I Got My Jeep Wrangler Rubicon 392 Very Stuck On TFL's Off-Road Course! Will The HEMI Get Me Out? 

Agreed its there vehicle not a test vehicle.

@@shitloveaduck I thought Roman talked a bit excessively on some of them. But i agree with you he does a good job calling out potential issues in advance and so on. It just could be a little distracting sometimes I think. Love his positive energy though.

Yeah if I took my rig there I’d just send it like I do when I wheel lol

What wheels are those guys ? A little help

I think they stop the production after 2024 ends.

In the future TFL could add an impossible obstacle called either Yes or Harder.

Garbage tires

He would have made it if he didn't pussy foot it haha

Always remain humble.

But the CJ-5 wasn't a bus.

Could not be better!

Yeah I feel like that happens a lot with people on their gimble in the way lol

Agree. if you're moving in the right direction, keep the momentum up until the rear tires clear.

People are suggesting once he made it out to throttle it more and reversed and tried again. Momentum is the answer...you should know that by how many "mud parks" you've visited

This guy is an awesome driver of this rig. Woww really talented driver.

I have a 2 door JK. Some obstacles favor short wheelbase, some long. Just the way it goes....I'd love a 392!

We'll be there

Not all that are lost, wandered. ;)

Exactly, i think it even went through Tommy's Demise being so light 🙂

simple things in life LOL

I’m sure they have a hose and a pressure washer at Tumbleweed.

No

I mean they literally all do the same.

They took the FJ up it when they first built the course and it couldn't do it. Of course, it was a stock FJ. If they had lifted it and put some good aggressive MT tires on it, then maybe it could have. But they never did.

Just get a blue trd pro and call Steve from Canada he’ll do it 😂

Watch jurrasic park if you want to see an old dinosaur off road

Like the LS. They're dimensionally the same... And a 6.0 will still get the same mileage as the 5.3 and won't drop while towing

The MSRP on a 392 is about $10K more than a loaded V6 Rubicon Recon. Go through a dealer selling below MSRP and that difference is even less. I believe Jeep used the 392 for two reasons. First, they wanted to throw down what they had to handle whatever Ford was going to release. Secondly, they ultimately don't want to sell to many V8 Wranglers as it destroys their corporate CAFE rating. If they offered a low cost 5.7L option the take rate would be too high. Supply constraints combined with customer demand would push the price up anyhow.

@@redtitan29 I mean, maybe the way YOU'D spec a V6 Rubicon, that's the price. I just spec'd one on the jeep website, and a non XR (because I'd put my own aftermarket lift kit, regear to 4.88s, and 37s) with my options (Gorilla Glass windshield, auto transmission, tow package, tailgate reinforcement and remote start) gives me a Wrangler Rubicon for about $54k. Sure, you can add blind spot monitoring and adaptive cruise control and all that if you want, or steel bumpers and LED headlights, but I don't really need all that extra fancy stuff in my Jeep, because that's not what I'm buying it for. And stuff like bumpers and LED headlights can be added in the aftermarket for way cheaper. And that's on a Rubicon. I'd love to see the V8 option in a Sport or Willys, and I'd 100% pay $5-6k extra for it. But the 392 *starts* at $80k. I'm not paying that much. I understand why they did it - like you said, it ensures they meet their MPG requirements because most people won't be getting it because most people can't afford an $80k car - but it would still have been nice to have the option. Wishful thinking on my part. It doesn't really matter, anyway, since all Jeeps will be electric in 12 years or so, regardless. Would have been nice to experience it before that, though.

@@backwoodstherapy A 392 is only available loaded so my comments were towards a similar equipped V6 Rubicon. All things equal, I gladly paid the marginal increase to get the V8. Like you, I chose to go with a standard 392 to install my own lift etc.

@@redtitan29 that is actually my point. There may not be a huge difference between a loaded V6 Rubicon and a 392, but I'd like it to be an option in a non-loaded vehicle. Let it be an option in the Willys with the XR package, and I can throw in a front locker, an economy lift, and some 37s and I'd have an amazing V8 rock crawler for less than $60k but that's almost certainly what jeep DOESN'T want. 🤣

Your right and I bet if they let someone run the obstacles in reverse start of with the hardest obstacle first Tommy Demise a few would probably get thru before it’s rutted out in each direction…

The RAM 5500 is better than RAM 4500.

Completely. They’re not very good spotters and the whole panic yelling helps literally nothing.

Andre yells about everything... He gets way to worried.

100%. He needed more skinny pedal. Once stuck, he SHOULD HAVE reversed and tried again. Bad spotter.

@@Thatbeardedguy86 he put him in right in the ruts. I believe he was trying to get him stuck for a better video scene

That's what I'm saying Andre kinda goes overboard on telling people what hand how to do things. I don't think he means it in a bad way just kinda controlling.

I think a lot of it has to do with driver as well personally

A couple vehicles have actually cleared it. That guys with the TJ from a few weeks back got through it.

The jeep gladiator made it

@@outofboundmudders yeah it was with a LJ that got stuck but the LJ had smaller, less aggressive tires. I think the week before was the week the other built LJ (or was it a TJ?) got through it.

@@backwoodstherapy I would love to try the course my self I have a 2022 jeep gladiator willy 3.5 inch lift with 35s

What was the point in saying that?

lol Good catch!