Jaguar XE FULL REVIEW P250 Facelift 2020 - Autogefühl 

Nice! I drive a 2017 XE 35t and I love it too. It’s really the best to drive in the class. It’s awesome driving something rare plus the jaguar amazing warranty ‘

Bin sehr lange am überlegen ob ich einen XE oder a4 b9 kaufen soll. Hast du bishee irgendwelche Probleme?

👌

Lol

I didn't like the rim either, but I was told their is an option to update some cool rims from the dealer itself. My brother just booked one, that is how I know.

👌🙏

🙏

Thanks 🙏

=)

For survival, not for pleasure or to sit or lie on it

@@autogefuehl But people still will kill cows for meat so what's wrong with also getting their skin to use?

@@sergamespl Leather isn't just a by-product of the meat industry. There surely are industries that try to make use of most animal parts but there also are industries where most of the animal is simply wasted because most parts of the animal aren't worth it to be processed further. It's just less effort to take an animal, kill it, sell the expensive stuff and get rid of the rest to make room for the next animal and continue with the good stuff.

@@Skare147 I don't expect any part the animal is wasted. There is always dog food.

@@earthstick Yes but dog food is a byproduct. It doesn't create the demand for cows to be killed. It's only there because of human consumption. So it's important that we don't create a demand for it. Watch the penis bit in Game Changers on Netflix, you'll never eat meat again. Gelatin is also a byproduct. It's like food made by an evil disney villain. The skinless skulls, and cartilage and sinew are cooked into a slime called gelatin, and then colored and turned into candy for children, but of course nobody tells them what they are really eating, because they would be horrified.

Thank you very much for your interest in this topic. As a start, please tune in to what the animal leather industry tried to do here with our channel: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-nP_CvLlaFlI.html In general, depending on the animal skin grade, the animals are specifically raised for this matter. However even if meat would be the reason no.1 in other cases, the hide remains one of the most profitable body parts. That means: If manufacturers put animal leather in a car and you accept it as a customer, you give your money to an industry that earns money by oppressing humans, animals and destroys the environment, you make them more profitable. Also, if you turn the argument around "meat is the waste of the leather industry" you realize how biased the argument is. After all, would you care for which body part you would murdered? Or imagine someone robs you on the street and beats you to death - would it matter to you if it was for your Smartphone or for your purse? The animal agriculture industry occupies 2/3 of all farm land on this planet which cannot be used for direct human nutrition then. That is extremely inefficient. The no.1 cause for deforestation is the animal industry. It is also one of the biggest contributor to climate change. The amount of land, resources, energy and water being used is beyond imagination. For the alternative, you can either use artificial fabrics which can be made from recyclables (we have already shown a lot of vehicles that use great fabric seats from PET-bottles etc.) or more and more also from plant-based materials (like Pinatex). And even if you would create a seat completely with petroleum without a recycling share, the amount of oil being used for that is nothing in comparing just to once fueling up your car. In practical reasons, fabric or microfibre seats are just more useful. You do not sweat in summer and it is not cold in winter. Not using animal skin on seats is a major issue of animal rights, human rights - and after all just of common sense what is better both for the environment and just more practical and more luxurious for the customer. We cannot change what we have bought in the past (that also counts for ourselves of course!), but with more information and compassion we can change how we decide in the future.

I think the animal would disagree that it's being put to good use. The animal would like to keep living. It's a sad that we treat living individuals as property and resources. A cow is just a big dog, watch them play on youtube with a ball.

Indeed. Living being = wants to live and would never agree to be killed. And exactly, there is no difference in killing cats, dogs, pigs, cows.

😎

@@autogefuehl - Tesla now have a system called Sentinel where the on-board cameras can record. I think the system can also work as a dash cam recorder when the car is in motion. There are some that argue if all vehicles were fitted with video recording then drivers would behave more sensibly because the courts could easily determine who caused the crash from numerous video cameras, instead of the police always having to "appeal for witnesses"...!

😎

Thank you very much for your interest in this topic. As a start, please tune in to what the animal leather industry tried to do here with our channel: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-nP_CvLlaFlI.html In general, depending on the animal skin grade, the animals are specifically raised for this matter. However even if meat would be the reason no.1 in other cases, the hide remains one of the most profitable body parts. That means: If manufacturers put animal leather in a car and you accept it as a customer, you give your money to an industry that earns money by oppressing humans, animals and destroys the environment, you make them more profitable. Also, if you turn the argument around "meat is the waste of the leather industry" you realize how biased the argument is. After all, would you care for which exact body part you would be murdered? Or imagine someone robs you on the street and beats you to death - would it matter to you if it was for your Smartphone or for your purse? The animal agriculture industry occupies 2/3 of all farm land on this planet which cannot be used for direct human nutrition then. That is extremely inefficient. The no.1 cause for deforestation is the animal industry. It is also one of the biggest contributor to climate change. The amount of land, resources, energy and water being used is beyond imagination. For the alternative, you can either use artificial fabrics which can be made from recyclables (we have already shown a lot of vehicles that use great fabric seats from PET-bottles etc.) or more and more also from plant-based materials (like Pinatex). And even if you would create a seat completely with petroleum without a recycling share, the amount of oil being used for that is nothing in comparing just to once fueling up your car. In practical reasons, fabric or microfibre seats are just more useful. You do not sweat in summer and it is not cold in winter. And if you want the slick look or something to wipe clean easier, that is possible with animal free leatherette. Using animal skin on seats is a major issue of animal rights, human rights - and after all it is just common sense what is better both for the environment and just more practical and more luxurious for the customer. We cannot change what we have bought in the past (that also counts for ourselves of course!), but with more information and compassion we can change how we decide in the future.

@@autogefuehl Thanks for the reply Thomas - I've obviously not given it as much thought as you have and I appreciate you taking the time to better inform me - certainly a strong case against the leather industry. I enjoy your reviews by the way - thanks once again

thank you very much for considering. Have a good week!

U too!

😂

A problem for JLR cars is that not all models share the same infotainment systems. Defender and 2021 iPace use their new Pivi Pro system which has better performance whilst older models still use InControl Touch Pro. They also seem to ship slow processors. I think their digital dash is better designed than the new Mercedes system. JLR make some baffling design decisions. The rear seat release mechanism is a joke.

Alexander Foster it’s just like how some of merc’s lineup uses COMMAND or MBUX.

They can just offer a high grade leatherette like Mercedes, BMW and Tesla do

@@autogefuehl I do agree - but Jaguar drives specifically are leather obsessed - its a smell thing (I had this discussion with a pal who has had 5 Jags in a row)

@@OldPortsmouth its the smell, you are right, but times are a changin

Smell = perfume. Chemically treated animal skin doesnt have a natural smell that would suit the human nose

We need to change this idea that sitting on a dead animal's flesh is luxurious. It's rather barbaric don't you think? What if you sat on a dead dog's skin? Everyone would be outraged, because in dogs we recognise that it's awful to kill them. A cow is no different. They are just big dogs, but we normalized that their killing. This must change.

Reid Tucker Ingenuim engine series is not for the enjoyment of driving.

highly appreciated! Help to spread the word for compassion!

seems to be an option

The second screen is a option. This is S version and that option is standard on HSE models

No, they don´t.

You on drugs, homey??

haha yes, sure

No problems. I have a P300 XE R Sport and never an issue

It handles bettet than the germans and Swedish.

Cheers! Indeed it is questionable how many sedans they ll still offer...

Better than BMW

Nope

they have a different definition of how much a gallon is

​@@autogefuehl OK thanks. :) Imperial gallonists... get your s*it together. BR; metric system

u too !

Thank you very much for your interest in this topic. As a start, please tune in to what the animal leather industry tried to do here with our channel: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-nP_CvLlaFlI.html In general, depending on the animal skin grade, the animals are specifically raised for this matter. However even if meat would be the reason no.1 in other cases, the hide remains one of the most profitable body parts. That means: If manufacturers put animal leather in a car and you accept it as a customer, you give your money to an industry that earns money by oppressing humans, animals and destroys the environment, you make them more profitable. Also, if you turn the argument around "meat is the waste of the leather industry" you realize how biased the argument is. After all, would you care for which body part you would murdered? Or imagine someone robs you on the street and beats you to death - would it matter to you if it was for your Smartphone or for your purse? The animal agriculture industry occupies 2/3 of all farm land on this planet which cannot be used for direct human nutrition then. That is extremely inefficient. The no.1 cause for deforestation is the animal industry. It is also one of the biggest contributor to climate change. The amount of land, resources, energy and water being used is beyond imagination. If you are interested in how the animals are being treated and transported in the global leather industry, watch this footage: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-tkjCAmq1_8E.html Note that the footage is genuine and was recorded by a highly decorated investigative journalist in Germany I know myself personally. For the alternative, you can either use artificial fabrics which can be made from recyclables (we have already shown a lot of vehicles that use great fabric seats from PET-bottles etc.) or more and more also from plant-based materials (like Pinatex). And even if you would create a seat completely with petroleum without a recycling share, the amount of oil being used for that is nothing in comparing just to once fueling up your car. In practical reasons, fabric or microfibre seats are just more useful. You do not sweat in summer and it is not cold in winter. And there are also new leatherette materials available which are superior in every aspect: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-u94YXJ72UTA.html Using animal skin on seats is a major issue of animal rights, human rights - and after all just of common sense what is better both for the environment and just more practical and more luxurious for the customer. We cannot change what we have bought in the past (that also counts for ourselves of course!), but with more information and compassion we can change how we decide in the future.

I am with you !

SK funk I doubt it. I think the person who thinks that they look good would be the lonely one.

Thank you very much for your interest in this topic. I also bought cars with animal skin leather seats before I did my research and got to know the industry. The most important thing is: With today's modern materials, you have nothing to lose, just to gain. You achieve the same kind of luxury and comfort or even better while having the same or better durability with less impact on humans, animals and the environment. You can use fabric/cloth, microfibre or leatherette. The classic approach is using oil/plastic as source material. Overall, a vehicle contains about 300 kg plastic. A car seat needs about 5 kg plastic. So the overall plastic share for the seats is very low and it is at this moment the most efficient way to produce a car seat. A couple of litres of fuel equals a car seat basically. So if you want to save oil/plastic, rather look at consumption for energy, fuel and heating and to other car parts than the seat. Note that animal skin leather also always contains a plastic coating for durability. However, long-term we should of course find raw oil alternatives. So going further, seats can be made from recyclables (e.g. from PET-bottles or old fishing nets) or even increased share of plant-based materials (like pine oil, canola oil or start-up materials like Pinatex from pineapple leaves or Desertex from cactus fibre or the mixed-plant-based Mirum, so be seen at ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-S1aNZeoatmE.html). On a calculation base, by ditching animal skin leather from car interiors, the amount of emissions (CO2e) is reduced by 85 (!) % (www.press.bmwgroup.com/africa-dom-easteurope/article/detail/T0403389EN/on-the-market-from-2023:-bmw-and-mini-models-with-vegan-interiors?language=en) - and that is a very conservative calculation. So it is at this moment the most important thing you can do to make car interiors more sustainable. A good example for high-end luxury with ventilated animal free seats is the BMW X7 with Sensafin: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-1pRNkW9nrrw.html And the Kia EV9 with plant-based oil share: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-6vXePQi_MAk.html New leatherette materials can be superior in every aspect, even for cleaning: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-u94YXJ72UTA.html More and more natural materials are rising: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-nRSsXEnwHDo.html Also check out what the animal skin leather industry tried to with our channel: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-nP_CvLlaFlI.html For seeing how the animals are being treated and transported in the global leather industry, watch this footage: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-tkjCAmq1_8E.html Note that the footage is genuine and was recorded by a highly decorated investigative journalist in Germany I know myself personally. In a high animal skin grade, the animals are specifically raised for this matter. However even if meat is the "first" misuse case, the hide remains a profitable body part. That means: If manufacturers put animal leather in a car and you demand it as a customer, you give your money to an industry that earns money by oppressing humans, animals and harms the environment, you make them more profitable. Alternatively, you could support industries with your wallet which try to improve the sustainability of materials. Also, if you turn the argument around to "meat is the waste of the leather industry" you realize that it doesn't make sense (and is ethically doubtful) to discuss the primary use of individual body parts of mammals. Mind experiment: You are getting slain down on the street; would it matter to you if it was for your smartphone or for your purse? We cannot change what we have bought in the past, but with more information and compassion we can change how we decide in the future.

yea the steering wheel well we all know whats that from

I agree, but you buy a jag for the same reason as an alfa romeo, it has much more character than the germans

@@maxx.a8302 the germans are still the benchmark of cars. the italians are more traditional, i would say the french and british cars are a lost identity tbh.

Thank you very much for your interest in this topic. As a start, please tune in to what the animal leather industry tried to do here with our channel: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-nP_CvLlaFlI.html In general, depending on the animal skin grade, the animals are specifically raised for this matter. However even if meat would be the reason no.1 in other cases, the hide remains one of the most profitable body parts. That means: If manufacturers put animal leather in a car and you accept it as a customer, you give your money to an industry that earns money by oppressing humans, animals and destroys the environment, you make them more profitable. Also, if you turn the argument around "meat is the waste of the leather industry" you realize how biased the argument is. After all, would you care for which exact body part you would be murdered? Or imagine someone robs you on the street and beats you to death - would it matter to you if it was for your Smartphone or for your purse? The animal agriculture industry occupies 2/3 of all farm land on this planet which cannot be used for direct human nutrition then. That is extremely inefficient. The no.1 cause for deforestation is the animal industry. It is also one of the biggest contributor to climate change. The amount of land, resources, energy and water being used is beyond imagination. For the alternative, you can either use artificial fabrics which can be made from recyclables (we have already shown a lot of vehicles that use great fabric seats from PET-bottles etc.) or more and more also from plant-based materials (like Pinatex). And even if you would create a seat completely with petroleum without a recycling share, the amount of oil being used for that is nothing in comparing just to once fueling up your car. In practical reasons, fabric or microfibre seats are just more useful. You do not sweat in summer and it is not cold in winter. And if you want the slick look or something to wipe clean easier, that is possible with animal free leatherette. Using animal skin on seats is a major issue of animal rights, human rights - and after all it is just common sense what is better both for the environment and just more practical and more luxurious for the customer. We cannot change what we have bought in the past (that also counts for ourselves of course!), but with more information and compassion we can change how we decide in the future.

Thank you very much for your interest in this topic. As a start, please tune in to what the animal leather industry tried to do here with our channel: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-nP_CvLlaFlI.html In general, depending on the animal skin grade, the animals are specifically raised for this matter. However even if meat would be the reason no.1 in other cases, the hide remains one of the most profitable body parts. That means: If manufacturers put animal leather in a car and you accept it as a customer, you give your money to an industry that earns money by oppressing humans, animals and destroys the environment, you make them more profitable. Also, if you turn the argument around "meat is the waste of the leather industry" you realize how biased the argument is. After all, would you care for which exact body part you would be murdered? Or imagine someone robs you on the street and beats you to death - would it matter to you if it was for your Smartphone or for your purse? The animal agriculture industry occupies 2/3 of all farm land on this planet which cannot be used for direct human nutrition then. That is extremely inefficient. The no.1 cause for deforestation is the animal industry. It is also one of the biggest contributor to climate change. The amount of land, resources, energy and water being used is beyond imagination. For the alternative, you can either use artificial fabrics which can be made from recyclables (we have already shown a lot of vehicles that use great fabric seats from PET-bottles etc.) or more and more also from plant-based materials (like Pinatex). And even if you would create a seat completely with petroleum without a recycling share, the amount of oil being used for that is nothing in comparing just to once fueling up your car. In practical reasons, fabric or microfibre seats are just more useful. You do not sweat in summer and it is not cold in winter. And if you want the slick look or something to wipe clean easier, that is possible with animal free leatherette. Using animal skin on seats is a major issue of animal rights, human rights - and after all it is just common sense what is better both for the environment and just more practical and more luxurious for the customer. We cannot change what we have bought in the past (that also counts for ourselves of course!), but with more information and compassion we can change how we decide in the future.

@@autogefuehl Thank you Thomas, I appreciate your stance on this. However I was a vegetarian for almost 30 years...didn't stop people eating meat. If I went to a restaurant I had one vegetarian choice, everything else was meat. At christmas I had a nut roast.....didn't stop millions of turkeys being slaughtered, and Thomas, they were killed for humans to eat.....not to find somewhere to put the stuffing.

Times are changing. Being vegan in 2020 is super easy

@@autogefuehl I hope your right, but hoped that thirty years ago when I was your age. Great review as always.

@@autogefuehl I LOVE the channel, I was here before a 100K, but this argument is also biased and I think you shouldn't promote your own views on the channel. You statement (the moral part) only makes sense if you promote veganism also, however it would be VERY unethical and autocratic to force that lifestyle on any given person. A meat eating person probably thinks that killing a cow and killing a human being is a VASTLY different act morally - and I think also that we could make very convincing arguments to ground that (even our legal system is built on such premise). So please don't ever compare killing a cow to killing a human being and how it would be similar - this is just a trigger for many people and also a very questionable statement from a philosophical perspective. From an environmentalist perspective your statement on this issue makes a lot more sense, so I would keep the discussion in that valley.

How long?

That car is not available yet

Dustin Kensroue who cares

I trashed it after the review for you

sitting on leather doesn't kill cows and damage the environment. Purchasing it does though, so don't create a demand for animal products. That's why Thomas always says not to purchase them.

not anymore

Are you sure I though all of them? I don’t really know that’s why I asked

@@turaythanks4223 all of them now have JLR developed Ingenium engines. None of them have Ford engines.

Jaguar Land Rover built a brand new factory just off the M6 near Wolverhampton to make their own engines. The first was a diesel 4 fitted to the XE when it was launched in 2015. Now 4 & 6 cylinder petrol & diesel, mild hybrid & plug in hybrid. They are available on all models in the range except for the I-Pace which is electric.

Richard Wilton yeah but it’s a ford engine’s right?

Appreciated keep tuning in!

Jaguar XF is a SEDAN TOP 500 classified with 2 stars: ru-vid.com/group/PLLl6_VZCmHijWTsJ7jUbLMrPvxO6XTSxu

This is effectively a coupe with 2 small back doors. Think of it as a Audi A5 coupe which is (slightly) easier to get into.