International 2000 & 2001 Loaders: What Tractors Do They Fit? What size loader will fit your tractor? What size International loader will fit your antique tractor? #farmallfanatic #antiquetractors #farmall
I’ve got a 2500B with 2000 loader and a 584 with 2200 loader, love them both. If you take care of them and remember that you’re on a tractor and not a track loader they’ll last a long time.
Thanks for covering this ff. I am looking for a way to load round bales on my bale wagon in the field without moving a skid steer around from field to field anymore. I know these aren’t ideal loader tractors, but they’re a lot cheaper than another skid steer, and I’m a low budget type guy. Plus I already have a 400 just sitting here. Lol. Take care.
They do fit several models! IH would sell em with different mounting brackets for various tractors! You’d go to your local IH dealer and say Fred I want to buy a loser for my 656 or 706 etc and he’d sell you the loader for that tractor! That same loader would be sold for other models according to IH instruction and mounting brackets etc! Had two neighbors years ago bought the same loader for two different tractors from IH ! Thanks for making me recall these memories! Great video!
LOL there fanatic this is guy from Butler county. We move our bales but the 385 and a 2200 loader. Most of the guys that I run into in this part of the country always saw the 1066 was too big of tractor to ruin as you say quote ruin with a loader. I ran into a guy from Iowa Illinois Nebraska somewhere out there mentioned something about a neighbor having a 1066 and how they did in their heavy field work with he said oh yeah we have a little one like that we move round bales with it it just seemed kind of funny to me to use the tractor that big for moving around bales
I use a 1466 with a off brand loader to move bale. You use what u have at hand. It runs the cutter,rake baler and a 15ft shredder for cleanup jobs. Whatever I need it for is what it gets used forcan look silly at times🤣
Looks great that loader. I was looking at a tractor other day wanted you to call me but it's okay it sold now. He sold it for 400 running was small one with cultivators. Thanks your video have a good night
Interesting. I've got a brother named Larry and I am leaving that right there! Interesting about the loaders. Loader tractors are cool. Love the utility models with loaders.
That loader is just right for the 400 as far as being the right size and right fit for the tractor. We used a comparable Du-Al loader on a W-450 and it worked great. They cut it off with age with the 40/60 series tractors, but they also looked at hydraulic capacity. The 400 hydraulics are hardly adequate to run a loader not only because of pressure, but oil capacity. The 60 series tractors are the first to use Hy-Tran and run the hydraulic oil in the transmission, and by doing so, they greatly increased the reservoir capacity (8+ gallons rather than a gallon and a half.) Think about the rods of the cylinders... All four of them when fully extended... That's how much your reservoir drops. When you only have a gallon and a half, that eats it up pretty much all of it. When loaders were put on antique tractors, they typically had a PTO pump and larger tank to address that problem. The Du-Al loaders incorporated a hydraulic reservoir in the loader frame, and other manufactures have had similar ideas. The 2000 loader is much newer than the 400. I question using a 966 or 1066 on it, just as much as a 240 or B414. I wouldn't put much more than a 706 on it, but wouldn't put less than a 460 on it. The 2350 is just right on a 1066. We have a 2350 on a 1086, and it is just right for the tractor. We've never had a 2000 loader, so this is new to me... Thanks for the video again...
There were a lot of tractors these 2000 and 2001 loaders would fit that weren't listed, because the dimensions and mounting holes for the front brackets are the same. Anything from an M up through a 1456 has the same bolt pattern and distance between the frame rails at the front. The only difference is wheelbase and shape of the axle housing, square or hex. Easy enough to modify the back frame.
I had both a 2000 and 2001 loader there are same loader really only difference I see in two is the 2000 is a double ram tip and the 2001 is a single ram tip or a trip bucket like mine was
Good day Yrs. ago we had 414, it had 1501 loader, it had centre cylinder for bucket. I have dunham-lehr on 574, you can lift back wheel off ground Thanks
@@FarmallFanatic yes. It even has truck tires on the front because the load was too heavy for the IH tires. There's also a winch on the back that was on a old army truck from WW2 that used to work on the farm. The winch was on a jalopy to hall wood and was put on the tractor so they could continue to use the winch. Unfortunately my grandfather never got the pto hooked to it so now it is just a counter wate for the loader.
What was added to be able to use on the M. I have a loader but trying to figure out how to hook up to run. Would i need a belt driven pump in addition from my belly pump??
Actually had a 574 utility with a 1550 on it those were not a real well-built loader setup they were more for just a basic utility tractor operation where you didn't use them all the time not like we had for a dairy farm. We had a 450 with a farmhand loader and we could wear a bucket out about twice a year on that lol The 2000 on the 756 was the best
If you know , do tell me what actually drives the PTO on these tractors. I understand that they have the clutch, and brake pack on the rear with the big handle. I need to know what actually drives the shaft going back to that clutch pack. I know these tractors didn't have a 2 stage clutch. So I'm trying to figure out how that shaft is driven all the time when the transmission clutch is disabled.
@@FarmallFanatic The M, H was driven from the transmission, and would stop when the clutch pedal was pressed in. The 350 maybe the 300 ,but I know the 350 , and 450 had that clutch pack on the back. Somehow the shaft of going to it was driven any time the engine was running. I'm trying to figure out what drove that shaft. Like did they have a hydraulic motor that turned the PTO shaft all the time??? As I said I understand the clutch pack on the rear of the tractor, it's the shaft going to it that I don't understand how it gets it's power. Hope I explained, hope you have the answer.
...if I remember correctly.....my friend had one on a 544 utility with hydrostatic drive...but can't remember if it was. 2000 or 2001..... .... ..BOOM.....!!!
@@FarmallFanatic I got eyes on a wide front M with a 3 point but the next tractor I buy I want to be able to put that loader on it off my 2444. That thing is wore out from the rooter to the tooter lol
Ok, FF, I'll bite long time Farmall man now running a Massey 135 that has a two position clutch, power steering and a heavy front axle....will a 2000 or 2001 loader retro fit to my tractor? As a AWS certified welder anything can be done but... .am I just cobbling something together? Still gotta be better than an M with same set up....what do you think?
My uncle baught what was my grandpas diesel 544 it has a 2000 loader on it with bale forks and it had a year round cab it was the first tractor i ever drove
@@FarmallFanatic oh my yes and i was very lucky my grandpa had a gas and diesel version that i got to run/operate he also had a 544 utility but sold it to a local before i was born but i did get a chance to operate it
I have a ih 444 with a 2001 loader I'm wanting to install but I don't know where the hoses hook to on my tractor I'm wanting to not have to hook them to my wet lines
Seems like most 560s with loaders I've been around, looked liked whoever owned it just hated them, did their best to trash them,as long the bitch started and ran it was good enough
Well 1066 is the same exact tractor as a 14 or 1566. Just they had bigger engines. The frame was the exact same. So if it fit a 1066 then it would fit a 1466. Just the bigger tractor could very well break the loader or bend something with the extra power
@@FarmallFanatic no probably not. But if a man gets desperate for a tool he needs then he'll make it work. But man if that's the case then prob even 1066 would break it🤷♂️
The 1566 is a completely different tractor. They are heavier throughout and instead of having a 4 speed transmission with High/ Low range, the 1566 has a 3 speed with high/ low range. The 1566 has larger axles too. But as far as the frame goes, yes you're right. It would bolt right onto the 1466.
Some day, I’ll get a 1000 loader even though they look stupid. They’re good for picking things up and putting them down as well as a good conversation piece. 😖
