Тёмный

Ilya Prigogine (Илья Пригожин) - The End of Certainty (Interview 1997) 

Nomen Nominandum
Подписаться 7 тыс.
Просмотров 17 тыс.
50% 1

Ilya Prigogine * 1917 (Moscow) † 2003 (Brussels)
1977 Nobel Prize in Chemistry
English part extracted from the following video:
vimeo.com/212751953
Links:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ilya_Pr...
www.nobelprize.org/prizes/che...
books.google.de/books/about/T...

Наука

Опубликовано:

 

29 дек 2019

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 37   
@farier.series
@farier.series 4 года назад
Prigogine is my scientific hero - thank you for making this interview available! His sublte scientific philosophies are tremendously thought-provoking and inspiring - especially with the question of the arrow of time. Prigogine and Boltzmann are legends.
@PawlTV
@PawlTV 2 года назад
Very well said, I agree!
@jakecarlo9950
@jakecarlo9950 2 года назад
Bergson and Heidegger in the first two minutes?!? New favorite scientist. Thank you!
@peterpan0201
@peterpan0201 Год назад
Uncertainty is the hope. Well said!
@antkcuck
@antkcuck 3 года назад
This was fantastic thank you for uploading this
@poincaretrajectories5917
@poincaretrajectories5917 3 года назад
Great interview! Thank you for sharing
@renemilet2458
@renemilet2458 2 года назад
Beautiful interview. Thank you! I just started reading Exploring Complexity, and truly love his approach, so measured yet adventurous at the same time.
@PeaceFinder2024
@PeaceFinder2024 3 года назад
Thanks very much! One of the morst important scientists.
@bufoncalabacillas
@bufoncalabacillas 3 года назад
Thank you
@loveasmr9445
@loveasmr9445 2 года назад
Because if *really* the universe is an automaton, then you really need someone to start the automaton. If the universe is self-organzing, you have the choice: is self organization immanent, or coming from some external planning? That is something far beyond what you can even concieve at once at the moment. Therefore its a question of personal choice. And I think we are all astonished by this strange universe, and we have to be very tolerant.
@MrWolynski
@MrWolynski Год назад
Stellar metamorphosis and dissipative structures. The entire star is the dissipative structure that creates life.
@ZAck56100
@ZAck56100 Год назад
Can you describe that?
@Symphocal
@Symphocal Год назад
Real genius
@MajinHico
@MajinHico 4 года назад
This is crazy - only 560 views
@Ottmar555
@Ottmar555 4 года назад
Yeah. He's one of my favourite nobel laureates and basically no one knows him.
@mimisumimisu
@mimisumimisu 4 года назад
That is actually pretty normal. First of all we live in a worldwide idiocracy and you usually don't get a nobel prize for Zeitgeist ideas...Look at Einstein, it took several decades until we started to put his works to good use and we are still on the way of fully grasping the dimension of his works. I am absolutely certain that, a few decades in the future this will be a lot more popular.
@blackman5319
@blackman5319 3 года назад
2.8k slowly but surely
@blackman5319
@blackman5319 3 года назад
2.8k people are actually woke.... all the rest are just asleep saying they are woke
@arthurharrison1345
@arthurharrison1345 2 года назад
9,981 views.
@TheNoblot
@TheNoblot 3 года назад
Covid becoming complicated 🤔 more that you know less that is understood. 🤔 the very small 😥 ☯ out of chaos⏳⌚🕰 often reason prevails 🤗 Ilya Prigogine (Илья Пригожин) - The End of Certainty
@ceciliam1313
@ceciliam1313 7 месяцев назад
"For the Warmaster!" If anyone gets the reference...
@peterstaykov9670
@peterstaykov9670 2 года назад
☀️☀️☀️🧡🧡🧡
@antkcuck
@antkcuck 3 года назад
Cosmology Matter Life Man
@MichaelFomenko
@MichaelFomenko 2 года назад
He don't understand the difference between deterministic nature of the universe and the limits of mathematics to calculate deterministic processes. He think that because he can't calculate exactly something, but only probabilistic, the world must be non deterministic.
@MiauZi69
@MiauZi69 2 года назад
And maybe you just have quite an inflated ego and a superficial understanding of not only "science" but furthermore even the most basic ontological and phenomenological observations as a human.
@MichaelFomenko
@MichaelFomenko 2 года назад
@@MiauZi69 Your message have no Value. Only Social Crap Talk. If you don't have any Arguments in this topic, don't waste my time.
@MiauZi69
@MiauZi69 2 года назад
@@MichaelFomenko typical Dunning-Kruger as it seem. 1st of all, for one who claims superiority over someone like Prigogine, one at least can expect a grammatically correct sentence in the beginning, especially if it is so simple as: "Your message HAS no value." 2nd, your reply also does not assign any values, but only operates in the realm of meaning and words. But only an imbecile who has never ever heard anything of Gödel would treat that as a kind of deficiency. At least that is always quite entertaining to see those self-contradictions at play - without any form of self-awareness nor self-constraint. If I could, I would bet that you look exactly as the "I-fucking-love-science" alter-ego-meme, which you are representing. Btw, just that you know, mathematics beyond basic calculations (especially logic) developed out of practicing philosophy.
@MichaelFomenko
@MichaelFomenko 2 года назад
@@MiauZi69 you have nothing to say about the topic, you talk only about social crap.
@cathybing461
@cathybing461 2 года назад
It makes some sense, bro
Далее
Wolfgang Ketterle
1:17:07
Просмотров 44 тыс.
LIFE AS A DISSIPATIVE STRUCTURE
24:34
Просмотров 7 тыс.
Ilya Prigogine (Chemistry '77) at Nobel Conference XXVI
1:01:08
John Polkinghorne - Why is the Quantum so Mysterious?
10:41
Richard Feynman: Quantum Mechanical View of Reality 1
1:57:27
Probing Process & Reality - "Why Whitehead?"
31:44
Просмотров 33 тыс.
Здесь упор в процессор
18:02
Просмотров 265 тыс.