Тёмный

Integration by Parts (3 of 3: Integral of sin¯¹(x)) 

Eddie Woo
Подписаться 1,9 млн
Просмотров 14 тыс.
50% 1

Опубликовано:

 

25 окт 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 13   
@gwub7117
@gwub7117 5 лет назад
6:15 was very cheeky, very cheeky. Sub earned.
@mathematix-rodcast
@mathematix-rodcast 2 года назад
For the integral of x (4-x)^(1/2) dx is more conducive to integrate by de-radicalization, letting the radicand be u^2. So, x = u^2 +4; dx = 2u du and the radical expression becomes u. It bangs out pretty simply.
@guilhermefreire8093
@guilhermefreire8093 6 лет назад
This is so useful. It really made me understand integration by parts.
@roumanfirdous8707
@roumanfirdous8707 3 года назад
Sir Eddie there is a rule created by me called as I LATE ... To choose U and V in integration product rule I = Inverse function L= LOG A= algebraic T = trigonometric E = exponential Which even come first is taken as U other become V
@ghffhghhdhh3600
@ghffhghhdhh3600 Год назад
log comes first, followed by arc function
@fuvet
@fuvet 4 года назад
Efficiency
@shonab7618
@shonab7618 4 года назад
Saving me
@diaz6874
@diaz6874 4 года назад
3:44 Yay! :D
@xanh350
@xanh350 6 лет назад
derivitive of sine^-1x why can't I use the chain rule method for this? and it becomes -sine^-2x . cosx ?
@KolleLyrics
@KolleLyrics 5 лет назад
because you are not forming the integral what you did was the Differentiation. you have to add 1 to your power
@josephrance9984
@josephrance9984 4 года назад
I know this comment is a year old, but it is because sin^-1(x) means arcsin(x), not sin(x)^-1
@diaz6874
@diaz6874 4 года назад
@@josephrance9984 That why I like to write ArcSomething instead of the -1 power.
@carultch
@carultch Год назад
Because the notation of sin^(-1)(x) has nothing to do with 1/sin(x). It's a confusing notation, because it refers to the function inverse, instead of the reciprocal. 1/sin(x) is called cosecant, and even it can't just be integrated with the method you propose. The chain rule works for differentiating any function, but for integrating, it isn't as straight forward. You have to first spot the derivative outside the function, in order to use the chain rule in reverse. A derivative that is a simple constant can always be produced by multiplying by 1 in a fancy way, but any other derivative, not so much.
Далее
Integration by parts (visualised)
8:54
Просмотров 35 тыс.
Team Spiderman True Or False Mask,nono #Shorts
00:37
how Laplace solved the Gaussian integral
15:01
Просмотров 749 тыс.
Integration by Parts (2 of 3: How to choose u & dv)
8:14
integration by parts, DI method, VERY EASY
16:59
Просмотров 1,5 млн
Integration by Substitution (2 of 2)
4:50
Просмотров 24 тыс.
4 Horsemen of Integration Apocalypse
11:51
Просмотров 110 тыс.
Can you solve this Cambridge Entrance Exam Question?
24:48