Is Hinduism in conflict with science? 

One day religion will give up.

The caller had a very rough idea about creation. He doesn't know that the world was created by the 'Flying Spaghetti Monster'... or as he may call it 'a conscious being'.

A hypothesis is not just a guess - it should be based on existing theories and knowledge. It also has to be testable, which means you can support or refute it through scientific research methods (such as experiments, observations and statistical analysis of data).

i was there on the stream , really liked your stream , btw i joked that ai is gonna replace the artists lmao

Being controversial on its own existence for thousands and thousands of years and still prevails, is itself the best possible method to deny God existence. If still under exploration, which Infact never ends so discussion may be carried out till next asteroid impact and again the issue will vanish out with us unresolved.

Sunday morning premiere

Happy to see the cosmic duck fart universe hypothesis is getting some mainstream attention. Soon this will be proved as the true origin of the universe.

Very logical interesting debate Excellent 👍👍

Sab kab apka next podcast hai and aap hindi me bath karte ho kya!

Khayali Pulav Very tastey 😋

Sir with due Respect i want to participate in a debate with you on the matter and i believe it will be a great experience and indeed knowledgeable Thank you 🙏

This person on the line was a really rational being and provided great rebuttals and responses. I salute this man. I have very rarely found someone approach someting with such a neutral and objective stance. He even beat Vimoh at this.

I liked your debate with that guy

Caller: "i like to think i am opened minded" ... you know exactly where this is going ... and, yep, exactly

If only I beleive that I created god and universe I will be called stupid if 1 lakh people believe that it's me who created god and universe than it is a religion. Equally stupid but numbers ka fark hai

After watching this I forgot the meaning of hypothesis 😢😢😢 can someone explain please 😅

hypothesis is an assumption that is made based on some evidence...."SOME EVIDENCE"

Vimoh bhaii.... he is right... me God he baat kr rha hu😂😂😂

Vimoh, though i am an atheist as well, but talking about hypothesis only, Aryan said first there was god and then god manifested in various forms, to which you said he cannot base his hypothesis on utternaces of one or more persons on one planet. Similarly, since before the big bang there was singularity, which we all believe, why should we believe on what one/many scientists from just one planet say. AThat was a tie for you and Aryan. good debate though.

He admits , " there was.. means exist no more!

The headache of this video trying to decipher what the caller is trying to say

Hypothesis is an assumption based on 'some' evidence.

Sabine has a book on this. He calls such claims ascientific as opposed to anti-scientific.

Aaj Eid hai aur maine bhi khayali pulaw khaya😂😂

I proud to be muslim☪️️☪️️ Allah hu akbar❤❤❤❤❤

Vimoh: You made a huge jump there.😐 Him: Yes

background Comics Poster =MAST

Fine tuned universe.??

वैदिक ऋषि मुनि कहते हैं कि सच किसी के पास नहीं है क्योंकि इस मायावी संसार के अनुभव जो इंसानो को होते हैं वो अनुभव इस आधार पर होते हैं कि हम सभी प्राणी किसी खास आयाम मे, एक निश्चित समीकरण पर, किसी खास समय मे, किसी एक स्थान मे, किसी एक ग्रह पर, गुरुत्वाकर्षण की वजह से और वहाँ की तरंग आवृति और हमारी अपनी खुद की उन सभी तरंगों को ग्रहण करने की शक्ति पर ही सेट, फिक्स, टयुन्ड होते हैं और यहा तक कि वैज्ञानिकों के उपकरण भी इसी हिसाब से सेट व फिक्स होते हैं l हमारे ये अनुभव उन प्राणियों से अलग ही होंगे जो दूसरे अन्य किसी और अनुभव वाले बिंदुओं पर सेट हैं यानी इन अलग अलग बिंदुओं पर सेट तरह तरह के प्राणियों का अनुभव और फिर नजरिया अलग अलग ही होगा तो फिर किसका अनुभव सही और किसका गलत ये तय करने वाले हम, आप, वो, ये या अन्य कोई भी कौन होते हैं - समझो इसको गहराई से l देखिये ये दुनिया जैसे हम इंसानो को अनुभव होती है वैसी एक मच्छर को, एक कीड़े को, एक हाथी को, एक चींटी को, एक बैक्टीरिया को या फिर अन्य दूसरे ग्रह और ब्रह्मांड मे रहने वाले प्राणियों को नहीं होती है यानी ये दुनिया सबको अलग अलग रूप मे दिखती है और अनुभव मे आती है l इस एक दुनिया को सब अपने अपने हिसाब से अलग अलग तरीके से अनुभूत करते हैं और फिर वैसी ही राय बना लेते हैं और उसी को सच मान लेते हैं l उनके अनुभव उनके लिए तो सच हो सकते हैं मगर औरो के लिए वो सच बिल्कुल भी नहीं हैं l तभी तो वैदिक ऋषि ठहाका मार कर कहते हैं हे मुर्ख आदमी तू किस प्राणी के अनुभव मे आई हुई दुनिया के अनुभव को सच मानता है जो कि सबको अलग अलग रूपों मे अनुभव हो रही है l ये दुनिया मायावी और महाठग है जो हम सभी को भ्रम मे डाल कर उलझा दे रही है l तो किसी भी धार्मिक नेता, धर्म गुरु, वैज्ञानिक, मीडिया, राजनेता, प्रोफेसर, बुद्धिजीवी की बात का भी विश्वास मत करो बस अपनी खोज जारी रखो और दिमाग को हमेशा खुला ही रखो l कुदरत ने सबको अपना अपना प्राईवेट दिमाग इसीलिए दिया है कि लोग अपने का दिमाग इस्तेमाल करें और किसी के पीछे बिल्कुल भी ना चलें l यहाँ सच किसी के भी पास नहीं है फिर भले ही वो कोई भी तुर्रामखां हो l सब झूंठे अनुमान को अपने दिमाग मे लिए ढो रहे हैं l ये दुनिया ऐसे ही बनी और विकसित हुई है जहाँ सच एक बहुत ही गहराई मे जाकर के मिलता है और वो गहराई क्या है वो ही अभी तक किसी को मालूम नहीं है तो सच को क्या और कैसे खोजेगा कोई l सच किसी को नहीं मालूम है लेकिन अपनी पूँगी सब लोग बजाकर बड़े दावे करते हैं सच को खोज लेने के l तो सच ये ही है कि सच का किसी को भी नहीं पता l तो हम कह सकते हैं कि हर कोई सवाल पूछने वाला तो जिज्ञासु है मगर जवाब देने वाला ज्ञानी बिल्कुल भी नहीं है l दुनिया मे किये गए अब तक के सारे के सारे सवाल वाजिब हैं मगर दिये गए जवाबों मे से एक भी वाजिब और सही जवाब नहीं है l परमात्मा, ईश्वर एक तत्व है बिल्कुल खाली पड़े आकाश की तरह l ये कोई महामानव या सुपरमैन की तरह बिल्कुल भी नहीं है l ये कोई अज्ञान पुरुष (unknown person) की तरह से नहीं है जिसको कि हमको ढूँढना है ये तो बल्कि खाली पड़े आकाश की तरह से हर जगह मौजूद है l यानी ये कोई अज्ञात पुरुष नहीं है बल्कि ये अज्ञात स्थान है जो एक जगह केंद्रित ना हो कर सब जगह है, हर जगह है l और इसी अज्ञात जगह और खाली पड़े आकाश मे से ही सब कुछ अपने आप ही उत्पन्न होता है और नष्ट या विलुप्त होता है l उत्पत्ति मे से उत्पत्ति हो रही है यानी creator और creation दोनों एक ही हैं और ये ही अजूबा है जो समझ मे नहीं आता l यानी मैं अपने पिता की creation हूँ और मेरी संतान मेरी creation है l तो इस लिहाज से हर व्यक्ति खुद ही एक creation है और साथ ही साथ creator भी है - ये ही एक नियम है l

Aryan's definition of god is definitely logical contradictions. Omnipotent God leads to paradox of can God create a stone so heavy that he cannot lift it. Such contradictory definition of god cannot exist

Bro went went with no data is hypothesis and take it as hypothesis but don't shame me with some other hypothesis on aesthetic basis. Bhai Many World has Measurable Notations to make it hypothesis and it isn't even science yet.

NO! existence of God cannot be a hypothesis because it is not falsifiable. Other than that the god that religions around the world taking about has been disproven many times like the phenomenon of lightening, raining , waves etc all were thought to be caused by a supreme deity is every religion and culture and is explained by science. So the question should be why science should we take religion seriously when it have been proved wrong multiple times.

Are you from odisha ??

my man is rock hard to prove that his hypothesis is best for next netflix series.

Keep going Vimoh. What's your blood pressure after such streams? Please I need data.

❤❤❤❤❤❤

Just say few words for God and religion are they same or different Maybe be I can debate with you😅

This is a case for Scotland argument. ‘It’s my invention’. The national animal of Scotland is a Unicorn, so it’s officially backed by authority, tradition and perhaps ‘a constitution’ (or whatever). Now, is it up to us to disapprove it? because not all the nations of the world put together can prove that a unicorn doesn’t exist. So Scotland can continue to believe in Unicorns or Gremlins or Chupacabra, and give them exalted positions, but the rest of the world will wink, smile and joke about it. Lesson: No one is stopping you from calling a Unicorn your national animal or another animal as your favorite relative, but please do not expect the rest of the world to indulge in your fantasies.

Vimol is doing a great work towards removing stupidity from our society.....

Rashad khalifa advanced 19 hypothesis.

I created god😂

👍

First best thing I watched on Sunday morning 😅❤

Sir Madam This body is made of 4 billion cells live. Dr Brian Cox in Rajasthan 🐪 camel verified live cells of the camel is the same as Dr Cox.

13:18 ☠️

Sir apko jabab nhi de pate 😂

@13:51 .... there are many hypothesis we make in scientific world also *"on the basis of observation "* So मेरे भाई तुम्हारे सृष्टि करता कि व्याख्या में क्या और कौनसे ऐसे *" observation "* जिसके आधार पे ये दांवा कर रहे हो कि *"मनुष्य जैसे किसी सजीव ने इस सृष्टि का निर्माण किया"* what are the *observation* on which you draw a conclusion that there was a living being which create this universe *You are making only claim, without any observation

People need to really know about fallacies and cognitive biases before debating.

Good line ...Bro...in min 6:29 God in side us.. God in mountain... God in space ... Sab check kiya sab jhut nikla.. ...... 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

Evolution and cosmology are two things every religion got wrong, including Hinduism. No need to such sofisticated arguments.

Hello Vimoh, could you dispel the superstitions surrounding Mount Kailash? Numerous people assert that Lord Shiva resides there, and they believe the mountain is unclimbable and that one ages rapidly while there. Thanks 🙏

“you Knoooww?!”

sir hanuman chalisa me kaise earth to sun ki distance correct kaise likhi gyi ye to proof valid lagta hia na? what do you say?

to make claim about religion first read enough literature from the best possible source and INTERPRETATION that is accurate. to come with flawed argument and shameless to admit their theory as wrong. The conversation otherwise is a dead end.

इसमें आप हिंदी वाले कैसे सुने साहब कैसे समझे हिंदी वाले

I'll add a bit more detail to the conversation for better context. a hypothesis is actually the 2nd step of the scientific method. there needs to be some observations before one can even make a hypothesis, what Vimoh was referring to as data. based on observations we make a falsifiable statement, the hypothesis. we should remember that for physical realities, we can never prove a negative. the statement is always positive and evidence either proves the statement or leaves it in the hypothesis state. the many world interpretation is one way of explaining why quantum mechanics (QM) is the way it is. it is not the same as saying "there might be a god" which is based on subjective experiences. QM as a theory has been well established and the many world interpretation, along with other proposed theories, are proposing hypothesis based on the reality of QM. as long as we don't have any way of verifying the "other worlds" caused by wave function collapse, such theories will not be proved.

The human body has five main sensory organs through which we perceive the world. These are: Eyes, Ears, Nose, Tongue and Touch. So, if things, such as God and Ghost eyc. are not perceived through any of these senses, how can we believe in the existence of those things? For thousand years, nobody found any evidence of God's existence. Therefore, believing in God's existence without any evidence totally blind faith!

Bro is tryin hard💀💀

Is shit in conflict with biryani

God is par Brahma, this hypothesis is from a late period , (perhaps from Upnishad) God in earliest Hindu texts (Vedas) are Indra, Varun, Mitra etc.

God is the favourite imagination of humans to do irrational actions.

The many worlds theory comes out of math and observations. Its still a theory but saying its the same as some random thought this dude has is laughable.

Why are you eager to bring this down to such quantifiable level?

can anyone name things that don't have a creator?? just a question out of curiosity.

Aap debate karte raho badalne bala to kuch he nahi upar se aap ka channel bhi to debate kar ke hi chalta he. aap ka aur kuch kaam to hoga nahi. god he ki nahi issi par bat kar te raheteho.

I am not interested😂

Rigidity all around.😂

Aise logo ko hi shashtro me andh bhagat kaha gaya hai 😅

The person asking question has some confusions ParamBrahma is NOT God. God means Devata. The god of The Abrahamic religions is a devata. In these religions, the followers are monotheists. So, they are not allowed to worship any other devata. Many Hindus get confused by monotheism and mix up Param Brahma with the god worshipped by Abraham

Jai bhim jai Bharat sir