Is  

play master duel and stop complaining , konami didn’t make the prices the players did

​@@chipbowieI'm sorry - what? Why would you refer someome to a wholly different format/game? If you like playing paper yugioh, the only option rn is to buy S:P or lose wayy more games than you were supposed to if S:P was cheaper. If tennis rackets triple in price from one day to the next, you don't tell someone to start playing football instead of agreeing with them that prices are too high, do you? Also - yes, Konami influences secondary market prices by deciding card rarities.

@@chipbowie "Konami didn't make the prices" sure, but they made S:P a secret rare. Also "play master duel"? Bro the kinda guy to tell you "go to McDonald's" when you ask him for a Whopper.

​@@chipbowieyeah that's not how any card collection/game works. if Konami increased the print the prices go down. Rare modern cards are under printed in Yu-Gi-Oh by design

@@chipbowiehow’s that corporate boot taste?

Lol is the waspy wonderbread guy still around?

fenrir rant counter:

Imo little knight is doomed to be banned eventually

They literally don't care brother. They've already hit QCR's.

i can't appreciate anything from this game until unbreakable board on turn 1 would not be possible anymore

Good luck lol

literally the only problem with S:P is the price. Otherwise its a fun, interactive, and interesting game piece

You can't use Imperm after Duster, nor search it with BE

Couldn't just banish itself to get rid of the floodgate? (Yeah, Awakening is 2 floodgates in 1)

@@Jyxero yes he could have, but failure to read the card cause him to not do it, he kept trying by banishing other monsters. He went for 5 mins hiting the same wall only to end up in a worst situation.

Limited to one doesn't do anything to her. Most decks play her at one.

@@RazielTheUnborn it does. Many decks play multiples of her, and those tend to be extremely frustrating.

@@prosamis Many play her at multiple, MOST do not. Most play her at one.

@@RazielTheUnborn correct. But SP is most degenerate at multiples. If the first sp didn't wreck you, the second guarantees she will. She's TOO much in multiples Also makes things like extra deck rips stronger vs her

@@prosamis Most decks who run her at one are already oppressing you and keeping you from playing. The decks playing her at two are ethe ones getting stomped by the ones that play her at one. They play her at two to hang.

That applies to linking into it on the opponent's turn. People still use an extra deck monster when making it and have no issue with just committing to two main deck monsters. The temporary banish is the biggest strength of it since it is so versatile

infact, the only toxic thing about SP is the effect that let you ban whatever card if it's link summoned using a monster from the extra deck but its effect that ban until the end phase is not so toxic, and if the game would be slower (as i think it should be), this card would be just a useful generic toolbox and nothing else

Nah

You do not need rotations to have power creep. All they need to do is print something stronger than the last strong card/archetype by a country mile and that's power crept. Accesscode Talker most definitely power crept Borrelsword Dragon as a game ender since 9 times outta 10 it's way better to blow up a person's board then attack for 5300 directly than attack a monster then another monster or directly for the second attack if at all possible.

@@RazielTheUnborn I know there is more nuance to it. But without rotation, its a guarantee and the only place to is power creep! Up!!!!

@@PhyrexianFleshgorger bigger problem isn't the power creep but how generic the creep is. Take Ultimate Conductor Tyranno. That single card is holding up an entire archetype and one of the reasons (aside from Dinomorphia) that Dinosaurs are even rogue, and we're meta defining for years after it came out. It's still a threat today despite not having protections and yet it's locked to dinosaurs. Contrary to that, we got dumbass Accesscode Talker not being locked to its archetype or type. Baronne De Fleur being generic and only good card in her archetype. Crystons and (Infer)Noble Knights can't even play their own links anymore because how abused they are outside of their own archetype, same for Predaplants. It's frankly irritating. These cards should be either locked to their archetype or have a heavy consequence of being played outside their archetype if so piss generic.

It's overly stacked tbh. Self summoning self searching that banishes every turn

@@KevinTangYTbut it’s not an Omni negate. Most people want Omni negates gone, Konami gives us SP a non oppressive card just interaction, and people are mad..

​@@Geo-ok1nwPeople will get mad as long as a card costs 100$, that's all there is to it.