We travel to the Huawei campus in Shenzhen, China and find out their plans for 5G. Subscribe HERE bit.ly/1uNQEWR Find us online at www.bbc.com/click Twitter: @bbcclick Facebook: BBCClick
My bad they did know about it, it's a "standard networking tool" not a backdoor, I'm so stupid I thought theyd use that to spy. www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=amp.theguardian.com/technology/2019/apr/30/alleged-huawei-router-backdoor-is-standard-networking-tool-says-firm&ved=2ahUKEwj19JDIo9HiAhWvg-AKHWJIDTsQFjACegQIBBAB&usg=AOvVaw0rPRoQqcTvgBvctqwAafsU&cf=1
Are you a Muslim? Do you know chinese government rounds muslims into camps and takes children away from their parents to educate chinese propaganda in Xinjiang Uyghur region?
Spencer Bright. You're report is flawed and some may argue biased. No mention that Huawei has provided telco equipment for the U.Ks critical national infrastructure for the last 15 years? That the entire existing 4G transmission infrastructure for Vodafone and EE (now BT) is already Huawei equipment? That a very high percentage of Openreach's existing optical network is Huawei equipment i.e. any non cable broadband DSL business into every U.K users home. That GCHQ (funded by and fully supported by Huawei) created HCSEC (Huawei Cyber Security Evaluation Centre) over 8 years ago to continually evaluate and audit all equipment planned for use in core national infrastructure at code level. To date, no other vendor has the same arrangement with U.K Government. This report and the similar aired on BBC one panorama included none of this information. With all the above in consideration, one needs to question why is this narrative is being driven so aggressively now rather than at any time over the last 15 years? Are these concerns driven only by national security or are there commercial interests? At best this is poor journalism at worst sensationalism.
I work for a major US carrier creating 5G infrastructure for Southern California. I can't speak to the motivations or biases of this report, but I can say there is a much greater capability with 5G than any previous tech. In short, I don't believe the report was sensationalism. However, it definitely could have used a bit more insight and transparency. I feel Huawei would have more credibility if the founder denounces the law and swears publicly he would go to jail rather than to cooperate with China intelligence request. No such statement has been made to that effect that I am aware of. The "slow boil" tacit is as old as time, so using the existing infrastructure is not a reason to dismiss future concerns. In fact, is more reason to send a louder, clear alarm bell. At some point, one has to look more closely when enough red flags are raised. For instance, it was only 2017 the Chinese government created the law requiring complete cooperation yet without defined conditions. That is an important new consideration that cannot be ignored. The other is the speed and spread of 5G. I can tell you first hand, people really do not have a clue how 5G will transform our world, once matured. What is being created is essentially super advanced, constantly evolving and growing, highspeed neural network with vast amounts of processing power. This is key for advanced AI. That's super awesome but scary If it's not "secure". I believe 5G will transform lives for the better. However, to be blind to the rising world threats and geopolitical instability is willfully ignorant and dangerous. The 5G network will mature in 5 to 7 years. At that point, every part of your daily city existence will depend on 5G communications. From safe driving, home/building security to nearly every personal device with power. It's important to be productively concerned.
Smearing campaign of the western media? Bloomberg reported that Vodafone found backdoor in Huawei product. But Vodafone denied and said the telnet is common for provider to manage the system in long distance and they will be erased after installation. As a follow up of this report, another tech news site said the Cisco system had a lot of more of such so call backdoor.
@Dan Man The issue and the only issue is the wording of the law on its face and its potential implementation. None of the points raised are a reason to trust more. They are all reasons not to trust. Seems people are unable to understand their own root arguments.
Lol...that was a German official's actual response to a US query regarding Germany using Huawei equipment, but stated in more diplomatic terms of course.
I don't know how governments can spy over 5G. when the information are all encrypted then there might be no difference. But reality is Governments can spy on people by Malwares they don't need 5G or 4G to do that. Correct me if I am wrong!
Huawei set to become the world's no. 1 smartphone supplier, making them billions of dollars. Huawei owning over 1500 5g patents, their equipment - cheaper than the competition and way more advanced, again making them even more money than the smartphone sales. DIGITAL OIL! The US want their money!
China lives in this fear for a long time with Cisco, with the US Military, with GPS, with windows, with IOS and Android etc. Huawei is just the first point we can make some balance.
China might be doing t, but the US is already doing it. After so many investigations by many countries including the US nothing is found on Huawei. Hundreds of incidents of US spying have been exposed. The Chinese has not colonized or initiated war on any country in its thousands of years history but within 200 years the US has intruded and bombed many countries. This is the big different.
Until now there is no evidence to prove Huawei did anything illegal . But many media just keep insulting the company. Can we at least learn a lesson from what happened to ALSTOM and Toshiba.
I believe we should be thinking about insulting 5G rather than over eachother. None our our habitats allowed in human rights are to be anything radiating and toxic to OUR CELLS!
@@SherwinCeleste-cj7ng There are dozens of millions of Chinese citizens living or constantly travelling overseas. I am pretty sure they could make a country on their own.
U know the reason why Because Huawei is taking over the world by offering the better tech at 1/4 cost. Here in Pakistan ppl r pro Huawei Not because China is our friend and neighbour. But it's way cheaper than Iphone n samsung with better resolution camera and many other features..
@@alexl5682 I would never trust personal info on any cloud. Backups of media is as far as it goes, but even then cloud services have been reported to delete files in the past, accidentally or otherwise. If you delete personal files from a cloud, you can no longer access them, they are gone from your online folders, but how can you be assured that the company hasn't just kept them for it's own purposes. It only takes one rogue member of staff to steal or sell personal data
@@criptoejesus The news today was reporting on Chinese companies being notably involved in the development of the F-35 stealth fighter jet aircraft. They will be used by the US in a war situation and they accept that, yet it's a big no to setting up 5G. The security excuse doesn't work that well, legit reasons or not
Jeff bezos celebrated his dad from Cuba in twitter, Uber CEO is born and raised in IRAN, Google founder is from Russia, and Apple Steve Jobs is son of Syrian. Gosh American economy is controlled by ENEMIES
Huawei is the future of technological innovations. Huawei will realise most of science fiction theories and it will become the most and biggest innovative company in the 21st century.
Not spying but stealing tech is what they're worried about. And if the U.K. use huawei for their 5G network which is something the U.K. could do it not only it self but better. They risk their position in the 5 eyes coalition...
@@jimiweetbix8926 the problem is, there was no proof of steeling technology yet. It seems more economy protection than other things. The explanations are like "we killed Osama and threw him to the sea"... Ok, I'm santa-claus... If Osama was really dead, his head would be in a museum after what he did.
@@DnBastard i dont know you, so i cant tell if you were just trolling.....or if you really believe the chinese will come harvest your organs.....could you kindly tell which one it is, for my benefit?
When these u.k.or u.s. propaganda videos talk on China or Huawei: Put a gloomy depressing gray colored background layer surrounding Huawei’s name, or make a gloomy depressing gray colored map of China as their thumbnails.
What I hear is people being pragmatically and honestly concerned. Based on the facts of the events of the last 3 years. To propaganda sounds like this entire comment section. Really seems sad and sick. misdirection is insisting that the world should trust blindly with full and open arms and should not ever question or have meaningful critical conversations or concerns. Being concerned is somehow a disgusting hypocritical attempt at justifying the US dominance over the Earth. That sounds like government propaganda if I've ever heard it. Shut everyone up who wants a voice.
Paper Dragon Question Iraq war and dozen others evil wars u.s. brought to the world first. Go protest and tear down your evil u.s. government for the human race.
@@Littletime839 The question is not CCP employ propaganda or not, its when the west make so much propaganda everywhere, its funny their main propaganda is that they dont employ any propaganda, you lot just love double standard.
As a retired military pilot I attended many briefings about security and such and was told fifty years ago that the United States employed more spies than all the other countries put together.
@@HammerLeaf what you do with your money game I can't care less; Boeing releases the none flight tested system upgrade and KILLED people is a FACT, where is FAA in this? Is it a good company? I won't even go into FAA part. Boeing can not take criticism? Why are you not defending for the victim's family? Friend of Thanos
@@HammerLeaf I Only talked about Boeing and that's what you're replied on, where is your logic in this??? Friend of Thanos. BTW, which country boldly marks their HQ for espionage on the map??? Heavily funding possible espionage Corp Money Gamer. Where is your evidence when accusing potential of espionage??? No shreds of evidence? Seek help, I do not treat Delusional Disorder.
@@HammerLeaf Plastic eggs are created by whom? Trump? There are less than 0.1% people eating dogs but it does not mean they maltreat dogs and they have their rights.
I am sorry,you get wrong, this company has the support and subsidy form government, whereas it costs higher than Apple. so it's impossible for most of Chinese to embrace huawei.
@@miaoli3991 that's incorrect,Huawei is own by it's own employee,which is mean their own employee control their own enterprises not to give subsidy from their own government,stop spreading lies.
@@monstar7566 My back? I wish but they are not interested in me. All companies especially high-profile ones must have the government on their back. Otherwise, who will stand for them when they encountered such a goofy sanction imposed by some ridiculous!!!!!!!!!!! politicians.
@@jin9500 very true, I was just asking the question that should be on everyone's mind if you want this to be prosperous society. If the answer is no then you have the answer to the problem.
@@chrissc238 I'd rather have a phone that has only been thrown baseless allegations of spying on me than a phone that has been objectively proven to be spying on me.
@Felipe They give codes to the germans for security checks too, and they found nothing, either the germans turn evil again or they stupid, so the americans thought, can never accept that it has no problem because american company always cheat and spy?
@niftertube That has nothing to do with the "what ifs", I recommend you to tackle the specific arguments at hand. Tackle the alleged "spying" that has not been proven yet they are still attacking. Not who they are keeping in prison. That's a strawman fallacy. Yes it's wrong but don't bring up a whole different argument to counter another.
niftertube and most people we “execute” are prisoners. An example a candadian who smuggled 50kg worth of drugs was arrested and imprisoned years before the Canada scandal, but he was Laster on executed this year.
niftertube the Canadian prisoner get executed by drugs smuggling over 200g, so he should’ve read Chinese laws before entering China. China and lots of Asian countries have very restricted laws about drugs smuggling, unlike Canada. He even had a record of same crime in his own country. Despite of this extreme case, millions of foreigners settled in China and they have no problems at all of living in a normal life as long as they are crime-free.
Huawei needs to prove that they are independent from their authoritarian government which will be hard to prove because of the investment and ties with the communist party.
huawei has great solutions......in kenya all safaricom base station equipment: i.e OLTs,switches,routers,BBUs RRUs, etc are huawei, we phased out most of cisco and Ericsson gear...Huawei is a strategic partner in building our Nation's telecom infrastructure
The U.S.: Does Huawei have a backdoor? British officer: We did not find any backdoor The U.S.: They can secretly install one. SMH...SO WHY DO YOU EVEN ASK THE QUESTION IN THE FIRST PLACE
@@realitycheck6622 never heard of the national security letter? The Chinese law is just a right of subpoena within China and concerning Chinese people. If the Chinese government were to spy on foreigners, they would have never written it into law. It is hilarious how some criticize China for not being the rule of law yet at the same time criticize Chinese law that goes nowhere near what America law already give to law enforcement.
They spend millions inculcating "Communism = Bad" into their sheeps/population heads, so they are compelled to use it since they invested so much already. Without such nonsense it would be too clear that they are just a bunch of terrorist imperialists.
I am mostly impressed with how you are able to pronounce Huawei correctly. Most cucasians will say wuawei instead of huawei. So I guess it is,UK is embracing Huawei. Good sign for Chinese possibly?
HUAWEI made a video teach foreigners how to pronunc HUAWEI，they say it should pronunc wuawei，so it is not foreigners fault，I think its easilyer for Germans to pronounce Huawei，there has a lots “H” sound words in German
True! it's so stupid, sounds like saying Samsung is not trustable because every Korean male worker in the company has been part of the Army, since it's mandatory...
South koreans are required to serve in the military, but not in China, which has a strict selection system that has dashed many people's dreams of becoming soldiers. But a lot of people go to the U.S. military to make their dreams come true, because anyone can be a soldier there.
In fact, Huawei founder worked for a state own company after he retired from army. He was fired by his then employer because he lost company money on the job. He had no alternative so he tried to start his own company. Knowing such history, Nobody with decent mind would believe he founded the company as a CCP/PLA tool.
Problem is they have backdoors. The owner of Huawei is a former Military Inteligence. Under Chinese laws ALL chinese companies must enable spying. The issue is that if the Chinese government deciedes to shut down the networks when there is a time of war or China wants to bully the west they can shut down western communications at the push of a button
the hell with it, you cant stop other country progressing. should you not like other country use 5G, so create your own networks then. go 6G or stay with your beloved 4G forever?
So u want 5G then fine it's good for u. But let's see if still u can survive in ur own life. This 5G can kill anything. It will consume ur life and it will consume ur meantime that's y i hate this, it's better to stay 4G because 4G is enough
al alex the huawei phone can't be cheaper , or it makes other companies have no way to survive! the phone brand from China are always good and quality. including the oneplus!
I have an app on Apple appstore & Google play store. What is the process of getting it on Huawei App Store? Also, will it help me reach bigger audience? Meaning customers and businesses?
It was an excutive order made by TRUMP. They had no choice but to follow it. Google made profit of HUAWEI phones, if anything thier goggle to be losing money. They had no choice but to comply with the law.
@@gymsserver2970 he is abusing the presidential executive order, it wasnt meant to be use like that, previous taiwanese president also abuse his presidential budget, and end up in jail, lets watch if USA truly has the "auto-correction" mechanism in their self-proclaim good system.
*Spy from Place A, or B, or C. Pick one :-)* Do not assume that other places are less spying than others. US is pissed, because Apple is losing to Huawei in important markets.
i dont think apple have anyting to do .. here is about 5g telecomunications... not phones.. apple have nothing to do with all carriers like vodafone t-mobile they use huawei antena.. there is no apple antena for 5g.. and 5g will open many doors.. in all domains.. phones is just a small side very small one for 5g
ATTENTION: UK's MI6 as well as Germany and many other countries have already inspected Huawei's SOURCE CODE many times and found NO BACK DOORS. They didn't mention that in the video I guess they forgot. :)
@@WelshGuitarDude Inspecting source code was only one of many inspections. In the end they concluded "no threat found". So ur smarter than the MI6, Germany's, and many other intelligence agencies combined? lol.
@@zszs100 do you even study computer science? I'm guessing not. Software is what they tested and no threat was found. I am on about hardware back doors - you need electron microscopes to even being to see structures and they are nearly impossible to reverse engineer, infact it is literally impossible. Because electron microscopes are not detailed enough to see what does what - and you can't probe it whilst it is running either - even Intel can't be reverse engineered. MI6 and Germany do not have the tech to dig into hardware, for that you need to look to Intel or AMD or US military. Not a spy agency. This is why US claims its a risk but can't prove or disprove either way, its physically impossible to do so at the hardware level.
@@WelshGuitarDude Again, Im sure u are more expert than Europe's intelligence agency when it comes to determining if Huawei is a threat or not. LOL amusing. Oh and btw, US and its allies have been proven again and again that they spy on everyone, despite the fact that they are democracy etc etc end of day the result is they are proven spies in this field. Yet there is zero proof on Huawei. Nuff said. :D
@@zszs100 the level of stupidity on youtube annoys me. Europe's intelligence agency and USA's can ONLY find software threats. The unknown threats are to do with the hardware level, there is no physically humanly way possible to detect hardware level threats.....this is physically impossible by quantum mechanics aka the literal laws of physics denies you the ability to probe the hardware for threats at run time. There is no proof because there can't be proof it is NOT PHYSICALLY POSSIBLE. This is why they warn of the potential threat but can never prove it, it isn't possible. Seriously either read a damn book or study higher education. We can all easily agree there is no software threat, but no one can say for certain if the hardware has a remote kill switch or backdoor. techcrunch.com/2018/07/19/uk-government-panel-issues-inconclusive-huawei-security-report/
Anyone remember how the US feds want backdoors in everyone's phones?? Remember how they have data centers that log all kinds of information on as many people as possible to the point of facial recognition on the street?? Yeah, me neither.
Lol, you guys are hilarious 1. Everyone spies....not just China as you would like to have us believe 2. Nations on 5G...(a)It's not about using Huawei equipment as such but about the extent to which nations feel the can mitigate the threat which the obviously should be able to, (all hardware blue prints, software etc are made available and checked b4 installation and no one is dumb enough to have critical systems out your home territory and control except Sweden,(you guys need to have that sorted out) (b)availability of the technology (c)it's quality and price compared to completion Realise that we have some brains in our heads and will not just buy what you say without thinking, Correct me if I am wrong
