Inside: Jomox (Electronic Beats TV) 

but a painful buggy product. it's good when it's working but every time there's an issue, usually it's a BIG issue that you want to throw the machine in the garbage. from PSU problem to OS issues,..it's a very problematic product

He is talking about pitch up or down a sample. You have to interpolate/resample it. With an analog oscilator there is no interpolation when changing the pitch.

I fully agree. There is no „nothing“ between the samples. However, I still have great respect for the develoment of analog gear.

It looks like you watched a YT video about Nyquist. Cool. But what does your theoretical scenario involving an analog LPF have to do with anything? And where are you claiming there is "no interpolation going on"? @MarkusCologne If you look at an audio signal, it is voltage. That voltage translates to the position of a speaker driver which moves air. Digital audio produces a voltage with no gaps, and it moves the speaker smoothly between samples and creates sound with no gaps. But that has nothing to do with the digital processing of those signals! There's interpolation/regression all over the place in digital production. Interfaces and mixers oversample and further interpolate. VSTs interpolate (and call it oversampling). At least the good ones do. Like he says in the video, digital is fine for recording and playback, but it has limitations in production. And Jomox makes hardware for producers. He makes a point of this! 8:50 People have misconceptions about the gaps between digital samples and/or what the waveform will actually look like - which isn't what it looks like when you zoom down to the sample level. But that's not what he's talking about. He repeatedly referred to the aliasing frequency. And he's 100% correct. Any digital audio processor has to work with a finite number of frequencies, and there can be interactions - like the audio version of the moiré effect. There are differences between analog and digital. And Jürgen certainly understands those differences a lot better than most, even if his comment about "ribs" could be misinterpreted.

@garnwell heyndrr i think i've grown in the past month, i dont think that way anymore but still think people should go in the woods to listen to the birds just because it is a medicine.. but i do like synths that are not trying to replace sounds that we can hear outside

..his dumbass even solders the batteries directly in so you have to desolder then put in a real battery holder.. on top of everything he makes has ridiculously buggy software .

Never, my advice to you: SELL IT!!!!

Jürgen says these are not bugs, these are features.He is not even ashamed of it and recommends to use an external sequencer like everyone else. Never again a product from Jomox. I will keep the 888 anyway.

Klingt wie Seife.

no let‘s keep Jonox substream and something special! ;)

I don't think so, I think he's saying they interact with frequencies we can hear and it adds to the complexity of the system

Nothing to do with sound. Is all in durability and long lasting. Thats why b/er products are generally cheap cause if it breaks you wont cry much about it vs an equal channels and features 4x the price mackie or heath