better fighters may exist, none exist in sufficient numbers to overwhelm our inventory of F-35's. As long as we keep cranking them out, this will remain true. The F-35 is also fully capable of providing mid-course guidance to missiles launched by other assets, including AEGIS and THAAD, for which it can also provide critical data for a hi-res 3d target track which is essential for missile defense. That's a big fucking deal. Look, I think the F-22 is the best performing fighter the US has ever made, and along with the B-2, it is a very special weapon indeed. But logistics, availability, and of course politics matter too, and when those aspects are also factored in, the F-35 has the edge. Think about it. 700 F-35 or ~120ish combat-coded F-22? The F-35s are gonna get the job done, and be ready for more, over and over. The F-22 availability is gonna drop like a rock from the word go.

@@ray32245mv Unfortunately the biggest problem with the F22 had nothing to do with it's capabilities but it's inability to be upgraded. If the USA had allowed select nations to purchase the F22 I think they'd still be going strong, albeit that inability to be updated/upgraded is huge problem. Just look the pilots aren't able to utilise helmet mounted displays, and their datalinks cannot communicate to modern aircraft or other assets. It will be missed when it finally stops flying, like the A12 and SR71.

Remember the F35 is the quarterback long range radar much better than China can do, the F15 is a missile truck that can use the F35 radar targets

No big nation should waste money on non-stealth planes now. China need to crank out like 1000 J20s just like US building F35.

There are more F-35s than J-10s. In fact, China is frustrated that their F-35 counterpart (a cheaper 5gen) is not matured yet.

Probably just structural for rigidity

Except ebris

The only issue with that is you will lose a lot of thrust with a generator THAT big.

@@zchen27 True, but an F-35 that can cook you from 40 miles away doesn't need to run from anything :)

The new 6th gen jet USAAF designed, manufactured, and tested in 1 year is supposed to have that, UK RAF seem to also be doing something similar with their "Tempest Project" 6th gen interceptor; Roll Royce is cooperating with both USA and UK on the R&D of New age magnet Assisted Turbofans

@@EzraMerr Oh, that's brilliant! Now I'm imagining a shaft with electro-magnets attached alternating current to provide rotational torque on a shaft connected to the turbine. I wonder if you could also attach magnets in a dynamo configuration for electricity generation! Maybe you can use the same magnets?

​@@spackle9999 you really are a simpleton on the internet aren't you

that’s not true 300km is too much and rather useless! at that range the target could easily outmaneuver it! most fox 3 missiles are engaging under 70km even though they have 2 times more as their total range

J-10s speed, combat range and wing loading are greater than rafael.

@@masoudi1414 70km is pretty low for modren requiments also the way you talk about high range making it easy to maneuver makes me think u dont know how air to air missles track.All airforces trying to get hugh range missles

done already, search on the channel

@Griffin Taurus 👹🎭 thanks alot sir most capable airforce in term of fleet i think is saudi arabia...they have very advanced variant of f15 the s version that specially made for them...ithink in irans choices there is no plane could be even close to eagles.....

@Griffin Taurus 👹🎭 Arabs also use latest versions of F15s, Rafeals. J-10c costs $35 million compared to $80-$150 million depend on type of Arab fighters. Iran could buy 2-4 for the price of 1 western fighter.

First, who says J10c only cost $35m? Even the JF17 block3 costs more than that Second, any of Euro fighters, like rafale or J16V or Typhone, which are comparable to J10C, costs more than $100m and they are not necessary better than J10C, maybe Rafale is slightly better, but given how much India AF spend of Rafale, i really doubt Iron can afford that and still buy sufficient amount

@@donchen4906 Google J-10Cs price it will show up as $35 mil Rafeal at $130 mils

@@Ace-Av8er That's how much when domestic AF purchase it. ok? USAF buy F35 only at $100m while sale it for more than $200m to UK and Japan

Type 1475 is the old J10A

@@zhoutim4754 so which radar j 10 uses

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-ZjLWGJuR7ww.html

you know why no one liked or replied to your comment? nah you're not worth my time either.

Dollar store grade, and military grade . . Go play your nintendo or lego.

It is land based but it operates on the sea

@Simon Hu yep the shittiest smelliest curryfested hell

What is this kind of logic 🤣🤣🤣. I am taking your statement with a truckload of salt

@@ipsofactoraj he is probably right, it is much newer

@@ipsofactoraj come on, the data is all there, maybe review and compare it carefully with Rafale first before you make biased judgement. J10 is totally different from J10C, from inside to outside, it might be not better than Rafale but definetely a good reliable aircraft for Pakistan since They have to report to US everytime before they use F16 Block 52. Chinese make good products and cheap products, and it is so sad that you can only afford cheap ones in your life and that is why you think China can only produce cheap products.

@@theflyingdutchman4083 isn’t the last sentence truly reflective of China… I am certainly not convinced of an aircraft which has not seen any action made by a country whose claim to fame is photocopying other countries products. Let’s see how it performs if and when there is action

U mean block 3 right?

@@sharequsman596 Yes, block 3s. My bad.

See it ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-ZjLWGJuR7ww.html

First of all he got tha radar wrong that radar is installed on jf-17 not j-10c. plus modren missile uses its own radars they only need guidence at initial stage. Later they switch on to their own radars and that is when they are independent. They do this to avoid enemies MAWS. Third yoh dont need to have long term range radars to fire long range missiles. Awacs can provide guidance.

@@munnumkhalid I have seen many Pakistanis claiming Pl-15 can kill anything @300km 2nd. AWACS guidance is hell of a technology and needs advancement in terms of integration and weapon commonality. I don't think Chinese have cracked this so far. 3. How will you lock on a target even if your missile allows locking at 180km if your radar can detect only at 170 km that too for 4msq (most modern fighters have RCS 1-2msq)

@@VivekKumar-je3pg we don't know china. And we should accept it. It's not the china that we knew 30 or even 20 years Ago what we belive does not matter. If usa and west is woried of china advances so does everyone else. Today you see modren China civilians equipments like their cars their bikes their cellular network. Its easy to say their military is advancing too. Example is their hypersonic missiles.

@@VivekKumar-je3pg dude it can target long range target if you read USA official reports on PL-15. Plus 300km range is only detterance obviously you don't want to get risked shooting down when your maws is beeping at you. Your meteor does the same.

Indian tejas is better obviously Look at the tejas it has gaumooter fuel to make it go hypersonic and gobar stealth coating to render it invisible like the Klingon cloaking device from star trek . Open and shut case .

Oh yeah.. a stolen legacy tech, re-engineered decommissioned Israeli model.. is far superior than the modern SU-57 and F-35.. if not F-22. 👍

If you want something said, ask India. If you want something done, ask China. - Maitreya Bhakal 🤭👈

J20 is not supposed to "out-maneuver" fighters , the J20 (like an F22) are actually Interceptors and infiltration bombers, mostly for defense purposes rather than offense. They are supposed to not be detected from a long range but to detect and engage at a long range without engaging in a dogfight

@@EzraMerr Well, at least you know your topic unlike this Indian guy who mentioned those models where C2Y did not compare. C2Y guy only mentioned SU35 not SU57 or F22. 🤭👈

@@adakot123 In fact, Isreal secretly gave the design dossiers to Chinese as the part of the compensation because Isreal has to break a weapon deal between C/I due to the American pressure, I believe China was try to buy couple of C-17 from Israel and their already signed the contract, but Isreal has to cancel the contract because US said no, so the design of this Israel plane prototype was handed out to China along with other military aids. It is interesting that Israel doesn't have to design their own aircrafts because everything they need can be bought from America. J-10C is better than Suhkoi only in mid-range fight and low speed swifting, and it is also a good choice for Pakistan to replace their cheap JF-17. Nobody said J10C is far superior than SU57, F22, F35 and J20, if you really wanna make such a statement then I assume Tejas will be the best one you have known then.

There's a short video for correction

plenty

@@donchen4906 say what? Again, how many junkies....

Which block and which version of j10?