Is This Really What Happened to Danny? 

Being a Homeless Veteran for 10yrs if any of you think it's easy it's not. Nobody cares about our situation Now i make 22k weekly. have a home, a wife, a lovely daughter... A child of God. HALLELUJAH

I recommend everyone get a dash cam save you from all of this nonsense

Hi Larry, you are adorable to watch. If I was on the jury I would find your client innocent every time.

Just a hint or i would say a recommendation. Please link or put on the description the continued from so it's easier to follow the case from start to finish. Thank you. You know so far from what i see your a pretty damn good attorney..

This prosecutor must have been lucky to have never been cut off before. The truck moved over before clearing the center lane and it resulted in the truck being clipped in the right rear and the car being clipped in the left front..the total impact on the guard rail. The prosecutor f’d up and trying to save face.. making him look like a total idiot

I am really invested in this case that has absolutely nothing to do with me. I’m literally on the edge of my seat.

The story from the defendant seems consistent, nothing indicates that he would of been impaired.

AHHH!!!! This trial better come back innocent! 😂

I’m really hoping you give us a breakdown of what you thought about when you were at the Karen Read trial today! I was watching with EDB and we all saw you. Thank you for covering these trials for us!

Very frustrating not having the verdict.

26:12 "You didn't create your own for the trial?" 😂

This is why you should have a dash camera. Crazy stuff has happened to us in our RV. I point to our camera and people take off in a hurry.

When the truck in the left lane was going 75 MPH and cut the guy off, he’s no longer going 75 MPH in a forward direction, he’s going X speed to the right as well which means he can’t be going 75 MPH in a forward/ straight line.

In my early years (1969) I would transcribe official police accident records for the traffic engineering department of the city. Even back then there would have been photo evidence of impact points. Barring that, I would have expected to be able to get photos from the body shops. Still, great job.

The logic escapes you because you don’t want to understand basic traffic. If someone starts moves into your lane BEFORE they clear your front bumper, you would hit the back corner of the vehicle.

It is a high school trigonometry problem to determine how the accident occurred. If you could assume that both speedometers were accurate. When the guy traveling 75 mph turned together in the other lane he was no longer traveling straight. We would have to know what angle he turned to determine if a rear end collision would occur.

Larry, you are always respectful, prepared and professional. ❤️

Prosecutor tell me you have no knowledge of physics without telling me you have no knowledge of physics.

Speed going straight vs speed at an angle. They could absolutely hit

The prosecutor seems to believe that car accidents with a loved one are a way to relax & clear one’s head as long as it doesn’t require medical treatment.

Why weren’t any of the skid marks measured? You can tell a lot about the length of a skid mark. That cop did a horrible job of investigating the accident. What good is this cop if he can’t even work an accident properly ?

That attorney did not pay attention to his 5th grade science teacher.

Larry I saw you in the courtroom Karen Read trial,you looked great 👍

Yes, it was so awesome to see you during EDB’s stream today. I hope you took notes about how the jury is engaged

How about the bar tab? Did it show that he purchased any alcohol?

I've had idiots cut me off then back off thier gas pedal reducing speed if I hadn't hit my brakes I would of crashed this has happen in my own car and alot while I was in my semi trying to get me to hit em or go off road

Many automatic vehicles have the ability to downshift, slow down, and no breaklights will engage. All the while The cruse can still be on. 😊

Sounds believable. I’ve been in an accident when cut off by another vehicle and once a car makes impact the vehicles start spinning, making further contact. Cars are already in motion and it’s very possible to receive rear damage in a spinning car when another car is spinning also.

You gotta just love how these DAs make up a story and try and fit the circumstances to their narrative. He doesn’t think that someone would hit the brakes when somebody cuts them off then he’s pretty damn stupid. And the person in front of them would also hit the brakes once they felt the impact. I’ve been a truck driver for 40 years and I’ve seen all kinds of accidents and the one the defendant explained sounds like many that I have seen in person up close and personal.😁🎯

I love the respect you show, your whole appearance, questioning, and presentation is impeccable. I'm from Australia, never been to court, so I think it's very interesting.

Excellent job DUIGUY!! 👏 bravo 👏 I never grt tired of seeing your work that magic 🎉❤

Sudden impact effects you suddenly... you walk it off and don't go to the doctor... that's how I grew up in the 70's

that Judge is the most laid back unassuming guy ever. I wish every Judge had his temperament.

I saw your face on the Karen Read trial. Looking very handsome. It was like seeing a friend.

Never checked about the other driver? Did the officer check on the other driver and take a statement? Why wasn’t that part of the trial.

Simple..the driver of the truck cut over to soon and believe me I know its possible to rear-end a vehicle that has cut u when they're cutting in front of you to soon ..fatty is twisting

😱 I didn't think the KY prosecutor could stand let alone walk 😱😱😱😱😱😱

Persecutor: "I'm not getting the physics..." that's because, based in this and other cases I've seen, you're not to bright.

1800 on the dot! When are you going to share your thoughts on trial today? I actually became giddy, like a little kid 😂😂😂😂. Edited to add... What kind of EMT or Medic makes a patient hop to a stretcher or truck? Hearing things like this make me livid 😡

Also if the defendent was going 109 mph and the 3rd party was at 75 mph, both being in the centre lane the rear ending would have not looked like that. The impact would have been fully across the front and the back of the vehicles.

That other lawyer is an overactor. He's making me nauseous. Good on you guys for not mocking his tone right back at him.

did you watch TB "Ep654 - Karen Read Case: Bombshells Dropped at Final Pretrial Hearing", in it, defense argues 3rd party defense, but references a lot of Federal testimony

That prosecutor gives me hint of "I am just a simple Cavemen lawyer..."

The courtroom cameras must be from the 80's.

Corrupt prosecutor and cop, imho!

I didn’t like the prosecutor. He seemed to twist the testimony to fit his need to win and putting words in your client’s mouth. It is possible for a vehicle to come into your lane going 75 mph while you’re going 70 and both vehicles collide. It wasn’t your client that hit the truck, the truck hit your client’s vehicle. QUESTION LARRY did the truck’s insurance company pay the repairs/replacement to your client’s vehicle?

As a cab driver, you see people getting cut off, because the person coming in their lane, never looked over their shoulder. (The blind spot). Especially if they are from a different country. Is your last name Mason? LOL 😂 🤣 😆

I DONT LIKE that prosecutor !!! He is the true yokel country lawyer. Stupid !!!

"You didn't create your own?" ... LOL

"Would it be fair to say that you were a little shaken from the accident and distracted by your wife's injuries, so that you might not have paid attention to everything that was being said?" That would be a great way of covering for any inconsistencies between what witnesses were claiming was said.

A classic case of swoop and squat.

"Do you have an explanation as to why you smelled like alcohol"... because the Cop lied?

This guy cut him off. That attorney knows that he’s been in the same situation himself and a car traveling 50 mph and someone can come up doing 100mph on their left cut them off and clip the front of the slower vehicle. The operitive word is he didn’t tear end the guy. He was struck by the other vehicle.

Does the prosecutor have independent evidence that the man was in fact was travelling at 75 the scenario is based on what the driver told the deputy he was doing 75 and did not decelerate as he pulled over and did the other driver pass a DUI or was it only the defendant. Again it was only the deputy that claimed he told him he had drank a beer and hour or so earlier.

The truck driver could have accidentally disabled his cruise control and not realized he was slowing down. That could also explain why he cut off Mr Faulkner. I can't count the times my cruise control was disabled unintentionally. You look down and you've dropped speed without realizing it.

why is it taking for granted that the other driver was doing 75 , what is the evidence to support that , why is the other driver not there to testify if they are discussing the accident, why was Danny not breathylised ? weird

The so called cop should not be on duty without cameras. How many other people has he lied about and put in custody of the jail hmmmmmm . I dont like it one bit

Prosecutor totally exposes himself as someone who wants the win, not justice. What a POS

The other lawyer sounds like lawyer on the show, "Longmire". He was a big butt and kept asking questions the same way. Hoping to mess up the defendant.

Of course the hospital got pissy 🤦🏼‍♀️ they wanted that $$$

Most people, including prosecutors apparently, confuse Acceleration Deceleration speed and velocity. The first two are derived values. Acceleration is the rate of change in velocity over time and is analyzed by inserting the appropriate values into the formula dv/dt = A Deceleration is likewise derived D=vf-vi/t where f is the final velocity and i is the initial velocity and D is expressed in distance per unit of time squared Speed is a single component value expressing a magnitude with respect to time Velocity is a two component value achieved by expressing speed in units of distance with respect to unit of time² All of the preamble was given here to point out that as the directional component of velocity changes the magnitude of the speed component must ALSO change. Therefore the static speeds on the screen in court are meaningless unless they give direction and time at initiation direction at final (final velocity is 0 relative to the ground) and closing velocities of both vehicles. It is entirely possible for the closing velocity between the two vehicles to match, indeed in any situation where one vehicle passes another there comes a moment where closing speed is equal. If that moment arrives and one vehicle has not cleared the other then a collision will occur and the following vehicle will strike the passing vehicle in the rear.

Lordy Lordy if I knew club soda can get you drunk. I start drinking club soda.

Why wasn’t the women driving the F-150 subpoenaed to testify? I feel like her testimony is pretty critical? Along with the EMT’s who arrived first?!

He was absolutely, with out a doubt the designated driver. There is zero evidence to show otherwise.

Honestly, I’m having trouble understanding how car a going faster than car b and moving into b’s lane hits b unless the side of a hits the side of b. OTOH, the prosecution story had car a going 75 and b going 100, yet has a overtaking b. Maybe should have prepped defendant a little better on the particulars. There’s also the fact that the specifics of the accident have no evidentiary value in determining his sobriety or intoxication.

Has the prosecuting attorney ever actually driven a car?? I’m confused by his confusion 😮. The second hand embarrassment is real… I’ve never felt it before seeing this 😂

Uk if you are involved in an accident and the airbags go off the police have to make sure you go to hospital and checked to see if you have concussion. No stupid line dancing follow my pen stand on one leg. They will stick a breathalyser in your mouth and you blow if it is below the drink drive limit off you go to hospital above they take a blood sample at the hospital. That is the end they will then work out who was at fault for the accident and issue tickets.

His full first name is probably actually Daniel, isn't it? Seems likely.

Prosecutor in this case seems like he's used to getting his way is frankly offended and perturbed that this big city lawyer didn't just have his client agree to the plea deal so it really put him out to have to try this case.

So what was the outcome. I never see that

If your going 75, but merging, your going to be traveling 70ish strait, and 5ish right. The car is going 75 but not in a strait line

There are actual accident investigation experts who can tell by skid marks, etc, how fast people were going. If the prosecutor wanted to try to prove that then he should have gotten an expert. I'm not trusting some rookie cop to just take a gander at it and say, "Oh! Must have been going 100!".

The prosecuting attorney is an idiot. When you pass someone you very often times speed up. When you get past them you slow back down to the speed you were going. This happens thousands of times daily all across the country. If the guy passing wasn't paying attention, he could have thought he cleared the car and started moving over too soon.

Well, I see things like this happen sometimes, but when someone is coming into your lane, IF they're already ahead of you, while going FASTER than you, how is that "cutting off" really? You're not going to hit them unless they slow down suddenly. Otherwise, the distance between you will increase over time. Now, if they start coming over before being in front of you, that's a different story. But if the... defendant?... actually hit the truck in the rear, not the side, then the truck must have slowed down. But just because the truck WAS going 75, doesn't mean it continued to go 75. It is pretty common for people to slow down after "passing." That is by far the most likely scenario.

53' trailers...

How did he pass the bar exam? He’s driving me crazy I was in a car wreck. I can remember everything before but the wreck rattled me so much. I didn’t know what went on after it.

What a grease ball he is!!!

Before the beginning did you have the same policy? Did you seriously ask that question?

At the point where he was describing the actual collision, I noticed something. The prosecuting attorney did not ask if he saw that the vehicle slowed down. Now, I have seen plenty of accidents in my time where somebody does cut you off and in the process of cutting you off, they do slow down, which means you could possibly rear end them or make contact with the rear quarter panel of the vehicle in front of you. And yes, that could be considered an unintentional pit maneuver, which would also allow the vehicle that was merging over from the left to suddenly be facing the other way, and it would also drag the car that collided with it One Direction leading into a collision with a guard rail on the right. if you can visualize it the way I do, it’s pretty easy to see how this can come about.

I have been in bars and dance clubs and never touched a drop of alcohol and I came out smelling like alcohol because people tend to spill drinks on chairs, tables, other people and themselves throughout the night. The prosecutor went fishing without any knowledge of bar scenes nor any knowledge of how idiots cut people off on highways every minute of every day. Sometimes accidents occur and many times no accident occur. Just because someone WAS going faster than you and then cut you off does not negate a simple FACT that they could have slowed down in the process of cutting you off. You cannot ask someone to "speculate" as to what the driver that cut you off did in the process of cutting you off beyond what your eyes have seen. Then add to that when cops make their reports they can also get things mixed up and write down something that did not occur or write it in a manner in which gives a false representation as to what occurred. This is one case where a dash cam would have revealed it all.

If the judge instructs the jury that guilt must be proven beyond reasonable doubt, the verdict must be innocent. Because there's reasonable doubt that the defence witnesses are being truthful enough. And it's a one rookie cop's word, based on his personal opinions against the word of 3 people (that know each other). There's reasonable doubt that the rookie cop's arresting process was: there's been an accident, the party that told me their version of events first is the party I'm more inclined to believe (which may have included them saying that they thought the defendant had been drink driving), the driver of the other vehicle smells of alcoholic beverages, I'm going to arrest him for drink driving. And then after that, it was a case of doubling down on his arrest.

so what was the verdict? that is one thing that seems to always be missing from these videos

Why do the courts still have such poor (it's analog video quality even!) video now in 2024? It's not like they couldn't afford to upgrade it, that wouldn't cost much these days. Sorry for going a bit off topic.

Man I was hoping to hear the outcome of this case

At the end of the day, if the degendent was driving at 100 mph, he would not have been there at that time. Also, if the 3rd party was driving at 75 mph, he wouldn't have been able to undertake another vehicle at 100 mph. The prosecutor is a moron.

Can u slip a not to Karen’s defence to the the word at is not ever in the time for text messages. Like it says AT 12.10 this and At 12.30 this. Nowhere ever does it say At in ant timeline

You’re the man bud, but if I had to be a critic (and I know I’m going to be crucified for this) I would say the only part that could have been done better was the sequence around moving the TV back.. I know you were just being cordial, but the tone with the small talk was too nice and sounded submissive.. And for all the haters I’ve still been following him since less than 100 subscribers so give me some grace. It’s all love.

I can't listen to that prosecutor without cringing 😬

5mph isn't that much of a difference that they wouldn't hit when he switch lane.. we can break the math out

My lord, prosecuting attorney was sooo reaching!! Sure even one's on jury could yell he had nothing

Why is the trooper sitting with the DA??? Weird!

I experienced the "impossible" while in the far right lane I had fresh green at 40mph. This dipshit in a company vehicle, made a right turn blowing the his red light. I ran into the back squared up with bumper. My truck light bar/ push bar bent in the body, off road lights fell off, i missed damage, till i was under my truck, why i didtt call LE, I put hazards on gestering to pull over. He refused to, started driving reckless / wanton on sidewalk, center median Island to lose me cause I was honking, lights, not aggressive. I got picture of the rear of van, plate, company and terminated my pursuit. Contacted company headquards, they sent it to local office. His boss contacts me saying I'm committing fraud, liar, doing 60 mph in a 40mph. I asked for their insurance and legal contact. Refused... Telling me it's my fault, just trying to get money cause covid, and contact my own insurance company. -Running red light, -Hit and Run, -Failure to Yield, -Ran another red light to attempting to lose me, -Driving on sidewalk,

Really could have used a good answer to the 70/75 speed. As I see it, the defendant can testify to what they did and saw but they can't really confirm that truck was going 75. It also sounded weird that everything was a statement of fact until questioned about the field sobriety tests where it quickly changed to "I do not recall".

Slimy prosecutor

Does this court use a potato to film? 😅

Boy did you get a good great day to be there...

❤❤❤

That old game "How many times can I rephrase that question to hav'em say 'yes' or 'no'?" could be a nice one, more so if an "Asked and answered!" back strike is not to expect like from this shiny but slow head, but playing it with "This is your job? That's what you do for your living? ... ?" would really pi$$ me off as a Juror ... Why didn't you spent more into "So you where a professional driver? Having seen a lot and know of the responsibility of driving sober?" and into his career change to an even more responsible area (maybe working with asthma-kids?) ...

If they eere already at the hospital why wouldn't the officer ask him to take a blood test ❓ problem solved.😅

Leave this and the kids alone