Olaine Rapid Tournament Blitz chess and rapid chess video. Live blitz and rapid chess. IM Eric Rosen - GM Engeny Sveshnikov, English Opening, Rapid chess
This is wonderful. Clear view of the physical board and the clock, no commentary, and no fancy graphics to distract from the game. This is how professional chess should be presented.
Erm....the fancy graphics do you mean a board to give us a better view of the action? Because if every game is presented like this I'm sure less people would watch chess
I happen to agree with your comment. Just enjoy watching the 2 people play their game, Without all the other distractions & talking. It takes away from the Game their playing & in it's self is rather a Huge DISTRACTION.
Evgeny Sveshnikov, Grandmaster and Theorist of Chess, Dies at 71 (R.I.P) , he made significant contributions to the theory of the game, particularly the openings, one of which is named for him.
The engine is still reading equal until eric plays 27. Rd3, which allows b4, trapping the queen and forcing a trade with a pawn sac. Black then enters a winning endgame.
What I observed in the game was : The enemy troops slowly approched a bit closer towards white's army with every single move and all white has to do was to defend from behind instead of attacking. Came from Eric Rosen's channel's latest video
Upon initial inspection of this game, and noting the e5 square theme of the London, I thought (intuitively) that 18. Nxc6 was a mistake. Running it through Stockfish confirmed it. I think white had to be patient and wait with 18. Nd3...for either e5 or f4...as pawn moves always leave holes behind. Otherwise, I think that I would not have allowed Bg4 by delaying Nf3 until black either played e6 (unlikely) or put the bishop on f5. Small thing but a little more flexible. Tough game though. Black was well prepared it seemed...with Bg4 and Nge7 development to really go at the e5 square.
What was that loud noise in the background? Sounded like gunfire or construction. Not a great setting for a chess game. Loved the camera angle showing the clock.
At 16:31 wasn't Rh6 better? Holding the knight and preparing to push the f pawn. White rook would be displaced and there wouldn't be much room for second rook to play.
If anyone is wondering why Black can't win a pawn with cxd4 after nbd2, it is because cxd4 exd4 nxd4 nxd4!! Bxd1 Bb5+ and Black is lost. Might be obvious to some stronger players, but a subtle idea to less advanced players.
@@Sosa40706 If he took the knight with his h3 rook that would leave the f5 rook undefended. Then if black retakes the rook that just captured the knight, white can grab the f5 rook for free. If black decided to capture the e5 rook with his f5 rook instead, white could just recapture with the pawn with tempo on the queen, and after the queen moves white can simply move his h4 rook out of the way so it wouln't be captured by the pawn. At the very least its would be a free knight. Unless I'm missing something.
At 17:56 black blundered here I think... g3 would win th black ♞ because it has nowhere to go... I saw it while eric was thinking for 45 seconds. Am I missing something? I haven't checked the engine yet.
Trades rooks, loses a pawn, he no longer has center control, weakens the pawn structure around his king, the rook on h3 is trapped (can't help with the center) and it's also now unprotected.
Eric, you played Nf3 too soon before black played e3. That allowed his bishop to become active ending in the exchange of bishops, which stopped your King's side attack. Wait for e3, then play Bf3. Play c3 instead. Wait.
White played it way too conservatively in the middle game. A pawn push in response to Black's audacious g5 move would have been in order as well as doing more to open up the h file. Black played very well though.
ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-K35bLF9K_RA.htmlm16s to me Rfe1 is Eric's first mistake ; he should've played Rae1 and retain the option of pushing f4, to stall black's onslaught and establish his knight on e5. He must have regreted this move at several points in this game! Great one though, perfect camera and very instructive game. Just when I thought black was going to play e5 he went for the kill with Nh4! The years haven't tamed the Sveshnikov beast!
I belive that IM rosen made a mistake according to London system of course, he should play Sbd2 instead of Nf3 in the beginning. You can play Nf3 only when black play e6, so black white coloured bishop has no funky play like Bg4 or Bf5. He played Nf3 and after Sveshnikov Bg4 he was thinking, it means he was unprepared and confused. still disappointing that Rosen is not playing the best book moves in London, he was teaching how to play that system.
1) You can play Nf3 (there are different approaches about how to play the London) 2) It was in 2017, you can look how he won a Arena King by playing only the london with white pieces against strong players and by playing Nf3 3) That's not because you are giving lessons about a opening that you are invincible with it, there is middlegame then and endgame then ^^
@@vladimirnabokov4414 Hey I aldo won a tournament playing only london but it was on amateur level with rating performance 2200. I was speaking by GM Simon Williams analysis and also my thought about classic al London. I Still Think that you should play nf3 ony afer black e6. Magnus carlsen also develops first his bishop on d3 delaying his kings knight. But thats only my opinion you can play whatever you wants. We are speaking strictly about opening not middle game or ending.
Свешникову - брависсимо за монолитную партию. а Эрику минус=насколько ж не уважать соперника, тем более гросса, что двигать 10 ходов в уже давно проигранной партии, очевидно даже для второрозрядников. Куда котится шахматный мир?
Писец! Международный мастер якобы, играет против международного гроссмейстера, настоящего, нелипового, а не умеет сдаваться. Последние ходов пятнадцать было просто стыдно сиотреть.
dear Eric ...you could play better the London system ..and better calculate but i think you did not attention to middle game about this opening ..and just answered your opponent plans and was not active ...for example ...the last move about rook ...why ..d3 ? and ETC ..ok ..not important this lose ... good luck ..
Psychologically, playing a more rated opponent is intimidating... Though it may be boring to some but it is instructive for some... If you can play a GM (if you have the luck), I don't think you can get any further with your knowledge. Unless you're a GM yourself...
Oh dear. How strong are you? Sveshnikov is about ELO 2450. I'd be amazed if you didn't have lots to learn from this game - more than from eating a limp biscuit certainly :-). I think you're having a laff.
His highest rating was 2610 in 1994. At age 69 (I think) this year, he will naturally have slowed down a bit - it happens to all of us. I wonder what your rating is - and what it will be when you are his age. I think you should do some research into his career. He is one of the legends of the game and deserves a bit more respect.
Booooring! No fantasy in these two. Just exchanging and moving neutral because they had no attacking strategy. Exchanging the bishop pair just after the opening, waiting for the opponent's mistake... booooring.
