Is The Last of Us GREATER Than…The Last of Us? 

W skippa

W hustle

@@StopDropDash fuck that sellout mentality

AW HEEEEEELL NAH

@@StopDropDashnah, rare Skipper L

Dont give them any ideas. Do you know how horrible and woke it will be? I can just see it now. They will add an overly buff lesbian.

@@greasy8394 And a girl who shaves her head and says she’s a boy

Old joke

@@greasy8394 Theyll probably decide to have her kill off a major character like ellie or something

@@greasy8394 ​ “woke” is just a buzzword so you don’t sound like a asshole woke is a good thing the fuck the woke episode 3 was a huge success

its scary how often i see you heisenberg

Walter White how are you always on every channel and how do you always get your comment hearted?

I have a theory, you are all the RU-vidrs you subscribed to and they work together to comment and heart each comment across all of their channels! Or maybe you are Vince Gilligan.

Eh

@@deadlyninja112 ratio

@@aaronbissonnette good for you

@@deadlyninja112 bro said eh

It was good but lets not act like it was the first grounded cinematic game.

Holy shit ER has a comic?

So... there is no point in playing 'the Last of Us' if the show is the superior experience of the same tale? Ok. I'm going to play more Mario.

@@whaleping ??????? I didn’t say anything to that effect in my comment

@@whaleping You make no sense

Show was ass 🙌⬇️

​@Your Favourite Visionary cool opinion bro

No. I have finished RDR2 and by the end I was just so frustrated by Arthur's inability to think for himself always following Dutch like a lost puppy. All the while we never saw WHY he was so dependant. He was a cool charaxter but sucked at motivations and identification.

He is a retread of the RDR1 John Marston character, which is why they are so similar. And also why RDR2 John was retconned and downgraded to not make it is so glaringly obvious that Arthur is a copy of the RDR1 John.

​@@Pedro_Le_Chefi agree but it works for me, they did it better and in my mind it retconns John to be imitating Arthur, because Arthur was the best man he knew.

They have chillis in mexico

@@jimmyboy1582no

Synthetic man sucks. His opinions are actually some of the worst I've ever seen. There's liking something, disliking something and then being whatever the fuck synthetic man is

Yeah a lot of unnecessary changes, like two filler love story episodes, almost an episode and a half of building up the raider leader hypocrite lady who I guess was supposed to be “intimidating” when her and her people got wiped instantly due to her incompetence, Ellie trying to cure Sam and not telling anyone almost leading to her death and possibly the death of Henry and Joel, for some reason they made Tommy and Joel have a closer relationship when Tommy still holds the same resentment he has in the game which makes less sense since he’s still buddy buddy with Joel in the show, and swapping spores out of the fungus plague with tendrils because they’re “more realistic” 😂 also Neil ruining the analogy of Bills story in the game just so that the gay people don’t look bad is hilarious, less hilarious is how he left Bruce’s name off the credit of the HBO show trying to make it look like the story was completely Neil’s. Even if he was the one who wrote the HBO show, Bruce helped him make the original story and they wouldn’t have the show without the game.

​@@blakeandthecake4368"make the gays not look bad" Ellie is gay already Its a reimagining of the story and its supposed to make it hit even harder that joel could have had a happy life with tess but he failed that Yes the episode being big and bill and frank dying made it bad for pacing with the raiders leader but in this case its not bad writing just bad pacing, more episodes would help it Also ellie knew that if she told them they wouldve killed henry, the entire scene you can see her almost pleading to god that her blood work She is a kid and her making a bad decision isnt bad writing its just to show her again losing her Innocence that she is this savior with this magical cure Also the spores was because its harder to emote emotions with people in masks its more about translating it to a live action than it just being unnecessary Story changing≠ruining the other story Its like saying new joel or new ellie ruin old joel and old ellie But yeah the credits thing was such a jerk move

@@blakeandthecake4368 A lot of the things you list as “bad” are just changes from the game, that doesn’t make it bad. You are so contradicting yourself without realizing it

@@Indigo_1001 I mean, can you state how those changes improved upon what the game had already done? They just felt unnecessary to me, you had a masterpiece of a first game, why do you keep trying to change little things about it that were never wrong or broken to begin with? Like Sam for example, what was achieved out of making him deaf? Sympathy? As if we couldn’t already sympathize with his already terrible situation in the game? He just ended up getting less speaking lines.

this, it ruined games media idea of how to tell a story, so much is drivel now

MCU is one of the worst things to happen to film. Literally all show and no substance, Disney thought they needed to follow the Avengers model for Star Wars with cracking lame jokes and having no real sense of worry for the characters because they literally always win

Like Amy Hennig

Calling Neil, the creator of The Last Of Us, is like calling Turtle Rock the creators of Left 4 Dead. Back 4 Blood + The Last Of Us 2 (oh I'm sorry- PART 2) prove my point.

Exactly and last of us part 2 proves it😂

no, neil was at ND long before TLOU. he worked on the jax and daxter games and co wrote uncharted 2. bruce and neil were both the “main guys” of TLOU. bruce straley was game director and neil wrote the story and was the creative director. straley storyboarded with druckmann but ultimately neil wrote the story. bruce was in charge of the gameplay. stop spreading misinformation.

@@aaronbissonnette they have a narrative to reinforce, ofc they’re gonna lie

*your

Weirdo

Lets pretend that Neil didn't give her the role because the actress is "non binary".

@@Pedro_Le_Chef Uhhh they came out a “non-binary” years after she was casted for the roll. What the fuck are you talking about?

@@Indigo_1001he’s one of those redpill anti woke people just ignore em

Show isn’t made for you to be attracted to them lol get a girlfriend bro

The Last Of Us TV show is a good adaptation. However it's not perfect like the game. I remember the first time I played The Last Of Us and it impacted me to such an extent that I regard it as one of the greatest not only games but pieces of media every created. However with the TV show which I watched with my parents and my brother (who's around the same age as me but never played the game) watched the show and the reaction was, "Yeah it was good." They didn't have the same reaction that I had with the game instead of being awed and inspired by absolute perfection the reaction was, yeah it was alright. The Last of Us is a good adaptation but it struggles to be either a perfect adaptation or a perfect show.

​@@pintolerance785 The game comes off as 'perfect' bc of the medium that it's in, bc it's unique in balancing a good story with good gameplay. It places you into the shoes of the character which makes you experience the story more intimately than you normally would thru a passive experience w/ a movie or show. But it isn't a unique story in any way, or something that hasn't been done better in any other form- as a book, movie, or even a tv show, it's pretty standard and not groundbreaking in the slightest, thus ppl who have only seen the tv show won't see it as some sort of masterpiece unless they really love Bella and Pedro's chemistry or the show's worldbuilding/side characters (which seems to be a lot of ppl based on how successful this show is with the general population + critics, esp with how viral Ep3 became due to being so unique). There is also plenty of ppl who've played the game and don't think TLOU1 is perfect, bc it's subjective, but can connect to the live-action more bc of the storytelling strengths that tv shows have to offer over a videogame that focuses more on gameplay. You're doing the TV show a disservice if you think it's trying to break new ground or that it'll be the same experience as playing a video game. It's just meant to adapt the game's story into a new medium to reach a bigger audience that will never pick up a controller or ppl who don't know that video games can tell complex stories. The upcoming Horizon Zero Dawn and GoW adaptions will also not be the same 'masterpieces' or as immersive as the games bc they quite literally can't be, due to the change in format- but they can still excel in their storytelling and characters, which is all that's needed for a good show. You have hindsight and the ability to compare your experience between TLOU1 and the show, which won't be the same as ppl who are experiencing the story for the first time thru the show alone. The fact that it's improving some areas of the plot, worldbuilding, and the characters, as well as providing an immersive story, is the most it can do. But it's undoubtedly the best live-action game-adaption to date.

@@beccazach So in simpler terms you're saying that it can't be a perfect television show because the story its adapting isn't amazing/unique and the only thing that made the original last of us a masterpiece was just the blend between gameplay and story. Also just for the sake of elaboration can you give me some examples of stories that have been done that are the same as the last of us but done better? The Road comes to mind a story about a father and son traveling across an apocalyptic world in search of shelter but never find it, but that's not a good example because the question of sacrificing the one you love most for the many i.e the trolley problem doesn't ever come up in the road. So tell me what stories have done the un-unique story of The Last Of Us better then the last of us. Yes I agree that it is a great live action adaptation of a game however it still could have done some things better, it's not perfect. If I had the choice of say watching the last of us season 1 vs watching the walking dead season 1 I'd pick the walking dead every time. And both of those are adaptations.

@@pintolerance785 [longgg comment] Never said the original game isn't amazing as a story- it's just the relationship between a man that lost his kid and a lonely child that's not unique, but it's elevated by the storytelling medium and apocalypse situation it's in. The relationship that unfolds between Joel and Ellie in the game is a specific journey but can still be told in a different way than how the game showed it, because many of the story beats and relationship milestones they experience can be displayed in the show through smaller actions and not just fighting infected all the time (it works with the fact that there are fewer infected seen in the show, as HBO Joel doesn't need to be just saving her from hordes of infected to show his protectiveness, but from him not wanting her to use a gun to protect her innocence or him staying awake to keep watch while Ellie's sleeping, which isn't seen at all in the game). And the trolly problem never comes up until the very end of the game, where many people have said they don't find it to be a conflict in the first place bc no one would ever sacrifice someone they love for a slim chance of making a cure. I'm not sure what aspect of the show you're saying you have a problem with, just not being able to invest in the story or characters?? Bc that's not a fault of the show if a majority of new viewers are easily able to do that bc they can see the relationship coming from a mile away- it's like I said, you have a bias bc you're remembering how it played out in the game, and so any deviation in the show might throw you off and make you think it's not effective storytelling. Your family not thinking the story is unique can also happen if they had certain expectations if you told them abt it, but as a show, it doesn't come off as a relationship that they haven't seen before in other passive media. But there are plenty of other families who love this show and its characters. Obviously TLOU1 isn't completely the same as one specific story, but it's similar to many other ones that develop a relationship that is easy to root for and not very complex. The Last of Us, The Mandalorian, Logan, Stranger Things (Eleven and Hopper), and probably a lot more than I can't remember all follow that similar surrogate father-child relationship, but what makes them great is that they have the ability to do it well under different circumstances bc of the chemistry between the actors and the dialogue between them. You're saying you'd rather watch TWD s1 and that's your choice bc there might be aspects that you prefer in that over how TLOU HBO did its storytelling, but there are ppl who prefer the storytelling of TLOU. This show is purposely not trying to be an action movie, but a character drama, which has always been the emotional core of the series (apart from fighting the infected, which was just gameplay required for the medium). Unlike how the drama in TWD is abt humans dealing with the new threat of walkers and humanity falling apart because the apocalypse just started, TLOU is already 20 years into the outbreak + has a more positive message of focusing on what motivates humans to keep surviving in such a broken world, meanwhile the infected are just a looming threat in the background to explain why humanity has never fully recovered. If you're disappointed in the lack of action: as a show filled with fungus monsters, things could've gotten very over the top and unrealistic to new viewers if not handled correctly, which would undermine the whole emotional tone of the story. By making the humans in the show not have superhuman strength/abilities like the characters in the games, it makes the threat of the infected, and basic survival in general, more immersive. The creators also wanted the show to be different from the game by only highlighting the emotions behind violence + its repercussions and not the violence itself, such as always cutting away from a scene before a human gets killed. Walkers aren't as scary or dangerous as the infected, as TWD made walkers pop up in the middle of nowhere for random action scenes that quickly got stale and repetitive. The infected in the show are way too fast and strong to fight (as shown by how every encounter with them ends with someone dying) and having random infected isn't how TLOU HBO set up the rules for them in this series- they're only in the city, right outside the QZs, not in evacuated towns or isolated forests with no people, where Joel and Ellie purposely travel to avoid running into the infected. Desensitization to violence in a show or movie is important to avoid or else it loses its impact in the story; in a game that's not much of an issue since you're supposed to be fighting waves of infected/human enemies.

@@beccazach I'll tell you what not many people can come along and make me ponder something but you did so good job. What I'm stuck on is we can't find something to disagree on, both of us are stuck in this duality where we both hold normal rational opinions on something but where as one of us is good with the last of us the other is not. I don't knew perhaps me being a fan of the last of us for so long has made me jaded maybe when the last of us 2 released and I got caught up in the discourse surrounding the game something inside of me broke a little when it came to The Last Of Us, where as before part 2 came out I was an avid fan who saw the game as a masterpiece and had 0 qualms but then 2 came out and destroyed the fan base, fracturing it beyond repair because there is just a either you don't like the game and hate everyone who likes it or you do like the game and hate everyone who doesn't like it. It got to the point where I genuinely hated being a Last Of Us fan like actually but I can't stop caring about the franchise, and discussing the franchise, and pondering over the franchise because like what else am I gonna do I've dedicated too much already to the last of us. What're we even arguing about I don't know anymore, I forgor. All those examples you gave about story's similar to the last of us came out after the last of us by the way. Also I didn't tell my family to expect anything from the show it was kinda like an experiment more then anything like I just wanted to see what their reaction would be and the reaction was that it was good, and I look online and the most sizable contingent opinion from people is that the last of us show is good. And I'm saying the last of us show is good and it's the best live action remake that exists but it's not perfect and there are things it does do wrong and that's my whole opinion. Good show. Great adaptation. Not perfect. Game = perfect.

Why don't you marry him? Damn.

When joel and Ellie be kissing and stuff 😂😂😂😂

When Tess got tounged by the tentacle zombie. Both ridiculous and hilarious.

I am blown away skipper, as an editor for a RU-vidr and myself I can confidently say this video probably took an excruciating amount of time and work and I have yet to watch the rest but I applaud you man great job

The part where an airplane comes out of nowhere and so happens to hit right behind Joel's car so it doesn't kill them but does minimal enough damage so that the car doesn't work. Also when the cop car just rams the back of their car which starts a fire that stops Joel and Sarah from being separated from Tommy... for some reason.

University Section from the game

Hope you end up giving the game a chance 🙏

@@LadyFeverdream I most likely will when I get a playstation

I think that was intentional because frick TLOU 2

@@77ELCREADOR hard to say but yeah I guess that’s possible. Seemed like an editing hiccup to me, maybe he rewrote the script or restructured the vid and forgot to fix the time code or something. Mainly speaking from a place of experience as someone who used to edit with text quite a bit in fan edits I did lol. I’d go back and restructure parts of an edit and I’d constantly have to readjust the text and it could be easy to forget or miss when you’re doing it constantly.

@@Sev3617 it was 100% intentional lmao. He did it twice.

“MAN ME CHASE A BITCH?! MAN I CANT EEN WALK!”

Nah because WTH was he cooking with that one gumball clip, I was watching that video in public and was SO CLOSE to having my entire reputation go down the drain

How is this guy only 20 years old?

not good for season 2 though, I have no idea how she’ll pass as a 19 year old Ellie. gotta be recast

​@@yhavinmilesthe actor is literally a adult whut

@@miigi-p4939 An adult that was casted as Ellie because she looks like a young teenage. And don't let me start with the physical part. How in hell Bella is going to play the ruthless killing machine that TLOU2 Ellie is? She already looks totally akward and ridiculous in the few action scenes of the first season, heck she looks silly just trying to hold a rifle properly, and unless they spend months trining her with professionals the only way that it can work would be using a lot of stunt doubles and CGI in the action scenes.

@@quiver5756 did we watch the same scenes of her holding the riffle? hell tlou series ellie is more aggresive than normal ellie but more childish, i dont know if she can act like ellie on tlou2 but to just dismiss her is weird

Bella Ramsey is terrible casting and it will be even more apparent in season 2 when she has the play adult Ellie while still looking like a 14 year old girl. It would've been way smarter to cast an actual child actress for season 1, who's small and vulnerable, and then cast an adult actress, who's capable and imposing, for season 2.

Conspiracy theories and slander. You cant prove L*gos are real

The Bella Ramsey issue is a writing issue not an acting issue. They changed her characterization. Tbh her acting in the show is really good. She did a great job doing what they wanted her to do. What they wanted her to do is the problem

Yea I just didn't like the writing other than that I feel the actors did well with what they had

So Joel having a slightly darker skinned daughter rubs you the wrong way, but an hour of gay sex is quality TV huh? Americans...

​@@austinlarrimore6542except for the barn scene. That wasn't as good.

“Hot take: don’t like race swapping” Yeah, such a hot take. Definitely not the 1# thing people complain about

Using a theoretical example involving a real person to discredit examples involving fictional characters is wack ngl

I don't care about race swapping in media as long as it serves a purpose and isn't just some company checking off diversity boxes, I think that the race swapping in the last of us is fine. In a show like house of the dragon I think the race swapping is actually perfect and actually benefits the story because we can easily tell apart the targaryens from the valerians when it would be confusing just having 2 different major houses with their soul characteristic being white hair. On the opposite end of the spectrum there's Velma, which is just everything wrong with everything that's ever existed in the history of forever.

@@aledandrian Netflix has changed cleopatras race and even Anne fucking Boleyn. Painting of Ann show her to be one of the whitest people ever😂and they casted a really dark skinned black women for it. Guess what both of these people are real

​@@austinlarrimore6542 those choices where definitely made to piss people like you off and guess what? it worked all that will happen is have people like YOU bitch and whine about it while giving Netflix more money to their pockets

they didn't change their races for inclusivity they knew absolutely that all publicity is good publicity and that the more pissed off people are at something the more people will hate watch something and give them money

Killed himself

@@aleaf01 that's true. He got the truck ready to go to Boston, he was going to meet the guy in the subway where Ellie got her flashlight. He never showed up because he got bitten and hanged himself

100%. Every time the momentum of Joel and Ellie's friendship starts, its immediately cut off by cutting to someone else's storyline for an extended period of time, leaving Ellie and Joel with so little time. Episode 3, as much as I loved it, should've keep the train going on building up Joel and Ellie as partners. But instead, we spent an hour with characters who will have no further impact on the series. A great episode but in the end, it was just good Emmy bait and a theme that I don't think was worth the time we lost with our main characters. Sam and Henry were great characters to expand on, but Kathleen turns into such a cartoonishly evil character, like someone out of Uncharted, not Last Of Us, that it makes me angry that they even wasted time on her. And don't even get me started on how much they de-clawed Tess and the show's chronic habit of Telling Not Showing. I also think Bella did a good job. Their Ellie is just a slightly more aggressive version, but nothing out of the realm of possibility of how Ellie acted in the game. Pedro as Joel on the other hand.... It didn't even feel like the same character. He was Joel 'In Name Only.' Instead of adapting game Joel to the screen he just played another Pedro Pascal Sad Dad™. The writing was servicing Pedro as an actor and not Joel as a character. I think Pedro was horribly miscasted for Joel. He doesn't have the tone to play Joel, he's soft hearted and you can see it in his face, the way he speaks, and the way he acts. The same way Game Bill and Show Bill are basically two different characters, I see Pedro Joel and Game Joel the same way.

I think Joel's character perfectly fits this adaptation more than the game Joel could. I mean they can't recreate the characters one to one from game to live action if they want actually good characters because games and shows work completely differently. The show's Joel plays to the strength of live action because you have less room for the suspension of disbelief and it's more believable for a man to be traumatized in this world and he suffers the physical effects of age. The game's Joel works for games because it's easier to suspend your disbelief on how a 56 year old can go guns blazin and murder 20 enemies in each area because it's a game and it's fun and you attach yourself to Joel rather than in the show where JOEL is physically separate and you can't control him. Idk about the Ellie stuff your talkin about cause I need a few examples but sure I'll agree with u here cause why not

1. You can definitely 100% feel the difference in the dialogue between the show and the game, here's a few examples for our Kirby friend and others. When Joel and Ellie have the fight at Tommy's which is like the pen ultimate climax of Joel's frustration they are done in 2 different ways, first in the game, Ellie finds out about Joel wanting her to go with Tommy and she takes off on a horse, out of the settlement and into a house, so Joel sheet having to ride after her with Tommy and he put into a Ton of danger had his emotions running high and that's when he blows up at her, and I know that you need to distinguish between the game and the TV show because of different actors n such but take into account how Neil Druckman told the cast not to do any research into the game. Which in all honesty is one of the Dumbest things I've ever heard, it's a video game ADAPTATION wtf wouldn't you want help ADAPTING AN ADAPTATION. Anyways, my point is that it makes sense for Joel to have this big blowup. In the show they don't leave Jackson for the entire episode and in the event right before the big blowup Joel is sitting and crying to Tommy about how he's old and how much he loves Ellie and how he needs her to get to the fireflies which is like A. The development between the twos relationship in the show is like lightning speed. And B. This makes the scene afterwards where Joel blows up at Ellie just so weird because it's a 1 to 1 translation from the game but it honestly seems like Joel suffers from some sort of bipolar disorder because he flips on a dime just from walking down the street. . Another scene is the scene at the very end, there are so many details in the game which I have no idea why they aren't expunged upon in the TV show such as Joel touching Sarah's watch when he's talking about finding something to fight for and also. (And I'm taking about the og game not the remake with Benjamin button Ellie) the way how Ellies face just ever so slightly changes, how you can tell EVERYTHING SHE IS THINKING just from the look on her face and the twitch of her eyes. (Which isn't done in the remake because some dummy who's name starts with Neil decided that, "Hey you know how to Mahe people look more realistic, give them wrinkles." EVEN THOUGH A 14-16- WHATEVER ELLIE IS DOESN'T HAVE WRINKLES!) Meanwhile though in the show Bella Ramsey and through no fault of her own, I blame the director. Just has the EXACT SAME STONE FACE She's had throughout the whole episode. 2. Another scene that they changed to a idiotic amount is in the episode where Joel and Ellie go to the college, a place where in the game there are some infected you fight, some bandits you fight, you know because its a college... in a city. Denver Colorado isn't exactly known for its low population count. There are 0 infected, and there are 4 bandits at the end, and those bandits don't have guns because duhhh obviously pfff guns what are those? Lmao! Guns IN AMERICA WHAT ARE YOU CRAZY! They have BATS, CHAINS, AND TIRE IRONS! WHY WOULD DAVID SEND OUT HIS GUYS ON A SUPPLY RUN LOOKING LIKE THEYRE COMING OUT OF THE WARRIORS! This entire scene is almost like a joke when you compare it to the game and I already know what people are going to say, "durr but you can't have it be like da game where Joel kills twenty people durr." I'm not saying that, what I'm saying is look at how awkward the scene is in the show, there is 0 build up, 0 tension, 0 action. It just felt like the writers said, "We need Joel to get injured in someway that isn't like the game." And they just reverse engineered the whole scene. And then in the game when Joel goes unconscious and falls off the horse, we get to hear Ellie scream Joel's name and then he hits the ground and Cut to black. Why didn't they do that same thing for the show! I guarantee that would have carried more weight to it then the CHEESY, CORNY, CAMPY! Scene we get in the show where Joel falls off the horse and we see Bella Ramsey, "I don't know what to do. You've gotta tell me what to do. Joel-:(" Disgusting sad song begins to play that's like the music in Stranger Things, "THIS IS THE PART WHERE YOU CRY!" I'm surprised that they don't just flash the words CRY! CRY! CRY! On the screen. My 3rd biggest problem they used CGI in the show when they had practical effects that were already so much better, in episode 5 I think there's a part with a little girl Clicker. ORIGINALLY they had planned for an actual child to play as her. And guess what, THEY DID IT! They actually filmed scenes with this little girl who's an acrobat contortionist who had to sit in a makeup chair for like 12 hours a day or something and they filmed it, it looked perfect and then you know what happened... they removed her in post and replaced her with cgi that looks like TRASH! The part where she jumps on the bad lady is so AWFUL! Straight up looks like ps2 graphics and effects completely lacking all gravity, all bones, just fully liquid garbage. And they did the same thing, in the same episode with the Bloater, originally they had a big guy in a practical suit doing all the work and guess what, they did the same thing removed him in post and replaced with a cgi monster. Oh also the infected in that scene, the exact same thing. Your not even watching a show at that point its literally just like a video game cutscene or the amazing world of Gumball where the background is real but everything else is a cartoon. Also no infected. The infected are shown off in Episode 1-2 and Episode 5, and in every other episode it's either 1 infected or 0 infected. And in a show that's all about curing the zombie apocalypse it's a pretty bold choice to uhh not have zombies in 70% of it. And there are a few things funny about that, 1. It is told to us in the show that the infected congregate in the cities and that's why we don't see them. Now here's where that logic completely begins to fall apart. If in the beginning of the apocalypse the hot spots were cities then that would lead you to believe that the food sources inside of cities would have depleted in the course of TWENTY YEARS and it has become common knowledge that cities are hot spots so there shouldn't be anybody going into cities, so WHY ARE ZOMBIES IN THE CITIES! It makes sense for there to be MORE infected in cities but ALL! That makes no sense. But it makes for a good excuse why zombies don't show up in the episodes where they are walking around in the woods n such but even in the final episode in this giant city, no zombies. I just cannot wrap my head around the logic. Either A. All of the zombies have died off over 20 years making the need for a cure useless. B. All of the zombies stay underground once again making the cure useless, just don't go underground. C. All of the zombies stay in cities so ONCE AGAIN just don't go into cities and your fine. Anyways what was I talking about I don't remember?

​@@pintolerance785True but Arcane>