Your comment makes me remember in sixth grade my math teacher got mad at himself when I didn't understand the lesson one day. I was usually one of the only people in class who was paying attention. I felt so bad lol.
@@soldier08901 the only person on here who knows barack's first name, which is really weird cause he was the president at one point, everyone just thought his name was "obama" i guess, which makes no sense, it seems the uploaded of this video thought that too unless i'm missing some kind of really weird joke
But wait, the Obamium has 4 triangular faces. So, we'll have to multiply 0bama by 4. Hence, Obama's real full name is Barack Obama 0bama 0bama 0bama 0bama 0bama 0bama 0bama 0bama.
@@rayes119 1+1= 2. If you add 0 to both sides it's still correct: 0+1+1=2+0 and if you simplify this equation it becomes 1+1=2. How does that not worK?
I wrote a similar derivation on my final math paper, but I ended up scoring 0/100 marks. Clearly, my math teacher works with the enemies and is trying to preserve the Obamian secrets of the lost underworld.
I know his full name you see, everybody calls him "Mr. President." Because people usually say last names after "Mr" or "Ms." we know that his last name is president. This means that Obama is actually his first name, and his full name is Obama President
Hello expert in obamiums. Thank you for this information we need any we can get on his name for the creation of the Final Obamium you sir are a genius and a hero
I tried this proof myself, in college but I could never do it. The "be there or be square" axiom is so simple yet elegant. I can't believe I couldn't see it. Groundbreaking.
This will change the course of all mathematics into the future, and all mathematical theories that there are. Everything thing we’ve ever thought is wrong, we’ve all been living lies this whole time. This will truly change humanity forever!
@@zafarmasood1430 they all liked the comment tho, so idk why my comment has 230 likes and no replies. These replies don't count because they are about it having 230 likes with no reply. 🆓
"... And then I'm going to remove this side of the equation because we no longer need it..." I'm going to have to casually drop that into my intermediate algebra lecture, just so I can see the look on their faces at the exact moment that their psyche fractures
@@Mike-oi3le Except that AP Calculus is much faster-paced and gives you college credit because it is counted as if you are taking a college class. You'd be surprised how different the "advanced" versions of classes are to their regular counterparts. In my Freshman year they accidentally put me in regular Geometry, and it was extremely easy, but once I took Honors Geometry the following trimester the difficulty spiked way up. So, no, they are not the same.
@@KingNedya ap is just a different system. Calculus is calculus but the ap sorts it into AB/BC classes. The pacing should be similar depending on the topics covered in those classes.
Hey I am an expert in Obamiums and have discovered a scientific breakthrough in Obamium Theory so. If you take an Obamiums (preferably traditional triangle but any is good) and combine it with a Nuclear Obamium you can mess with the shape of an Obamium now this will actually reveal Obama’s entire name including middle name, nicknames, etc this if you did not know is extremely valuable information as we can use it to craft the Final Obamium which is crucial in ending literally all troubles humanity has and once the final Obamium has been crafted the creator will ascend to godhood which we over at the Obama Foundation have been working towards for millennia thank you for this information as it should help in the long run
Scientist working on obamology here, we just had a breakthrough. We found that under high pressure (69GPa to be exact), the molecular structure of obamium changes fundamentally and enters a delta decay chain. We suspect that this is the theorized Gabliniophilius effect, which might be the key to understand the true nature of our universe.
@@idahooo3253 the whole “pie are square” thing is wrong anyway. Everyone knows pie are round. And that’s not even getting into the subject-verb agreement problem there. It’s “pie is round”, or alternately, “pies are round”!
Well i tried and fucking lost right when i took my first step. My reaction was quickly pulling my leg back up and throwing the water onto a wall behind me. Try the challange your self!
You helped me understand this in 3 minutes and my math teacher could not explain it properly for an entire semester! Thank you so much for posting this 😅❤️❤️
@@iiErsaii i was adding on to the joke, what other possibility is there? like thats not a rhetorical question, in this exact situation how would this not be a joke, i am actually confused (edit because they deleted their comment, they just said "r/wooosh" exactly like that im pretty sure)
Thanks man, my professor did a bad job explaining this, but your videos ALWAYS help me out. You're the only reason I'm passing any of my classes. Thank you for your hard work
Oh, idk why I thought this was going to be about training an ML model to predict (distributions over) last names given first names, and then plug in “Obama” in the “first name” input field.
@@Paqcar “ML model “ : “machine learning model” , a kind of computer program where we throw a bunch of data at the program, and it comes up with some (usually fairly incomprehensible) set of rules or numbers to apply to the data which is supposed to do well at the task that the data is for, with the hope that if we put in more data that we maybe haven’t seen before, the rules or bunch of numbers will give the kind of behavior we want as the output. If you’ve seen the things headlined like “we forced an AI to read 10,000 pages of and the write its own script, and this is what it produced”, that’s using a ML model. (Though, many of those actually have a person like, choosing between words that the model suggests, so it is more like the person writing something they thing is wacky using inspiration from the trained model, which makes the way they describe it kind of deceptive IMO) As is like, basically all the stuff used for object detection. “distribution” : a probability distribution. A “how likely is this one?” for each of the things. So, essentially, I was saying, “I thought the video would be about, showing a computer program a bunch of pairs of people’s first and last names, and training it to predict how likely different last names are given different first names, and then once that works well enough, asking the computer to guess what last names would be the most likely given that someone’s first name was “Obama”.
